Swipe More, Connect Less?

Topic 4: Blindsided · Data Visualisation and Communication
Swipe More, Connect Less?
Dating apps have made meeting people easier than ever. Open data suggests the harder problem — meaningful connection, emotional safety, and loneliness — is being left unsolved.
Tran Viet Anh (s4071165) · June 2026

Story pitch: Dating apps promised to make connection easier. But the data suggests the harder problem is not access to people — it is whether those interactions create trust, safety, and meaningful relationships. This visual story uses open data to explore a growing blindspot in modern dating: young adults may be swiping more, but not necessarily connecting better. By drawing on Pew Research Center surveys of dating app behaviour and Australian loneliness survey data from 2018 and 2022, the story shows how platforms designed for access may be scaling mismatched expectations and uneven emotional costs. The issue is not whether dating apps are good or bad. The issue is that a platform optimised for volume and swipe-speed may not be designed for compatibility, emotional safety, or long-term wellbeing — and that blindspot deserves serious public attention.


Chart 1 of 5
Dating apps went from niche to mainstream — and young adults led the way

A decade ago, fewer than one in four young adults had ever used a dating site or app. By 2023, that figure had risen to more than half — 53% of 18–29 year-olds in the United States. The rise is not confined to younger cohorts: every age group has seen substantial growth. But the gap between the youngest and oldest adults has widened, making dating apps an especially defining feature of how young people navigate relationships today. Hover over the chart to explore each age group’s trajectory.

Source: Pew Research Center (2013; 2020; 2023). Per cent of U.S. adults who have ever used a dating site or app, by age group. Note: question wording and sampling may vary slightly across survey years.

Chart 2 of 5
Men and women enter dating apps with strikingly different goals

More users does not mean more alignment. Pew Research Center data shows that while men and women share broadly similar motivations for finding a long-term partner, dating casually, or making friends, a stark gap opens around casual sex: 31% of men cite it as a major reason, compared with just 13% of women. That 18-percentage-point gap means many users are navigating the same platform with fundamentally incompatible intentions. Hover over each dot to see the exact percentage and the gender gap. Click a legend item to isolate one gender.

Source: Vogels, E. A., & McClain, C. (2023). Among recent online daters (used a dating site or app in the past year). Per cent saying each is a major reason. Note: Not all differences are statistically significant. U.S. adults only.

Chart 3 of 5
The emotional cost of dating apps falls more heavily on women

Mismatched expectations do not play out neutrally. Pew Research Center data shows that women who use dating apps are significantly more likely than men to report negative experiences — from unwanted explicit content and persistent contact after rejection, to feeling physically threatened. More than half of women (53%) say their overall experience on dating apps has been more negative than positive, compared with 37% of men. These are not minor inconveniences: they point to a systematic asymmetry in how the same platform feels to different users. Hover to see each experience type and the gap between genders.

Source: Vogels, E. A., & McClain, C. (2023). Per cent of U.S. adults who have ever used a dating site or app reporting each experience. Note: “Overall experience mostly negative” refers to those who say their personal experience has been more negative than positive.

Chart 4 of 5
Young Australians are the loneliest age group — and the gap is growing

Here is the paradox at the heart of this story. Australian survey research on loneliness — comparing age groups across two time points (2018 and 2022) — shows that young adults consistently report the highest rates of significant loneliness, not the lowest. Older adults, who use dating apps far less, are no more lonely than the generation doing the most swiping. The data suggests loneliness among 18–25 year-olds increased between 2018 and 2022, even as digital social tools became more prevalent. This does not prove that dating apps cause loneliness. But it does suggest that access to more potential connections is not automatically translating into better social wellbeing. Click each age group in the legend to explore. Note: values are approximate estimates derived from published report summaries — see source note below.

Source: Lim et al. (2018). Australian Loneliness Report. Swinburne University / APS; Ending Loneliness Together (2022). Mapping loneliness in Australia. Values are approximate estimates of the proportion reporting significant loneliness by age group, derived from published report summaries (original reports use continuous UCLA Loneliness Scale scores). Relative age-group pattern is consistent with published findings. Australian population data — not directly comparable to U.S. Pew samples in Charts 1–3.

Chart 5 of 5
The blindspot: high app use, high loneliness, and a widening mismatch — all in the same age group

This final chart brings the story together. Each bubble represents an age group. The horizontal axis shows how many people in that group use dating apps (access). The vertical axis shows how lonely they are (wellbeing outcome). The bubble size represents the gender gap in casual-sex motivation — a proxy for expectation mismatch on the platform. The pattern is striking: the age group with the highest app use (18–29 year-olds) also has the highest loneliness and the largest motivation mismatch. Older adults, who use dating apps less, show lower loneliness and smaller mismatches. Hover over each bubble for details.

⚠ Cross-source synthesis — not causal evidence. Dating app usage figures are from a U.S. survey (Pew Research Center, 2023). Loneliness figures are from a separate Australian survey (Ending Loneliness Together, 2022). These are two independent studies of different national populations. This chart places them side-by-side to surface a pattern worth investigating — it does not establish that dating app use causes loneliness, or that the two datasets measure the same people.

Source: App usage from Vogels & McClain (2023), Pew Research Center (U.S. adults). Loneliness from Ending Loneliness Together (2022) (Australian adults). Motivation mismatch estimated from Pew Research Center (2023) Q31 topline cross-tabulation. Data are from two separate national studies; combined here to illustrate a cross-national pattern, not a single sample.

Acknowledgements

Generative AI tools (Claude, Anthropic, 2026) were used to assist with project planning, R code structure, tooltip wording, and CSS styling. All data source selection, narrative framing, chart design decisions, and final editorial judgement were made by the author. Data values were manually extracted by the author from cited public reports and verified against original sources.

The colour palette uses principles from Okabe & Ito (2008) and is aligned with The Conversation brand style guide.


References

Anderson, M., Vogels, E. A., & Turner, E. (2020). The virtues and downsides of online dating. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2020/02/06/the-virtues-and-downsides-of-online-dating/

Anthropic. (2026). Claude (claude-sonnet-4-6) [Large language model]. https://claude.ai

Ending Loneliness Together. (2022). Mapping loneliness in Australia. https://endingloneliness.com.au/

Lim, M. H., Eres, R., & Vasan, S. (2020). Understanding loneliness in the twenty-first century: An update on correlates, risk factors, and potential solutions. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 55, 793–810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-020-01889-7

Lim, M. H., Qualter, P., & Holt-Lunstad, J. (2018). Australian loneliness report: A survey exploring the loneliness levels of Australians and the impact on their health and wellbeing. Australian Psychological Society & Swinburne University. https://psychweek.org.au/wp/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Psychology-Week-2018-Australian-Loneliness-Report.pdf

Okabe, M., & Ito, K. (2008). Color universal design (CUD): How to make figures and presentations that are friendly to colorblind people. Jichi Medical University. https://jfly.uni-koeln.de/color/

Smith, A. (2013). Online dating & relationships. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2013/10/21/online-dating-relationships/

Smith, A., & Anderson, M. (2016). 5 facts about online dating. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2016/02/29/5-facts-about-online-dating/

Vogels, E. A. (2020). 10 facts about Americans and online dating. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2020/02/06/10-facts-about-americans-and-online-dating/

Vogels, E. A., & McClain, C. (2023). From looking for love to swiping the field: Online dating in the U.S. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2023/02/02/online-dating/