Moneyball’s notebook changed the way players were valued. The emphasis was put on whether or not the player would get to base by whichever means iso their batting average (BA). The thought was that BA was overated.
# VIDEO 2
# Read in data
baseball = read.csv("baseball.csv")
str(baseball)
'data.frame': 1232 obs. of 15 variables:
$ Team : chr "ARI" "ATL" "BAL" "BOS" ...
$ League : chr "NL" "NL" "AL" "AL" ...
$ Year : int 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 ...
$ RS : int 734 700 712 734 613 748 669 667 758 726 ...
$ RA : int 688 600 705 806 759 676 588 845 890 670 ...
$ W : int 81 94 93 69 61 85 97 68 64 88 ...
$ OBP : num 0.328 0.32 0.311 0.315 0.302 0.318 0.315 0.324 0.33 0.335 ...
$ SLG : num 0.418 0.389 0.417 0.415 0.378 0.422 0.411 0.381 0.436 0.422 ...
$ BA : num 0.259 0.247 0.247 0.26 0.24 0.255 0.251 0.251 0.274 0.268 ...
$ Playoffs : int 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 ...
$ RankSeason : int NA 4 5 NA NA NA 2 NA NA 6 ...
$ RankPlayoffs: int NA 5 4 NA NA NA 4 NA NA 2 ...
$ G : int 162 162 162 162 162 162 162 162 162 162 ...
$ OOBP : num 0.317 0.306 0.315 0.331 0.335 0.319 0.305 0.336 0.357 0.314 ...
$ OSLG : num 0.415 0.378 0.403 0.428 0.424 0.405 0.39 0.43 0.47 0.402 ...
# Subset to only include moneyball years
moneyball = subset(baseball, Year < 2002)
str(moneyball)
'data.frame': 902 obs. of 15 variables:
$ Team : chr "ANA" "ARI" "ATL" "BAL" ...
$ League : chr "AL" "NL" "NL" "AL" ...
$ Year : int 2001 2001 2001 2001 2001 2001 2001 2001 2001 2001 ...
$ RS : int 691 818 729 687 772 777 798 735 897 923 ...
$ RA : int 730 677 643 829 745 701 795 850 821 906 ...
$ W : int 75 92 88 63 82 88 83 66 91 73 ...
$ OBP : num 0.327 0.341 0.324 0.319 0.334 0.336 0.334 0.324 0.35 0.354 ...
$ SLG : num 0.405 0.442 0.412 0.38 0.439 0.43 0.451 0.419 0.458 0.483 ...
$ BA : num 0.261 0.267 0.26 0.248 0.266 0.261 0.268 0.262 0.278 0.292 ...
$ Playoffs : int 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 ...
$ RankSeason : int NA 5 7 NA NA NA NA NA 6 NA ...
$ RankPlayoffs: int NA 1 3 NA NA NA NA NA 4 NA ...
$ G : int 162 162 162 162 161 162 162 162 162 162 ...
$ OOBP : num 0.331 0.311 0.314 0.337 0.329 0.321 0.334 0.341 0.341 0.35 ...
$ OSLG : num 0.412 0.404 0.384 0.439 0.393 0.398 0.427 0.455 0.417 0.48 ...
# Compute Run Difference
moneyball$RD = moneyball$RS - moneyball$RA
str(moneyball)
'data.frame': 902 obs. of 16 variables:
$ Team : chr "ANA" "ARI" "ATL" "BAL" ...
$ League : chr "AL" "NL" "NL" "AL" ...
$ Year : int 2001 2001 2001 2001 2001 2001 2001 2001 2001 2001 ...
$ RS : int 691 818 729 687 772 777 798 735 897 923 ...
$ RA : int 730 677 643 829 745 701 795 850 821 906 ...
$ W : int 75 92 88 63 82 88 83 66 91 73 ...
$ OBP : num 0.327 0.341 0.324 0.319 0.334 0.336 0.334 0.324 0.35 0.354 ...
$ SLG : num 0.405 0.442 0.412 0.38 0.439 0.43 0.451 0.419 0.458 0.483 ...
$ BA : num 0.261 0.267 0.26 0.248 0.266 0.261 0.268 0.262 0.278 0.292 ...
$ Playoffs : int 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 ...
$ RankSeason : int NA 5 7 NA NA NA NA NA 6 NA ...
$ RankPlayoffs: int NA 1 3 NA NA NA NA NA 4 NA ...
$ G : int 162 162 162 162 161 162 162 162 162 162 ...
$ OOBP : num 0.331 0.311 0.314 0.337 0.329 0.321 0.334 0.341 0.341 0.35 ...
$ OSLG : num 0.412 0.404 0.384 0.439 0.393 0.398 0.427 0.455 0.417 0.48 ...
$ RD : int -39 141 86 -142 27 76 3 -115 76 17 ...
LEt’s create a scatterplot ro see if there is a linear relationship between RD & W
# Scatterplot to check for linear relationship
plot(moneyball$RD, moneyball$W)
Does scoring more runs than you allow help you win more games?
# Regression model to predict Wins using RD
WinsReg = lm(W ~ RD, data=moneyball)
summary(WinsReg)
Call:
lm(formula = W ~ RD, data = moneyball)
Residuals:
Min 1Q Median 3Q Max
-14.2662 -2.6509 0.1234 2.9364 11.6570
Coefficients:
Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
(Intercept) 80.881375 0.131157 616.67 <2e-16 ***
RD 0.105766 0.001297 81.55 <2e-16 ***
---
Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1
Residual standard error: 3.939 on 900 degrees of freedom
Multiple R-squared: 0.8808, Adjusted R-squared: 0.8807
F-statistic: 6651 on 1 and 900 DF, p-value: < 2.2e-16
Interpretation of results: Residual = Actual Wins − Predicted Wins –> Median (0.1234) is close to 0 so the model is petty accurat.
Coefficients= Intercept: If a team’s Run Differential is 0, the model predicts it will win about 81 games RD: For every extra run of run differential, a team is expected to win about 0.106 more games. Standard Error: tells us how precise each estimate is. t-value: -value measures how much evidence there is that a coefficient is different from zero. p-value: the relationship is almost certainly not due to chance.
Residual Standard Error:the typical size of the prediction error. Multiple R-Squared: the percentage of the variation that can be explained by RD (88.08%). Adjusted R-Squared: F-Statistic: tests whether the model as a whole is useful.
Based on the data used for this model: if a baseball team consistently scores more runs than it allows, it is very likely to win more games, and this model demonstrates that relationship extremely well.
Video 3 Do OBP, SLG & BA contribute to more Wins?
str(moneyball)
'data.frame': 902 obs. of 16 variables:
$ Team : chr "ANA" "ARI" "ATL" "BAL" ...
$ League : chr "AL" "NL" "NL" "AL" ...
$ Year : int 2001 2001 2001 2001 2001 2001 2001 2001 2001 2001 ...
$ RS : int 691 818 729 687 772 777 798 735 897 923 ...
$ RA : int 730 677 643 829 745 701 795 850 821 906 ...
$ W : int 75 92 88 63 82 88 83 66 91 73 ...
$ OBP : num 0.327 0.341 0.324 0.319 0.334 0.336 0.334 0.324 0.35 0.354 ...
$ SLG : num 0.405 0.442 0.412 0.38 0.439 0.43 0.451 0.419 0.458 0.483 ...
$ BA : num 0.261 0.267 0.26 0.248 0.266 0.261 0.268 0.262 0.278 0.292 ...
$ Playoffs : int 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 ...
$ RankSeason : int NA 5 7 NA NA NA NA NA 6 NA ...
$ RankPlayoffs: int NA 1 3 NA NA NA NA NA 4 NA ...
$ G : int 162 162 162 162 161 162 162 162 162 162 ...
$ OOBP : num 0.331 0.311 0.314 0.337 0.329 0.321 0.334 0.341 0.341 0.35 ...
$ OSLG : num 0.412 0.404 0.384 0.439 0.393 0.398 0.427 0.455 0.417 0.48 ...
$ RD : int -39 141 86 -142 27 76 3 -115 76 17 ...
# Regression model to predict runs scored
RunsReg = lm(RS ~ OBP + SLG + BA, data=moneyball)
summary(RunsReg)
Call:
lm(formula = RS ~ OBP + SLG + BA, data = moneyball)
Residuals:
Min 1Q Median 3Q Max
-70.941 -17.247 -0.621 16.754 90.998
Coefficients:
Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
(Intercept) -788.46 19.70 -40.029 < 2e-16 ***
OBP 2917.42 110.47 26.410 < 2e-16 ***
SLG 1637.93 45.99 35.612 < 2e-16 ***
BA -368.97 130.58 -2.826 0.00482 **
---
Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1
Residual standard error: 24.69 on 898 degrees of freedom
Multiple R-squared: 0.9302, Adjusted R-squared: 0.93
F-statistic: 3989 on 3 and 898 DF, p-value: < 2.2e-16
Of the three factors, BA is the least significant. Continuing to push the hypothesis that BA is overrated, let’s see if eliminating it makes a difference
# Regression model to predict runs scored again but removing the batting average
RunsReg = lm(RS ~ OBP + SLG, data=moneyball)
summary(RunsReg)
Call:
lm(formula = RS ~ OBP + SLG, data = moneyball)
Residuals:
Min 1Q Median 3Q Max
-70.838 -17.174 -1.108 16.770 90.036
Coefficients:
Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
(Intercept) -804.63 18.92 -42.53 <2e-16 ***
OBP 2737.77 90.68 30.19 <2e-16 ***
SLG 1584.91 42.16 37.60 <2e-16 ***
---
Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1
Residual standard error: 24.79 on 899 degrees of freedom
Multiple R-squared: 0.9296, Adjusted R-squared: 0.9294
F-statistic: 5934 on 2 and 899 DF, p-value: < 2.2e-16
The Adjusted R-Squared remains about the same 0.93 vs 0.9294
#Regression model to predict runs allowed
RunsAllowedReg = lm(RA ~ OOBP + OSLG, data = moneyball)
summary(RunsAllowedReg)
Call:
lm(formula = RA ~ OOBP + OSLG, data = moneyball)
Residuals:
Min 1Q Median 3Q Max
-82.397 -15.178 -0.129 17.679 60.955
Coefficients:
Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
(Intercept) -837.38 60.26 -13.897 < 2e-16 ***
OOBP 2913.60 291.97 9.979 4.46e-16 ***
OSLG 1514.29 175.43 8.632 2.55e-13 ***
---
Signif. codes:
0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1
Residual standard error: 25.67 on 87 degrees of freedom
(812 observations deleted due to missingness)
Multiple R-squared: 0.9073, Adjusted R-squared: 0.9052
F-statistic: 425.8 on 2 and 87 DF, p-value: < 2.2e-16
Both variables OOBP & OSGL have a high significance rating and result in a Adjusted R-Squared of 0.9052.