library(readxl)
library(ggpubr)
## Loading required package: ggplot2
library(dplyr)
##
## Attaching package: 'dplyr'
## The following objects are masked from 'package:stats':
##
## filter, lag
## The following objects are masked from 'package:base':
##
## intersect, setdiff, setequal, union
library(effectsize)
library(effsize)
Working vs Non-Working Students
Import dataset
Dataset6.2<- read_excel("/Users/karim/Desktop/Dataset6.2.xlsx")
Step 4: Descriptive Statistics
Dataset6.2 %>%
group_by(Work_Status) %>%
summarise(
Mean = mean(Study_Hours, na.rm = TRUE),
Median = median(Study_Hours, na.rm = TRUE),
SD = sd(Study_Hours, na.rm = TRUE),
N = n()
)
## # A tibble: 2 Ă— 5
## Work_Status Mean Median SD N
## <chr> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <int>
## 1 Does_Not_Work 9.62 8.54 7.45 30
## 2 Works 6.41 5.64 4.41 30
Step 5: Histograms
hist(Dataset6.2$Study_Hours[Dataset6.2$Work_Status == "Works"],
main = "Works Histogram", xlab = "Study Hours",
col = "lightblue", border = "black")
hist(Dataset6.2$Study_Hours[Dataset6.2$Work_Status == "Does_Not_Work"],
main = "Does_Not_Work Histogram", xlab = "Study Hours",
col = "lightgreen", border = "black")
The histograms appear approximately symmetrical and bell-shaped.
Boxplot
ggboxplot(Dataset6.2, x = "Work_Status", y = "Study_Hours",
color = "Work_Status",
palette = "jco",
add = "jitter")
There were some outliers present.
Step 7: Shapiro-Wilk Test
shapiro.test(Dataset6.2$Study_Hours[Dataset6.2$Work_Status == "Works"])
##
## Shapiro-Wilk normality test
##
## data: Dataset6.2$Study_Hours[Dataset6.2$Work_Status == "Works"]
## W = 0.94582, p-value = 0.1305
shapiro.test(Dataset6.2$Study_Hours[Dataset6.2$Work_Status == "Does_Not_Work"])
##
## Shapiro-Wilk normality test
##
## data: Dataset6.2$Study_Hours[Dataset6.2$Work_Status == "Does_Not_Work"]
## W = 0.83909, p-value = 0.0003695
Interpretation: p < .05 = not normal
One group non-normal -> Mann-Whitney U
wilcox_result <- wilcox.test(Study_Hours ~ Work_Status, data = Dataset6.2, exact = FALSE)
wilcox_result
##
## Wilcoxon rank sum test with continuity correction
##
## data: Study_Hours by Work_Status
## W = 569, p-value = 0.07978
## alternative hypothesis: true location shift is not equal to 0
Cliff’s delta
cliff.delta(Study_Hours ~ Work_Status, data = Dataset6.2)
##
## Cliff's Delta
##
## delta estimate: 0.2644444 (small)
## 95 percent confidence interval:
## lower upper
## -0.03422594 0.51975307
The effect size was small (r_rb = 0.26).
Interpretation Mann-Whitney U Result: Working students (Mdn = 5.64) were not significantly different from Non-working students (Mdn = 8.54), U = 331, p = .080.