Pharo Foundation

Stakeholder Experience & Satisfaction Surveys

i How to read this dashboard click to collapse

Navigation

Choose a school tab at the top; within each school, switch between Staff and Parents. The sidebar on the left jumps to any section; sections collapse and expand so you can scan or drill in. Expand all / Collapse all sits at the top of each pane.

Net Promoter Score (NPS)

Respondents score the question "How likely are you to recommend the school?" 0–10. Promoters (9–10) would actively recommend; Passives (7–8) are satisfied but unenthusiastic; Detractors (0–6) are unhappy. NPS = % Promoters − % Detractors, on a −100 to +100 scale.

Likert agreement

Each closed-ended statement uses a 5-point scale (Strongly Disagree → Strongly Agree). % agreement = share who picked Agree or Strongly Agree. The mini distribution under each tile shows the full breakdown.

Open-ended themes

Replies are pattern-matched against curated theme buckets. Each theme card shows mention volume, a one-sentence narrative of the top sub-aspects respondents named, the full sub-aspect breakdown, and a verbatim quote per top sub-aspect. A reply touching two themes is counted in both; a reply touching two sub-aspects within one theme is counted in both, so sub-aspect totals can exceed the theme total.

Kenya · satisfaction survey results
🇰🇪
Kenya

Nairobi

Collecting since 30 Apr 2026
Staff NPS +13
169of 185 responded
91%
Avg agreement across statements
76%
Top praise
Academic performance & teaching quality
Top concern
Communication
Parents NPS +32
798of 1,775 responded
45%
Avg agreement across statements
84%
Top praise
Academic performance & teaching quality
Top concern
Fees & affordability
Download themes & quotes Full open-ended analysis: every theme and all supporting quotes for this school.
Staff · Kenya
169 responses of 185 invited · 91% response rate
All sections below are collapsible — click a header to expand. Snapshot is open by default.
01

Overview & key takeaways

NPS +13 · positive · 76% avg agreement across 10 statements · 52 promoters, 87 passives, 30 detractors · promoters praise care, safety & support, detractors flag job security, contracts & retention

Three to four sentence summary distilled from the closed and open-ended responses below.

Key takeaways
  • NPS sits at +13 (mean score 7.7 / 10) — positive but with room to grow.
  • Average 76% agreement across 10 statements, ranging from 42% on the weakest to 88% on the strongest.
  • Top theme in “what does the school do well?” — academic performance & teaching quality (56 mentions).
  • Top theme in “what should the school improve?” — communication (36 mentions).
02

Net Promoter Score & why

52 promoters, 87 passives, 30 detractors · promoters praise care, safety & support, detractors flag job security, contracts & retention

How the score sits on the 0–10 distribution, and what each segment (Promoters / Passives / Detractors) gave as their main reason.

Net Promoter Score
+13
Positive
Promoters 31% Passives 51% Detractors 18%
Mean 7.7 / 10 · n = 169
Score distribution — how many people picked each value 0–10
Score 0: 0 respondents Score 1: 0 respondents Score 2: 2 respondents Score 3: 2 respondents Score 4: 3 respondents Score 5: 13 respondents Score 6: 10 respondents Score 7: 33 respondents Score 8: 54 respondents Score 9: 33 respondents Score 10: 19 respondents 012223341351063375483391910 Detractors (0–6) Passives (7–8) Promoters (9–10)

Why staff in each segment scored the way they did

Cards below show what staff wrote — not parents and staff combined. The companion sub-tab carries the other audience's reasons.

Promoters Scored 9 or 10
52
1
Good management, systems, structure and professionalism
14 mentions

Promoters cite clear systems, well-defined hierarchy, supportive leadership and professionalism as reasons to recommend.

2
Quality education and strong academics
12 mentions

Promoters most often recommend Pharo for the quality and affordability of the education it delivers — strong academics, good results and a focus on the whole child. Several stress the school's broader mission of accessible, high-quality African education.

3
Supportive, conducive working environment
10 mentions

Promoters frequently cite a welcoming, supportive and conducive environment for both staff and learners as their reason to recommend.

4
Professional growth and staff development culture
9 mentions

Many promoters recommend Pharo because it invests in staff careers — trainings, CPDs and a culture that values growth. Several describe it as more than a workplace: a community that invests in its people.

5
Impact, mission, values and purpose
6 mentions

Some promoters recommend Pharo for its mission and impact — on children, the economy and the community — and a sense of purpose and legacy in the work.

6
Good service and responsiveness to concerns
2 mentions

A few promoters cite good service and the school's openness to complaints and compliments.

Passives Scored 7 or 8
87
1
Professional growth, but not yet a 10
25 mentions

The largest passive cluster credits Pharo for professional growth opportunities while signalling the school stops short of a wholehearted recommendation. These respondents value trainings, CPDs and career advancement but hold back the top score.

2
Conducive working environment and welfare benefits
25 mentions

Passives cite a supportive, conducive environment and welfare benefits (transport, meals, teamwork) as the basis for a solid-but-not-top score.

3
Quality education and learner growth
19 mentions

Passives also point to quality education and learner development as reasons for a favourable-but-reserved score.

4
Good but with reservations / room for improvement
12 mentions

A cluster of passives explicitly frame their score as "good but needs improvement," naming communication, consistency, processes and staff-parent engagement as the gap to a higher number.

5
Pay, rest and security concerns tempering the score
8 mentions

Some passives anchor their reservation in pay, lack of rest, workload or job-security worries — the same issues that push others into the detractor band.

Detractors Scored 0 to 6
30
1
Qualified positives despite a low score
8 mentions

Several detractors still acknowledge genuine positives — fairness, growth, flexible policies, talent development — even as they withhold a recommendation, suggesting their low scores stem from specific grievances rather than wholesale dissatisfaction.

2
Job insecurity, contracts and fear of the unknown
7 mentions

The defining detractor theme is contractual insecurity — the one-year contract, no guarantee of renewal, and a recurring "fear of the unknown." These respondents often value the school otherwise but cannot give a high score while their employment feels precarious.

3
Pay, workload and the pay-workload mismatch
6 mentions

Detractors cite low remuneration, heavy workload and the mismatch between the two, often paired with insecurity and pressure.

4
Working-environment toxicity and disregard for staff wellbeing
3 mentions

A small but sharp detractor strand describes toxicity, abuse of working hours, and a sense that staff mental and psychological wellbeing — and even religious freedom — are not valued.

5
Lack of rest and family time
2 mentions

Detractors point to the absence of rest and limited family time — Saturdays, holidays and long hours — as a reason they would hesitate to recommend.

Noted, not themed: Unclear or noncommittal reasons (4).

03

Agreement by statement

Strongest: The school culture supports collaboration. (88%) · Weakest: I feel comfortable raising concerns without fear. (42%) · Biggest divider: I feel comfortable raising concerns without fear. (46 pp gap)

All closed-ended statements: how respondents agree overall, where the experience is strongest and weakest, where promoters and detractors diverge, and which statements most move the NPS score.

Per-statement agreement

One tile per statement, sorted by % agreement. The mini chart shows the full distribution from Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree.

88%
The school culture supports collaboration.
0%
SD
2%
D
10%
N
60%
A
28%
SA
n=169 · 2% disagree
87%
I understand the strategic direction of the school.
1%
SD
1%
D
12%
N
67%
A
20%
SA
n=169 · 1% disagree
86%
I receive useful feedback on my performance.
2%
SD
1%
D
10%
N
60%
A
26%
SA
n=169 · 4% disagree
86%
I have meaningful opportunities to grow professionally.
2%
SD
1%
D
11%
N
51%
A
34%
SA
n=169 · 3% disagree
83%
School operations support me to do my job effectively.
1%
SD
1%
D
15%
N
60%
A
22%
SA
n=169 · 2% disagree
82%
I have the tools and resources I need to do my job well.
1%
SD
4%
D
14%
N
57%
A
25%
SA
n=169 · 5% disagree
80%
My immediate leadership supports me to perform at my best.
2%
SD
2%
D
16%
N
54%
A
25%
SA
n=169 · 4% disagree
64%
Leadership decisions are clear and well-communicated.
1%
SD
9%
D
26%
N
53%
A
11%
SA
n=169 · 10% disagree
60%
I feel valued for the contribution I make.
2%
SD
11%
D
27%
N
49%
A
11%
SA
n=169 · 13% disagree
42%
I feel comfortable raising concerns without fear.
9%
SD
16%
D
33%
N
32%
A
10%
SA
n=169 · 25% disagree
Strongly disagreeDisagreeNeutralAgreeStrongly agree

Strongest to weakest, with promoter vs detractor split

All 10 statements ranked by overall % agreement. Under each statement: how promoters (NPS 9–10) and detractors (NPS 0–6) compared, and the gap between them. Bar colour: green ≥ 70%, amber 50–70%, red < 50%.

01
The school culture supports collaboration.
88%
0% 100%
Detractors 73% Promoters 94%
21 pp gap
02
I understand the strategic direction of the school.
87%
0% 100%
Detractors 60% Promoters 96%
36 pp gap
03
I receive useful feedback on my performance.
86%
0% 100%
Detractors 67% Promoters 94%
28 pp gap
04
I have meaningful opportunities to grow professionally.
86%
0% 100%
Detractors 73% Promoters 88%
15 pp gap
05
School operations support me to do my job effectively.
83%
0% 100%
Detractors 67% Promoters 92%
26 pp gap
06
I have the tools and resources I need to do my job well.
82%
0% 100%
Detractors 77% Promoters 90%
14 pp gap
07
My immediate leadership supports me to perform at my best.
80%
0% 100%
Detractors 70% Promoters 85%
15 pp gap
08
Leadership decisions are clear and well-communicated.
64%
0% 100%
Detractors 57% Promoters 83%
26 pp gap
09
I feel valued for the contribution I make.
60%
0% 100%
Detractors 37% Promoters 75%
38 pp gap
10
I feel comfortable raising concerns without fear.
42%
0% 100%
Detractors 23% Promoters 69%
46 pp gap
04

What’s working

Top theme: Academic performance & teaching quality (56) · top sub-aspect: Academic standards & curriculum delivery

Themes pulled from the open-ended “What does the school do well?” replies.

What’s working From: “What does the school do well?”
164

164 staff wrote a substantive reply to this question.

1
Quality education, academics and a strong learning environment
37 mentions

Staff repeatedly cite the school's core academic delivery — quality teaching, strong standards, good results and a supportive, structured learning environment — as something Pharo does well. Many responses bundle academic excellence with character development and a "well-rounded" or "holistic" approach, framing the school as shaping confident, disciplined individuals rather than just passing exams. This strand is voiced across all segments and is the second most common after professional development.

2
Professional development, training and CPD for teachers
25 mentions

By far the most prominent staff strength is Pharo's sustained investment in teacher growth — continuous professional development, workshops, refresher courses, seminars, study leave and university sponsorship. Staff describe this as the school "having teachers' professional growth at heart," and the strand spans promoters and passives almost equally, with even some detractors crediting it. It is voiced as both a structural commitment (CPD programmes, curriculum workshops) and a personal benefit (being enriched with skills, growing into a better version of oneself). This is the single most repeated word-cluster in the does-well responses.

3
Timely salary payment and remuneration
22 mentions

A large cluster of staff name on-time, every-month salary payment as a concrete thing the school does well — frequently phrased simply as "payment on time." Tellingly, several detractors and passives who criticise the salary level elsewhere still credit the school for paying punctually, which marks this as a reliable operational strength even among the less satisfied. It is one of the most frequently repeated single points in the does-well question.

4
Strong management, structure, leadership and organisation
16 mentions

Staff credit the school with clear leadership structures, defined reporting protocols, organised systems and professional, supportive management. Several note that leadership is placed at each level of learning and that the school runs in an orderly, well-coordinated way. This is voiced mostly by promoters and passives.

5
Care for the wellbeing of learners and staff
15 mentions

Staff consistently praise the school for prioritising the welfare and wellbeing of both learners and teachers, often naming child protection and safeguarding alongside a caring, valuing culture. The strand ranges from broad statements that the school "cares about workers and students" to specific safeguarding and individual-attention practices. It is voiced across all segments.

6
ICT integration, digital tools and teaching resources
15 mentions

A distinct strand praises the school's digital-first approach — ICT integration in lessons, the CBC app, provision of laptops and learning materials, and the move away from manual paperwork. This is named by both promoters and passives, with a couple of detractors also acknowledging it, and it is one of the clearer operational strengths.

7
Staff welfare: meals, transport, subsidies and benefits
10 mentions

Staff value the tangible welfare package — free or subsidised daily meals, reliable transport, tuition subsidies for their own children, scholarships and pension. Several responses frame these as evidence that "the school values its people" rather than as mere perks. This strand is voiced mainly by passives and promoters and overlaps with the broader "cares about staff and learners" sentiment.

8
Teamwork, collaboration and staff involvement
8 mentions

Staff value a collaborative culture — teamwork among colleagues, cross-campus collaborative meetings, and being involved in decisions. The strand is voiced mostly by passives and promoters and conveys a sense of belonging and shared effort.

9
Communication and feedback
7 mentions

A set of staff name communication and feedback as something the school does well, though the same word recurs in the improvement question — signalling this is an area of mixed experience. Here it is cited positively, mostly by passives.

10
Marketing, branding, transport operations and fleet
6 mentions

A smaller strand singles out the school's marketing, branding and transport/fleet operations as professionally run, with one respondent calling these "exceptional." Voiced by a mix of promoters, passives and detractors.

11
Affordable, quality service to clients
4 mentions

A few staff frame the school's strength as delivering quality education affordably and serving its clients (parents) well. Voiced by promoters and passives.

12
Coordination across departments and campuses
1 mention

A small strand names cross-departmental and cross-campus coordination as a strength, voiced by a detractor and a passive (and overlapping with the management theme).

Noted, not themed: No specific feedback / not yet able to comment (3).

05

What to improve

Top theme: Communication (36) · top sub-aspect: Feedback on child's progress

Themes pulled from the open-ended “What should the school improve?” replies.

What to improve From: “What should the school improve?”
164

164 staff wrote a substantive reply to this question.

1
Salary, remuneration and pay increments
30 mentions

The loudest improvement ask from staff is pay — higher salaries, annual increments to match the cost of living and workload, and fewer deductions. The strand is voiced strongly across every segment, including promoters who otherwise rate the school highly, which signals it is a genuine pain point rather than a detractor-only grievance. Several tie pay directly to their ability to survive, concentrate and stay (retention), and a few raise fairness — equal starting pay for equal qualifications and workload.

2
Communication, transparency and timely information flow
26 mentions

A very large cluster asks the school to improve communication — clearer, more timely information from leadership to staff, better cascade across departments, and more transparency around decisions. Many connect poor communication to confusion, planning problems and collisions when answering parents. Voiced heavily by passives and promoters, with several detractors too.

3
Staff welfare, benefits and medical cover
15 mentions

Closely linked to pay, staff ask for a stronger welfare package — comprehensive medical cover beyond SHA, annual leave, allowances, and general improvement of workers' welfare and morale. Respondents frame welfare as the lever for motivation, productivity and long-term commitment. Voiced across all segments.

4
Work-life balance, rest, Saturdays and holidays
14 mentions

A strong, emotionally charged cluster asks for more rest — relief from Saturday duties and holiday duty rosters, longer mid-term and closure holidays, fewer late evening meetings, and respect for personal and family time. Respondents tie this directly to motivation, mental wellbeing and performance. Voiced across all segments, with detractors especially pointed.

5
Job security, contracts and teacher retention
12 mentions

A pointed strand asks the school to move away from one-year contracts toward longer, open-ended or permanent terms, citing the anxiety and turnover that contract uncertainty causes. Several explicitly link retention of good teachers to job security, and one promoter argues that greater security would let teachers fully commit to the school's vision. Voiced by passives and promoters.

6
Leadership approachability, respect and listening to staff voice
12 mentions

A related strand asks leaders to listen — to be approachable, accord a listening ear, respect junior staff, keep confidences, and consult before imposing decisions. Respondents want their views genuinely heard rather than overridden. Voiced across all segments.

7
Facilities, classrooms, equipment and learning resources
10 mentions

Staff request better facilities and equipment — modern classrooms, photocopiers per branch, laptops for class managers and learners, renovation of unsafe/flooded playground areas, and adequate teaching tools and network. Voiced across all segments.

8
Fairness, favouritism, nepotism and merit-based opportunity
8 mentions

A strongly-felt strand asks the school to root out bias, favouritism, tribalism and nepotism, and to award leadership positions and opportunities on merit. Respondents call for mutual respect between seniors and juniors and consistent, fair leadership practices. Voiced by detractors and passives most intensely.

9
Workload, planning and timely approvals
8 mentions

Staff ask for more manageable workloads, better and earlier planning of events and trainings, and faster approvals — especially for finance-related decisions, where delays cause frustration. Voiced across all segments.

10
Student support services and individualised learning
7 mentions

A strand asks for stronger student support — guidance and counselling, academic help for struggling learners, career guidance, mentorship and leadership platforms for students, plus more individualised attention. Voiced mostly by passives and promoters.

11
Teamwork and departmental collaboration
6 mentions

Staff ask for stronger collaboration and teamwork between departments and more frequent departmental meetings. Voiced by promoters, passives and detractors.

12
Execution, consistency and operational excellence
6 mentions

A reflective strand urges the school to close the gap between intention and execution — consistent service delivery and operational excellence experienced daily. Voiced by promoters.

13
Learner discipline management
3 mentions

A focused strand asks the school for clearer strategies to manage and improve learner discipline. Voiced mostly by passives and promoters.

14
Scholarships and fee benefits for staff children
2 mentions

A small strand asks the school to offer internal scholarships or full fee benefits for employees' children. Voiced by detractors and a promoter.

15
Trainings valued; minor enhancements only
2 mentions

A few responses use the improvement question to affirm that trainings are helpful, while suggesting only minor enhancements. Voiced by passives.

Noted, not themed: Nothing to improve / fully satisfied (5); No specific feedback given (5).

Cut by campus Hover a chip to see that campus's headline numbers without leaving this view.
Hover or click a campus chip…
Parents · Kenya
798 responses of 1,775 invited · 45% response rate
All sections below are collapsible — click a header to expand. Snapshot is open by default.
01

Overview & key takeaways

NPS +32 · solidly positive · 84% avg agreement across 7 statements · 406 promoters, 245 passives, 147 detractors · promoters praise academic performance & teaching quality, detractors flag fees & affordability

Three to four sentence summary distilled from the closed and open-ended responses below.

Key takeaways
  • NPS sits at +32 (mean score 8.0 / 10) — solidly positive.
  • Average 84% agreement across 7 statements, ranging from 69% on the weakest to 90% on the strongest.
  • Top theme in “what does the school do well?” — academic performance & teaching quality (276 mentions).
  • Top theme in “what should the school improve?” — fees & affordability (141 mentions).
02

Net Promoter Score & why

406 promoters, 245 passives, 147 detractors · promoters praise academic performance & teaching quality, detractors flag fees & affordability

How the score sits on the 0–10 distribution, and what each segment (Promoters / Passives / Detractors) gave as their main reason.

Net Promoter Score
+32
Solidly positive
Promoters 51% Passives 31% Detractors 18%
Mean 8.0 / 10 · n = 798
Score distribution — how many people picked each value 0–10
Score 0: 7 respondents Score 1: 8 respondents Score 2: 11 respondents Score 3: 10 respondents Score 4: 20 respondents Score 5: 53 respondents Score 6: 38 respondents Score 7: 87 respondents Score 8: 158 respondents Score 9: 149 respondents Score 10: 257 respondents 70811121032045353868771588149925710 Detractors (0–6) Passives (7–8) Promoters (9–10)

Why parents in each segment scored the way they did

Cards below show what parents wrote — not parents and staff combined. The companion sub-tab carries the other audience's reasons.

Promoters Scored 9 or 10
406
1
Visible progress and growth in my child
84 mentions

The most common reason promoters give is the visible progress and growth they see in their own child — improved reading, handwriting, confidence, behaviour and academic results, often contrasted favourably with a previous school. Many trace the journey from playgroup or Tender Care days and credit the school with transforming a shy or struggling child. This personal, evidence-based satisfaction is what most strongly drives the highest scores.

2
Quality education and academic performance
82 mentions

A near-equal cluster of promoters cite the quality of education and academic performance outright — strong results, high standards, excellence in academics and co-curriculars, and value for the fees. Many answers are brief ("Quality education", "Performance", "Academic excellence") and reflect confidence in the school's core academic offer as the reason they would recommend it.

3
Simply a good school
55 mentions

A large group of promoters simply say it is "a good school", "the best", or words to that effect without elaborating. These short blanket endorsements reflect broad satisfaction and trust even where no single reason is specified.

4
Good, committed, caring teachers
49 mentions

Promoters frequently recommend the school because of its teachers — dedicated, committed, qualified, patient, friendly and caring, with several naming individual teachers who made a difference. Strong teacher-learner and teacher-parent relationships recur. This is one of the warmest threads behind the promoter scores.

5
Discipline and strong values
31 mentions

Many promoters point to discipline and the strong values instilled in learners — good manners, well-behaved children and a values-driven culture — frequently paired with performance. It reflects a reputation parents actively want to be associated with.

6
Well organised, professional and responsive
25 mentions

Promoters also cite how well-run, organised and professional the school is — strong management, structure, responsiveness, service delivery and smooth execution. This operational confidence underpins their willingness to recommend.

7
Good communication and parent engagement
24 mentions

A group of promoters specifically credit good communication, feedback, responsiveness and parent engagement — the school listening, partnering with parents and keeping them informed — as their reason to recommend.

8
Good care, meals and hospitality
20 mentions

Some promoters recommend the school for the care, meals, hygiene and hospitality — attentive handling of children, a clean and motivating environment and good food — especially parents of younger children.

9
Strong foundation and all-round development
13 mentions

A set of promoters frame their recommendation around the strong foundation and holistic, all-round development the school gives — nurturing the whole child mentally, spiritually and physically, often referencing a long journey from the early years.

10
A good, conducive, safe learning environment
8 mentions

Some promoters cite the overall environment — conducive, safe, enabling, friendly and welcoming — as the reason they would recommend, a sense of the school simply being a good place to be.

11
Reliable transport and services
8 mentions

A small group of promoters single out reliable transport and services — a dependable transport system and good service delivery — as their reason to recommend.

12
Technology and digital learning
7 mentions

A few promoters specifically credit the school's technology and digital learning — digital literacy, modern systems and digitised results — as what sets Pharo apart and earns their recommendation.

Passives Scored 7 or 8
245
1
Good academics and education, with room to grow
84 mentions

The largest passive group recommends the school in principle for its good academics, education quality, organisation and foundation, but stops short of a top score — many phrase it as "a good school" with the implicit or explicit sense that it is solid rather than exceptional. The tone is positive but measured, which is exactly what keeps these parents in the 7–8 band.

2
Good school, but the fees temper the score
41 mentions

For a large share of passives, the thing pulling their score down is fees — the school is good but expensive, with frequent increases and additional charges they find hard to justify against the value received. Many explicitly say they would score higher if the fees were lower or more transparent. This fee-tempered satisfaction is the clearest single driver of passive scores.

3
Good teachers and relationships, with reservations
33 mentions

A group of passives praise the teachers and relationships but attach reservations — good, friendly, supportive staff, yet concerns about teacher changes, communication or consistency that hold the score below promoter level.

4
My child is progressing, but not yet a 10
32 mentions

Some passives cite genuine progress in their child but remain measured — the child is improving and happy, but the parent is not yet ready to give a perfect score, sometimes because they are still new or want to see more.

5
Specific concerns holding back a higher score
26 mentions

A distinct passive group anchors a middling score to a specific concern — transport timing, crowded classes, infrastructure, teacher turnover, clubs, hairstyle rules, early mornings, or a missing facility — while otherwise rating the school positively. These are targeted, fixable issues rather than broad dissatisfaction.

6
A generally good, standard school
22 mentions

Several passives give a brief, neutral-positive verdict — "a good school", "standard", "relatively good", "well coordinated" — without strong enthusiasm or a specific complaint, the hallmark of the passive middle.

7
Communication, feedback and engagement gaps
6 mentions

A small passive group ties their score to communication, feedback and engagement gaps — wanting more or clearer updates and follow-up — which keeps an otherwise good experience from rating higher.

8
Good overall, but there is room for improvement
1 mention

A few passives explicitly say the school is good but has room for improvement, declining a top score on that general basis.

Detractors Scored 0 to 6
147
1
High and rising fees relative to value
58 mentions

The dominant reason detractors give is fees — the cost is seen as too high and rising, often by large margins, with extra and seemingly duplicated charges (book fund, stationery, digital and club fees) that feel unjustified against the value delivered. A sharp sub-strand objects to harassment over fees, children being sent home and the school feeling "like a business". For many detractors the school is acknowledged as good but simply unaffordable or poor value.

2
Declining or questionable education quality
41 mentions

A large detractor cluster centres on declining or questionable education quality and provision — standards seen as slipping, inexperienced or "green" teachers, weak follow-up, under-used facilities, crowded classes, poor infrastructure (iron-sheet rooms, the Umoja access road) and gaps in clubs or co-curriculars. Some compare unfavourably with the former Tender Care era. This is the second-largest detractor theme and the broadest in scope.

3
Teacher conduct, harshness and treatment of children
10 mentions

A pointed detractor theme concerns teacher conduct and the treatment of children — teachers described as unfriendly, harsh, demeaning, or physically punishing (pinching, bruising), and children made fearful or anxious about going to school. These are some of the most serious individual complaints in the dataset and weigh heavily on the lowest scores.

4
Discipline, bullying and accountability concerns
9 mentions

Some detractors cite discipline and accountability concerns — declining discipline, persistent bullying despite complaints, and a perceived lack of accountability among teachers and administration.

5
Administration, management and not listening to parents
7 mentions

A set of detractors point to administration and management — not listening to parents, no parental involvement in decisions (including fees), poor responsiveness to concerns, and a preference for the former Tender Care management.

6
Poor communication and responsiveness
2 mentions

A couple of detractors cite poor communication and responsiveness — unanswered queries, slow reconciliation and not being informed of incidents — as the basis for their low score.

7
High teacher turnover and instability
2 mentions

A small detractor group anchors their score to high teacher turnover and instability — teachers leaving or transferring frequently, which they say undermines learning.

Noted, not themed: No clear or noncommittal reason (18).

03

Agreement by statement

Strongest: My child feels safe at school. (90%) · Weakest: The quality of education and experience justifies the fees paid. (69%) · Biggest divider: The quality of education and experience justifies the fees paid. (65 pp gap)

All closed-ended statements: how respondents agree overall, where the experience is strongest and weakest, where promoters and detractors diverge, and which statements most move the NPS score.

Per-statement agreement

One tile per statement, sorted by % agreement. The mini chart shows the full distribution from Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree.

90%
My child feels safe at school.
2%
SD
1%
D
7%
N
48%
A
42%
SA
n=798 · 3% disagree
90%
School promotes strong values and discipline.
2%
SD
1%
D
7%
N
47%
A
42%
SA
n=798 · 3% disagree
90%
My child is learning and progressing well.
2%
SD
1%
D
8%
N
49%
A
41%
SA
n=798 · 2% disagree
89%
Teachers support my child to understand and improve their learning.
2%
SD
1%
D
9%
N
48%
A
41%
SA
n=798 · 2% disagree
83%
The school communicates clearly about my child's learning and school activities.
3%
SD
3%
D
11%
N
44%
A
38%
SA
n=798 · 6% disagree
77%
When I raise concerns, they are handled well.
4%
SD
5%
D
15%
N
50%
A
27%
SA
n=798 · 9% disagree
69%
The quality of education and experience justifies the fees paid.
4%
SD
8%
D
20%
N
43%
A
25%
SA
n=798 · 11% disagree
Strongly disagreeDisagreeNeutralAgreeStrongly agree

Strongest to weakest, with promoter vs detractor split

All 7 statements ranked by overall % agreement. Under each statement: how promoters (NPS 9–10) and detractors (NPS 0–6) compared, and the gap between them. Bar colour: green ≥ 70%, amber 50–70%, red < 50%.

01
My child feels safe at school.
90%
0% 100%
Detractors 73% Promoters 97%
24 pp gap
02
School promotes strong values and discipline.
90%
0% 100%
Detractors 69% Promoters 97%
28 pp gap
03
My child is learning and progressing well.
90%
0% 100%
Detractors 65% Promoters 97%
32 pp gap
04
Teachers support my child to understand and improve their learning.
89%
0% 100%
Detractors 65% Promoters 96%
32 pp gap
05
The school communicates clearly about my child's learning and school activities.
83%
0% 100%
Detractors 57% Promoters 93%
36 pp gap
06
When I raise concerns, they are handled well.
77%
0% 100%
Detractors 43% Promoters 91%
48 pp gap
07
The quality of education and experience justifies the fees paid.
69%
0% 100%
Detractors 23% Promoters 88%
65 pp gap
04

What’s working

Top theme: Academic performance & teaching quality (276) · top sub-aspect: Strong teaching & qualified teachers

Themes pulled from the open-ended “What does the school do well?” replies.

What’s working From: “What does the school do well?”
776

776 parents wrote a substantive reply to this question.

1
Quality education and academic performance
181 mentions

Academic quality is the single loudest note in what parents praise: the standard of education, exam performance, strong results, and a rigorous, competitive learning culture. The strand runs from one-word answers like "Academics", "Performance" and "Quality education" to fuller statements about syllabus coverage, value for fees, and producing high scorers. It is voiced overwhelmingly by promoters but is well represented among passives and even some detractors who still concede the school is academically strong. Phrasing recurs across all campuses and grades, making this the clearest shared perception of the school's core strength.

2
Teaching and how the kids are taught
138 mentions

Closely tied to academics is praise for the act of teaching itself — how lessons are delivered, how children are made to understand, and the relationship between teacher and learner. Parents cite teaching methodology, personalised and learner-centred approaches, helping weaker areas improve, covering the syllabus with understanding, and the visible skill of the teachers. Many answers are simply "Teaching" or "Teach well", while longer ones describe individual attention and learners being challenged to think. This theme spans every segment and grade band and overlaps heavily with the academic-quality theme above.

3
Communication with parents
70 mentions

Parent-facing communication is a strong and frequently named strength: timely updates on events, results posted promptly after assessments, school-to-parent messaging, and consistent feedback channels. Parents value being kept informed about their child's progress and school programmes, and several single out the digital reporting of results. It is praised across segments, including detractors who still rate communication highly even while criticising other areas, signalling this is a genuine operational strength rather than a halo effect.

4
Co-curricular activities, clubs and sports
65 mentions

Co-curricular life — clubs, sports, games, trips, cultural days, scouting and martial arts — is widely credited, often as the counterweight that makes the education feel "all-round" rather than purely academic. Parents praise the balance between classwork and activities and specific events such as cultural day. The strand is mostly promoter-voiced but appears across segments, and several detractors still name activities as a bright spot.

5
Discipline and values instilled in learners
60 mentions

Discipline and the instilling of good values, manners and respect form a major pillar of what parents appreciate. Many one-word "Discipline"/"Displine" answers sit alongside comments on good morals, respect for elders, cleanliness, uniform standards and well-behaved children. The theme is voiced strongly by promoters and passives and is often paired with performance in the same breath ("discipline and performance"). It reflects a values-driven reputation that parents across grades clearly buy into.

6
Care, nurturing and wellbeing of the children
35 mentions

A warm, caring and nurturing environment is something many parents single out: the school handling children well, attending to wellbeing, warm morning welcomes, and treating each child with love. Some of the most heartfelt comments come from parents of young or special-needs children (including a parent of an autistic child) who feel their child is safe and seen. This care theme is voiced across all segments and is especially associated with lower-primary and playgroup parents.

7
Transport, pick-up and drop-off
34 mentions

Transport — reliable pick-up and drop-off, professional drivers and a supportive transport team — is repeatedly named as a standout, sometimes in glowing detail naming the transport manager and individual drivers. Notably, several detractors who are unhappy overall still say transport is the one thing working well. The theme cuts across campuses and is one of the clearest operational strengths parents recognise.

8
Other strengths parents highlighted
29 mentions

This theme gathers other genuine strengths parents named that don't cluster into the larger themes — equal treatment of children, guidance, making school enjoyable, pupil-centredness, comfort and a friendly environment, plus a few homework-related positives. They are short, scattered and mostly warm, and span all segments.

9
Meals, snacks and feeding
28 mentions

Meals, snacks and feeding are a recurring strength: balanced diet, the snack programme, cleanliness around food, and the convenience of not packing food from home. Most mentions are brief ("Food", "Meals", "Feeding") and appear across segments; it is a smaller but consistent thread, and it is mirrored as an improvement area where portions and menu come up.

10
Quality, committed and friendly staff
26 mentions

Parents praise the calibre and attitude of the staff themselves — qualified, experienced, dedicated, friendly and approachable teachers, and courteous support staff including drivers, cooks and reception. Several name the professionalism of the teaching staff specifically. This staff-quality theme is largely promoter- and passive-voiced and underpins the academic and care themes.

11
Organisation, management and leadership
21 mentions

Organisation, leadership and overall management are praised by parents who value the school running in an orderly, well-planned, professional way — good leadership, structure, time-keeping and smooth operations. Several mention strong customer service and good management style. The theme is voiced across segments and reflects confidence in how the institution is run.

12
Flexible fees, book fund and stationery provision
16 mentions

A distinct group of parents credit the school's handling of money matters as a strength: flexible, understanding fee payment and installment arrangements, not chasing children away over arrears, the book fund, and bundling stationery into fees. A few ambivalent or critical entries about fee charging also land here. It is voiced mostly by passives and promoters and contrasts with the strong fee-related criticism in the improvement section.

13
Strong values and character building
15 mentions

Beyond classroom discipline, parents praise the school for building character, confidence and strong values — nurturing talent and potential, instilling confidence, mentoring children toward the future and grounding them in good morals and faith. This theme overlaps with discipline but is distinct in its emphasis on the child's inner growth and future readiness, and is largely promoter-voiced.

14
Tracking and reporting learner progress
12 mentions

Parents value how the school tracks and reports learner progress — frequent assessments, academic clinics, follow-ups, digital results and proactive updates when a child improves. Several describe being reached out to about results and progress, and appreciate the most-improved recognition. This is a focused, mostly promoter-voiced theme that overlaps with communication but centres specifically on academic monitoring.

15
Doing well across the board / everything
12 mentions

A handful of parents simply answer that the school does well "in everything" or across all areas, declining to single out one strength. These blanket-positive answers are almost entirely from promoters and reflect broad, unqualified satisfaction.

16
Digital learning and ICT integration
10 mentions

Parents credit the school's adoption of technology — digital learning, ICT integration, computer exposure and digital reporting of results and homework. Several note that digital communication has helped them stay involved, especially with homework. It is a smaller, mostly promoter- and passive-voiced theme that signals the school is seen as modern and progressive.

17
Provision of books, stationery and learning materials
10 mentions

Some parents specifically praise the provision of books, stationery and learning materials — the book fund, textbooks supplied to pupils, and investment in learning resources that make studying easier. It is a small, cross-segment theme that overlaps with the fee-flexibility strength.

18
A strong foundation and all-round growth
9 mentions

A number of parents frame the strength as a strong foundation and holistic, all-round development — wholesome upbringing, grooming, shaping and a good start, especially in the lower grades. The language of "foundation" and "all-round" recurs across segments and ties together academics, values and co-curricular life into a single sense of well-rounded growth.

19
Safety and a secure environment
8 mentions

Safety and a secure environment are named by a small but clear group of parents, covering child safety from pick-up to drop-off and a safe space for the child at school. It is mostly promoter-voiced and links closely to the care and transport themes.

Noted, not themed: No specific feedback / not yet able to comment (19).

05

What to improve

Top theme: Fees & affordability (141) · top sub-aspect: Fees too high

Themes pulled from the open-ended “What should the school improve?” replies.

What to improve From: “What should the school improve?”
742

742 parents wrote a substantive reply to this question.

1
School fees: high cost, increases and payment flexibility
146 mentions

By a clear margin, the loudest improvement ask from parents is about fees — the level is seen as too high, increases are frequent and sometimes unexplained, and parents want reductions, sibling discounts, installment options and transparency before any hike. A strong sub-strand objects to children being sent home or denied results over arrears, and to perceived double-charging (book fund plus buying books, stationery and digital fees). It is voiced across all segments — including many promoters who love the school but find it expensive — and is the dominant single concern in the whole parent dataset.

2
Teaching quality, curriculum and academics
81 mentions

The second-largest improvement cluster concerns teaching, curriculum and academics: parents want stronger, more qualified subject teachers, better alignment to CBC/CBE (less rote 8-4-4 style), more practical and hands-on learning, counselling and mentorship, and a sharper academic edge. Several worry about specific transition points such as Grade 4. The theme spans all segments and overlaps with the individual-support and retention themes.

3
Transport: timing, safety and reliability
71 mentions

Transport is a heavy improvement theme: pick-up times seen as far too early for young learners, late evening drop-offs, long routes, communication when transport is disrupted, old vehicles, and safety on the bus (drivers moving off before children are seated). Parents also raise the clocking-in/out SMS alerts they want reinstated. It is voiced across segments and campuses and is one of the most operationally specific asks.

4
Meals, food quantity and diet
64 mentions

Food and diet are a prominent improvement request: parents want larger portions, better quality and variety, healthier choices (milk instead of cocoa, fewer fast foods on trips), special-diet provision, and meal-plan transparency. Many entries are a single word ("Food", "Diet", "Meals"). The theme appears across all segments and mirrors the smaller does-well meals praise.

5
Parent meetings and engagement
58 mentions

Many parents want more and better engagement — regular parent-teacher meetings, a PTA, suggestion or complaint boxes, consultation before decisions (especially on fees), and meetings held on Saturdays to fit work schedules. The strand is about voice and partnership as much as information. It is voiced across all segments and overlaps with the communication theme.

6
Clubs and co-curricular value
51 mentions

Clubs and co-curricular value draw a distinct set of complaints: clubs that are paid for but dormant or poorly run (swimming, ballet, coding, robotics, music), a wish for competitions and visible results, easier club switching, and treating sport as part of learning rather than a paid add-on. Parents across segments — notably passives and detractors — question whether the club fees deliver value.

7
Facilities, infrastructure, playground and hygiene
45 mentions

Infrastructure and facilities are a clear ask: bigger and safer playgrounds and fields, replacing iron-sheet classrooms with permanent structures, decongesting crowded lower-primary classes, better toilets and hygiene, a library, dining hall, projectors and improved access roads (Umoja campus is named repeatedly). The theme spans segments and is concentrated where physical conditions are weakest.

8
Discipline, bullying and corporal punishment
37 mentions

A serious improvement theme covers discipline, bullying and staff harshness: parents report bullying that persists despite complaints, and a number describe teachers shouting, pinching, beating or instilling fear — including explicit references to corporal punishment that should have ended. Some ask for stronger discipline of learners; others ask the school to protect children from harsh treatment. The strand is emotionally intense and, while spread across segments, is voiced sharply by several detractors.

9
Communication with parents
32 mentions

Distinct from broad engagement, parents want communication itself improved — earlier notice on requirements and homework, alerts on transport and fees in good time, two-way channels rather than admin-only WhatsApp groups, and not relying on children to relay messages. It is voiced across segments and overlaps with the transport and parent-engagement asks.

10
Hairstyle, grooming and dress-code flexibility
25 mentions

A recurring, specific request concerns grooming and dress code — allowing girls neat black braids, more hairstyle freedom, not sending children home over hair, and revisiting uniform and tracksuit/sporting-shoe rules. Parents frame this as the school feeling too rigid or "public-school" on grooming. It is voiced across segments, often as an aside in otherwise positive feedback.

11
Individual attention and support for weaker learners
23 mentions

Parents ask for more individual attention and support for weaker, slower or absent learners — catch-up help, smaller class sizes, enough teachers, support for learning disabilities, and not leaving struggling children to private tuition. Several want each child's weak areas identified and addressed. The theme spans segments and connects to the teaching-quality and facilities (class size) asks.

12
Teacher retention and turnover
20 mentions

Teacher turnover is a focused concern: parents report teachers leaving or being changed mid-term, which they say disrupts continuity, syllabus flow and learner morale. Many explicitly ask the school to retain and value experienced teachers. It is voiced across segments and links to the quality and decline concerns raised by detractors.

13
Language: English, Kiswahili and other languages
15 mentions

Language is a smaller but distinct ask — stronger English (and public-speaking), better Kiswahili teaching, requests for French/German, and for some Muslim parents the introduction of IRE. Parents worry about children mixing in Sheng or not speaking fluent English. The theme appears across segments.

14
ICT, computers and online learning
12 mentions

A small group wants ICT and digital learning strengthened — fuller use of the computer lab, more computers, coding integration, and a balanced pilot of Google Workspace alongside handwriting. It is mostly promoter- and passive-voiced and mirrors the digital strength some parents already praise.

15
Academic days and event organisation
11 mentions

Parents specifically flag the organisation of academic/open days and events as needing work — last term's academic day is repeatedly called disorganised and time-consuming, with requests to split it by grade or stretch it into a week, and to plan sports days and other events better. It is voiced across segments.

16
Homework, assignments and reporting times
8 mentions

A focused set of comments concerns homework and timetabling — too much homework on weekdays, homework given as punishment, requests for textbook-based rather than online homework, breaks between lessons, and better-timed assignments. It overlaps with the teaching theme but centres on workload and scheduling.

17
Safety, child safeguarding and lost items
8 mentions

A small group raises safety and safeguarding gaps — lost or stolen items, monitoring children on buses and at play, first-aid and supervision. It overlaps with transport and discipline but is distinct in its focus on physical safety and lost property.

18
Snacks-from-home and provisioning rules
4 mentions

A few parents object specifically to the rule against carrying snacks from home and want more flexibility on what children may bring or be allowed healthy snacks. It is a small, pointed provisioning ask voiced across segments.

19
Staff conduct and professionalism
1 mention

A lone comment singles out support staff for improvement, distinct from the broader discipline/harshness theme.

Noted, not themed: No specific feedback / satisfied for now (48); Nothing to improve / keep it up (38).

06

Parent demographics

4 campuses · 13 grade bands represented

Composition of the responding parent body — campus split and grade distribution.

Parent demographics
Campus
Phase 4 campus 59Main campus 44Umoja campus 30Not specified 665
Grade / phase
Grade 4 18PP1 18Grade 5 17Grade 6 15PP2 12Grade 8 10Playgroup 10Grade 2 8Grade 1 7Grade 7 7Grade 9 7Grade 3 4Not specified 665
07

Campus × Grade NPS

NPS by campus-grade cell

Net Promoter Score broken down by campus and grade band — surfaces pockets where sentiment runs ahead of or behind the school average.

Where parents are happiest (and unhappiest) NPS by campus × grade · darker green = better, red = negative
PlaygroupPre-PrimaryLower Pri (1-3)Upper Pri (4-6)Junior Sec (7-8)Senior Sec (9-10)
Main campus
+80
n=5
-17
n=6
+100
n=1
+35
n=26
+0
n=6
·
Phase 4 campus
+75
n=4
+8
n=13
+42
n=12
+0
n=13
+40
n=10
+43
n=7
Umoja campus
+0
n=1
+55
n=11
+17
n=6
+45
n=11
+100
n=1
·
< 0 0–19 20–39 40–59 60+ n < 5