library(readxl)
library(ggpubr)
## Loading required package: ggplot2
library(effectsize)
library(rstatix)
## 
## Attaching package: 'rstatix'
## The following objects are masked from 'package:effectsize':
## 
##     cohens_d, eta_squared
## The following object is masked from 'package:stats':
## 
##     filter
A6Q1 <- read_excel("C:/Users/laksh/Downloads/A6Q1.xlsx")
Before <- A6Q1$Before
After <- A6Q1$After

Differences <- After - Before
mean(Before, na.rm = TRUE)
## [1] 76.13299
median(Before, na.rm = TRUE)
## [1] 75.95988
sd(Before, na.rm = TRUE)
## [1] 7.781323
mean(After, na.rm = TRUE)
## [1] 71.58994
median(After, na.rm = TRUE)
## [1] 70.88045
sd(After, na.rm = TRUE)
## [1] 6.639509
hist(Differences,
     main = "Histogram of Body Weight",
     xlab = "Value",
     ylab = "Frequency",
     col = "blue",
     border = "black",
     breaks = 20)

Histogram of Body Weight The difference scores look abnormally distributed. The data is negatively skewed. The data does not have a proper bell curve.

boxplot(Differences,
        main = "Distribution of Score Differences (After - Before)",
        ylab = "Difference in Scores",
        col = "blue",
        border = "darkblue")

There is one dot outside the boxplot. The dot is not close to the whiskers. The dot is very far away from the whiskers. Based on these findings, the boxplot is normal.

shapiro.test(Differences)
## 
##  Shapiro-Wilk normality test
## 
## data:  Differences
## W = 0.94757, p-value = 0.3318

Shapiro-Wilk Difference Scores The data is normally distributed, (p = .331).

t.test(Before, After, paired = TRUE, na.action = na.omit)
## 
##  Paired t-test
## 
## data:  Before and After
## t = 1.902, df = 19, p-value = 0.07245
## alternative hypothesis: true mean difference is not equal to 0
## 95 percent confidence interval:
##  -0.4563808  9.5424763
## sample estimates:
## mean difference 
##        4.543048

A Dependent T-Test was conducted to determine if there was a difference in weight before the diet versus after the diet. Before scores (M = 76.13, SD = 7.78) were significantly different from after scores (M = 57.18, SD = 14.4), t(19) = 1.902, p =0.072