This project looks at the 2024 MLB standings through Pythagorean expected wins. Instead of only judging teams by their actual wins and losses, this gives another way to look at how strong each team was based on runs scored and runs allowed.
The first part of the project calculates each team’s Pythagorean expected win proportion using the exponent 1.86. The reason this assignment uses 1.86 instead of the original exponent of 2 is because baseball does not always follow the basic squared version perfectly. The 1.86 exponent is commonly used because it better fits MLB run scoring patterns and gives a more realistic estimate of how often a team should win based on runs scored and runs allowed.
The second part of the project builds off that by calculating Lucky Wins, which shows how many games each team won above or below its Pythagorean expected win total.
\[ \text{Pythagorean Expected Win Proportion} = \frac{RS^{1.86}}{RS^{1.86} + RA^{1.86}} \]
In this formula, RS means runs scored and
RA means runs allowed.
After finding the Pythagorean win proportion, I converted it into Pythagorean expected wins by multiplying it by 162, because MLB teams play 162 regular season games. For example, if a team had a Pythagorean win proportion of 0.600, the expected win total would be \(0.600 \times 162 = 97.2\) wins.
\[ \text{Pythagorean Expected Wins} = \text{Pythagorean Win Proportion} \times 162 \]
\[ \text{Lucky Wins} = \text{Actual Wins} - \text{Pythagorean Expected Wins} \]
A positive Lucky Wins number means the team won more games than expected. A negative number means the team won fewer games than expected. The main goal is to compare what actually happened in the standings to what the teams’ run profiles suggested should have happened.
For Part 1, the assignment asks:
Which team had the highest Pythagorean expected win proportion in MLB? Which team had the lowest? Are these the same as the teams that had the highest and lowest actual win proportion in MLB?
The table below ranks each division by Pythagorean expected wins.
| 2024 MLB Pythagorean Expected Win Proportion by Division | ||||||||
| Teams are ranked within each division by Pythagorean expected wins | ||||||||
| Pyth Rk | Team | Act. W | Pyth W | Pyth L | Lucky Wins | Actual Win% | Pyth Win Prop. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL Central | ||||||||
| 1 | Cleveland Guardians | 92 | 90.0 | 72.0 | 2.0 | 0.571 | 0.556 | |
| 2 | Kansas City Royals | 86 | 89.8 | 72.2 | −3.8 | 0.531 | 0.555 | |
| 3 | Detroit Tigers | 86 | 84.7 | 77.3 | 1.3 | 0.531 | 0.523 | |
| 4 | Minnesota Twins | 82 | 82.7 | 79.3 | −0.7 | 0.506 | 0.510 | |
| 5 | Chicago White Sox | 41 | 47.2 | 114.8 | −6.2 | 0.253 | 0.291 | |
| AL East | ||||||||
| 1 | New York Yankees | 94 | 95.8 | 66.2 | −1.8 | 0.580 | 0.591 | |
| 2 | Baltimore Orioles | 91 | 90.8 | 71.2 | 0.2 | 0.562 | 0.560 | |
| 3 | Boston Red Sox | 81 | 81.0 | 81.0 | 0.0 | 0.500 | 0.500 | |
| 4 | Tampa Bay Rays | 80 | 73.3 | 88.7 | 6.7 | 0.494 | 0.452 | |
| 5 | Toronto Blue Jays | 74 | 72.4 | 89.6 | 1.6 | 0.457 | 0.447 | |
| AL West | ||||||||
| 1 | Houston Astros | 88 | 91.5 | 70.5 | −3.5 | 0.547 | 0.565 | |
| 2 | Seattle Mariners | 85 | 90.5 | 71.5 | −5.5 | 0.525 | 0.559 | |
| 3 | Texas Rangers | 78 | 74.2 | 87.8 | 3.8 | 0.481 | 0.458 | |
| 4 | Athletics | 69 | 68.9 | 93.1 | 0.1 | 0.426 | 0.426 | |
| 5 | Los Angeles Angels | 63 | 64.1 | 97.9 | −1.1 | 0.389 | 0.395 | |
| NL Central | ||||||||
| 1 | Milwaukee Brewers | 93 | 94.6 | 67.4 | −1.6 | 0.574 | 0.584 | |
| 2 | Chicago Cubs | 83 | 88.0 | 74.0 | −5.0 | 0.512 | 0.543 | |
| 3 | Cincinnati Reds | 77 | 81.0 | 81.0 | −4.0 | 0.475 | 0.500 | |
| 4 | St. Louis Cardinals | 83 | 75.7 | 86.3 | 7.3 | 0.512 | 0.467 | |
| 5 | Pittsburgh Pirates | 76 | 72.4 | 89.6 | 3.6 | 0.469 | 0.447 | |
| NL East | ||||||||
| 1 | Philadelphia Phillies | 95 | 92.8 | 69.2 | 2.2 | 0.586 | 0.573 | |
| 2 | Atlanta Braves | 89 | 92.2 | 69.8 | −3.2 | 0.549 | 0.569 | |
| 3 | New York Mets | 89 | 87.7 | 74.3 | 1.3 | 0.549 | 0.541 | |
| 4 | Washington Nationals | 71 | 70.8 | 91.2 | 0.2 | 0.438 | 0.437 | |
| 5 | Miami Marlins | 62 | 59.8 | 102.2 | 2.2 | 0.383 | 0.369 | |
| NL West | ||||||||
| 1 | Los Angeles Dodgers | 98 | 96.9 | 65.1 | 1.1 | 0.605 | 0.598 | |
| 2 | San Diego Padres | 93 | 91.2 | 70.8 | 1.8 | 0.574 | 0.563 | |
| 3 | Arizona Diamondbacks | 89 | 89.7 | 72.3 | −0.7 | 0.549 | 0.554 | |
| 4 | San Francisco Giants | 80 | 81.0 | 81.0 | −1.0 | 0.494 | 0.500 | |
| 5 | Colorado Rockies | 61 | 58.6 | 103.4 | 2.4 | 0.377 | 0.362 | |
| Pyth Rk = division rank using Pythagorean expected wins. Lucky Wins = actual wins minus Pythagorean expected wins. | ||||||||
This visual compares actual win proportion to Pythagorean expected win proportion. The dashed line shows where actual performance equals expected performance.
The table below ranks all MLB teams by Pythagorean expected wins.
| 2024 MLB Teams Ranked by Pythagorean Expected Wins | ||||||||
| All teams combined | ||||||||
| Pyth Rk | Team | Act. W | Pyth W | Pyth L | Lucky Wins | Actual Win% | Pyth Win Prop. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Los Angeles Dodgers | 98 | 96.9 | 65.1 | 1.1 | 0.605 | 0.598 | |
| 2 | New York Yankees | 94 | 95.8 | 66.2 | −1.8 | 0.580 | 0.591 | |
| 3 | Milwaukee Brewers | 93 | 94.6 | 67.4 | −1.6 | 0.574 | 0.584 | |
| 4 | Philadelphia Phillies | 95 | 92.8 | 69.2 | 2.2 | 0.586 | 0.573 | |
| 5 | Atlanta Braves | 89 | 92.2 | 69.8 | −3.2 | 0.549 | 0.569 | |
| 6 | Houston Astros | 88 | 91.5 | 70.5 | −3.5 | 0.547 | 0.565 | |
| 7 | San Diego Padres | 93 | 91.2 | 70.8 | 1.8 | 0.574 | 0.563 | |
| 8 | Baltimore Orioles | 91 | 90.8 | 71.2 | 0.2 | 0.562 | 0.560 | |
| 9 | Seattle Mariners | 85 | 90.5 | 71.5 | −5.5 | 0.525 | 0.559 | |
| 10 | Cleveland Guardians | 92 | 90.0 | 72.0 | 2.0 | 0.571 | 0.556 | |
| 11 | Kansas City Royals | 86 | 89.8 | 72.2 | −3.8 | 0.531 | 0.555 | |
| 12 | Arizona Diamondbacks | 89 | 89.7 | 72.3 | −0.7 | 0.549 | 0.554 | |
| 13 | Chicago Cubs | 83 | 88.0 | 74.0 | −5.0 | 0.512 | 0.543 | |
| 14 | New York Mets | 89 | 87.7 | 74.3 | 1.3 | 0.549 | 0.541 | |
| 15 | Detroit Tigers | 86 | 84.7 | 77.3 | 1.3 | 0.531 | 0.523 | |
| 16 | Minnesota Twins | 82 | 82.7 | 79.3 | −0.7 | 0.506 | 0.510 | |
| 17 | Boston Red Sox | 81 | 81.0 | 81.0 | 0.0 | 0.500 | 0.500 | |
| 18 | San Francisco Giants | 80 | 81.0 | 81.0 | −1.0 | 0.494 | 0.500 | |
| 19 | Cincinnati Reds | 77 | 81.0 | 81.0 | −4.0 | 0.475 | 0.500 | |
| 20 | St. Louis Cardinals | 83 | 75.7 | 86.3 | 7.3 | 0.512 | 0.467 | |
| 21 | Texas Rangers | 78 | 74.2 | 87.8 | 3.8 | 0.481 | 0.458 | |
| 22 | Tampa Bay Rays | 80 | 73.3 | 88.7 | 6.7 | 0.494 | 0.452 | |
| 23 | Pittsburgh Pirates | 76 | 72.4 | 89.6 | 3.6 | 0.469 | 0.447 | |
| 24 | Toronto Blue Jays | 74 | 72.4 | 89.6 | 1.6 | 0.457 | 0.447 | |
| 25 | Washington Nationals | 71 | 70.8 | 91.2 | 0.2 | 0.438 | 0.437 | |
| 26 | Athletics | 69 | 68.9 | 93.1 | 0.1 | 0.426 | 0.426 | |
| 27 | Los Angeles Angels | 63 | 64.1 | 97.9 | −1.1 | 0.389 | 0.395 | |
| 28 | Miami Marlins | 62 | 59.8 | 102.2 | 2.2 | 0.383 | 0.369 | |
| 29 | Colorado Rockies | 61 | 58.6 | 103.4 | 2.4 | 0.377 | 0.362 | |
| 30 | Chicago White Sox | 41 | 47.2 | 114.8 | −6.2 | 0.253 | 0.291 | |
| Pyth Rk = MLB rank using Pythagorean expected wins. Lucky Wins = actual wins minus Pythagorean expected wins. | ||||||||
| Highest and Lowest Teams | |||||||
| Comparing Pythagorean expected win proportion to actual win proportion | |||||||
| Category | Pythagorean Team | Pyth Win Prop. | Actual Team | Actual Win% | Same? | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Highest | Los Angeles Dodgers | 0.598 | Los Angeles Dodgers | 0.605 | Yes | ||
| Lowest | Chicago White Sox | 0.291 | Chicago White Sox | 0.253 | Yes | ||
The Los Angeles Dodgers had the highest Pythagorean expected win proportion in MLB at 0.594. That means their run profile projected them for about 96.2 wins over a 162-game season. They actually won 98 games, so they finished about 1.8 Lucky Wins above their Pythagorean expectation.
The Chicago White Sox had the lowest Pythagorean expected win proportion at 0.294. That translates to about 47.6 expected wins, but they only won 41 games, so they finished about 6.6 Lucky Wins below their Pythagorean expectation.
These results matched the actual standings extremes. The Dodgers also had the highest actual win proportion in MLB, while the White Sox had the lowest actual win proportion. So for the highest and lowest teams, the Pythagorean model told the same basic story as the real standings. In fact, the only team that would have finished differently in their division would have been the St. Louis Cardinals who finished 2nd in the NL Central, but according to Pythagorean Exp. Wins, they would have finished 4th.
For Part 2, the assignment asks:
Which MLB team was the luckiest? Which team was the most unlucky? Would the playoff teams have been different if playoff spots were assigned according to Pythagorean expected wins instead of actual wins?
The table below ranks every MLB team by Lucky Wins. Teams at the top won more games than expected based on their run profile, while teams at the bottom won fewer games than expected.
| 2024 MLB Teams Ranked by Lucky Wins | ||||||||
| Lucky Wins = actual wins minus Pythagorean expected wins | ||||||||
| Rk | Team | Act. W | Pyth W | Pyth L | Lucky Wins | Actual Win% | Pyth Win Prop. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | St. Louis Cardinals | 83 | 75.7 | 86.3 | 7.3 | 0.512 | 0.467 | |
| 2 | Tampa Bay Rays | 80 | 73.3 | 88.7 | 6.7 | 0.494 | 0.452 | |
| 3 | Texas Rangers | 78 | 74.2 | 87.8 | 3.8 | 0.481 | 0.458 | |
| 4 | Pittsburgh Pirates | 76 | 72.4 | 89.6 | 3.6 | 0.469 | 0.447 | |
| 5 | Colorado Rockies | 61 | 58.6 | 103.4 | 2.4 | 0.377 | 0.362 | |
| 6 | Philadelphia Phillies | 95 | 92.8 | 69.2 | 2.2 | 0.586 | 0.573 | |
| 7 | Miami Marlins | 62 | 59.8 | 102.2 | 2.2 | 0.383 | 0.369 | |
| 8 | Cleveland Guardians | 92 | 90.0 | 72.0 | 2.0 | 0.571 | 0.556 | |
| 9 | San Diego Padres | 93 | 91.2 | 70.8 | 1.8 | 0.574 | 0.563 | |
| 10 | Toronto Blue Jays | 74 | 72.4 | 89.6 | 1.6 | 0.457 | 0.447 | |
| 11 | Detroit Tigers | 86 | 84.7 | 77.3 | 1.3 | 0.531 | 0.523 | |
| 12 | New York Mets | 89 | 87.7 | 74.3 | 1.3 | 0.549 | 0.541 | |
| 13 | Los Angeles Dodgers | 98 | 96.9 | 65.1 | 1.1 | 0.605 | 0.598 | |
| 14 | Washington Nationals | 71 | 70.8 | 91.2 | 0.2 | 0.438 | 0.437 | |
| 15 | Baltimore Orioles | 91 | 90.8 | 71.2 | 0.2 | 0.562 | 0.560 | |
| 16 | Athletics | 69 | 68.9 | 93.1 | 0.1 | 0.426 | 0.426 | |
| 17 | Boston Red Sox | 81 | 81.0 | 81.0 | 0.0 | 0.500 | 0.500 | |
| 18 | Minnesota Twins | 82 | 82.7 | 79.3 | −0.7 | 0.506 | 0.510 | |
| 19 | Arizona Diamondbacks | 89 | 89.7 | 72.3 | −0.7 | 0.549 | 0.554 | |
| 20 | San Francisco Giants | 80 | 81.0 | 81.0 | −1.0 | 0.494 | 0.500 | |
| 21 | Los Angeles Angels | 63 | 64.1 | 97.9 | −1.1 | 0.389 | 0.395 | |
| 22 | Milwaukee Brewers | 93 | 94.6 | 67.4 | −1.6 | 0.574 | 0.584 | |
| 23 | New York Yankees | 94 | 95.8 | 66.2 | −1.8 | 0.580 | 0.591 | |
| 24 | Atlanta Braves | 89 | 92.2 | 69.8 | −3.2 | 0.549 | 0.569 | |
| 25 | Houston Astros | 88 | 91.5 | 70.5 | −3.5 | 0.547 | 0.565 | |
| 26 | Kansas City Royals | 86 | 89.8 | 72.2 | −3.8 | 0.531 | 0.555 | |
| 27 | Cincinnati Reds | 77 | 81.0 | 81.0 | −4.0 | 0.475 | 0.500 | |
| 28 | Chicago Cubs | 83 | 88.0 | 74.0 | −5.0 | 0.512 | 0.543 | |
| 29 | Seattle Mariners | 85 | 90.5 | 71.5 | −5.5 | 0.525 | 0.559 | |
| 30 | Chicago White Sox | 41 | 47.2 | 114.8 | −6.2 | 0.253 | 0.291 | |
| Positive Lucky Wins means the team won more games than expected. Negative Lucky Wins means the team won fewer games than expected. | ||||||||
This chart shows which teams won more or fewer games than their Pythagorean expected win total.
| Luckiest and Most Unlucky Teams | ||||||||
| Based on actual wins minus Pythagorean expected wins | ||||||||
| Category | Team | Act. W | Pyth W | Pyth L | Lucky Wins | Actual Win% | Pyth Win Prop. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luckiest Team | St. Louis Cardinals | 83 | 75.7 | 86.3 | 7.3 | 0.512 | 0.467 | |
| Most Unlucky Team | Chicago White Sox | 41 | 47.2 | 114.8 | −6.2 | 0.253 | 0.291 | |
| Lucky Wins = actual wins minus Pythagorean expected wins. | ||||||||
For the playoff comparison, I used the actual MLB playoff format. Each league gets six playoff teams: three division winners and three Wild Card teams. The actual playoff teams are selected by actual wins. The Pythagorean playoff teams are selected the same way, but using Pythagorean expected wins instead.
| Actual Playoff Teams vs. Pythagorean Playoff Teams | |||||||||
| Using the actual MLB playoff format: division winners plus Wild Card teams | |||||||||
| Seed | Type | Division | Team | Act. W | Pyth W | Pyth L | Pyth Win Prop. | Lucky Wins | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual Wins | |||||||||
| AL #1 | Division Winner | AL East | New York Yankees | 94 | 95.8 | 66.2 | 0.591 | −1.8 | |
| AL #2 | Division Winner | AL Central | Cleveland Guardians | 92 | 90.0 | 72.0 | 0.556 | 2.0 | |
| AL #3 | Division Winner | AL West | Houston Astros | 88 | 91.5 | 70.5 | 0.565 | −3.5 | |
| AL #4 | Wild Card | AL East | Baltimore Orioles | 91 | 90.8 | 71.2 | 0.560 | 0.2 | |
| AL #5 | Wild Card | AL Central | Kansas City Royals | 86 | 89.8 | 72.2 | 0.555 | −3.8 | |
| AL #6 | Wild Card | AL Central | Detroit Tigers | 86 | 84.7 | 77.3 | 0.523 | 1.3 | |
| NL #1 | Division Winner | NL West | Los Angeles Dodgers | 98 | 96.9 | 65.1 | 0.598 | 1.1 | |
| NL #2 | Division Winner | NL East | Philadelphia Phillies | 95 | 92.8 | 69.2 | 0.573 | 2.2 | |
| NL #3 | Division Winner | NL Central | Milwaukee Brewers | 93 | 94.6 | 67.4 | 0.584 | −1.6 | |
| NL #4 | Wild Card | NL West | San Diego Padres | 93 | 91.2 | 70.8 | 0.563 | 1.8 | |
| NL #5 | Wild Card | NL East | Atlanta Braves | 89 | 92.2 | 69.8 | 0.569 | −3.2 | |
| NL #6 | Wild Card | NL West | Arizona Diamondbacks | 89 | 89.7 | 72.3 | 0.554 | −0.7 | |
| Pythagorean Expected Wins | |||||||||
| AL #1 | Division Winner | AL East | New York Yankees | 94 | 95.8 | 66.2 | 0.591 | −1.8 | |
| AL #2 | Division Winner | AL West | Houston Astros | 88 | 91.5 | 70.5 | 0.565 | −3.5 | |
| AL #3 | Division Winner | AL Central | Cleveland Guardians | 92 | 90.0 | 72.0 | 0.556 | 2.0 | |
| AL #4 | Wild Card | AL East | Baltimore Orioles | 91 | 90.8 | 71.2 | 0.560 | 0.2 | |
| AL #5 | Wild Card | AL West | Seattle Mariners | 85 | 90.5 | 71.5 | 0.559 | −5.5 | |
| AL #6 | Wild Card | AL Central | Kansas City Royals | 86 | 89.8 | 72.2 | 0.555 | −3.8 | |
| NL #1 | Division Winner | NL West | Los Angeles Dodgers | 98 | 96.9 | 65.1 | 0.598 | 1.1 | |
| NL #2 | Division Winner | NL Central | Milwaukee Brewers | 93 | 94.6 | 67.4 | 0.584 | −1.6 | |
| NL #3 | Division Winner | NL East | Philadelphia Phillies | 95 | 92.8 | 69.2 | 0.573 | 2.2 | |
| NL #4 | Wild Card | NL East | Atlanta Braves | 89 | 92.2 | 69.8 | 0.569 | −3.2 | |
| NL #5 | Wild Card | NL West | San Diego Padres | 93 | 91.2 | 70.8 | 0.563 | 1.8 | |
| NL #6 | Wild Card | NL West | Arizona Diamondbacks | 89 | 89.7 | 72.3 | 0.554 | −0.7 | |
| Lucky Wins = actual wins minus Pythagorean expected wins. | |||||||||
The table below shows which teams would change if playoff teams were selected by Pythagorean expected wins instead of actual wins.
| Playoff Teams That Would Change | ||||||||||
| Comparing actual playoff teams to Pythagorean expected win playoff teams | ||||||||||
| Category | Team | Division | Actual Seed | Pyth Seed | Act. W | Pyth W | Pyth L | Pyth Win Prop. | Lucky Wins | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Made Actual Playoffs, Missed by Pythagorean Expected Wins | Detroit Tigers | AL Central | AL #6 | NA | 86 | 84.7 | 77.3 | 0.523 | 1.3 | |
| Missed Actual Playoffs, Made by Pythagorean Expected Wins | Seattle Mariners | AL West | NA | AL #5 | 85 | 90.5 | 71.5 | 0.559 | −5.5 | |
| Lucky Wins = actual wins minus Pythagorean expected wins. | ||||||||||
This table only includes teams that made the playoffs under both systems but would have had a different seed using Pythagorean expected wins.
| Playoff Seeds That Would Change | |||||||||
| Teams that made the playoffs under both systems but would have moved seeds | |||||||||
| Team | Division | Actual Seed | Pyth Seed | Act. W | Pyth W | Pyth L | Pyth Win Prop. | Lucky Wins | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cleveland Guardians | AL Central | AL #2 | AL #3 | 92 | 90.0 | 72.0 | 0.556 | 2.0 | |
| Houston Astros | AL West | AL #3 | AL #2 | 88 | 91.5 | 70.5 | 0.565 | −3.5 | |
| Kansas City Royals | AL Central | AL #5 | AL #6 | 86 | 89.8 | 72.2 | 0.555 | −3.8 | |
| Philadelphia Phillies | NL East | NL #2 | NL #3 | 95 | 92.8 | 69.2 | 0.573 | 2.2 | |
| Milwaukee Brewers | NL Central | NL #3 | NL #2 | 93 | 94.6 | 67.4 | 0.584 | −1.6 | |
| San Diego Padres | NL West | NL #4 | NL #5 | 93 | 91.2 | 70.8 | 0.563 | 1.8 | |
| Atlanta Braves | NL East | NL #5 | NL #4 | 89 | 92.2 | 69.8 | 0.569 | −3.2 | |
| Lucky Wins = actual wins minus Pythagorean expected wins. | |||||||||
The St. Louis Cardinals came out as the luckiest team in MLB by this measure. They won 83 games, but their Pythagorean expected win total was about 75.9 wins, so they finished roughly 7.1 Lucky Wins above expected.
The Chicago White Sox were on the other side. They won 41 games, but their run profile projected them for about 47.6 wins, meaning they finished about 6.6 Lucky Wins below expected. That is honestly kind of wild because they were already the worst team in the league by actual record, but they also came out as the most unlucky team by this calculation.
The playoff field would have looked a little different if spots were based on Pythagorean expected wins instead of actual wins. The Detroit Tigers made the actual playoffs, but under the Pythagorean version, the Seattle Mariners would have taken that spot. Some playoff seeds would have changed too, which could have mattered a lot because seeding changes can affect matchups and home-field advantage.
This project answered two main questions. First, it looked at which teams had the highest and lowest Pythagorean expected win proportion. Second, it looked at which teams were the luckiest or most unlucky based on the difference between actual wins and Pythagorean expected wins.
For Part 1, the Los Angeles Dodgers had the highest Pythagorean expected win proportion in MLB at 0.594, while the Chicago White Sox had the lowest at 0.294. Those were also the same teams that had the highest and lowest actual win proportions, so the Pythagorean model matched the real standings at the top and the bottom.
For Part 2, the St. Louis Cardinals were the luckiest team because they won about 7.1 more games than their run profile expected. The Chicago White Sox were the most unlucky team because they won about 6.6 fewer games than expected.
The playoff comparison also showed that the playoff field would not have been exactly the same. The Detroit Tigers made the actual playoffs, but if playoff spots were based on Pythagorean expected wins, the Seattle Mariners would have replaced them. That does not mean the actual standings were wrong, but it does show how useful Pythagorean expected wins can be for looking past the record and getting a better feel for how strong a team’s overall run profile really was as well how lucky or unlucky a team was that season.