New national surveys reveal a population that is rapidly adopting artificial intelligence tools while quietly harbouring deep unease. The fault lines run sharply along age, education and income — and Australians have clear views on what should be done about it.
Awareness of AI tools is near-universal for the most prominent products, yet translating that familiarity into regular use remains a different story. Voice assistants — embedded in smartphones for over a decade — top the weekly usage chart by a wide margin, while newer generative AI tools see a steep drop-off between those who have tried them and those who return each week.
Read this chart: Each tool shows three layers. The grey bar represents Australians who have heard of the tool. The indigo bar shows those who have tried it at least once. The coloured dot marks those who use it at least once a week. Hover over any bar or dot for exact figures.
When we look at how often Australians use AI for different purposes — and break this down by age — a generational chasm appears. For 18–29 year olds, AI-assisted learning and productivity are near-daily habits. For those over 60, non-use is the overwhelming norm across every category.
Read this chart: Darker indigo = more daily users. Hover over any cell to see the full breakdown of never / monthly / weekly / daily usage for that age group and purpose. The starkest contrast: 28% of 18–29s use AI for learning every day, versus just 6% of those over 60.
Trust in AI is not uniform — it is highly context-dependent. Australians are comfortable letting AI recommend a playlist or filter their spam. But when the stakes are high — a medical diagnosis, a welfare decision, a criminal sentence — trust collapses and concern surges. Crucially, this gap has barely moved between 2023 and 2025, suggesting neither good-news AI stories nor high-profile failures have shifted attitudes much.
Read this chart: Each row shows one AI application domain. Indigo circles = trust; tomato triangles = concern. Filled shapes are 2025 data; open (hollow) shapes are 2023. Red circles flag high-stakes domains. Hover over any point for exact figures and year-on-year change.
Who trusts AI the most? Largely, those who already hold structural advantages — the young, the highly educated, the high earners. This is not merely a knowledge gap. It reflects unequal exposure to AI’s benefits and disproportionate exposure to its risks. If AI governance is designed around those who trust it most, it risks cementing existing inequalities.
Read this chart: Each dot represents a demographic group. Larger dots = more survey respondents. The open circle on each row shows the proportion who believe AI’s benefits outweigh its risks — often notably lower than the trust score. The dashed line marks the national average trust score of 40%. Hover for full detail.
Despite widespread anxiety, Australians are not asking for AI to be banned. Across every governance measure tested, strong majorities want more accountability, transparency and public oversight — not less AI. The message to policymakers is clear: the public is ahead of the regulatory conversation, and they are waiting.
Read this chart: Each bar shows the full distribution of opinion on an AI governance proposal, sorted by total support (top = highest support). Dark indigo = strongly support; iris = support; grey = neutral; coral = oppose; cherry = strongly oppose. Hover over any segment for exact figures.
This five-chart article makes the case that Australia’s AI conversation is stuck in the wrong place. The public debate focuses on whether AI will “take our jobs” or “change everything” — yet the actual evidence from national surveys tells a far more nuanced story: adoption is real and accelerating, but it is deeply unequal; trust exists, but only in low-stakes contexts; and Australians are not waiting for permission to demand accountability — they already want it.
What makes this story worth publishing now is the timing: Australia is currently developing its national AI regulatory framework, and this data shows that public sentiment has already crystallised ahead of policy. The demographic splits are particularly striking — the trust gap between an 18-year-old postgraduate and a 60-year-old on a low income is not a curiosity; it is a governance problem. If AI policy is designed by and for those who trust it most, we risk encoding existing inequality into infrastructure.
These five charts are designed to pull a general audience through from “here’s what everyone’s using” to “here’s what’s at stake and what people want done about it.” The story ends not with alarm but with agency — Australians have clear, constructive views on oversight, and those views deserve more airtime than they are currently getting.
Generative AI (ChatGPT, OpenAI) was used to assist with brainstorming ideas and narrative framing during the preparation of this assignment. All visualisation design decisions, interpretations, and data source selections were made by the author. Acknowledged in accordance with RMIT Library AI referencing guidelines.
The Conversation brand colour palette was applied throughout to align with publication standards.
Edelman. (2024). Edelman trust barometer 2024: Australia supplement. Edelman. https://www.edelman.com/trust/2024/trust-barometer
Fifth Quadrant & National Artificial Intelligence Centre. (2024). Australian responsible AI index 2024. Fifth Quadrant. https://www.fifthquadrant.com.au/responsible-ai-index-2024
Gillespie, N., Lockey, S., Ward, T., Macdade, A., & Hassed, G. (2023). Trust in artificial intelligence: A global study 2023. The University of Queensland & KPMG. https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmgsites/au/pdf/2023/trust-in-ai-global-insights-2023.pdf
Gillespie, N., Lockey, S., Ward, T., Macdade, A., & Hassed, G. (2025). Trust, attitudes and use of artificial intelligence: A global study 2025. The University of Melbourne & KPMG. https://doi.org/10.26188/28822919
Ipsos. (2024). The Ipsos AI monitor 2024. Ipsos. https://www.ipsos.com/en-au/2024_AI_Monitor
KPMG Australia. (2024). Trust in artificial intelligence: A global study 2024 — Australian results. KPMG. https://doi.org/10.26188/28822919
Monash University & Gradient Institute. (2024). Australian AI index 2024. Monash University. https://www.monash.edu/data-futures-institute/research/australian-ai-index