Rename long column names for readability (e.g., year, slaves_embarked, slaves_disembarked).
## # A tibble: 6 × 46
## id voyage_id year slaves_disembarked slaves_embarked
## <int> <int> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
## 1 1 1 1817 290 404
## 2 2 2 1817 223 246
## 3 3 3 1817 350 405
## 4 4 4 1817 342 381
## 5 5 5 1817 516 578
## 6 6 6 1817 515 557
## # ℹ 41 more variables: voyage_dates__length_middle_passage_days <dbl>,
## # voyage_dates__imp_length_home_to_disembark <dbl>,
## # voyage_crew__crew_first_landing <dbl>,
## # voyage_crew__crew_voyage_outset <dbl>, voyage_ship__tonnage_mod <dbl>,
## # voyage_slaves_numbers__imp_jamaican_cash_price <dbl>,
## # voyage_slaves_numbers__imp_mortality_ratio <dbl>,
## # voyage_slaves_numbers__percentage_women_among_embarked_slaves <dbl>, …
## # A tibble: 6 × 46
## id voyage_id year slaves_disembarked slaves_embarked
## <int> <int> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
## 1 99998 99998 0 0 0
## 2 100002 100002 1717 40 41
## 3 100003 100003 1717 16 17
## 4 100004 100004 1717 30 31
## 5 100008 100008 1737 8 9
## 6 100009 100009 1700 96 100
## # ℹ 41 more variables: voyage_dates__length_middle_passage_days <dbl>,
## # voyage_dates__imp_length_home_to_disembark <dbl>,
## # voyage_crew__crew_first_landing <dbl>,
## # voyage_crew__crew_voyage_outset <dbl>, voyage_ship__tonnage_mod <dbl>,
## # voyage_slaves_numbers__imp_jamaican_cash_price <dbl>,
## # voyage_slaves_numbers__imp_mortality_ratio <dbl>,
## # voyage_slaves_numbers__percentage_women_among_embarked_slaves <dbl>, …
Convert year to integer, slave numbers to numeric.
## # A tibble: 6 × 46
## id voyage_id year slaves_disembarked slaves_embarked
## <int> <int> <int> <dbl> <dbl>
## 1 1 1 1817 290 404
## 2 2 2 1817 223 246
## 3 3 3 1817 350 405
## 4 4 4 1817 342 381
## 5 5 5 1817 516 578
## 6 6 6 1817 515 557
## # ℹ 41 more variables: voyage_dates__length_middle_passage_days <dbl>,
## # voyage_dates__imp_length_home_to_disembark <dbl>,
## # voyage_crew__crew_first_landing <dbl>,
## # voyage_crew__crew_voyage_outset <dbl>, voyage_ship__tonnage_mod <dbl>,
## # voyage_slaves_numbers__imp_jamaican_cash_price <dbl>,
## # voyage_slaves_numbers__imp_mortality_ratio <dbl>,
## # voyage_slaves_numbers__percentage_women_among_embarked_slaves <dbl>, …
## # A tibble: 6 × 46
## id voyage_id year slaves_disembarked slaves_embarked
## <int> <int> <int> <dbl> <dbl>
## 1 99998 99998 0 0 0
## 2 100002 100002 1717 40 41
## 3 100003 100003 1717 16 17
## 4 100004 100004 1717 30 31
## 5 100008 100008 1737 8 9
## 6 100009 100009 1700 96 100
## # ℹ 41 more variables: voyage_dates__length_middle_passage_days <dbl>,
## # voyage_dates__imp_length_home_to_disembark <dbl>,
## # voyage_crew__crew_first_landing <dbl>,
## # voyage_crew__crew_voyage_outset <dbl>, voyage_ship__tonnage_mod <dbl>,
## # voyage_slaves_numbers__imp_jamaican_cash_price <dbl>,
## # voyage_slaves_numbers__imp_mortality_ratio <dbl>,
## # voyage_slaves_numbers__percentage_women_among_embarked_slaves <dbl>, …
Filter out rows where slaves_disembarked is 0 or NA (incomplete voyages).
## # A tibble: 6 × 46
## id voyage_id year slaves_disembarked slaves_embarked
## <int> <int> <int> <dbl> <dbl>
## 1 1 1 1817 290 404
## 2 2 2 1817 223 246
## 3 3 3 1817 350 405
## 4 4 4 1817 342 381
## 5 5 5 1817 516 578
## 6 6 6 1817 515 557
## # ℹ 41 more variables: voyage_dates__length_middle_passage_days <dbl>,
## # voyage_dates__imp_length_home_to_disembark <dbl>,
## # voyage_crew__crew_first_landing <dbl>,
## # voyage_crew__crew_voyage_outset <dbl>, voyage_ship__tonnage_mod <dbl>,
## # voyage_slaves_numbers__imp_jamaican_cash_price <dbl>,
## # voyage_slaves_numbers__imp_mortality_ratio <dbl>,
## # voyage_slaves_numbers__percentage_women_among_embarked_slaves <dbl>, …
## # A tibble: 6 × 46
## id voyage_id year slaves_disembarked slaves_embarked
## <int> <int> <int> <dbl> <dbl>
## 1 100002 100002 1717 40 41
## 2 100003 100003 1717 16 17
## 3 100004 100004 1717 30 31
## 4 100008 100008 1737 8 9
## 5 100009 100009 1700 96 100
## 6 100012 100012 1730 15 16
## # ℹ 41 more variables: voyage_dates__length_middle_passage_days <dbl>,
## # voyage_dates__imp_length_home_to_disembark <dbl>,
## # voyage_crew__crew_first_landing <dbl>,
## # voyage_crew__crew_voyage_outset <dbl>, voyage_ship__tonnage_mod <dbl>,
## # voyage_slaves_numbers__imp_jamaican_cash_price <dbl>,
## # voyage_slaves_numbers__imp_mortality_ratio <dbl>,
## # voyage_slaves_numbers__percentage_women_among_embarked_slaves <dbl>, …
Filter for successful outcomes (e.g., “Slaves disembarked”, “Voyage completed”, “Sold slaves”).
## # A tibble: 6 × 46
## id voyage_id year slaves_disembarked slaves_embarked
## <int> <int> <int> <dbl> <dbl>
## 1 1 1 1817 290 404
## 2 2 2 1817 223 246
## 3 3 3 1817 350 405
## 4 4 4 1817 342 381
## 5 5 5 1817 516 578
## 6 6 6 1817 515 557
## # ℹ 41 more variables: voyage_dates__length_middle_passage_days <dbl>,
## # voyage_dates__imp_length_home_to_disembark <dbl>,
## # voyage_crew__crew_first_landing <dbl>,
## # voyage_crew__crew_voyage_outset <dbl>, voyage_ship__tonnage_mod <dbl>,
## # voyage_slaves_numbers__imp_jamaican_cash_price <dbl>,
## # voyage_slaves_numbers__imp_mortality_ratio <dbl>,
## # voyage_slaves_numbers__percentage_women_among_embarked_slaves <dbl>, …
## # A tibble: 6 × 46
## id voyage_id year slaves_disembarked slaves_embarked
## <int> <int> <int> <dbl> <dbl>
## 1 100002 100002 1717 40 41
## 2 100003 100003 1717 16 17
## 3 100004 100004 1717 30 31
## 4 100008 100008 1737 8 9
## 5 100012 100012 1730 15 16
## 6 100013 100013 1730 147 150
## # ℹ 41 more variables: voyage_dates__length_middle_passage_days <dbl>,
## # voyage_dates__imp_length_home_to_disembark <dbl>,
## # voyage_crew__crew_first_landing <dbl>,
## # voyage_crew__crew_voyage_outset <dbl>, voyage_ship__tonnage_mod <dbl>,
## # voyage_slaves_numbers__imp_jamaican_cash_price <dbl>,
## # voyage_slaves_numbers__imp_mortality_ratio <dbl>,
## # voyage_slaves_numbers__percentage_women_among_embarked_slaves <dbl>, …
Add new columns: decade (e.g., floor(year / 10) * 10), estimated_deaths (slaves_embarked - slaves_disembarked), is_us (TRUE if disembark is US-based, using dis_broad == “Mainland North America” or specific US regions/ports like “New Orleans”).
## # A tibble: 6 × 49
## id voyage_id year slaves_disembarked slaves_embarked
## <int> <int> <int> <dbl> <dbl>
## 1 1 1 1817 290 404
## 2 2 2 1817 223 246
## 3 3 3 1817 350 405
## 4 4 4 1817 342 381
## 5 5 5 1817 516 578
## 6 6 6 1817 515 557
## # ℹ 44 more variables: voyage_dates__length_middle_passage_days <dbl>,
## # voyage_dates__imp_length_home_to_disembark <dbl>,
## # voyage_crew__crew_first_landing <dbl>,
## # voyage_crew__crew_voyage_outset <dbl>, voyage_ship__tonnage_mod <dbl>,
## # voyage_slaves_numbers__imp_jamaican_cash_price <dbl>,
## # voyage_slaves_numbers__imp_mortality_ratio <dbl>,
## # voyage_slaves_numbers__percentage_women_among_embarked_slaves <dbl>, …
## # A tibble: 6 × 49
## id voyage_id year slaves_disembarked slaves_embarked
## <int> <int> <int> <dbl> <dbl>
## 1 100002 100002 1717 40 41
## 2 100003 100003 1717 16 17
## 3 100004 100004 1717 30 31
## 4 100008 100008 1737 8 9
## 5 100012 100012 1730 15 16
## 6 100013 100013 1730 147 150
## # ℹ 44 more variables: voyage_dates__length_middle_passage_days <dbl>,
## # voyage_dates__imp_length_home_to_disembark <dbl>,
## # voyage_crew__crew_first_landing <dbl>,
## # voyage_crew__crew_voyage_outset <dbl>, voyage_ship__tonnage_mod <dbl>,
## # voyage_slaves_numbers__imp_jamaican_cash_price <dbl>,
## # voyage_slaves_numbers__imp_mortality_ratio <dbl>,
## # voyage_slaves_numbers__percentage_women_among_embarked_slaves <dbl>, …
Combine the datasets with bind_rows(), adding a source_type column (“Trans-Atlantic” or “Intra-American”).
## # A tibble: 6 × 50
## id voyage_id year slaves_disembarked slaves_embarked
## <int> <int> <int> <dbl> <dbl>
## 1 1 1 1817 290 404
## 2 2 2 1817 223 246
## 3 3 3 1817 350 405
## 4 4 4 1817 342 381
## 5 5 5 1817 516 578
## 6 6 6 1817 515 557
## # ℹ 45 more variables: voyage_dates__length_middle_passage_days <dbl>,
## # voyage_dates__imp_length_home_to_disembark <dbl>,
## # voyage_crew__crew_first_landing <dbl>,
## # voyage_crew__crew_voyage_outset <dbl>, voyage_ship__tonnage_mod <dbl>,
## # voyage_slaves_numbers__imp_jamaican_cash_price <dbl>,
## # voyage_slaves_numbers__imp_mortality_ratio <dbl>,
## # voyage_slaves_numbers__percentage_women_among_embarked_slaves <dbl>, …
## # A tibble: 1 × 1
## total_us_imported
## <dbl>
## 1 400314
## [1] "400,314"
The data show that a total of 400,314 enslaved people were brought to the United States based on the cleaned Trans-Atlantic and Intra-American datasets. This number reflects voyages that successfully disembarked enslaved individuals in US ports. While other regions in the Americas received larger numbers overall, this total shows that the United States was still an important destination in the Atlantic slave trade.
## [1] 0.05154527
The proportion of enslaved people taken from Africa who ultimately arrived in the United States was approximately 0.0515. This means that only a share of the total enslaved population transported across the Atlantic ended up in US ports. Most enslaved individuals were sent to other regions in the Americas, such as the Caribbean or South America.
The bar graph shows that slave imports to the United States varied significantly by decade. Some decades saw much higher numbers of arrivals, while others experienced declines. This suggests that the US slave trade was not constant over time and was influenced by economic conditions, policy changes, and historical events.
## # A tibble: 25 × 5
## decade state dis_region dis_port us_imports
## <dbl> <chr> <chr> <chr> <dbl>
## 1 1610 Other/Unknown Virginia Hampton 29
## 2 1620 Other/Unknown Virginia Virginia, port unspecified 3
## 3 1630 New York New York New York 53
## 4 1630 Other/Unknown Virginia Virginia, port unspecified 13
## 5 1630 Massachusetts Massachusetts Boston 7
## 6 1640 New York New York New York 69
## 7 1640 Other/Unknown Virginia Virginia, port unspecified 12
## 8 1650 New York New York New York 477
## 9 1650 Other/Unknown Virginia Virginia, port unspecified 125
## 10 1650 Other/Unknown Maryland Maryland, port unspecified 5
## # ℹ 15 more rows
The table and faceted bar plot show that slave imports to the United States were concentrated in a small number of major ports. Ports such as New Orleans and Charleston accounted for a large share of arrivals. The data also show that different states experienced peaks during different decades, indicating regional differences in the demand for enslaved labor.
## # A tibble: 30 × 4
## decade country voyages total_embarked
## <dbl> <chr> <int> <dbl>
## 1 1510 Portugal / Brazil 2 624
## 2 1510 Spain / Uruguay 8 144
## 3 1520 Spain / Uruguay 3 1043
## 4 1530 Portugal / Brazil 2 560
## 5 1530 Spain / Uruguay 1 224
## 6 1540 Portugal / Brazil 1 160
## 7 1550 Portugal / Brazil 2 718
## 8 1560 Great Britain 17 1749
## 9 1560 Spain 1 400
## 10 1560 Spain / Uruguay 1 208
## # ℹ 20 more rows
The country-by-decade table shows which nationalities were most involved in the export of enslaved people from Africa. Participation changed over time, with some countries dominating during certain decades. This reflects shifts in political power, trade routes, and economic influence within the Atlantic slave trade system.
I cleaned and combined Trans-Atlantic and Intra-American slave trade voyage data using tidyverse. After removing incomplete voyages and adding decade, estimated deaths, and a US indicator, I calculated totals and trends for US arrivals.
The cleaned data show 400,314 enslaved people disembarked in the United States. The decade chart shows that arrivals varied over time, and the faceted port chart suggests that a few major ports accounted for a large share of arrivals.