Summary of IPV and Cognition Regression Results

Trails A

Final Model: TrailsAtestSec ~ Age + IPVstatus + Sex + Race + (1 | HNDid) + Age:Race + IPVstatus:Sex

Conclusions

1. There is a signficant main effect for Age (p < .001).

2. There is a significant main effect for Race (p < .01).

   -Caucasians performed significantly better than African Americans.

3. There is an interaction effect for Age*Race (p < .05).

4. There is an interaction effect for IPVstatus*Sex (p < .05).

   -Men without a history of intimate partner violence performed significantly better than men with a history of intimate partner violence.

Trails A (with CES)

Final Model: TrailsAtestSec ~ Age + Race + (Age| HNDid) + Age:Race

Conclusions:

1. There is a signficant main effect for age (p < .01).

   -On average, participants' performance significantly decreased with age.

2. There is a significant main effect for race (p < .01).

   -Caucasians performed significantly better than African Americans.

3. There is an interaction effect for Age*Race (p< .05).

Trails B

Final Model: TrailsBtestSec ~ IPVstatus + Sex + Race + (1 | HNDid) + IPVstatus:Sex

Conclusions:

1. There is a significant main effect for sex (p < .05).

   -Women performed significantly better than men.

2. There is a significant main effect for race (p < .05).

   -Caucasians performed significantly better than African Americans.

3. There is a significant interaction for IPVstatus*Sex (p < .01).

   -Women without a history of IPV performed significantly better than men with a history of IPV.

   -Women with a history of IPV performed significantly better than men with a history of IPV.

   -Men without a history of IPV performed significantly better than men with a history of IPV.

Trails B (with Depression as a Covariate)

Final Model: TrailsBtestSec~IPVstatus + Sex + Race + CES1 + (1 | HNDid) + IPVstatus:Sex + IPVstatus:CES1 + Sex:CES1 + IPVstatus:Sex:CES1

Conclusions:

1. There is a significant main effect for IPVstatus (p < .05).

   -Participants without a history of IPV performed significantly better than participants with a history of IPV.

2. There is a significant main effect for Sex (p < .01).

   -Women performed significantly better than men.

3. There is a significant main effect for Race (p < .05).

   -Caucasians performed significantly better than African Americans.

4. There is a significant interaction for IPVstatus*Sex (p < .001).

   -Women without a history of IPV performed significantly better than men with a history of IPV.

   -Women with a history of IPV performed significantly better than men with a history of IPV.

   -Men without a history of IPV performed significantly better than men with a history of IPV.

5. There is a significant interaction for IPVstatus*Sex*CES1 (p < .05).

   -Participants WITH a history IPV and NO depression performed better than participants with NO history of IPV WITH depression.

   -Women without depression performed better than men without depression.

   -Men without depression performed better than women with depression.

Word Fluency

Final Model: FluencyWord ~ Sex + Race + (1 | HNDid)

Conclusions:

1. There is a significant main effect for sex (P < .05).

   -Men performed significantly better than women.

2. There is a significant main effect for race (p < .001).

   -Caucasians performed significantly better than African Americans.

Word Fluency (With Depression as a Covariate)

Final Model: FluencyWord ~ Age + IPVstatus + Sex + Race + CES1 + (1 | Subclass) + (1 | HNDid) + Age:Sex + Age:Race + Age:CES1 + IPVstatus:Race + IPVstatus:CES1 + Sex:Race + Sex:CES1 + Race:CES1 + Age:Sex:Race + Age:Sex:CES1 + Age:Race:CES1 + IPVstatus:Race:CES1 + Sex:Race:CES1 + Age:Sex:Race:CES1

Conclusions:

1. There is a signficant main effect for Age (p < .05)

   -Participants' performance significantly increased with age.

2. There is a significant main effect for sex (p < .01).

   -Men performed significantly better than women.

3. There is a significant main effect for race (p < .001).

   -Caucasians performed significantly better than African Americans.

4. There is a significant interaction for Sex*CES1 (p < .05).

   -Men without depression performed signficantly better than women without depression.

   -Men with depression performed signficantly better than women without depression.

   -Men with depression performed significantly better than men without depression.

   -Men with depression performed significantly better than women with depression.

5. There is a significant interaction for Race*CES1 (p < .05).

   -Caucasian participants WITH depression performed significantly better than caucasian participants with NO depression.

   -Caucasian participants with NO depression performed significantly better than African American participants WITH depression.

   -Caucasian participants WITH depression performed significantly better than African American participants WITHOUT depression.

   -Caucasian participants WITH depression performed significantly better than African American participants WITH depression.

6. There is a significant interaction for Age*Sex*CES1 (p < .05).

7. There is a significant interaction for IPVstatus*Race*CES1 (p < .01).

   -Caucasians without a history of IPV performed significantly better than African Americans with a history of IPV.

   -Caucasians without a history of IPV performed significantly better than African Americans without a history of IPV.

   -Caucasians with a history of IPV performed significantly better than African Americans without a history of IPV.

8. There is a signficant interaction for Sex*Race*CES1 (p < .001)

9. There is a signficant interaction for Age*Sex*Race*CES1 (p < .001).

Clock Total

Final Model: ClockTotal ~ IPVstatus + Sex + Race + (1 | Subclass) + IPVstatus:Sex + IPVstatus:Race + Sex:Race + IPVstatus:Sex:Race

Conclusions:

1. There is a significant main effect for race (p < .05).

   -Caucasians performed significantly better than African Americans.

2. There is a significant interaction for IPVstatusSex Race (p < .05).

   -Men without a history of IPV performed significantly better than women without a history of IPV.

   -Caucasians without a history of IPV performed significantly better than African Americans without a history of IPV.

   -Caucasian women performed significantly better than African American women.

   -Caucasian men performed significantly better than African American women.

Clock Total (With Depression as a Covariate)

Final Model: ClockTotal ~ IPVstatus + Sex + Race + CES1 + (Age + 0 | HNDid) + IPVstatus:Sex + IPVstatus:Race + Sex:Race + Sex:CES1 + Race:CES1 + IPVstatus:Sex:Race + Sex:Race:CES1

Conclusions:

1. There is a significant main effect for race (p < .05).

   -Caucasians performed significantly better than African Americans.

2. There is a significant interaction for IPVstatus*Sex*Race (p < .01).

   -Caucasians without a history of IPV performed significantly better than African Americans without a history of IPV.

   -Men without a history of IPV performed significantly better than women without a history of IPV.

   -Caucasian women performed significantly better than African American women.

   -Caucasian men performed significantly better than African American women.

3. There is a significant interaction for Sex*Race*CES1 (p < .05).