library(readxl)
library(ggpubr)
## Loading required package: ggplot2
A4Q2 <- read_excel("C:/Users/lahar/Downloads/A4Q2.xlsx")
ggscatter(
A4Q2,
x = "phone",
y = "sleep",
add = "reg.line",
xlab = "phone",
ylab = "sleep"
)
The relationship is negatrive.
The relationship is moderate or strong.
There are outliers
mean(A4Q2$phone)
## [1] 3.804609
sd(A4Q2$phone)
## [1] 2.661866
median(A4Q2$phone)
## [1] 3.270839
mean(A4Q2$sleep)
## [1] 7.559076
sd(A4Q2$sleep)
## [1] 1.208797
median(A4Q2$sleep)
## [1] 7.524099
hist(A4Q2$phone,
main = "phone",
breaks = 20,
col = "lightblue",
border = "white",
cex.main = 1,
cex.axis = 1,
cex.lab = 1)
Variable 1: phone The first variable looks abnormally distributed. The data is negatively skewed. The data does not have a bell curve.
hist(A4Q2$sleep,
main = "sleep",
breaks = 20,
col = "lightcoral",
border = "white",
cex.main = 1,
cex.axis = 1,
cex.lab = 1)
Variable 2:sleep The second variable looks abnormally distributed. The data is negatively skewed. The data does not have a proper bell curve.
shapiro.test(A4Q2$phone)
##
## Shapiro-Wilk normality test
##
## data: A4Q2$phone
## W = 0.89755, p-value = 9.641e-09
shapiro.test(A4Q2$sleep)
##
## Shapiro-Wilk normality test
##
## data: A4Q2$sleep
## W = 0.91407, p-value = 8.964e-08
Variable 1: phone The first variable is normally distributed (p = 9.641e-09).
Variable 2: education The second variable is normally distributed (p = 8.964e-08).
cor.test(A4Q2$phone, A4Q2$sleep, method = "pearson")
##
## Pearson's product-moment correlation
##
## data: A4Q2$phone and A4Q2$sleep
## t = -11.813, df = 148, p-value < 2.2e-16
## alternative hypothesis: true correlation is not equal to 0
## 95 percent confidence interval:
## -0.7708489 -0.6038001
## sample estimates:
## cor
## -0.6966497
A Pearson correlation was conducted to test the relationship between Variable 1 (M = 3.804609 , SD = 2.661866) and Variable 2 (M = 7.559076, SD = 1.208797 ). There [was / was not] a statistically significant relationship between the two variables, r(148) = _.61, p = < .001. The relationship was positive and strong. As age increased, income increased.