1 Purpose

This report prepares the Ames housing data for regression modeling without fitting a final predictive model. The emphasis is on disciplined data preparation: profiling, cleaning, missingness assessment, validation checks, outlier handling for regression, transformation planning, scaling, normality checks, and feature engineering. A particular focus is placed on the 30 strongest numeric features correlated with SalePrice, along with binning neighborhoods into a regression-ready grouping.

2 Why this matters

Regression quality depends heavily on the quality and structure of the data going into the model. If data are not profiled, cleaned, validated, and transformed appropriately, coefficient estimates and predictions can become unstable, biased, or misleading. This report therefore treats data preparation as a first-class modeling step.

3 Packages

# Install these if needed:
# install.packages(c(
#   "readxl","dplyr","ggplot2","tidyr","stringr","purrr","skimr",
#   "DataExplorer","naniar","corrplot","moments","forcats","scales","knitr"
# ))

library(readxl)
library(dplyr)
library(ggplot2)
library(tidyr)
library(stringr)
library(purrr)
library(skimr)
library(DataExplorer)
library(naniar)
library(corrplot)
library(moments)
library(forcats)
library(scales)
library(knitr)

4 1. Load the data

This section imports the Ames data and standardizes column names so that later code is easier to write and less error-prone.

# Update the path only if needed
ames <- read_excel("ames_housing_data.xlsx")

# Standardize names for cleaner coding
names(ames) <- make.names(names(ames))

# Basic structure checks
dim(ames)
## [1] 2930   82
names(ames)[1:15]
##  [1] "SID"          "PID"          "SubClass"     "Zoning"       "LotFrontage" 
##  [6] "LotArea"      "Street"       "Alley"        "LotShape"     "LandContour" 
## [11] "Utilities"    "LotConfig"    "LandSlope"    "Neighborhood" "Condition1"
head(ames, 3)
## # A tibble: 3 × 82
##     SID       PID SubClass Zoning LotFrontage LotArea Street Alley LotShape
##   <dbl>     <dbl>    <dbl> <chr>        <dbl>   <dbl> <chr>  <chr> <chr>   
## 1     1 526301100       20 RL             141   31770 Pave   NA    IR1     
## 2     2 526350040       20 RH              80   11622 Pave   NA    Reg     
## 3     3 526351010       20 RL              81   14267 Pave   NA    IR1     
## # ℹ 73 more variables: LandContour <chr>, Utilities <chr>, LotConfig <chr>,
## #   LandSlope <chr>, Neighborhood <chr>, Condition1 <chr>, Condition2 <chr>,
## #   BldgType <chr>, HouseStyle <chr>, OverallQual <dbl>, OverallCond <dbl>,
## #   YearBuilt <dbl>, YearRemodel <dbl>, RoofStyle <chr>, RoofMat <chr>,
## #   Exterior1 <chr>, Exterior2 <chr>, MasVnrType <chr>, MasVnrArea <dbl>,
## #   ExterQual <chr>, ExterCond <chr>, Foundation <chr>, BsmtQual <chr>,
## #   BsmtCond <chr>, BsmtExposure <chr>, BsmtFinType1 <chr>, BsmtFinSF1 <dbl>, …

4.1 Insights

cat(
  paste0(
    "- The raw dataset contains **", nrow(ames), "** rows and **", ncol(ames), "** columns.\n",
    "- Standardizing the column names early helps avoid later coding problems due to spaces or punctuation.\n",
    "- The data include a mix of numeric, ordinal, and nominal fields, so regression preparation must treat variables differently depending on type.\n"
  )
)
  • The raw dataset contains 2930 rows and 82 columns.
  • Standardizing the column names early helps avoid later coding problems due to spaces or punctuation.
  • The data include a mix of numeric, ordinal, and nominal fields, so regression preparation must treat variables differently depending on type.

5 2. Data profiling

Profiling gives a broad overview of structure, variable types, ranges, and missingness patterns before any filtering or feature engineering.

# Compact profiling summary
skim(ames)
Data summary
Name ames
Number of rows 2930
Number of columns 82
_______________________
Column type frequency:
character 43
numeric 39
________________________
Group variables None

Variable type: character

skim_variable n_missing complete_rate min max empty n_unique whitespace
Zoning 0 1.00 2 7 0 7 0
Street 0 1.00 4 4 0 2 0
Alley 0 1.00 2 4 0 3 0
LotShape 0 1.00 3 3 0 4 0
LandContour 0 1.00 3 3 0 4 0
Utilities 0 1.00 6 6 0 3 0
LotConfig 0 1.00 3 7 0 5 0
LandSlope 0 1.00 3 3 0 3 0
Neighborhood 0 1.00 5 7 0 28 0
Condition1 0 1.00 4 6 0 9 0
Condition2 0 1.00 4 6 0 8 0
BldgType 0 1.00 4 6 0 5 0
HouseStyle 0 1.00 4 6 0 8 0
RoofStyle 0 1.00 3 7 0 6 0
RoofMat 0 1.00 4 7 0 8 0
Exterior1 0 1.00 5 7 0 16 0
Exterior2 0 1.00 5 7 0 17 0
MasVnrType 23 0.99 4 7 0 5 0
ExterQual 0 1.00 2 2 0 4 0
ExterCond 0 1.00 2 2 0 5 0
Foundation 0 1.00 4 6 0 6 0
BsmtQual 1 1.00 2 2 0 6 0
BsmtCond 1 1.00 2 2 0 6 0
BsmtExposure 4 1.00 2 2 0 5 0
BsmtFinType1 1 1.00 2 3 0 7 0
BsmtFinType2 2 1.00 2 3 0 7 0
Heating 0 1.00 4 5 0 6 0
HeatingQC 0 1.00 2 2 0 5 0
CentralAir 0 1.00 1 1 0 2 0
Electrical 1 1.00 3 5 0 5 0
KitchenQual 0 1.00 2 2 0 5 0
Functional 0 1.00 3 4 0 8 0
FireplaceQu 0 1.00 2 2 0 6 0
GarageType 0 1.00 2 7 0 7 0
GarageFinish 2 1.00 2 3 0 4 0
GarageQual 1 1.00 2 2 0 6 0
GarageCond 1 1.00 2 2 0 6 0
PavedDrive 0 1.00 1 1 0 3 0
PoolQC 0 1.00 2 2 0 5 0
Fence 0 1.00 2 5 0 5 0
MiscFeature 0 1.00 2 4 0 6 0
SaleType 0 1.00 2 5 0 10 0
SaleCondition 0 1.00 6 7 0 6 0

Variable type: numeric

skim_variable n_missing complete_rate mean sd p0 p25 p50 p75 p100 hist
SID 0 1.00 1465.50 845.96 1 733.25 1465.5 2197.75 2930 ▇▇▇▇▇
PID 0 1.00 714464496.99 188730844.65 526301100 528477022.50 535453620.0 907181097.50 1007100110 ▇▁▁▆▂
SubClass 0 1.00 57.39 42.64 20 20.00 50.0 70.00 190 ▇▅▂▁▁
LotFrontage 490 0.83 69.22 23.37 21 58.00 68.0 80.00 313 ▇▃▁▁▁
LotArea 0 1.00 10147.92 7880.02 1300 7440.25 9436.5 11555.25 215245 ▇▁▁▁▁
OverallQual 0 1.00 6.09 1.41 1 5.00 6.0 7.00 10 ▁▂▇▅▁
OverallCond 0 1.00 5.56 1.11 1 5.00 5.0 6.00 9 ▁▁▇▅▁
YearBuilt 0 1.00 1971.36 30.25 1872 1954.00 1973.0 2001.00 2010 ▁▂▃▆▇
YearRemodel 0 1.00 1984.27 20.86 1950 1965.00 1993.0 2004.00 2010 ▅▂▂▃▇
MasVnrArea 23 0.99 101.90 179.11 0 0.00 0.0 164.00 1600 ▇▁▁▁▁
BsmtFinSF1 1 1.00 442.63 455.59 0 0.00 370.0 734.00 5644 ▇▁▁▁▁
BsmtFinSF2 1 1.00 49.72 169.17 0 0.00 0.0 0.00 1526 ▇▁▁▁▁
BsmtUnfSF 1 1.00 559.26 439.49 0 219.00 466.0 802.00 2336 ▇▅▂▁▁
TotalBsmtSF 1 1.00 1051.61 440.62 0 793.00 990.0 1302.00 6110 ▇▃▁▁▁
FirstFlrSF 0 1.00 1159.56 391.89 334 876.25 1084.0 1384.00 5095 ▇▃▁▁▁
SecondFlrSF 0 1.00 335.46 428.40 0 0.00 0.0 703.75 2065 ▇▃▂▁▁
LowQualFinSF 0 1.00 4.68 46.31 0 0.00 0.0 0.00 1064 ▇▁▁▁▁
GrLivArea 0 1.00 1499.69 505.51 334 1126.00 1442.0 1742.75 5642 ▇▇▁▁▁
BsmtFullBath 2 1.00 0.43 0.52 0 0.00 0.0 1.00 3 ▇▆▁▁▁
BsmtHalfBath 2 1.00 0.06 0.25 0 0.00 0.0 0.00 2 ▇▁▁▁▁
FullBath 0 1.00 1.57 0.55 0 1.00 2.0 2.00 4 ▁▇▇▁▁
HalfBath 0 1.00 0.38 0.50 0 0.00 0.0 1.00 2 ▇▁▅▁▁
BedroomAbvGr 0 1.00 2.85 0.83 0 2.00 3.0 3.00 8 ▁▇▂▁▁
KitchenAbvGr 0 1.00 1.04 0.21 0 1.00 1.0 1.00 3 ▁▇▁▁▁
TotRmsAbvGrd 0 1.00 6.44 1.57 2 5.00 6.0 7.00 15 ▁▇▂▁▁
Fireplaces 0 1.00 0.60 0.65 0 0.00 1.0 1.00 4 ▇▇▁▁▁
GarageYrBlt 159 0.95 1978.13 25.53 1895 1960.00 1979.0 2002.00 2207 ▂▇▁▁▁
GarageCars 1 1.00 1.77 0.76 0 1.00 2.0 2.00 5 ▅▇▂▁▁
GarageArea 1 1.00 472.82 215.05 0 320.00 480.0 576.00 1488 ▃▇▃▁▁
WoodDeckSF 0 1.00 93.75 126.36 0 0.00 0.0 168.00 1424 ▇▁▁▁▁
OpenPorchSF 0 1.00 47.53 67.48 0 0.00 27.0 70.00 742 ▇▁▁▁▁
EnclosedPorch 0 1.00 23.01 64.14 0 0.00 0.0 0.00 1012 ▇▁▁▁▁
ThreeSsnPorch 0 1.00 2.59 25.14 0 0.00 0.0 0.00 508 ▇▁▁▁▁
ScreenPorch 0 1.00 16.00 56.09 0 0.00 0.0 0.00 576 ▇▁▁▁▁
PoolArea 0 1.00 2.24 35.60 0 0.00 0.0 0.00 800 ▇▁▁▁▁
MiscVal 0 1.00 50.64 566.34 0 0.00 0.0 0.00 17000 ▇▁▁▁▁
MoSold 0 1.00 6.22 2.71 1 4.00 6.0 8.00 12 ▅▆▇▃▃
YrSold 0 1.00 2007.79 1.32 2006 2007.00 2008.0 2009.00 2010 ▇▇▇▇▃
SalePrice 0 1.00 180796.06 79886.69 12789 129500.00 160000.0 213500.00 755000 ▇▇▁▁▁
# Global profiling visuals
plot_intro(ames)

plot_missing(ames)

5.1 Insights

num_cols <- sum(sapply(ames, is.numeric))
cat_cols <- ncol(ames) - num_cols
cat(
  paste0(
    "- The dataset contains **", num_cols, "** numeric columns and **", cat_cols, "** non-numeric columns.\n",
    "- Profiling is important because regression preparation depends on identifying which variables are continuous, discrete, ordinal, or nominal.\n",
    "- Missingness is not random in this dataset for some housing attributes, so it should be studied before imputation or row removal.\n"
  )
)
  • The dataset contains 39 numeric columns and 43 non-numeric columns.
  • Profiling is important because regression preparation depends on identifying which variables are continuous, discrete, ordinal, or nominal.
  • Missingness is not random in this dataset for some housing attributes, so it should be studied before imputation or row removal.

6 3. Initial feature engineering for survey purposes

Before filtering, create a few derived variables that are useful for data understanding and later regression preparation.

ames <- ames %>%
  mutate(
    TotalFloorSF = FirstFlrSF + SecondFlrSF,
    HouseAge = YrSold - YearBuilt,
    RemodAge = YrSold - YearRemodel,
    TotalBath = FullBath + HalfBath * 0.5 + BsmtFullBath + BsmtHalfBath * 0.5,
    QualityIndex = OverallQual * OverallCond,
    GarageAge = ifelse(is.na(GarageYrBlt), NA, YrSold - GarageYrBlt),
    TotalPorchSF = OpenPorchSF + EnclosedPorch  + ScreenPorch,
    TotalOutdoorSF = WoodDeckSF + OpenPorchSF + EnclosedPorch + ScreenPorch,
    logSalePrice = log(SalePrice)
  )

summary(select(ames, SalePrice, logSalePrice, TotalFloorSF, HouseAge, RemodAge, TotalBath, QualityIndex))
##    SalePrice       logSalePrice     TotalFloorSF     HouseAge     
##  Min.   : 12789   Min.   : 9.456   Min.   : 334   Min.   : -1.00  
##  1st Qu.:129500   1st Qu.:11.771   1st Qu.:1120   1st Qu.:  7.00  
##  Median :160000   Median :11.983   Median :1440   Median : 34.00  
##  Mean   :180796   Mean   :12.021   Mean   :1495   Mean   : 36.43  
##  3rd Qu.:213500   3rd Qu.:12.271   3rd Qu.:1740   3rd Qu.: 54.00  
##  Max.   :755000   Max.   :13.534   Max.   :5642   Max.   :136.00  
##                                                                   
##     RemodAge       TotalBath      QualityIndex  
##  Min.   :-2.00   Min.   :1.000   Min.   : 1.00  
##  1st Qu.: 4.00   1st Qu.:1.500   1st Qu.:30.00  
##  Median :15.00   Median :2.000   Median :35.00  
##  Mean   :23.52   Mean   :2.218   Mean   :33.76  
##  3rd Qu.:42.75   3rd Qu.:2.500   3rd Qu.:40.00  
##  Max.   :60.00   Max.   :7.000   Max.   :90.00  
##                  NA's   :2

6.1 Insights

cat(
  "- Derived variables often capture housing value more directly than raw variables alone.\n",
  "- `TotalFloorSF`, `HouseAge`, `TotalBath`, and `QualityIndex` are especially useful because they summarize physical size, age, utility, and construction quality.\n",
  "- `logSalePrice` is created now because home prices are commonly right-skewed, and log-transformation is often useful in regression preparation.\n"
)
  • Derived variables often capture housing value more directly than raw variables alone.
  • TotalFloorSF, HouseAge, TotalBath, and QualityIndex are especially useful because they summarize physical size, age, utility, and construction quality.
  • logSalePrice is created now because home prices are commonly right-skewed, and log-transformation is often useful in regression preparation.

7 4. Define the regression sample

The goal here is not to keep every sale, but to define a cleaner sample for modeling typical residential transactions.

n0 <- nrow(ames)

sample_df <- ames

# Keep single-family homes only
drop1 <- sample_df %>% filter(BldgType != "1Fam")
sample_df <- sample_df %>% filter(BldgType == "1Fam")
after1 <- nrow(sample_df)

# Remove very large homes as recommended by the Ames documentation
drop2 <- sample_df %>% filter(GrLivArea > 4000)
sample_df <- sample_df %>% filter(GrLivArea <= 4000)
after2 <- nrow(sample_df)

# Remove atypical sale conditions
drop3 <- sample_df %>% filter(SaleCondition %in% c("Partial", "Family", "Abnorml", "Alloca", "AdjLand"))
sample_df <- sample_df %>% filter(!SaleCondition %in% c("Partial", "Family", "Abnorml", "Alloca", "AdjLand"))
after3 <- nrow(sample_df)

# Remove missing or nonpositive sale price
drop4 <- sample_df %>% filter(is.na(SalePrice) | SalePrice <= 0)
sample_df <- sample_df %>% filter(!is.na(SalePrice), SalePrice > 0)
after4 <- nrow(sample_df)

waterfall <- tibble(
  Step = c(
    "Original data",
    "Keep only BldgType = 1Fam",
    "Remove GrLivArea > 4000",
    "Remove atypical sale conditions",
    "Remove missing/nonpositive SalePrice",
    "Final sample"
  ),
  Count = c(n0, after1, after2, after3, after4, nrow(sample_df))
)

kable(waterfall)
Step Count
Original data 2930
Keep only BldgType = 1Fam 2425
Remove GrLivArea > 4000 2420
Remove atypical sale conditions 2001
Remove missing/nonpositive SalePrice 2001
Final sample 2001
ggplot(waterfall, aes(x = reorder(Step, -seq_along(Step)), y = Count)) +
  geom_col(fill = "steelblue") +
  geom_text(aes(label = comma(Count)), vjust = -0.3, size = 3.5) +
  labs(
    title = "Sample Definition Waterfall",
    x = NULL,
    y = "Count"
  ) +
  theme_minimal() +
  theme(axis.text.x = element_text(angle = 25, hjust = 1))

7.1 Insights

cat(
  paste0(
    "- The filtered regression sample contains **", nrow(sample_df), "** observations.\n",
    "- These drop conditions improve comparability by focusing on typical single-family residential sales.\n",
    "- Outlier removal at this stage is not arbitrary; it is tied to the practical modeling objective of valuing typical homes rather than every possible transaction type.\n"
  )
)
  • The filtered regression sample contains 2001 observations.
  • These drop conditions improve comparability by focusing on typical single-family residential sales.
  • Outlier removal at this stage is not arbitrary; it is tied to the practical modeling objective of valuing typical homes rather than every possible transaction type.

8 5. Data missingness

Missingness should be examined before imputation decisions are made. Some missing values in Ames mean “not present” rather than “unknown.”

missing_tbl <- tibble(
  Variable = names(sample_df),
  MissingN = sapply(sample_df, function(x) sum(is.na(x))),
  MissingPct = sapply(sample_df, function(x) mean(is.na(x)) * 100)
) %>%
  arrange(desc(MissingPct))

kable(head(missing_tbl, 20), digits = 2)
Variable MissingN MissingPct
LotFrontage 386 19.29
GarageYrBlt 74 3.70
GarageAge 74 3.70
MasVnrType 11 0.55
MasVnrArea 11 0.55
BsmtExposure 2 0.10
BsmtFinType2 1 0.05
Electrical 1 0.05
BsmtFullBath 1 0.05
BsmtHalfBath 1 0.05
TotalBath 1 0.05
SID 0 0.00
PID 0 0.00
SubClass 0 0.00
Zoning 0 0.00
LotArea 0 0.00
Street 0 0.00
Alley 0 0.00
LotShape 0 0.00
LandContour 0 0.00
vis_miss(sample_df, sort_miss = TRUE)

8.1 Missingness handling strategy

# Distinguish likely "structural" NA fields from true missingness
structural_na_vars <- c(
  "Alley", "MasVnrType", "BsmtQual", "BsmtCond", "BsmtExposure",
  "BsmtFinType1", "BsmtFinType2", "FireplaceQu", "GarageType",
  "GarageFinish", "GarageQual", "GarageCond", "PoolQC", "Fence",
  "MiscFeature"
)

# Create a working copy for cleaning
clean_df <- sample_df

# Replace structural missing categories with "None"
for (v in structural_na_vars[structural_na_vars %in% names(clean_df)]) {
  clean_df[[v]] <- as.character(clean_df[[v]])
  clean_df[[v]][is.na(clean_df[[v]])] <- "None"
  clean_df[[v]] <- as.factor(clean_df[[v]])
}

# Replace selected numeric structural missing values with zero
zero_if_absent <- c(
  "MasVnrArea", "BsmtFinSF1", "BsmtFinSF2", "BsmtUnfSF", "TotalBsmtSF",
  "BsmtFullBath", "BsmtHalfBath", "GarageCars", "GarageArea"
)

for (v in zero_if_absent[zero_if_absent %in% names(clean_df)]) {
  clean_df[[v]][is.na(clean_df[[v]])] <- 0
}

# Median imputation for remaining numeric missing values
num_missing_before <- sum(is.na(clean_df[sapply(clean_df, is.numeric)]))

clean_df <- clean_df %>%
  mutate(across(where(is.numeric), ~ ifelse(is.na(.), median(., na.rm = TRUE), .)))

num_missing_after <- sum(is.na(clean_df[sapply(clean_df, is.numeric)]))
c(num_missing_before = num_missing_before, num_missing_after = num_missing_after)
## num_missing_before  num_missing_after 
##                535                  0

8.2 Insights

top_missing <- missing_tbl %>% filter(MissingPct > 0) %>% slice(1:5)
cat("- Not all missingness should be treated the same way.\n")
  • Not all missingness should be treated the same way.
cat("- In this dataset, several housing attributes are missing because the feature does not exist, which should typically be encoded as `None` or `0` rather than dropped.\n")
  • In this dataset, several housing attributes are missing because the feature does not exist, which should typically be encoded as None or 0 rather than dropped.
cat("- Remaining numeric missingness is reduced with median imputation in the cleaned working dataset.\n")
  • Remaining numeric missingness is reduced with median imputation in the cleaned working dataset.
if (nrow(top_missing) > 0) {
  cat("- The most affected variables by missingness in the modeling sample are:\n")
  for (i in seq_len(nrow(top_missing))) {
    cat(paste0("  - `", top_missing$Variable[i], "`: ", round(top_missing$MissingPct[i], 2), "% missing\n"))
  }
}
  • The most affected variables by missingness in the modeling sample are:
    • LotFrontage: 19.29% missing
    • GarageYrBlt: 3.7% missing
    • GarageAge: 3.7% missing
    • MasVnrType: 0.55% missing
    • MasVnrArea: 0.55% missing

9 6. Data validation and logical checks

Validation ensures the cleaned data are still consistent with known housing logic and measurement rules.

rule_checks <- tibble(
  Rule = c(
    "SalePrice > 0",
    "GrLivArea > 0",
    "OverallQual between 1 and 10",
    "OverallCond between 1 and 10",
    "GarageCars >= 0",
    "YearBuilt <= YrSold",
    "HouseAge >= 0",
    "TotalBath >= 0",
    "TotalFloorSF >= GrLivArea not required but should be nonnegative",
    "LotArea > 0"
  ),
  Violations = c(
    sum(clean_df$SalePrice <= 0 | is.na(clean_df$SalePrice)),
    sum(clean_df$GrLivArea <= 0 | is.na(clean_df$GrLivArea)),
    sum(!(clean_df$OverallQual %in% 1:10) | is.na(clean_df$OverallQual)),
    sum(!(clean_df$OverallCond %in% 1:10) | is.na(clean_df$OverallCond)),
    sum(clean_df$GarageCars < 0, na.rm = TRUE),
    sum(clean_df$YearBuilt > clean_df$YrSold, na.rm = TRUE),
    sum(clean_df$HouseAge < 0, na.rm = TRUE),
    sum(clean_df$TotalBath < 0, na.rm = TRUE),
    sum(clean_df$TotalFloorSF < 0, na.rm = TRUE),
    sum(clean_df$LotArea <= 0 | is.na(clean_df$LotArea))
  )
)

kable(rule_checks)
Rule Violations
SalePrice > 0 0
GrLivArea > 0 0
OverallQual between 1 and 10 0
OverallCond between 1 and 10 0
GarageCars >= 0 0
YearBuilt <= YrSold 0
HouseAge >= 0 0
TotalBath >= 0 0
TotalFloorSF >= GrLivArea not required but should be nonnegative 0
LotArea > 0 0

9.1 Insights

viol_n <- sum(rule_checks$Violations)
cat(
  paste0(
    "- Validation checks are used to confirm that the data still make sense after cleaning.\n",
    "- Total validation violations found across the listed rules: **", viol_n, "**.\n",
    "- These checks are especially important before regression because impossible values can distort coefficients and residual patterns.\n"
  )
)
  • Validation checks are used to confirm that the data still make sense after cleaning.
  • Total validation violations found across the listed rules: 0.
  • These checks are especially important before regression because impossible values can distort coefficients and residual patterns.

10 7. Top 30 numeric features correlated with SalePrice

Correlation is not a modeling strategy by itself, but it is a useful screening step for identifying variables most strongly associated with the response.

num_data <- clean_df %>% select(where(is.numeric))

if (!"SalePrice" %in% names(num_data)) {
  stop("SalePrice not found among numeric columns.")
}

cor_vals <- sapply(num_data, function(x) cor(x, num_data$SalePrice, use = "pairwise.complete.obs"))

top30_saleprice <- tibble(
  Feature = names(cor_vals),
  Correlation = as.numeric(cor_vals)
) %>%
  filter(Feature != "SalePrice") %>%
  mutate(abs_corr = abs(Correlation)) %>%
  arrange(desc(abs_corr)) %>%
  slice(1:30)

kable(top30_saleprice, digits = 3)
Feature Correlation abs_corr
logSalePrice 0.958 0.958
OverallQual 0.806 0.806
TotalFloorSF 0.778 0.778
GrLivArea 0.771 0.771
TotalBath 0.700 0.700
GarageCars 0.666 0.666
TotalBsmtSF 0.651 0.651
GarageArea 0.642 0.642
FirstFlrSF 0.640 0.640
FullBath 0.611 0.611
TotRmsAbvGrd 0.601 0.601
YearBuilt 0.571 0.571
HouseAge -0.570 0.570
MasVnrArea 0.544 0.544
QualityIndex 0.525 0.525
GarageYrBlt 0.522 0.522
GarageAge -0.521 0.521
RemodAge -0.507 0.507
YearRemodel 0.507 0.507
Fireplaces 0.484 0.484
BsmtFinSF1 0.454 0.454
TotalOutdoorSF 0.405 0.405
LotFrontage 0.387 0.387
WoodDeckSF 0.350 0.350
SecondFlrSF 0.350 0.350
HalfBath 0.349 0.349
OpenPorchSF 0.342 0.342
BsmtFullBath 0.294 0.294
LotArea 0.290 0.290
BedroomAbvGr 0.273 0.273
ggplot(top30_saleprice, aes(x = reorder(Feature, abs_corr), y = Correlation)) +
  geom_col(fill = "steelblue") +
  coord_flip() +
  labs(
    title = "Top 30 Numeric Features Correlated with SalePrice",
    x = "Feature",
    y = "Correlation"
  ) +
  theme_minimal()

10.1 Insights

cat("- The top 30 correlation table is a screening tool for regression preparation, not a final variable selection method.\n")
  • The top 30 correlation table is a screening tool for regression preparation, not a final variable selection method.
cat("- Highly correlated predictors often include size, quality, age, basement, garage, and bath-related features.\n")
  • Highly correlated predictors often include size, quality, age, basement, garage, and bath-related features.
cat("- Some of these predictors will also be highly correlated with each other, so later regression work should check multicollinearity even after this screening step.\n")
  • Some of these predictors will also be highly correlated with each other, so later regression work should check multicollinearity even after this screening step.

11 8. Correlation matrix among the strongest features

This section looks at the correlation structure among the top predictors to identify possible redundancy.

top_corr_vars <- top30_saleprice$Feature[1:min(15, nrow(top30_saleprice))]
corr_subset <- clean_df %>% select(all_of(c("SalePrice", top_corr_vars))) %>% select(where(is.numeric))
corr_matrix <- cor(corr_subset, use = "pairwise.complete.obs")

round(corr_matrix, 3)
##              SalePrice logSalePrice OverallQual TotalFloorSF GrLivArea
## SalePrice        1.000        0.958       0.806        0.778     0.771
## logSalePrice     0.958        1.000       0.828        0.780     0.773
## OverallQual      0.806        0.828       1.000        0.631     0.622
## TotalFloorSF     0.778        0.780       0.631        1.000     0.995
## GrLivArea        0.771        0.773       0.622        0.995     1.000
## TotalBath        0.700        0.731       0.583        0.634     0.627
## GarageCars       0.666        0.690       0.604        0.526     0.519
## TotalBsmtSF      0.651        0.638       0.526        0.397     0.393
## GarageArea       0.642        0.656       0.550        0.490     0.485
## FirstFlrSF       0.640        0.619       0.455        0.529     0.526
## FullBath         0.611        0.646       0.572        0.669     0.668
## TotRmsAbvGrd     0.601        0.618       0.511        0.821     0.829
## YearBuilt        0.571        0.626       0.558        0.301     0.286
## HouseAge        -0.570       -0.625      -0.557       -0.301    -0.286
## MasVnrArea       0.544        0.491       0.429        0.429     0.422
## QualityIndex     0.525        0.566       0.694        0.407     0.403
##              TotalBath GarageCars TotalBsmtSF GarageArea FirstFlrSF FullBath
## SalePrice        0.700      0.666       0.651      0.642      0.640    0.611
## logSalePrice     0.731      0.690       0.638      0.656      0.619    0.646
## OverallQual      0.583      0.604       0.526      0.550      0.455    0.572
## TotalFloorSF     0.634      0.526       0.397      0.490      0.529    0.669
## GrLivArea        0.627      0.519       0.393      0.485      0.526    0.668
## TotalBath        1.000      0.532       0.436      0.486      0.395    0.734
## GarageCars       0.532      1.000       0.440      0.880      0.439    0.515
## TotalBsmtSF      0.436      0.440       1.000      0.455      0.764    0.340
## GarageArea       0.486      0.880       0.455      1.000      0.463    0.450
## FirstFlrSF       0.395      0.439       0.764      0.463      1.000    0.373
## FullBath         0.734      0.515       0.340      0.450      0.373    1.000
## TotRmsAbvGrd     0.516      0.425       0.261      0.366      0.358    0.585
## YearBuilt        0.584      0.536       0.425      0.487      0.316    0.499
## HouseAge        -0.583     -0.536      -0.424     -0.486     -0.315   -0.498
## MasVnrArea       0.353      0.386       0.411      0.386      0.426    0.292
## QualityIndex     0.293      0.307       0.251      0.283      0.236    0.286
##              TotRmsAbvGrd YearBuilt HouseAge MasVnrArea QualityIndex
## SalePrice           0.601     0.571   -0.570      0.544        0.525
## logSalePrice        0.618     0.626   -0.625      0.491        0.566
## OverallQual         0.511     0.558   -0.557      0.429        0.694
## TotalFloorSF        0.821     0.301   -0.301      0.429        0.407
## GrLivArea           0.829     0.286   -0.286      0.422        0.403
## TotalBath           0.516     0.584   -0.583      0.353        0.293
## GarageCars          0.425     0.536   -0.536      0.386        0.307
## TotalBsmtSF         0.261     0.425   -0.424      0.411        0.251
## GarageArea          0.366     0.487   -0.486      0.386        0.283
## FirstFlrSF          0.358     0.316   -0.315      0.426        0.236
## FullBath            0.585     0.499   -0.498      0.292        0.286
## TotRmsAbvGrd        1.000     0.233   -0.233      0.322        0.322
## YearBuilt           0.233     1.000   -0.999      0.314        0.105
## HouseAge           -0.233    -0.999    1.000     -0.315       -0.104
## MasVnrArea          0.322     0.314   -0.315      1.000        0.217
## QualityIndex        0.322     0.105   -0.104      0.217        1.000
corrplot(
  corr_matrix,
  method = "color",
  type = "upper",
  tl.col = "black",
  tl.cex = 0.55,
  number.cex = 0.45
)

11.1 Insights

cat("- Correlation clustering among size-related predictors is expected in housing data.\n")
  • Correlation clustering among size-related predictors is expected in housing data.
cat("- Strong blocks of correlation suggest that some variables may carry overlapping information.\n")
  • Strong blocks of correlation suggest that some variables may carry overlapping information.
cat("- This is helpful to know now, because regression modeling later may require choosing among similar predictors or combining them through feature engineering.\n")
  • This is helpful to know now, because regression modeling later may require choosing among similar predictors or combining them through feature engineering.

12 9. Data quality summaries for selected high-value variables

This section gives compact summaries for the strongest candidate variables for regression.

quality_numeric <- function(x) {
  tibble(
    n = length(x),
    missing_n = sum(is.na(x)),
    missing_pct = mean(is.na(x)) * 100,
    unique_n = n_distinct(x, na.rm = TRUE),
    min = suppressWarnings(min(x, na.rm = TRUE)),
    q1 = suppressWarnings(quantile(x, 0.25, na.rm = TRUE)),
    median = suppressWarnings(median(x, na.rm = TRUE)),
    mean = suppressWarnings(mean(x, na.rm = TRUE)),
    q3 = suppressWarnings(quantile(x, 0.75, na.rm = TRUE)),
    max = suppressWarnings(max(x, na.rm = TRUE)),
    sd = suppressWarnings(sd(x, na.rm = TRUE)),
    skewness = suppressWarnings(moments::skewness(x, na.rm = TRUE))
  )
}
quality_results <- map_dfr(top30_saleprice$Feature[1:15], function(v) {
  quality_numeric(clean_df[[v]]) %>% mutate(variable = v, .before = 1)
})

kable(quality_results, digits = 2)
variable n missing_n missing_pct unique_n min q1 median mean q3 max sd skewness
logSalePrice 2001 0 0 721 10.46 11.78 11.99 12.02 12.27 13.35 0.37 0.11
OverallQual 2001 0 0 10 1.00 5.00 6.00 5.99 7.00 10.00 1.33 0.17
TotalFloorSF 2001 0 0 1083 334.00 1107.00 1442.00 1488.07 1755.00 3820.00 489.19 0.81
GrLivArea 2001 0 0 1084 334.00 1111.00 1445.00 1492.91 1760.00 3820.00 491.96 0.84
TotalBath 2001 0 0 8 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.15 2.50 4.50 0.79 0.22
GarageCars 2001 0 0 6 0.00 1.00 2.00 1.74 2.00 5.00 0.72 -0.07
TotalBsmtSF 2001 0 0 859 0.00 801.00 973.00 1030.62 1228.00 3206.00 400.27 0.60
GarageArea 2001 0 0 537 0.00 312.00 472.00 467.84 576.00 1488.00 202.10 0.28
FirstFlrSF 2001 0 0 898 334.00 882.00 1062.00 1144.38 1344.00 3820.00 360.73 1.24
FullBath 2001 0 0 4 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.51 2.00 3.00 0.54 0.25
TotRmsAbvGrd 2001 0 0 11 2.00 5.00 6.00 6.43 7.00 12.00 1.42 0.60
YearBuilt 2001 0 0 113 1872.00 1950.00 1968.00 1967.50 1996.00 2010.00 29.79 -0.47
HouseAge 2001 0 0 125 0.00 11.00 40.00 40.37 58.00 136.00 29.76 0.47
MasVnrArea 2001 0 0 359 0.00 0.00 0.00 93.02 143.00 1600.00 170.67 2.81
QualityIndex 2001 0 0 34 1.00 30.00 35.00 34.22 40.00 90.00 9.29 0.43

12.1 Insights

cat("- Numeric quality summaries help identify skewed, sparse, or low-variance predictors before modeling.\n")
  • Numeric quality summaries help identify skewed, sparse, or low-variance predictors before modeling.
cat("- Skewness is especially useful here because strongly non-normal predictors may need transformation or winsorization before regression.\n")
  • Skewness is especially useful here because strongly non-normal predictors may need transformation or winsorization before regression.
cat("- Variables with extreme maxima relative to quartiles should be reviewed for outliers or long-tailed distributions.\n")
  • Variables with extreme maxima relative to quartiles should be reviewed for outliers or long-tailed distributions.

13 10. Outlier handling for regression preparation

Outliers can distort least squares regression. At the preparation stage, the goal is not to erase all extremes, but to identify them and decide whether to trim, cap, or transform.

13.1 IQR-based outlier counts for top features

count_outliers_iqr <- function(x) {
  q1 <- quantile(x, 0.25, na.rm = TRUE)
  q3 <- quantile(x, 0.75, na.rm = TRUE)
  iqr <- q3 - q1
  lo <- q1 - 1.5 * iqr
  hi <- q3 + 1.5 * iqr
  sum(x < lo | x > hi, na.rm = TRUE)
}

outlier_tbl <- tibble(
  Feature = top30_saleprice$Feature[1:15],
  OutlierCount = sapply(clean_df[top30_saleprice$Feature[1:15]], count_outliers_iqr)
) %>%
  arrange(desc(OutlierCount))

kable(outlier_tbl)
Feature OutlierCount
MasVnrArea 148
TotalBsmtSF 101
QualityIndex 86
FirstFlrSF 41
logSalePrice 32
GrLivArea 32
TotalFloorSF 31
TotRmsAbvGrd 20
GarageArea 18
TotalBath 9
GarageCars 8
YearBuilt 7
HouseAge 4
OverallQual 3
FullBath 0

13.2 Boxplots for top continuous features

top_continuous <- top30_saleprice$Feature[1:9]

plot_df <- clean_df %>%
  select(all_of(top_continuous)) %>%
  pivot_longer(everything(), names_to = "Feature", values_to = "Value")

ggplot(plot_df, aes(x = Feature, y = Value)) +
  geom_boxplot(fill = "lightblue") +
  coord_flip() +
  labs(
    title = "Boxplots of Top Continuous Predictors",
    x = NULL,
    y = "Value"
  ) +
  theme_minimal()

13.3 Winsorization helper (prepared, not yet universally applied)

winsorize_iqr <- function(x) {
  q1 <- quantile(x, 0.25, na.rm = TRUE)
  q3 <- quantile(x, 0.75, na.rm = TRUE)
  iqr <- q3 - q1
  lo <- q1 - 1.5 * iqr
  hi <- q3 + 1.5 * iqr
  pmin(pmax(x, lo), hi)
}

# Example prepared versions for likely long-tailed numeric fields
clean_df <- clean_df %>%
  mutate(
    LotArea_w = winsorize_iqr(LotArea),
    TotalBsmtSF_w = winsorize_iqr(TotalBsmtSF),
    GarageArea_w = winsorize_iqr(GarageArea),
    TotalFloorSF_w = winsorize_iqr(TotalFloorSF)
  )

13.4 Insights

cat("- Outlier handling in regression should be deliberate, not automatic.\n")
  • Outlier handling in regression should be deliberate, not automatic.
cat("- Some extreme observations are informative and should be transformed rather than removed.\n")
  • Some extreme observations are informative and should be transformed rather than removed.
cat("- Winsorized versions of long-tailed predictors are created here as optional regression-ready alternatives.\n")
  • Winsorized versions of long-tailed predictors are created here as optional regression-ready alternatives.

14 11. Non-normality and transformation planning

Regression does not require every predictor to be normal, but strong skewness and nonlinear scale effects often justify transformations.

14.1 Distribution checks

dist_vars <- c("SalePrice", "logSalePrice", "LotArea", "GrLivArea", "TotalBsmtSF", "GarageArea", "HouseAge", "TotalFloorSF")

dist_df <- clean_df %>%
  select(all_of(dist_vars)) %>%
  pivot_longer(everything(), names_to = "Variable", values_to = "Value")

ggplot(dist_df, aes(x = Value)) +
  geom_histogram(bins = 30, fill = "steelblue", color = "white") +
  facet_wrap(~ Variable, scales = "free", ncol = 2) +
  theme_minimal() +
  labs(title = "Distribution Review for Key Variables")

ggplot(clean_df, aes(sample = SalePrice)) +
  stat_qq() +
  stat_qq_line(color = "blue") +
  labs(title = "Q-Q Plot for SalePrice") +
  theme_minimal()

ggplot(clean_df, aes(sample = logSalePrice)) +
  stat_qq() +
  stat_qq_line(color = "blue") +
  labs(title = "Q-Q Plot for logSalePrice") +
  theme_minimal()

14.2 Transformation creation

clean_df <- clean_df %>%
  mutate(
    logLotArea = log1p(LotArea),
    logGrLivArea = log1p(GrLivArea),
    logTotalBsmtSF = log1p(TotalBsmtSF),
    logGarageArea = log1p(GarageArea),
    sqrtHouseAge = sqrt(pmax(HouseAge, 0)),
    logTotalFloorSF = log1p(TotalFloorSF)
  )

summary(select(clean_df, logLotArea, logGrLivArea, logTotalBsmtSF, logGarageArea, sqrtHouseAge, logTotalFloorSF))
##    logLotArea      logGrLivArea   logTotalBsmtSF  logGarageArea  
##  Min.   : 7.824   Min.   :5.814   Min.   :0.000   Min.   :0.000  
##  1st Qu.: 9.003   1st Qu.:7.014   1st Qu.:6.687   1st Qu.:5.746  
##  Median : 9.185   Median :7.277   Median :6.881   Median :6.159  
##  Mean   : 9.204   Mean   :7.256   Mean   :6.742   Mean   :5.889  
##  3rd Qu.: 9.375   3rd Qu.:7.474   3rd Qu.:7.114   3rd Qu.:6.358  
##  Max.   :12.280   Max.   :8.248   Max.   :8.073   Max.   :7.306  
##   sqrtHouseAge    logTotalFloorSF
##  Min.   : 0.000   Min.   :5.814  
##  1st Qu.: 3.317   1st Qu.:7.010  
##  Median : 6.325   Median :7.274  
##  Mean   : 5.785   Mean   :7.253  
##  3rd Qu.: 7.616   3rd Qu.:7.471  
##  Max.   :11.662   Max.   :8.248

14.3 Insights

cat("- `SalePrice` is usually less normal than `logSalePrice`, so both are reviewed during preparation.\n")
  • SalePrice is usually less normal than logSalePrice, so both are reviewed during preparation.
cat("- Log transforms are especially useful for right-skewed size-related variables.\n")
  • Log transforms are especially useful for right-skewed size-related variables.
cat("- The square-root transform for age is a softer transformation that can help when the effect of age is nonlinear but not extremely skewed.\n")
  • The square-root transform for age is a softer transformation that can help when the effect of age is nonlinear but not extremely skewed.

15 12. Scaling and normalization

Scaling does not change correlation structure, but it becomes important when regression methods are sensitive to measurement units or penalties.

# Z-score scaling for selected engineered numeric predictors
scale_vars <- c(
  "GrLivArea", "LotArea", "TotalBsmtSF", "GarageArea",
  "TotalFloorSF", "HouseAge", "TotalBath", "QualityIndex",
  "logLotArea", "logGrLivArea", "logTotalBsmtSF", "logGarageArea", "logTotalFloorSF"
)

existing_scale_vars <- scale_vars[scale_vars %in% names(clean_df)]

scaled_matrix <- scale(clean_df[, existing_scale_vars])

scaled_df <- as.data.frame(scaled_matrix)
names(scaled_df) <- paste0(existing_scale_vars, "_z")

clean_df <- bind_cols(clean_df, scaled_df)

summary(select(clean_df, ends_with("_z")))[, 1:6]
##   GrLivArea_z         LotArea_z       TotalBsmtSF_z      GarageArea_z     
##  Min.   :-2.35570   Min.   :-1.0625   Min.   :-2.5748   Min.   :-2.31486  
##  1st Qu.:-0.77630   1st Qu.:-0.3444   1st Qu.:-0.5737   1st Qu.:-0.77109  
##  Median :-0.09739   Median :-0.1373   Median :-0.1440   Median : 0.02058  
##  Mean   : 0.00000   Mean   : 0.0000   Mean   : 0.0000   Mean   : 0.00000  
##  3rd Qu.: 0.54291   3rd Qu.: 0.1232   3rd Qu.: 0.4931   3rd Qu.: 0.53517  
##  Max.   : 4.73024   Max.   :26.0844   Max.   : 5.4348   Max.   : 5.04773  
##  TotalFloorSF_z       HouseAge_z      
##  Min.   :-2.35916   Min.   :-1.35655  
##  1st Qu.:-0.77899   1st Qu.:-0.98696  
##  Median :-0.09418   Median :-0.01259  
##  Mean   : 0.00000   Mean   : 0.00000  
##  3rd Qu.: 0.54565   3rd Qu.: 0.59219  
##  Max.   : 4.76693   Max.   : 3.21290

15.1 Normalization to 0-1 range (optional alternative)

min_max_norm <- function(x) {
  rng <- range(x, na.rm = TRUE)
  if (rng[1] == rng[2]) return(rep(0, length(x)))
  (x - rng[1]) / (rng[2] - rng[1])
}

norm_vars <- c("SalePrice", "GrLivArea", "LotArea", "TotalFloorSF", "GarageArea")
existing_norm_vars <- norm_vars[norm_vars %in% names(clean_df)]

for (v in existing_norm_vars) {
  clean_df[[paste0(v, "_mm")]] <- min_max_norm(clean_df[[v]])
}

summary(select(clean_df, ends_with("_mm")))
##   SalePrice_mm     GrLivArea_mm      LotArea_mm      TotalFloorSF_mm 
##  Min.   :0.0000   Min.   :0.0000   Min.   :0.00000   Min.   :0.0000  
##  1st Qu.:0.1610   1st Qu.:0.2229   1st Qu.:0.02645   1st Qu.:0.2217  
##  Median :0.2148   Median :0.3187   Median :0.03408   Median :0.3178  
##  Mean   :0.2439   Mean   :0.3324   Mean   :0.03914   Mean   :0.3311  
##  3rd Qu.:0.3005   3rd Qu.:0.4091   3rd Qu.:0.04368   3rd Qu.:0.4076  
##  Max.   :1.0000   Max.   :1.0000   Max.   :1.00000   Max.   :1.0000  
##  GarageArea_mm   
##  Min.   :0.0000  
##  1st Qu.:0.2097  
##  Median :0.3172  
##  Mean   :0.3144  
##  3rd Qu.:0.3871  
##  Max.   :1.0000

15.2 Insights

cat("- Standardization produces mean-centered predictors on a common scale and is especially useful for penalized regression methods.\n")
  • Standardization produces mean-centered predictors on a common scale and is especially useful for penalized regression methods.
cat("- Min-max normalization is optional and mainly useful for algorithms that expect bounded inputs.\n")
  • Min-max normalization is optional and mainly useful for algorithms that expect bounded inputs.
cat("- For ordinary least squares, scaling is not mandatory for fit quality, but it still helps with interpretability and later method comparisons.\n")
  • For ordinary least squares, scaling is not mandatory for fit quality, but it still helps with interpretability and later method comparisons.

16 13. Neighborhood feature engineering for regression readiness

Neighborhood is a strong housing-price signal, but using many sparse levels can make regression unstable. A practical strategy is to bin neighborhoods using price behavior.

16.1 Neighborhood summary table

nbhd_summary <- clean_df %>%
  group_by(Neighborhood) %>%
  summarise(
    n = n(),
    MeanSalePrice = mean(SalePrice, na.rm = TRUE),
    MedianSalePrice = median(SalePrice, na.rm = TRUE),
    MeanPricePerSF = mean(SalePrice / pmax(GrLivArea, 1), na.rm = TRUE),
    .groups = "drop"
  ) %>%
  arrange(MeanPricePerSF)

kable(nbhd_summary, digits = 2)
Neighborhood n MeanSalePrice MedianSalePrice MeanPricePerSF
SWISU 34 132983.8 135750 93.10
IDOTRR 62 113263.4 118700 94.38
OldTown 177 128156.1 122000 95.32
BrkSide 96 126740.4 127750 103.94
Edwards 129 132956.2 125000 104.54
NWAmes 113 194384.1 185000 116.73
Gilbert 128 189209.6 184050 117.77
Crawfor 78 199021.4 196500 118.20
NAmes 360 146903.7 142000 119.78
SawyerW 89 190508.2 184900 119.88
Sawyer 121 137326.1 135000 125.23
Blmngtn 1 159895.0 159895 126.30
ClearCr 37 218400.9 225000 128.37
NoRidge 66 319616.0 301750 131.90
CollgCr 213 199779.2 200500 134.44
Mitchel 84 165514.9 156225 135.02
Veenker 17 252491.2 255000 140.69
Timber 49 241995.2 214900 143.03
Somerst 67 248517.9 245000 144.30
StoneBr 13 348963.1 349265 165.07
NridgHt 67 345267.9 326000 166.91

16.2 Visualize neighborhood price-per-square-foot signal

ggplot(nbhd_summary, aes(x = reorder(Neighborhood, MeanPricePerSF), y = MeanPricePerSF)) +
  geom_col(fill = "steelblue") +
  coord_flip() +
  labs(
    title = "Neighborhood Mean Price per Square Foot",
    x = "Neighborhood",
    y = "Mean Price per SF"
  ) +
  theme_minimal()

16.3 Create neighborhood bins

# Create quartile-style bins using mean price per square foot
nbhd_summary <- nbhd_summary %>%
  mutate(
    NbhdBin = ntile(MeanPricePerSF, 4),
    NbhdBin = paste0("grp", NbhdBin)
  )

clean_df <- clean_df %>%
  left_join(nbhd_summary %>% select(Neighborhood, NbhdBin), by = "Neighborhood")

clean_df$NbhdBin <- factor(clean_df$NbhdBin, levels = c("grp1", "grp2", "grp3", "grp4"))

table(clean_df$NbhdBin)
## 
## grp1 grp2 grp3 grp4 
##  611  776  401  213

16.4 Compare sale price by neighborhood bin

ggplot(clean_df, aes(x = NbhdBin, y = SalePrice)) +
  geom_boxplot(fill = "lightblue") +
  labs(
    title = "SalePrice by Neighborhood Bin",
    x = "Neighborhood Bin",
    y = "SalePrice"
  ) +
  theme_minimal()

16.5 Dummy variables for later regression use

clean_df <- clean_df %>%
  mutate(
    NbhdBin_grp1 = ifelse(NbhdBin == "grp1", 1, 0),
    NbhdBin_grp2 = ifelse(NbhdBin == "grp2", 1, 0),
    NbhdBin_grp3 = ifelse(NbhdBin == "grp3", 1, 0)
  )

head(select(clean_df, Neighborhood, NbhdBin, NbhdBin_grp1, NbhdBin_grp2, NbhdBin_grp3))
## # A tibble: 6 × 5
##   Neighborhood NbhdBin NbhdBin_grp1 NbhdBin_grp2 NbhdBin_grp3
##   <chr>        <fct>          <dbl>        <dbl>        <dbl>
## 1 NAmes        grp2               0            1            0
## 2 NAmes        grp2               0            1            0
## 3 NAmes        grp2               0            1            0
## 4 NAmes        grp2               0            1            0
## 5 Gilbert      grp2               0            1            0
## 6 Gilbert      grp2               0            1            0

16.6 Insights

cat("- Neighborhood is an important pricing signal, but using all raw categories can create many regression coefficients with uneven group sizes.\n")
  • Neighborhood is an important pricing signal, but using all raw categories can create many regression coefficients with uneven group sizes.
cat("- Binning neighborhoods by average price-per-square-foot preserves much of the market signal while reducing dimensionality.\n")
  • Binning neighborhoods by average price-per-square-foot preserves much of the market signal while reducing dimensionality.
cat("- The grouped neighborhood feature is now ready for later regression modeling without fitting that model here.\n")
  • The grouped neighborhood feature is now ready for later regression modeling without fitting that model here.

17 14. Final regression-preparation dataset

This section assembles a curated set of variables that are prepared for later modeling work. No model is fit in this report.

prepared_vars <- c(
  "SalePrice", "logSalePrice",
  "OverallQual", "OverallCond",
  "GrLivArea", "LotArea", "TotalBsmtSF", "GarageArea", "GarageCars",
  "TotalFloorSF", "HouseAge", "RemodAge", "TotalBath", "QualityIndex",
  "logLotArea", "logGrLivArea", "logTotalBsmtSF", "logGarageArea", "logTotalFloorSF",
  "LotArea_w", "TotalBsmtSF_w", "GarageArea_w", "TotalFloorSF_w",
  "Neighborhood", "NbhdBin", "NbhdBin_grp1", "NbhdBin_grp2", "NbhdBin_grp3"
)

prepared_vars <- prepared_vars[prepared_vars %in% names(clean_df)]
prepared_df <- clean_df %>% select(all_of(prepared_vars))

dim(prepared_df)
## [1] 2001   28
head(prepared_df, 5)
## # A tibble: 5 × 28
##   SalePrice logSalePrice OverallQual OverallCond GrLivArea LotArea TotalBsmtSF
##       <dbl>        <dbl>       <dbl>       <dbl>     <dbl>   <dbl>       <dbl>
## 1    215000         12.3           6           5      1656   31770        1080
## 2    105000         11.6           5           6       896   11622         882
## 3    172000         12.1           6           6      1329   14267        1329
## 4    244000         12.4           7           5      2110   11160        2110
## 5    189900         12.2           5           5      1629   13830         928
## # ℹ 21 more variables: GarageArea <dbl>, GarageCars <dbl>, TotalFloorSF <dbl>,
## #   HouseAge <dbl>, RemodAge <dbl>, TotalBath <dbl>, QualityIndex <dbl>,
## #   logLotArea <dbl>, logGrLivArea <dbl>, logTotalBsmtSF <dbl>,
## #   logGarageArea <dbl>, logTotalFloorSF <dbl>, LotArea_w <dbl>,
## #   TotalBsmtSF_w <dbl>, GarageArea_w <dbl>, TotalFloorSF_w <dbl>,
## #   Neighborhood <chr>, NbhdBin <fct>, NbhdBin_grp1 <dbl>, NbhdBin_grp2 <dbl>,
## #   NbhdBin_grp3 <dbl>
# Optional export for later regression modeling
write.csv(prepared_df, "ames_prepared_for_regression.csv", row.names = FALSE)

17.1 Insights

cat(
  paste0(
    "- The final prepared dataset contains **", nrow(prepared_df), "** rows and **", ncol(prepared_df), "** selected columns.\n",
    "- This report intentionally stops after preparation and feature engineering.\n",
    "- The next step, if needed, would be regression modeling using the prepared dataset and a carefully chosen subset of predictors.\n"
  )
)
  • The final prepared dataset contains 2001 rows and 28 selected columns.
  • This report intentionally stops after preparation and feature engineering.
  • The next step, if needed, would be regression modeling using the prepared dataset and a carefully chosen subset of predictors.

18 Conclusion

This report focused on preparing Ames housing data for regression rather than fitting a final model. The process included profiling, sample definition, missingness treatment, rule-based validation, outlier review, transformation planning, scaling, and neighborhood binning. The top 30 correlations with SalePrice were used as a screening device to identify strong candidate predictors, while additional feature engineering created more regression-ready versions of size, age, quality, and neighborhood effects.

A key takeaway is that regression preparation should not be reduced to a single cleaning step. Different issues require different responses: some missing values reflect absent home features, some extreme values should be transformed instead of deleted, and some categorical predictors should be grouped before modeling. By separating these tasks clearly, the resulting dataset is better aligned with the assumptions and practical needs of future regression work.