# A tibble: 6 × 24
Year StateAbbr StateDesc CityName GeographicLevel DataSource Category
<dbl> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr>
1 2017 CA California Hawthorne Census Tract BRFSS Health Outcom…
2 2017 CA California Hawthorne City BRFSS Unhealthy Beh…
3 2017 CA California Hayward City BRFSS Health Outcom…
4 2017 CA California Hayward City BRFSS Unhealthy Beh…
5 2017 CA California Hemet City BRFSS Prevention
6 2017 CA California Indio Census Tract BRFSS Health Outcom…
# ℹ 17 more variables: UniqueID <chr>, Measure <chr>, Data_Value_Unit <chr>,
# DataValueTypeID <chr>, Data_Value_Type <chr>, Data_Value <dbl>,
# Low_Confidence_Limit <dbl>, High_Confidence_Limit <dbl>,
# Data_Value_Footnote_Symbol <chr>, Data_Value_Footnote <chr>,
# PopulationCount <dbl>, GeoLocation <chr>, CategoryID <chr>,
# MeasureId <chr>, CityFIPS <dbl>, TractFIPS <dbl>, Short_Question_Text <chr>
The GeoLocation variable has (lat, long) format
Split GeoLocation (lat, long) into two columns: lat and long
# A tibble: 6 × 25
Year StateAbbr StateDesc CityName GeographicLevel DataSource Category
<dbl> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr>
1 2017 CA California Hawthorne Census Tract BRFSS Health Outcom…
2 2017 CA California Hawthorne City BRFSS Unhealthy Beh…
3 2017 CA California Hayward City BRFSS Health Outcom…
4 2017 CA California Hayward City BRFSS Unhealthy Beh…
5 2017 CA California Hemet City BRFSS Prevention
6 2017 CA California Indio Census Tract BRFSS Health Outcom…
# ℹ 18 more variables: UniqueID <chr>, Measure <chr>, Data_Value_Unit <chr>,
# DataValueTypeID <chr>, Data_Value_Type <chr>, Data_Value <dbl>,
# Low_Confidence_Limit <dbl>, High_Confidence_Limit <dbl>,
# Data_Value_Footnote_Symbol <chr>, Data_Value_Footnote <chr>,
# PopulationCount <dbl>, lat <dbl>, long <dbl>, CategoryID <chr>,
# MeasureId <chr>, CityFIPS <dbl>, TractFIPS <dbl>, Short_Question_Text <chr>
Filter the dataset
Remove the StateDesc that includes the United Sates, select Prevention as the category (of interest), filter for only measuring crude prevalence and select only 2017.
# A tibble: 6 × 18
Year StateAbbr StateDesc CityName GeographicLevel Category UniqueID Measure
<dbl> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr>
1 2017 CT Connecticut Bridgep… Census Tract Unhealt… 0908000… Obesit…
2 2017 CT Connecticut Danbury City Unhealt… 918430 Obesit…
3 2017 CT Connecticut Norwalk Census Tract Unhealt… 0955990… Obesit…
4 2017 CT Connecticut Bridgep… Census Tract Unhealt… 0908000… Curren…
5 2017 CT Connecticut Hartford Census Tract Unhealt… 0937000… Obesit…
6 2017 CT Connecticut Waterbu… Census Tract Unhealt… 0980000… Obesit…
# ℹ 10 more variables: Data_Value_Type <chr>, Data_Value <dbl>,
# PopulationCount <dbl>, lat <dbl>, long <dbl>, CategoryID <chr>,
# MeasureId <chr>, CityFIPS <dbl>, TractFIPS <dbl>, Short_Question_Text <chr>
The new dataset “latlong_clean2” is a manageable dataset now.
For your assignment, work with a cleaned dataset where you perform your own cleaning and filtering.
1. Once you run the above code and filter this complicated dataset, perform your own investigation by filtering this dataset however you choose so that you have a subset with no more than 900 observations through some inclusion/exclusion criteria.
In a paragraph, describe the plots you created and the insights they show.
I chose to study the state of Texas because my husband was assigned there as part of his military service. He visited several cities, including Laredo and El Paso, which influenced my interest in this region. At first, these cities were part of my personal interest in the study. However, after exploring the data, I also included other major cities such as Austin, Dallas, San Antonio, and Fort Worth in order to have a better representation of urban areas in Texas.In analyzing diabetes prevalence data, I observed differences between cities. Some major cities such as Austin and Dallas appear to have relatively lower levels of diabetes compared to other areas such as Laredo or El Paso. To prepare the analysis, I applied several filters to the dataset. First, I selected only the state of Texas, then restricted the data to the year 2017 to ensure consistency over time. I then kept only records with “crude prevalence” and the measure “diagnosed diabetes among adults aged 18 years and older.” I removed missing values and limited the dataset to the five selected cities. Finally, I retained only the essential variables: CityName, PopulationCount, Data_Value, latitude, and longitude. I created two visualizations. First, a boxplot was used to compare the distribution of diabetes prevalence across the selected cities.It shows how diabetes rates vary within each city.Second, a Leaflet map was created to visualize the geographic distribution of diabetes across these selected cities in Texas. Each point represents a census tract, and the size of the circles reflects the level of diabetes prevalence.