Kelly Loria 2026-04-06
For all burned locations.
| Site | N Samples | Date Range | Burn Area (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| browns | 15 | 2025-02-19 to 2025-12-10 | 42 |
| browns_sub | 15 | 2025-02-19 to 2025-12-10 | 41 |
| ophir | 24 | 2024-10-16 to 2025-12-10 | 0 |
| winters_up | 18 | 2025-01-22 to 2025-12-10 | 62 |
| winters_usgs | 24 | 2024-10-16 to 2025-12-10 | 65 |
Summary of water quality sampling by site
| df | AIC | |
|---|---|---|
| ppt_mod | 7 | 612.26 |
| ppt_mod.1 | 6 | 616.75 |
| ppt_mod.2 | 7 | 612.23 |
| ppt_mod.3 | 7 | 611.84 |
| ppt_mod.4 | 5 | 625.52 |
| ppt_mod.5 | 6 | 618.08 |
AIC comparison of precipitation models
| (Intercept) | scale(lag_C_PPT * tsf) | scale(lag_C_PPT) | scale(tsf) | scale(flow_filled) | scale(flow_filled * tsf) | df | logLik | AICc | delta | weight | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ppt_mod.3 | 15.76 | NA | 0.35 | 10.60 | NA | -6.97 | 7 | -298.92 | 613.77 | 0.00 | 0.3570108149 |
| ppt_mod.2 | 15.80 | NA | 0.53 | 6.92 | -6.17 | NA | 7 | -299.12 | 614.16 | 0.40 | 0.2928640050 |
| ppt_mod | 14.93 | -6.17 | 4.41 | 10.77 | NA | NA | 7 | -299.13 | 614.19 | 0.42 | 0.2896802871 |
| ppt_mod.1 | 14.90 | NA | -0.91 | 9.01 | NA | NA | 6 | -302.37 | 618.17 | 4.40 | 0.0395207471 |
| ppt_mod.5 | 16.69 | NA | 0.88 | NA | -10.06 | NA | 6 | -303.04 | 619.50 | 5.73 | 0.0203157142 |
| ppt_mod.4 | 15.54 | NA | -1.70 | NA | NA | NA | 5 | -307.76 | 626.52 | 12.75 | 0.0006084316 |
Model selection based on AICc
Best model: ppt_mod.2 (TSS ~ PPT + TSF + Flow)
Rationale:
ΔAICc difference trivial from ppt_mod.2 to the interaction models (ppt_mod and ppt_mod.3)
Interaction unsupported and more complex in ppt_mod
Strong collinearity (r = −0.871) in ppt_mod
## Family: lognormal
## Links: mu = identity; sigma = identity
## Formula: TSS ~ scale(lag_C_PPT) + scale(tsf) + scale(flow_filled) + catchment + (1 | catchment:site)
## Data: data (Number of observations: 66)
## Draws: 3 chains, each with iter = 3000; warmup = 1500; thin = 1;
## total post-warmup draws = 4500
##
## Multilevel Hyperparameters:
## ~catchment:site (Number of levels: 4)
## Estimate Est.Error l-95% CI u-95% CI Rhat Bulk_ESS Tail_ESS
## sd(Intercept) 0.53 0.44 0.02 1.68 1.00 1166 1506
##
## Regression Coefficients:
## Estimate Est.Error l-95% CI u-95% CI Rhat Bulk_ESS Tail_ESS
## Intercept 0.90 0.51 -0.00 2.05 1.00 1313 1363
## scalelag_C_PPT 0.03 0.18 -0.32 0.39 1.00 2752 2544
## scaletsf 0.94 0.20 0.54 1.33 1.00 2175 2142
## scaleflow_filled -0.11 0.27 -0.64 0.43 1.00 1773 1852
## catchmentwinters 1.06 0.68 -0.43 2.23 1.00 1663 1316
##
## Further Distributional Parameters:
## Estimate Est.Error l-95% CI u-95% CI Rhat Bulk_ESS Tail_ESS
## sigma 1.37 0.13 1.15 1.64 1.00 2559 2840
##
## Draws were sampled using sampling(NUTS). For each parameter, Bulk_ESS
## and Tail_ESS are effective sample size measures, and Rhat is the potential
## scale reduction factor on split chains (at convergence, Rhat = 1).
##
## Computed from 4500 by 66 log-likelihood matrix.
##
## Estimate SE
## elpd_loo -216.3 15.3
## p_loo 7.5 1.5
## looic 432.5 30.7
## ------
## MCSE of elpd_loo is 0.1.
## MCSE and ESS estimates assume MCMC draws (r_eff in [0.4, 1.1]).
##
## All Pareto k estimates are good (k < 0.7).
## See help('pareto-k-diagnostic') for details.
| term | estimate | l90 | u90 | estimate_exp | l90_exp | u90_exp | bayes_R2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| b_Intercept | Intercept | 0.90 | 0.13 | 1.81 | 2.47 | 1.14 | 6.08 | 0.4 |
| b_scalelag_C_PPT | scalelag_C_PPT | 0.03 | -0.26 | 0.32 | 1.03 | 0.77 | 1.38 | 0.4 |
| b_scaletsf | scaletsf | 0.94 | 0.60 | 1.27 | 2.55 | 1.82 | 3.57 | 0.4 |
| b_scaleflow_filled | scaleflow_filled | -0.11 | -0.56 | 0.33 | 0.89 | 0.57 | 1.40 | 0.4 |
| b_catchmentwinters | catchmentwinters | 1.06 | -0.18 | 2.07 | 2.89 | 0.84 | 7.91 | 0.4 |
TSS Model Effects (Log and Exponentiated Scale)
Look at solute with TSS, PPT, and flow
## Family: lognormal
## Links: mu = identity; sigma = identity
## Formula: DOC_QC ~ scale(lag_C_PPT) + scale(tsf) + scale(flow_filled) + catchment + (1 | catchment:site)
## Data: data (Number of observations: 69)
## Draws: 3 chains, each with iter = 3000; warmup = 1500; thin = 1;
## total post-warmup draws = 4500
##
## Multilevel Hyperparameters:
## ~catchment:site (Number of levels: 4)
## Estimate Est.Error l-95% CI u-95% CI Rhat Bulk_ESS Tail_ESS
## sd(Intercept) 0.21 0.19 0.01 0.66 1.00 718 871
##
## Regression Coefficients:
## Estimate Est.Error l-95% CI u-95% CI Rhat Bulk_ESS Tail_ESS
## Intercept 0.91 0.19 0.50 1.29 1.00 1121 844
## scalelag_C_PPT 0.10 0.05 -0.01 0.21 1.00 3285 2752
## scaletsf 0.00 0.06 -0.12 0.12 1.00 3050 2933
## scaleflow_filled -0.04 0.09 -0.21 0.12 1.00 2561 2576
## catchmentwinters 0.04 0.27 -0.54 0.58 1.00 1393 1119
##
## Further Distributional Parameters:
## Estimate Est.Error l-95% CI u-95% CI Rhat Bulk_ESS Tail_ESS
## sigma 0.41 0.04 0.35 0.49 1.00 3248 2922
##
## Draws were sampled using sampling(NUTS). For each parameter, Bulk_ESS
## and Tail_ESS are effective sample size measures, and Rhat is the potential
## scale reduction factor on split chains (at convergence, Rhat = 1).
##
## Computed from 4500 by 69 log-likelihood matrix.
##
## Estimate SE
## elpd_loo -105.6 7.5
## p_loo 7.5 1.2
## looic 211.2 15.0
## ------
## MCSE of elpd_loo is 0.1.
## MCSE and ESS estimates assume MCMC draws (r_eff in [0.5, 1.0]).
##
## All Pareto k estimates are good (k < 0.7).
## See help('pareto-k-diagnostic') for details.
| term | estimate | l90 | u90 | estimate_exp | l90_exp | u90_exp | bayes_R2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| b_Intercept | Intercept | 0.91 | 0.61 | 1.22 | 2.49 | 1.84 | 3.38 | 0.14 |
| b_scalelag_C_PPT | scalelag_C_PPT | 0.10 | 0.01 | 0.19 | 1.11 | 1.01 | 1.21 | 0.14 |
| b_scaletsf | scaletsf | 0.00 | -0.10 | 0.10 | 1.00 | 0.91 | 1.10 | 0.14 |
| b_scaleflow_filled | scaleflow_filled | -0.04 | -0.18 | 0.10 | 0.96 | 0.83 | 1.10 | 0.14 |
| b_catchmentwinters | catchmentwinters | 0.04 | -0.41 | 0.47 | 1.04 | 0.67 | 1.60 | 0.14 |
DOC Model Effects (Log and Exponentiated Scale)
Look at solute with TSF, PPT, and flow
## Family: lognormal
## Links: mu = identity; sigma = identity
## Formula: TDN_QC ~ scale(lag_C_PPT) + scale(tsf) + scale(flow_filled) + catchment + (1 | catchment:site)
## Data: data (Number of observations: 69)
## Draws: 3 chains, each with iter = 3000; warmup = 1500; thin = 1;
## total post-warmup draws = 4500
##
## Multilevel Hyperparameters:
## ~catchment:site (Number of levels: 4)
## Estimate Est.Error l-95% CI u-95% CI Rhat Bulk_ESS Tail_ESS
## sd(Intercept) 0.42 0.31 0.04 1.30 1.00 697 756
##
## Regression Coefficients:
## Estimate Est.Error l-95% CI u-95% CI Rhat Bulk_ESS Tail_ESS
## Intercept -2.93 0.35 -3.70 -2.22 1.00 1428 1320
## scalelag_C_PPT 0.13 0.09 -0.05 0.31 1.00 3222 2367
## scaletsf -0.00 0.10 -0.21 0.19 1.00 1936 1685
## scaleflow_filled 0.20 0.15 -0.08 0.48 1.00 2016 2727
## catchmentwinters 0.27 0.46 -0.61 1.27 1.00 1453 1420
##
## Further Distributional Parameters:
## Estimate Est.Error l-95% CI u-95% CI Rhat Bulk_ESS Tail_ESS
## sigma 0.66 0.06 0.56 0.80 1.00 2264 2750
##
## Draws were sampled using sampling(NUTS). For each parameter, Bulk_ESS
## and Tail_ESS are effective sample size measures, and Rhat is the potential
## scale reduction factor on split chains (at convergence, Rhat = 1).
##
## Computed from 4500 by 69 log-likelihood matrix.
##
## Estimate SE
## elpd_loo 117.2 6.1
## p_loo 6.7 0.8
## looic -234.5 12.2
## ------
## MCSE of elpd_loo is 0.1.
## MCSE and ESS estimates assume MCMC draws (r_eff in [0.4, 1.1]).
##
## All Pareto k estimates are good (k < 0.7).
## See help('pareto-k-diagnostic') for details.
| term | estimate | l90 | u90 | estimate_exp | l90_exp | u90_exp | bayes_R2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| b_Intercept | Intercept | -2.93 | -3.52 | -2.38 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.09 | 0.31 |
| b_scalelag_C_PPT | scalelag_C_PPT | 0.13 | -0.01 | 0.28 | 1.14 | 0.99 | 1.33 | 0.31 |
| b_scaletsf | scaletsf | 0.00 | -0.17 | 0.16 | 1.00 | 0.84 | 1.18 | 0.31 |
| b_scaleflow_filled | scaleflow_filled | 0.20 | -0.04 | 0.44 | 1.23 | 0.96 | 1.55 | 0.31 |
| b_catchmentwinters | catchmentwinters | 0.27 | -0.46 | 1.04 | 1.30 | 0.63 | 2.83 | 0.31 |
TDN Model Effects (Log and Exponentiated Scale)
Look at solute with TSF, PPT, and flow
## Family: lognormal
## Links: mu = identity; sigma = identity
## Formula: PO4.P_QC ~ scale(lag_C_PPT) + scale(tsf) + scale(flow_filled) + catchment + (1 | catchment:site)
## Data: data (Number of observations: 55)
## Draws: 3 chains, each with iter = 3000; warmup = 1500; thin = 1;
## total post-warmup draws = 4500
##
## Multilevel Hyperparameters:
## ~catchment:site (Number of levels: 4)
## Estimate Est.Error l-95% CI u-95% CI Rhat Bulk_ESS Tail_ESS
## sd(Intercept) 0.27 0.27 0.01 1.05 1.00 461 220
##
## Regression Coefficients:
## Estimate Est.Error l-95% CI u-95% CI Rhat Bulk_ESS Tail_ESS
## Intercept -2.92 0.31 -3.52 -2.28 1.00 750 471
## scalelag_C_PPT 0.15 0.13 -0.10 0.41 1.00 1889 1863
## scaletsf -0.25 0.14 -0.51 0.02 1.00 1331 1539
## scaleflow_filled -0.20 0.18 -0.54 0.17 1.00 1558 954
## catchmentwinters -0.33 0.45 -1.28 0.54 1.01 470 171
##
## Further Distributional Parameters:
## Estimate Est.Error l-95% CI u-95% CI Rhat Bulk_ESS Tail_ESS
## sigma 0.83 0.09 0.68 1.03 1.00 1042 511
##
## Draws were sampled using sampling(NUTS). For each parameter, Bulk_ESS
## and Tail_ESS are effective sample size measures, and Rhat is the potential
## scale reduction factor on split chains (at convergence, Rhat = 1).
##
## Computed from 4500 by 55 log-likelihood matrix.
##
## Estimate SE
## elpd_loo 99.4 9.1
## p_loo 6.4 1.3
## looic -198.9 18.1
## ------
## MCSE of elpd_loo is 0.1.
## MCSE and ESS estimates assume MCMC draws (r_eff in [0.2, 0.9]).
##
## All Pareto k estimates are good (k < 0.7).
## See help('pareto-k-diagnostic') for details.
| term | estimate | l90 | u90 | estimate_exp | l90_exp | u90_exp | bayes_R2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| b_Intercept | Intercept | -2.92 | -3.42 | -2.43 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.09 | 0.13 |
| b_scalelag_C_PPT | scalelag_C_PPT | 0.15 | -0.06 | 0.36 | 1.16 | 0.94 | 1.44 | 0.13 |
| b_scaletsf | scaletsf | -0.25 | -0.47 | -0.02 | 0.78 | 0.62 | 0.98 | 0.13 |
| b_scaleflow_filled | scaleflow_filled | -0.20 | -0.50 | 0.11 | 0.82 | 0.61 | 1.11 | 0.13 |
| b_catchmentwinters | catchmentwinters | -0.33 | -1.05 | 0.40 | 0.72 | 0.35 | 1.49 | 0.13 |
PO4.P Model Effects (Log and Exponentiated Scale)
Look at solute with TSF, PPT, and flow
## Family: lognormal
## Links: mu = identity; sigma = identity
## Formula: Sr_QC ~ scale(lag_C_PPT) + scale(tsf) + scale(flow_filled) + catchment + (1 | catchment:site)
## Data: data (Number of observations: 69)
## Draws: 3 chains, each with iter = 3000; warmup = 1500; thin = 1;
## total post-warmup draws = 4500
##
## Multilevel Hyperparameters:
## ~catchment:site (Number of levels: 4)
## Estimate Est.Error l-95% CI u-95% CI Rhat Bulk_ESS Tail_ESS
## sd(Intercept) 0.15 0.11 0.01 0.43 1.00 796 1210
##
## Regression Coefficients:
## Estimate Est.Error l-95% CI u-95% CI Rhat Bulk_ESS Tail_ESS
## Intercept 4.83 0.13 4.53 5.10 1.00 1136 548
## scalelag_C_PPT 0.03 0.03 -0.03 0.08 1.00 2572 1871
## scaletsf 0.10 0.03 0.04 0.15 1.00 2339 2293
## scaleflow_filled 0.06 0.04 -0.02 0.14 1.00 2173 2217
## catchmentwinters -0.31 0.18 -0.69 0.07 1.01 1038 684
##
## Further Distributional Parameters:
## Estimate Est.Error l-95% CI u-95% CI Rhat Bulk_ESS Tail_ESS
## sigma 0.20 0.02 0.16 0.24 1.00 2715 2317
##
## Draws were sampled using sampling(NUTS). For each parameter, Bulk_ESS
## and Tail_ESS are effective sample size measures, and Rhat is the potential
## scale reduction factor on split chains (at convergence, Rhat = 1).
##
## Computed from 4500 by 69 log-likelihood matrix.
##
## Estimate SE
## elpd_loo -310.6 7.2
## p_loo 7.5 1.4
## looic 621.2 14.3
## ------
## MCSE of elpd_loo is 0.1.
## MCSE and ESS estimates assume MCMC draws (r_eff in [0.4, 0.9]).
##
## All Pareto k estimates are good (k < 0.7).
## See help('pareto-k-diagnostic') for details.
| term | estimate | l90 | u90 | estimate_exp | l90_exp | u90_exp | bayes_R2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| b_Intercept | Intercept | 4.83 | 4.60 | 5.03 | 124.83 | 99.17 | 153.37 | 0.56 |
| b_scalelag_C_PPT | scalelag_C_PPT | 0.03 | -0.02 | 0.07 | 1.03 | 0.98 | 1.07 | 0.56 |
| b_scaletsf | scaletsf | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.14 | 1.10 | 1.05 | 1.16 | 0.56 |
| b_scaleflow_filled | scaleflow_filled | 0.06 | -0.01 | 0.13 | 1.06 | 0.99 | 1.14 | 0.56 |
| b_catchmentwinters | catchmentwinters | -0.31 | -0.60 | 0.00 | 0.73 | 0.55 | 1.00 | 0.56 |
Sr Model Effects (Log and Exponentiated Scale)
Look at solute with TSF, PPT, and flow
## Family: lognormal
## Links: mu = identity; sigma = identity
## Formula: Fe_QC ~ scale(lag_C_PPT) + scale(tsf) + scale(flow_filled) + catchment + (1 | catchment:site)
## Data: data (Number of observations: 69)
## Draws: 3 chains, each with iter = 3000; warmup = 1500; thin = 1;
## total post-warmup draws = 4500
##
## Multilevel Hyperparameters:
## ~catchment:site (Number of levels: 4)
## Estimate Est.Error l-95% CI u-95% CI Rhat Bulk_ESS Tail_ESS
## sd(Intercept) 0.38 0.39 0.01 1.71 1.05 43 21
##
## Regression Coefficients:
## Estimate Est.Error l-95% CI u-95% CI Rhat Bulk_ESS Tail_ESS
## Intercept 5.45 0.33 4.74 6.05 1.01 269 566
## scalelag_C_PPT -0.09 0.10 -0.28 0.11 1.00 2544 3028
## scaletsf 0.56 0.11 0.35 0.78 1.01 2648 2956
## scaleflow_filled -0.58 0.16 -0.89 -0.27 1.00 1301 1815
## catchmentwinters 0.22 0.42 -0.58 1.10 1.02 164 331
##
## Further Distributional Parameters:
## Estimate Est.Error l-95% CI u-95% CI Rhat Bulk_ESS Tail_ESS
## sigma 0.76 0.07 0.63 0.92 1.00 360 131
##
## Draws were sampled using sampling(NUTS). For each parameter, Bulk_ESS
## and Tail_ESS are effective sample size measures, and Rhat is the potential
## scale reduction factor on split chains (at convergence, Rhat = 1).
##
## Computed from 4500 by 69 log-likelihood matrix.
##
## Estimate SE
## elpd_loo -466.9 8.6
## p_loo 7.3 1.3
## looic 933.9 17.1
## ------
## MCSE of elpd_loo is 0.1.
## MCSE and ESS estimates assume MCMC draws (r_eff in [0.1, 0.8]).
##
## All Pareto k estimates are good (k < 0.7).
## See help('pareto-k-diagnostic') for details.
| term | estimate | l90 | u90 | estimate_exp | l90_exp | u90_exp | bayes_R2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| b_Intercept | Intercept | 5.45 | 4.91 | 5.97 | 233.78 | 136.24 | 390.62 | 0.59 |
| b_scalelag_C_PPT | scalelag_C_PPT | -0.09 | -0.25 | 0.08 | 0.92 | 0.78 | 1.08 | 0.59 |
| b_scaletsf | scaletsf | 0.56 | 0.38 | 0.74 | 1.76 | 1.47 | 2.10 | 0.59 |
| b_scaleflow_filled | scaleflow_filled | -0.58 | -0.84 | -0.32 | 0.56 | 0.43 | 0.73 | 0.59 |
| b_catchmentwinters | catchmentwinters | 0.22 | -0.42 | 0.95 | 1.25 | 0.66 | 2.59 | 0.59 |
Fe Model Effects (Log and Exponentiated Scale)
Look at solute with TSF, PPT, and flow
## Family: lognormal
## Links: mu = identity; sigma = identity
## Formula: Mn_QC ~ scale(lag_C_PPT) + scale(tsf) + scale(flow_filled) + catchment + (1 | catchment:site)
## Data: data (Number of observations: 69)
## Draws: 3 chains, each with iter = 3000; warmup = 1500; thin = 1;
## total post-warmup draws = 4500
##
## Multilevel Hyperparameters:
## ~catchment:site (Number of levels: 4)
## Estimate Est.Error l-95% CI u-95% CI Rhat Bulk_ESS Tail_ESS
## sd(Intercept) 0.19 0.17 0.01 0.63 1.01 652 677
##
## Regression Coefficients:
## Estimate Est.Error l-95% CI u-95% CI Rhat Bulk_ESS Tail_ESS
## Intercept 2.60 0.19 2.15 2.98 1.00 754 478
## scalelag_C_PPT 0.23 0.05 0.13 0.33 1.00 2616 2668
## scaletsf 0.32 0.06 0.21 0.44 1.00 1619 2022
## scaleflow_filled -0.37 0.09 -0.54 -0.19 1.00 1463 1650
## catchmentwinters 0.08 0.27 -0.43 0.74 1.00 839 370
##
## Further Distributional Parameters:
## Estimate Est.Error l-95% CI u-95% CI Rhat Bulk_ESS Tail_ESS
## sigma 0.40 0.04 0.34 0.48 1.00 2220 2085
##
## Draws were sampled using sampling(NUTS). For each parameter, Bulk_ESS
## and Tail_ESS are effective sample size measures, and Rhat is the potential
## scale reduction factor on split chains (at convergence, Rhat = 1).
##
## Computed from 4500 by 69 log-likelihood matrix.
##
## Estimate SE
## elpd_loo -221.2 9.1
## p_loo 8.3 2.5
## looic 442.5 18.1
## ------
## MCSE of elpd_loo is 0.1.
## MCSE and ESS estimates assume MCMC draws (r_eff in [0.4, 0.9]).
##
## All Pareto k estimates are good (k < 0.7).
## See help('pareto-k-diagnostic') for details.
| term | estimate | l90 | u90 | estimate_exp | l90_exp | u90_exp | bayes_R2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| b_Intercept | Intercept | 2.60 | 2.25 | 2.89 | 13.46 | 9.47 | 18.06 | 0.68 |
| b_scalelag_C_PPT | scalelag_C_PPT | 0.23 | 0.15 | 0.32 | 1.26 | 1.16 | 1.37 | 0.68 |
| b_scaletsf | scaletsf | 0.32 | 0.23 | 0.43 | 1.38 | 1.26 | 1.53 | 0.68 |
| b_scaleflow_filled | scaleflow_filled | -0.37 | -0.51 | -0.22 | 0.69 | 0.60 | 0.80 | 0.68 |
| b_catchmentwinters | catchmentwinters | 0.08 | -0.32 | 0.57 | 1.09 | 0.73 | 1.77 | 0.68 |
Mn Model Effects (Log and Exponentiated Scale)
Look at solute with TSF, PPT, and flow
## Family: lognormal
## Links: mu = identity; sigma = identity
## Formula: Ba_QC ~ scale(lag_C_PPT) + scale(tsf) + scale(flow_filled) + catchment + (1 | catchment:site)
## Data: data (Number of observations: 69)
## Draws: 3 chains, each with iter = 3000; warmup = 1500; thin = 1;
## total post-warmup draws = 4500
##
## Multilevel Hyperparameters:
## ~catchment:site (Number of levels: 4)
## Estimate Est.Error l-95% CI u-95% CI Rhat Bulk_ESS Tail_ESS
## sd(Intercept) 0.20 0.15 0.01 0.60 1.01 490 933
##
## Regression Coefficients:
## Estimate Est.Error l-95% CI u-95% CI Rhat Bulk_ESS Tail_ESS
## Intercept 3.10 0.18 2.61 3.40 1.01 357 110
## scalelag_C_PPT 0.03 0.03 -0.04 0.09 1.00 2882 2787
## scaletsf 0.04 0.04 -0.04 0.11 1.00 2663 2927
## scaleflow_filled 0.11 0.05 0.00 0.22 1.00 2789 3066
## catchmentwinters -0.57 0.25 -0.99 0.12 1.01 326 111
##
## Further Distributional Parameters:
## Estimate Est.Error l-95% CI u-95% CI Rhat Bulk_ESS Tail_ESS
## sigma 0.26 0.02 0.22 0.31 1.00 2531 2776
##
## Draws were sampled using sampling(NUTS). For each parameter, Bulk_ESS
## and Tail_ESS are effective sample size measures, and Rhat is the potential
## scale reduction factor on split chains (at convergence, Rhat = 1).
##
## Computed from 4500 by 69 log-likelihood matrix.
##
## Estimate SE
## elpd_loo -199.0 7.6
## p_loo 7.2 1.2
## looic 398.1 15.2
## ------
## MCSE of elpd_loo is 0.1.
## MCSE and ESS estimates assume MCMC draws (r_eff in [0.5, 1.0]).
##
## All Pareto k estimates are good (k < 0.7).
## See help('pareto-k-diagnostic') for details.
## Estimate Est.Error Q2.5 Q97.5
## R2 0.614033 0.0577231 0.4935263 0.7126013
| term | estimate | l90 | u90 | estimate_exp | l90_exp | u90_exp | bayes_R2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| b_Intercept | Intercept | 3.10 | 2.78 | 3.34 | 22.10 | 16.20 | 28.17 | 0.61 |
| b_scalelag_C_PPT | scalelag_C_PPT | 0.03 | -0.03 | 0.08 | 1.03 | 0.97 | 1.09 | 0.61 |
| b_scaletsf | scaletsf | 0.04 | -0.02 | 0.10 | 1.04 | 0.98 | 1.11 | 0.61 |
| b_scaleflow_filled | scaleflow_filled | 0.11 | 0.02 | 0.20 | 1.12 | 1.02 | 1.22 | 0.61 |
| b_catchmentwinters | catchmentwinters | -0.57 | -0.91 | -0.13 | 0.56 | 0.40 | 0.88 | 0.61 |
Ba Model Effects (Log and Exponentiated Scale)
Look at solute with TSF, PPT, and flow
## Family: lognormal
## Links: mu = identity; sigma = identity
## Formula: Ca_QC ~ scale(lag_C_PPT) + scale(tsf) + scale(flow_filled) + catchment + (1 | catchment:site)
## Data: data (Number of observations: 69)
## Draws: 3 chains, each with iter = 3000; warmup = 1500; thin = 1;
## total post-warmup draws = 4500
##
## Multilevel Hyperparameters:
## ~catchment:site (Number of levels: 4)
## Estimate Est.Error l-95% CI u-95% CI Rhat Bulk_ESS Tail_ESS
## sd(Intercept) 0.21 0.17 0.03 0.75 1.00 295 123
##
## Regression Coefficients:
## Estimate Est.Error l-95% CI u-95% CI Rhat Bulk_ESS Tail_ESS
## Intercept 7.29 0.16 6.95 7.64 1.01 1523 1269
## scalelag_C_PPT -0.01 0.03 -0.08 0.05 1.01 489 139
## scaletsf 0.12 0.03 0.05 0.18 1.00 2489 2825
## scaleflow_filled -0.01 0.05 -0.11 0.10 1.00 760 303
## catchmentwinters -0.18 0.23 -0.64 0.30 1.00 648 193
##
## Further Distributional Parameters:
## Estimate Est.Error l-95% CI u-95% CI Rhat Bulk_ESS Tail_ESS
## sigma 0.23 0.02 0.19 0.27 1.00 2694 2779
##
## Draws were sampled using sampling(NUTS). For each parameter, Bulk_ESS
## and Tail_ESS are effective sample size measures, and Rhat is the potential
## scale reduction factor on split chains (at convergence, Rhat = 1).
##
## Computed from 4500 by 69 log-likelihood matrix.
##
## Estimate SE
## elpd_loo -495.9 6.3
## p_loo 7.5 1.4
## looic 991.9 12.5
## ------
## MCSE of elpd_loo is 0.1.
## MCSE and ESS estimates assume MCMC draws (r_eff in [0.1, 1.0]).
##
## All Pareto k estimates are good (k < 0.7).
## See help('pareto-k-diagnostic') for details.
| term | estimate | l90 | u90 | estimate_exp | l90_exp | u90_exp | bayes_R2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| b_Intercept | Intercept | 7.29 | 7.03 | 7.54 | 1463.68 | 1126.52 | 1886.12 | 0.36 |
| b_scalelag_C_PPT | scalelag_C_PPT | -0.01 | -0.07 | 0.04 | 0.99 | 0.94 | 1.04 | 0.36 |
| b_scaletsf | scaletsf | 0.12 | 0.06 | 0.17 | 1.12 | 1.06 | 1.19 | 0.36 |
| b_scaleflow_filled | scaleflow_filled | -0.01 | -0.09 | 0.08 | 0.99 | 0.91 | 1.09 | 0.36 |
| b_catchmentwinters | catchmentwinters | -0.18 | -0.58 | 0.20 | 0.84 | 0.56 | 1.22 | 0.36 |
Ca Model Effects (Log and Exponentiated Scale)
Look at solute with TSF, PPT, and flow
## Family: lognormal
## Links: mu = identity; sigma = identity
## Formula: Al_QC ~ scale(lag_C_PPT) + scale(tsf) + scale(flow_filled) + catchment + (1 | catchment:site)
## Data: data (Number of observations: 69)
## Draws: 3 chains, each with iter = 3000; warmup = 1500; thin = 1;
## total post-warmup draws = 4500
##
## Multilevel Hyperparameters:
## ~catchment:site (Number of levels: 4)
## Estimate Est.Error l-95% CI u-95% CI Rhat Bulk_ESS Tail_ESS
## sd(Intercept) 0.23 0.22 0.01 0.87 1.01 637 702
##
## Regression Coefficients:
## Estimate Est.Error l-95% CI u-95% CI Rhat Bulk_ESS Tail_ESS
## Intercept 1.17 0.27 0.66 1.73 1.00 1186 882
## scalelag_C_PPT 0.02 0.10 -0.18 0.22 1.00 2761 2644
## scaletsf 0.26 0.11 0.04 0.48 1.00 2376 2307
## scaleflow_filled 0.26 0.16 -0.05 0.56 1.00 1636 2189
## catchmentwinters 0.79 0.37 -0.00 1.49 1.00 1209 814
##
## Further Distributional Parameters:
## Estimate Est.Error l-95% CI u-95% CI Rhat Bulk_ESS Tail_ESS
## sigma 0.77 0.07 0.65 0.92 1.00 3358 2917
##
## Draws were sampled using sampling(NUTS). For each parameter, Bulk_ESS
## and Tail_ESS are effective sample size measures, and Rhat is the potential
## scale reduction factor on split chains (at convergence, Rhat = 1).
##
## Computed from 4500 by 69 log-likelihood matrix.
##
## Estimate SE
## elpd_loo -195.6 7.6
## p_loo 6.5 1.3
## looic 391.3 15.1
## ------
## MCSE of elpd_loo is 0.1.
## MCSE and ESS estimates assume MCMC draws (r_eff in [0.5, 1.1]).
##
## All Pareto k estimates are good (k < 0.7).
## See help('pareto-k-diagnostic') for details.
| term | estimate | l90 | u90 | estimate_exp | l90_exp | u90_exp | bayes_R2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| b_Intercept | Intercept | 1.17 | 0.76 | 1.61 | 3.23 | 2.14 | 5.02 | 0.25 |
| b_scalelag_C_PPT | scalelag_C_PPT | 0.02 | -0.15 | 0.18 | 1.02 | 0.86 | 1.20 | 0.25 |
| b_scaletsf | scaletsf | 0.26 | 0.08 | 0.45 | 1.30 | 1.08 | 1.57 | 0.25 |
| b_scaleflow_filled | scaleflow_filled | 0.26 | -0.01 | 0.51 | 1.30 | 0.99 | 1.67 | 0.25 |
| b_catchmentwinters | catchmentwinters | 0.79 | 0.13 | 1.37 | 2.20 | 1.14 | 3.93 | 0.25 |
Al Model Effects (Log and Exponentiated Scale)
Look at solute with TSF, PPT, and flow
## Family: lognormal
## Links: mu = identity; sigma = identity
## Formula: As_QC ~ scale(lag_C_PPT) + scale(tsf) + scale(flow_filled) + catchment + (1 | catchment:site)
## Data: data (Number of observations: 69)
## Draws: 3 chains, each with iter = 3000; warmup = 1500; thin = 1;
## total post-warmup draws = 4500
##
## Multilevel Hyperparameters:
## ~catchment:site (Number of levels: 4)
## Estimate Est.Error l-95% CI u-95% CI Rhat Bulk_ESS Tail_ESS
## sd(Intercept) 0.18 0.17 0.01 0.63 1.00 909 1088
##
## Regression Coefficients:
## Estimate Est.Error l-95% CI u-95% CI Rhat Bulk_ESS Tail_ESS
## Intercept -1.77 0.20 -2.20 -1.36 1.00 1025 592
## scalelag_C_PPT -0.06 0.07 -0.19 0.07 1.00 2568 3018
## scaletsf -0.01 0.07 -0.16 0.13 1.00 2138 2305
## scaleflow_filled -0.14 0.10 -0.35 0.07 1.00 1810 1610
## catchmentwinters -0.16 0.28 -0.74 0.39 1.00 1239 882
##
## Further Distributional Parameters:
## Estimate Est.Error l-95% CI u-95% CI Rhat Bulk_ESS Tail_ESS
## sigma 0.52 0.05 0.44 0.62 1.00 3149 2924
##
## Draws were sampled using sampling(NUTS). For each parameter, Bulk_ESS
## and Tail_ESS are effective sample size measures, and Rhat is the potential
## scale reduction factor on split chains (at convergence, Rhat = 1).
##
## Computed from 4500 by 69 log-likelihood matrix.
##
## Estimate SE
## elpd_loo 72.5 5.9
## p_loo 6.7 1.3
## looic -144.9 11.8
## ------
## MCSE of elpd_loo is 0.1.
## MCSE and ESS estimates assume MCMC draws (r_eff in [0.5, 1.0]).
##
## All Pareto k estimates are good (k < 0.7).
## See help('pareto-k-diagnostic') for details.
| term | estimate | l90 | u90 | estimate_exp | l90_exp | u90_exp | bayes_R2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| b_Intercept | Intercept | -1.77 | -2.08 | -1.45 | 0.17 | 0.12 | 0.23 | 0.14 |
| b_scalelag_C_PPT | scalelag_C_PPT | -0.06 | -0.17 | 0.05 | 0.94 | 0.84 | 1.05 | 0.14 |
| b_scaletsf | scaletsf | -0.01 | -0.14 | 0.11 | 0.99 | 0.87 | 1.11 | 0.14 |
| b_scaleflow_filled | scaleflow_filled | -0.14 | -0.31 | 0.03 | 0.87 | 0.73 | 1.03 | 0.14 |
| b_catchmentwinters | catchmentwinters | -0.16 | -0.59 | 0.29 | 0.85 | 0.55 | 1.34 | 0.14 |
Al Model Effects (Log and Exponentiated Scale)
## R version 4.4.2 (2024-10-31)
## Platform: aarch64-apple-darwin20
## Running under: macOS Sequoia 15.7.4
##
## Matrix products: default
## BLAS: /Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/4.4-arm64/Resources/lib/libRblas.0.dylib
## LAPACK: /Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/4.4-arm64/Resources/lib/libRlapack.dylib; LAPACK version 3.12.0
##
## locale:
## [1] en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/C/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8
##
## time zone: America/Los_Angeles
## tzcode source: internal
##
## attached base packages:
## [1] stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods base
##
## other attached packages:
## [1] broom_1.0.7 slider_0.3.3
## [3] kableExtra_1.4.0 knitr_1.50
## [5] ggpmisc_0.6.3 ggpp_0.5.9
## [7] ggpubr_0.6.0 cowplot_1.1.3
## [9] viridis_0.6.5 viridisLite_0.4.2
## [11] dataRetrieval_2.7.17 readxl_1.4.3
## [13] loo_2.8.0 PerformanceAnalytics_2.0.8
## [15] xts_0.14.1 zoo_1.8-12
## [17] MuMIn_1.48.4 brms_2.22.0
## [19] Rcpp_1.1.0 lmerTest_3.1-3
## [21] lme4_1.1-35.5 Matrix_1.7-1
## [23] here_1.0.1 lubridate_1.9.4
## [25] forcats_1.0.0 stringr_1.5.1
## [27] dplyr_1.1.4 purrr_1.1.0
## [29] readr_2.1.5 tidyr_1.3.1
## [31] tibble_3.3.0 ggplot2_3.5.2
## [33] tidyverse_2.0.0
##
## loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
## [1] RColorBrewer_1.1-3 tensorA_0.36.2.1 rstudioapi_0.17.1
## [4] jsonlite_2.0.0 magrittr_2.0.3 TH.data_1.1-2
## [7] estimability_1.5.1 farver_2.1.2 nloptr_2.1.1
## [10] rmarkdown_2.29 ragg_1.3.3 vctrs_0.6.5
## [13] minqa_1.2.8 rstatix_0.7.2 htmltools_0.5.8.1
## [16] polynom_1.4-1 curl_7.0.0 distributional_0.5.0
## [19] cellranger_1.1.0 Formula_1.2-5 StanHeaders_2.32.10
## [22] sass_0.4.10 KernSmooth_2.23-24 bslib_0.9.0
## [25] plyr_1.8.9 sandwich_3.1-1 emmeans_1.10.6
## [28] cachem_1.1.0 lifecycle_1.0.4 pkgconfig_2.0.3
## [31] R6_2.6.1 fastmap_1.2.0 digest_0.6.37
## [34] numDeriv_2016.8-1.1 colorspace_2.1-1 rprojroot_2.1.1
## [37] warp_0.2.2 textshaping_0.4.1 labeling_0.4.3
## [40] timechange_0.3.0 abind_1.4-8 compiler_4.4.2
## [43] proxy_0.4-27 bit64_4.5.2 withr_3.0.2
## [46] inline_0.3.20 backports_1.5.0 carData_3.0-5
## [49] DBI_1.2.3 QuickJSR_1.4.0 pkgbuild_1.4.8
## [52] ggsignif_0.6.4 MASS_7.3-61 quantreg_6.1
## [55] classInt_0.4-11 tools_4.4.2 units_0.8-7
## [58] glue_1.8.0 quadprog_1.5-8 nlme_3.1-166
## [61] grid_4.4.2 sf_1.0-21 checkmate_2.3.2
## [64] reshape2_1.4.4 generics_0.1.4 gtable_0.3.6
## [67] tzdb_0.4.0 class_7.3-22 hms_1.1.3
## [70] xml2_1.4.0 car_3.1-3 pillar_1.11.0
## [73] vroom_1.6.5 posterior_1.6.0 splines_4.4.2
## [76] lattice_0.22-6 survival_3.7-0 bit_4.5.0.1
## [79] SparseM_1.84-2 tidyselect_1.2.1 gridExtra_2.3
## [82] V8_6.0.0 svglite_2.1.3 stats4_4.4.2
## [85] xfun_0.53 bridgesampling_1.1-2 matrixStats_1.4.1
## [88] rstan_2.32.6 stringi_1.8.7 yaml_2.3.10
## [91] boot_1.3-31 evaluate_1.0.5 codetools_0.2-20
## [94] cli_3.6.5 RcppParallel_5.1.9 xtable_1.8-4
## [97] systemfonts_1.1.0 jquerylib_0.1.4 dichromat_2.0-0.1
## [100] coda_0.19-4.1 parallel_4.4.2 rstantools_2.4.0
## [103] MatrixModels_0.5-3 bayesplot_1.11.1 Brobdingnag_1.2-9
## [106] mvtnorm_1.3-2 scales_1.4.0 e1071_1.7-16
## [109] crayon_1.5.3 rlang_1.1.6 multcomp_1.4-26