library(readxl)
library(ggpubr)
## Loading required package: ggplot2
library(effectsize)
library(rstatix)
##
## Attaching package: 'rstatix'
## The following objects are masked from 'package:effectsize':
##
## cohens_d, eta_squared
## The following object is masked from 'package:stats':
##
## filter
Import Dataset
Dataset6.4 <- read_excel("/Users/karim/Desktop/Dataset6.4.xlsx")
Separate the Data by Condition
Before <- Dataset6.4$Stress_Pre
After <- Dataset6.4$Stress_Post
Differences <- After - Before
Descriptive Statistics
Before Program
mean(Before, na.rm = TRUE)
## [1] 51.53601
median(Before, na.rm = TRUE)
## [1] 47.24008
sd(Before, na.rm = TRUE)
## [1] 17.21906
After Program
mean(After, na.rm = TRUE)
## [1] 41.4913
median(After, na.rm = TRUE)
## [1] 40.84836
sd(After, na.rm = TRUE)
## [1] 18.88901
Histogram of Difference Scores
hist(Differences,
main = "Histogram of Stress Difference Scores",
xlab = "Post - Pre Stress",
ylab = "Frequency",
col = "blue",
border = "black",
breaks = 20)
The histogram appears symmetrical and bell-shaped (normal).
Boxplot of Difference Scores
boxplot(Differences,
main = "Boxplot of Stress Score Differences",
ylab = "Difference Scores",
col = "lightblue",
border = "darkblue")
There was one outlier in the boxplot. However, it is not very far away
from the whisker.
Shapiro-Wilk Test of Normality
shapiro.test(Differences)
##
## Shapiro-Wilk normality test
##
## data: Differences
## W = 0.87495, p-value = 0.0008963
The p-value was less than .05, which means we should proceed with the # Wilcoxon Sign.
Conduct Inferential Test
Wilcoxon Sign Rank
wilcox_test_result <- wilcox.test(Before, After, paired = TRUE)
wilcox_test_result
##
## Wilcoxon signed rank exact test
##
## data: Before and After
## V = 620, p-value = 2.503e-09
## alternative hypothesis: true location shift is not equal to 0
Calculate Effect Size
df_long <- data.frame(
id = rep(1:length(Before), 2),
time = rep(c("Before", "After"), each = length(Before)),
score = c(Before, After)
)
wilcox_effsize(df_long, score ~ time, paired = TRUE)
## # A tibble: 1 × 7
## .y. group1 group2 effsize n1 n2 magnitude
## * <chr> <chr> <chr> <dbl> <int> <int> <ord>
## 1 score After Before 0.844 35 35 large
effect size is VERY LARGE.
Report Results There was a significant difference in stress levels between Condition 1 (Mdn = 18.00) and Condition 2 (Mdn = 47.24), V = 0.00, p < .001. The effect size was large (r₍rb₎ = .87).