HW 7 data 101

Author

Kenneth

Question 1

  1. Many high school students take the AP tests in different subject areas. In 2017, of the 144,790 students who took the biology exam 84,200 of them were female. In that same year, of the 211,693 students who took the calculus AB exam 102,598 of them were female. Is there enough evidence to show that the proportion of female students taking the biology exam is higher than the proportion of female students taking the calculus AB exam? Test at the 5% level.

Hypotheses

α = 0.05

Ho= P1 = P2,

Ha= P1 > P2

P1= is the proportion of students who took the biology exam

P2 = is the proportion of students who took the calculus AB exam.

prop.test(c(84200, 102598), c(144790, 211693), alternative = "greater")

    2-sample test for equality of proportions with continuity correction

data:  c(84200, 102598) out of c(144790, 211693)
X-squared = 3234.9, df = 1, p-value < 2.2e-16
alternative hypothesis: greater
95 percent confidence interval:
 0.09408942 1.00000000
sample estimates:
   prop 1    prop 2 
0.5815319 0.4846547 

The p-value is < 2.2e-16, meaning that we will reject the null. This test gives us very strong evidence that the proportion of female students taking the biology exam is higher than the proportion of female students taking the calculus AB exam.

Question 2

  1. A vitamin K shot is given to infants soon after birth. The study is to see if how they handle the infants could reduce the pain the infants feel. One of the measurements taken was how long, in seconds, the infant cried after being given the shot. A random sample was taken from the group that was given the shot using conventional methods, and a random sample was taken from the group that was given the shot where the mother held the infant prior to and during the shot. Is there enough evidence to show that infants cried less on average when they are held by their mothers than if held using conventional methods? Test at the 5% level.

α = 0.05

Ho= μm = μc

Ha = μm < μc

μm = is the average time an infant cried while being held by their mom

μc = is the average time an infant cried during conventional method

conventional <- c(63, 0, 2, 46, 33, 33, 29, 23, 11, 12, 48, 15, 33, 14, 51, 37, 24, 70, 63, 0, 73, 39, 54, 52, 39, 34, 30, 55, 58, 18)
mom_holding <- c(0, 32, 20, 23, 14, 19, 60, 59, 64, 64, 72, 50, 44, 14, 10, 58, 19, 41, 17, 5, 36, 73, 19, 46, 9, 43, 73, 27, 25, 18)
t.test(mom_holding, conventional, alternative = "greater")

    Welch Two Sample t-test

data:  mom_holding and conventional
t = -0.029953, df = 57.707, p-value = 0.5119
alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is greater than 0
95 percent confidence interval:
 -9.468337       Inf
sample estimates:
mean of x mean of y 
 35.13333  35.30000 

The p-value is .5119 which is higher than .05, making it where we fail to reject the null. There is not enough evidence to suggests infants cried less when they were held by their mothers than the conventional methods. We still won’t accept the null hypotheses.