Artificial intelligence is no longer a future technology — it is already woven into search engines, chatbots, classrooms, workplaces and health systems. But adoption has outpaced comfort. Drawing on the Pew Research Center’s American Trends Panel Wave 152 survey of US adults, this five-chart story traces a quiet tension: people are using AI more than ever, yet many feel they have little say over how it shapes their lives. The charts move from how much people know about AI, to how often they use it, to how they feel about it — and end on a public that expects AI to reshape the next 20 years without feeling in control of the ride.
The story follows a simple question: if AI is becoming more common in everyday life, do people feel comfortable with that change? By examining awareness, usage, attitudes, perceived control and expectations for the future, the charts reveal a consistent pattern. Americans are increasingly familiar with AI and many use it regularly, yet concern remains widespread and feelings of control remain limited.
Artificial intelligence is now part of mainstream public conversation. Only a small minority of respondents reported hearing nothing at all about AI, while most said they had heard either “a lot” or “a little”. However, awareness does not necessarily mean understanding. The largest group falls into the “a little” category, suggesting that many people are familiar with AI as a concept but may not fully understand how it works or where it is being used. This sets up the rest of the story: AI is widely recognised, but public confidence and control remain more uncertain.
The relationship between age and AI use is striking. Daily use declines steadily across each age group, with younger adults reporting the highest levels of interaction and older adults the lowest. This pattern appears for both men and women, although men report slightly higher levels of use overall. The findings suggest that AI adoption is strongly linked to digital familiarity and exposure to emerging technologies. Younger adults are more likely to encounter AI through education, social media, work and online services, while older adults may have fewer opportunities or reasons to engage with AI-powered tools regularly.
Although younger adults are often described as more enthusiastic about new technologies, concern about AI remains widespread across all age groups. In every age category, the proportion expressing greater concern exceeds the proportion expressing greater excitement. However, the gap is noticeably smaller among younger respondents, indicating a more balanced view of AI’s risks and opportunities. Older adults appear considerably more cautious, particularly among women. This pattern suggests that familiarity may increase acceptance to some extent, but concerns about privacy, employment, misinformation and control continue to influence public opinion regardless of age. The centre line represents a neutral position. Values extending left indicate greater concern, while values extending right indicate greater excitement.
A recurring theme in public discussions about AI is the feeling that individuals have limited influence over how the technology is developed and deployed. Across all education groups, relatively few respondents report having a great deal of control, while much larger shares report having only some control or very little control. The dropdown comparison reveals that these perceptions are broadly consistent for men and women. While respondents with higher education levels report slightly greater feelings of control, the overall pattern suggests that uncertainty about personal influence over AI remains common throughout the population. The chart also shows that higher levels of education are associated with slightly greater feelings of control, although the differences between groups are relatively modest.
Public expectations of AI’s long-term impact are neither overwhelmingly optimistic nor overwhelmingly pessimistic. The largest group of respondents expect AI to bring both positive and negative consequences over the next two decades, suggesting that most people view AI as a technology with both opportunities and risks. At the same time, negative expectations slightly outweigh positive ones, reflecting persistent concerns about how AI may affect employment, privacy, social trust and decision-making. The results suggest that many people recognise AI’s potential benefits while remaining cautious about its broader social consequences. Rather than taking extreme positions, most respondents appear to hold a balanced and nuanced view of AI’s future impact.
The findings show that artificial intelligence has become a familiar part of everyday life for many people, but familiarity does not necessarily translate into confidence or trust. While most respondents have heard about AI and younger adults use it more frequently, concern continues to outweigh excitement across all age groups. Many people also feel they have limited control over how AI is used in their lives, highlighting a gap between adoption and empowerment.
At the same time, public expectations of AI are nuanced rather than extreme. Most respondents believe AI will bring both benefits and risks over the coming decades, suggesting that people recognise its potential while remaining cautious about its consequences. Overall, the data story reveals a consistent pattern: AI is becoming increasingly integrated into society, but questions of trust, control and responsible use remain central to public attitudes. These findings emphasise the importance of transparent development, effective governance and improved public understanding as AI continues to evolve.
Pew Research Center. (2024). American Trends Panel Wave 152. https://www.pewresearch.org
Plotly Technologies Inc. (2025). Plotly for R documentation. https://plotly.com/r/
R Core Team. (2025). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/
Sievert, C. (2020). Interactive web-based data visualization with R, plotly, and shiny. Chapman and Hall/CRC. https://plotly-r.com
Wickham, H., Averick, M., Bryan, J., Chang, W., McGowan, L. D., François, R., Grolemund, G., Hayes, A., Henry, L., Hester, J., Kuhn, M., Pedersen, T. L., Miller, E., Bache, S. M., Müller, K., Ooms, J., Robinson, D., Seidel, D. P., Spinu, V., Takahashi, K., Vaughan, D., Wilke, C., Woo, K., & Yutani, H. (2019). Welcome to the tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software, 4(43), 1686. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01686
OpenAI. (2026). ChatGPT (GPT-5.5 version used during assignment) [Large language model]. https://chatgpt.com