getwd()
[1] "/cloud/project"
# Read in the data
NBA = read.csv("NBA_train.csv")
str(NBA)
'data.frame': 835 obs. of 20 variables:
$ SeasonEnd: int 1980 1980 1980 1980 1980 1980 1980 1980 1980 1980 ...
$ Team : chr "Atlanta Hawks" "Boston Celtics" "Chicago Bulls" "Cleveland Cavaliers" ...
$ Playoffs : int 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 ...
$ W : int 50 61 30 37 30 16 24 41 37 47 ...
$ PTS : int 8573 9303 8813 9360 8878 8933 8493 9084 9119 8860 ...
$ oppPTS : int 8334 8664 9035 9332 9240 9609 8853 9070 9176 8603 ...
$ FG : int 3261 3617 3362 3811 3462 3643 3527 3599 3639 3582 ...
$ FGA : int 7027 7387 6943 8041 7470 7596 7318 7496 7689 7489 ...
$ X2P : int 3248 3455 3292 3775 3379 3586 3500 3495 3551 3557 ...
$ X2PA : int 6952 6965 6668 7854 7215 7377 7197 7117 7375 7375 ...
$ X3P : int 13 162 70 36 83 57 27 104 88 25 ...
$ X3PA : int 75 422 275 187 255 219 121 379 314 114 ...
$ FT : int 2038 1907 2019 1702 1871 1590 1412 1782 1753 1671 ...
$ FTA : int 2645 2449 2592 2205 2539 2149 1914 2326 2333 2250 ...
$ ORB : int 1369 1227 1115 1307 1311 1226 1155 1394 1398 1187 ...
$ DRB : int 2406 2457 2465 2381 2524 2415 2437 2217 2326 2429 ...
$ AST : int 1913 2198 2152 2108 2079 1950 2028 2149 2148 2123 ...
$ STL : int 782 809 704 764 746 783 779 782 900 863 ...
$ BLK : int 539 308 392 342 404 562 339 373 530 356 ...
$ TOV : int 1495 1539 1684 1370 1533 1742 1492 1565 1517 1439 ...
# How many wins to make the playoffs?
table(NBA$W, NBA$Playoffs)
0 1
11 2 0
12 2 0
13 2 0
14 2 0
15 10 0
16 2 0
17 11 0
18 5 0
19 10 0
20 10 0
21 12 0
22 11 0
23 11 0
24 18 0
25 11 0
26 17 0
27 10 0
28 18 0
29 12 0
30 19 1
31 15 1
32 12 0
33 17 0
34 16 0
35 13 3
36 17 4
37 15 4
38 8 7
39 10 10
40 9 13
41 11 26
42 8 29
43 2 18
44 2 27
45 3 22
46 1 15
47 0 28
48 1 14
49 0 17
50 0 32
51 0 12
52 0 20
53 0 17
54 0 18
55 0 24
56 0 16
57 0 23
58 0 13
59 0 14
60 0 8
61 0 10
62 0 13
63 0 7
64 0 3
65 0 3
66 0 2
67 0 4
69 0 1
72 0 1
# Compute Points Difference
NBA$PTSdiff = NBA$PTS - NBA$oppPTS
# Check for linear relationship
plot(NBA$PTSdiff, NBA$W)
NBA Moneyball analytics wins vs points difference
# Linear regression model for wins
WinsReg = lm(W ~ PTSdiff, data=NBA)
summary(WinsReg)
Call:
lm(formula = W ~ PTSdiff, data = NBA)
Residuals:
Min 1Q Median 3Q Max
-9.7393 -2.1018 -0.0672 2.0265 10.6026
Coefficients:
Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
(Intercept) 4.100e+01 1.059e-01 387.0 <2e-16 ***
PTSdiff 3.259e-02 2.793e-04 116.7 <2e-16 ***
---
Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1
Residual standard error: 3.061 on 833 degrees of freedom
Multiple R-squared: 0.9423, Adjusted R-squared: 0.9423
F-statistic: 1.361e+04 on 1 and 833 DF, p-value: < 2.2e-16
Points Scored vs 2PA,3PA,FTA,AST<ORB,DRB,TOVE,STL,BLK
# Linear regression model for points scored
PointsReg = lm(PTS ~ X2PA + X3PA + FTA + AST + ORB + DRB + TOV + STL + BLK, data=NBA)
summary(PointsReg)
Call:
lm(formula = PTS ~ X2PA + X3PA + FTA + AST + ORB + DRB + TOV +
STL + BLK, data = NBA)
Residuals:
Min 1Q Median 3Q Max
-527.40 -119.83 7.83 120.67 564.71
Coefficients:
Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
(Intercept) -2.051e+03 2.035e+02 -10.078 <2e-16 ***
X2PA 1.043e+00 2.957e-02 35.274 <2e-16 ***
X3PA 1.259e+00 3.843e-02 32.747 <2e-16 ***
FTA 1.128e+00 3.373e-02 33.440 <2e-16 ***
AST 8.858e-01 4.396e-02 20.150 <2e-16 ***
ORB -9.554e-01 7.792e-02 -12.261 <2e-16 ***
DRB 3.883e-02 6.157e-02 0.631 0.5285
TOV -2.475e-02 6.118e-02 -0.405 0.6859
STL -1.992e-01 9.181e-02 -2.169 0.0303 *
BLK -5.576e-02 8.782e-02 -0.635 0.5256
---
Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1
Residual standard error: 185.5 on 825 degrees of freedom
Multiple R-squared: 0.8992, Adjusted R-squared: 0.8981
F-statistic: 817.3 on 9 and 825 DF, p-value: < 2.2e-16
# Sum of Squared Errors
#PointsReg$residuals
SSE = sum(PointsReg$residuals^2)
SSE
[1] 28394314
# Root mean squared error
RMSE = sqrt(SSE/nrow(NBA))
RMSE
[1] 184.4049
# Average number of points in a season
mean(NBA$PTS)
[1] 8370.24
# Remove insignifcant variables
summary(PointsReg)
Call:
lm(formula = PTS ~ X2PA + X3PA + FTA + AST + ORB + DRB + TOV +
STL + BLK, data = NBA)
Residuals:
Min 1Q Median 3Q Max
-527.40 -119.83 7.83 120.67 564.71
Coefficients:
Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
(Intercept) -2.051e+03 2.035e+02 -10.078 <2e-16 ***
X2PA 1.043e+00 2.957e-02 35.274 <2e-16 ***
X3PA 1.259e+00 3.843e-02 32.747 <2e-16 ***
FTA 1.128e+00 3.373e-02 33.440 <2e-16 ***
AST 8.858e-01 4.396e-02 20.150 <2e-16 ***
ORB -9.554e-01 7.792e-02 -12.261 <2e-16 ***
DRB 3.883e-02 6.157e-02 0.631 0.5285
TOV -2.475e-02 6.118e-02 -0.405 0.6859
STL -1.992e-01 9.181e-02 -2.169 0.0303 *
BLK -5.576e-02 8.782e-02 -0.635 0.5256
---
Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1
Residual standard error: 185.5 on 825 degrees of freedom
Multiple R-squared: 0.8992, Adjusted R-squared: 0.8981
F-statistic: 817.3 on 9 and 825 DF, p-value: < 2.2e-16
PointsReg3 = lm(PTS ~ X2PA + X3PA + FTA + AST + ORB + STL + BLK, data=NBA)
summary(PointsReg3)
Call:
lm(formula = PTS ~ X2PA + X3PA + FTA + AST + ORB + STL + BLK,
data = NBA)
Residuals:
Min 1Q Median 3Q Max
-523.79 -121.64 6.07 120.81 573.64
Coefficients:
Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
(Intercept) -2.015e+03 1.670e+02 -12.068 < 2e-16 ***
X2PA 1.048e+00 2.852e-02 36.753 < 2e-16 ***
X3PA 1.271e+00 3.475e-02 36.568 < 2e-16 ***
FTA 1.128e+00 3.270e-02 34.506 < 2e-16 ***
AST 8.909e-01 4.326e-02 20.597 < 2e-16 ***
ORB -9.702e-01 7.519e-02 -12.903 < 2e-16 ***
STL -2.276e-01 8.356e-02 -2.724 0.00659 **
BLK -3.882e-02 8.165e-02 -0.475 0.63462
---
Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1
Residual standard error: 185.4 on 827 degrees of freedom
Multiple R-squared: 0.8991, Adjusted R-squared: 0.8982
F-statistic: 1053 on 7 and 827 DF, p-value: < 2.2e-16
All my predictors are significant at the 5%level
Points score vs 2PA,3PA,FTA,AST,ORB.STL
PointsReg4 = lm(PTS ~ X2PA + X3PA + FTA + AST + ORB + STL, data=NBA)
summary(PointsReg4)
Call:
lm(formula = PTS ~ X2PA + X3PA + FTA + AST + ORB + STL, data = NBA)
Residuals:
Min 1Q Median 3Q Max
-523.33 -122.02 6.93 120.68 568.26
Coefficients:
Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
(Intercept) -2.033e+03 1.629e+02 -12.475 < 2e-16 ***
X2PA 1.050e+00 2.829e-02 37.117 < 2e-16 ***
X3PA 1.273e+00 3.441e-02 37.001 < 2e-16 ***
FTA 1.127e+00 3.260e-02 34.581 < 2e-16 ***
AST 8.884e-01 4.292e-02 20.701 < 2e-16 ***
ORB -9.743e-01 7.465e-02 -13.051 < 2e-16 ***
STL -2.268e-01 8.350e-02 -2.717 0.00673 **
---
Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1
Residual standard error: 185.3 on 828 degrees of freedom
Multiple R-squared: 0.8991, Adjusted R-squared: 0.8983
F-statistic: 1229 on 6 and 828 DF, p-value: < 2.2e-16
# Compute SSE and RMSE for new model
SSE_4 = sum(PointsReg4$residuals^2)
RMSE_4 = sqrt(SSE_4/nrow(NBA))
SSE_4
[1] 28421465
RMSE_4
[1] 184.493
# Read in test set
NBA_test = read.csv("NBA_test.csv")
# Make predictions on test set
PointsPredictions = predict(PointsReg4, newdata=NBA_test)
# Compute out-of-sample R^2
SSE = sum((PointsPredictions - NBA_test$PTS)^2)
SST = sum((mean(NBA$PTS) - NBA_test$PTS)^2)
R2 = 1 - SSE/SST
R2
[1] 0.8127142
# Compute the RMSE
RMSE = sqrt(SSE/nrow(NBA_test))
RMSE
[1] 196.3723
#1. How many observations do we have in the training dataset? There are 835 observations in the training dataset
#2.Is there any chance that a team winning 38 games can make it to the playoffs? Why? Yes. Based on the historical data, 7 out of 15 teams with 38 wins qualified for the postseason. Therefore, a team with 38 wins has a chance to make the playoffs, although it is not guaranteed.
#3.What is the number of wins that can guarantee for any team a presence in the playoffs based on historical data? A team with 49 wins is guaranteed a playoff spot based on the historical data
#4. Can you determine (visually) if there is any relationship between the points difference (PTSdiff) and the number of wins (W)? Explain. Yes. The scatter plot shows a strong positive linear relationship between points difference (PTSdiff) and the number of wins (W). As the points difference increases, the number of wins also increases, indicating an upward-sloping trend.
#5. Here we want to determine what aspects of the game affect the number of wins of a team (WinsReg model). Is the predictor variable points difference (PTSdiff) significant at a 5% significance level?
Yes. The PTSdiff predictor is statistically significant at the 5% significance level because its p-value is less than 0.05. This indicates that points difference is an important predictor of the number of wins.
#6. We also built a linear model to predict the number of points as a function of some aspects of the game. Is the number of blocks (BLK) significant at a 5% significance level? No. The BLK (blocks) variable is not statistically significant at the 5% significance level, meaning it is not an important predictor of the number of points in the model.
#7. What has been the maximum number of points in a season? The maximum number of points scored in a season is 10,371.
#8. What is the meaning of the RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) in the PointsReg model? Are you satisfied with this value? The RMSE measures the average prediction error of the model in terms of points scored. The RMSE is approximately 196.37 points, meaning the model’s predictions differ from the actual values by about 196 points on average. Considering that teams score an average of about 8,370 points in a season, this error is relatively small, so the model performs well and the RMSE is satisfactory.
#9. How well did your predictions work on the testing dataset? Report the new R² and RMSE. The model performed well on the testing dataset.
R² = 0.8127 (approximately 0.81) RMSE = 196.37
An R² of 0.81 means that about 81% of the variation in the number of points is explained by the model, indicating good predictive performance. The RMSE of 196.37 also shows that the prediction error is relatively small compared with the total number of points scored in a season.
#Q13 Our data shows that a team with 49 wins has never missed the playoffs. What is the expected points difference for a team to make it to the postseason? Use the lecture solution file and more specifically the WingsReg model.
Expected_PTSDiff <- (49 - 41) / 0.03259
Expected_PTSDiff
[1] 245.4741
Based on the WinsReg model, a team expected to win 49 games would need an estimated point differential of approximately 245.5 points during the season. This means the team should score about 245 more points than its opponents to have a strong chance of making the playoffs. One correction: do not say it is “above the RMSE value” unless the question specifically asks for comparison with RMSE. The direct answer is simply 245.5 points.