How does Olist’s Sao Paulo-centered seller network affect delivery speed, freight cost, and national reach?
This question turns geolocation from a map exercise into a business story. The evidence below shows that Olist demand is national, but seller supply is much more concentrated in Sao Paulo. That creates reach, but also distance, cost, and customer-experience tradeoffs.
| metric | value |
|---|---|
| Customer ZIP coverage | 99.7% |
| Seller ZIP coverage | 99.8% |
| Item rows with both customer and seller coordinates | 99.5% |
What this says: customer demand is concentrated in Sao Paulo, but seller supply is even more concentrated. That imbalance is the root of the logistics story.

What this says: the typical customer-seller leg is hundreds of kilometers. Local fulfillment exists, but it is not the dominant pattern.

What this says: longer routes are not just geographically interesting. They are slower and more expensive.

What this says: the network is anchored in SP. The biggest lanes are SP to SP and SP to major nearby states.

What this says: the long-distance problem is specific enough to act on. It is mostly SP sellers shipping to North/Northeast destinations.

What this says: the largest seller hubs are tightly clustered in Sao Paulo, while demand is spread across more cities. Use the map to introduce the geography, then use the bar charts to prove the operating impact.
What this says: smooth areas show where customer demand is stronger than local seller supply and where seller hubs dominate. The detailed city layer is clustered and can be toggled on for exact city lookup.
What this says: the map is best for exploration, but a ranked table helps the audience remember the specific cities. Demand-heavy cities are places where customer volume is high relative to local seller activity. Supply-heavy cities are seller hubs that ship outward.
