Regression Trees and Model Trees

Understanding regression trees and model trees

Example: Calculating SDR

# set up the data
tee <- c(1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 3, 4, 5, 5, 6, 6, 7, 7, 7, 7)
at1 <- c(1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 3, 4, 5, 5)
at2 <- c(6, 6, 7, 7, 7, 7)
bt1 <- c(1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 3, 4)
bt2 <- c(5, 5, 6, 6, 7, 7, 7, 7)
getwd()
## [1] "/Users/joaovitorjeronimo/Downloads"
# compute the SDR
sdr_a <- sd(tee) - (length(at1) / length(tee) * sd(at1) + length(at2) / length(tee) * sd(at2))
sdr_b <- sd(tee) - (length(bt1) / length(tee) * sd(bt1) + length(bt2) / length(tee) * sd(bt2))
# compare the SDR for each split
sdr_a
## [1] 1.202815
sdr_b
## [1] 1.392751

Exercise No 3: Estimating Wine Quality

Step 2: Exploring and preparing the data

wine <- read.csv("whitewines.csv")
# examine the wine data
str(wine)
## 'data.frame':    4898 obs. of  1 variable:
##  $ fixed.acidity.volatile.acidity.citric.acid.residual.sugar.chlorides.free.sulfur.dioxide.total.sulfur.dioxide.density.pH.sulphates.alcohol.quality: chr  "7;0.27;0.36;20.7;0.045;45;170;1.001;3;0.45;8.8;6" "6.3;0.3;0.34;1.6;0.049;14;132;0.994;3.3;0.49;9.5;6" "8.1;0.28;0.4;6.9;0.05;30;97;0.9951;3.26;0.44;10.1;6" "7.2;0.23;0.32;8.5;0.058;47;186;0.9956;3.19;0.4;9.9;6" ...
wine <- read.csv("whitewines.csv", sep=";")
str(wine)
## 'data.frame':    4898 obs. of  12 variables:
##  $ fixed.acidity       : num  7 6.3 8.1 7.2 7.2 8.1 6.2 7 6.3 8.1 ...
##  $ volatile.acidity    : num  0.27 0.3 0.28 0.23 0.23 0.28 0.32 0.27 0.3 0.22 ...
##  $ citric.acid         : num  0.36 0.34 0.4 0.32 0.32 0.4 0.16 0.36 0.34 0.43 ...
##  $ residual.sugar      : num  20.7 1.6 6.9 8.5 8.5 6.9 7 20.7 1.6 1.5 ...
##  $ chlorides           : num  0.045 0.049 0.05 0.058 0.058 0.05 0.045 0.045 0.049 0.044 ...
##  $ free.sulfur.dioxide : num  45 14 30 47 47 30 30 45 14 28 ...
##  $ total.sulfur.dioxide: num  170 132 97 186 186 97 136 170 132 129 ...
##  $ density             : num  1.001 0.994 0.995 0.996 0.996 ...
##  $ pH                  : num  3 3.3 3.26 3.19 3.19 3.26 3.18 3 3.3 3.22 ...
##  $ sulphates           : num  0.45 0.49 0.44 0.4 0.4 0.44 0.47 0.45 0.49 0.45 ...
##  $ alcohol             : num  8.8 9.5 10.1 9.9 9.9 10.1 9.6 8.8 9.5 11 ...
##  $ quality             : int  6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 ...
# the distribution of quality ratings
hist(wine$quality)

# summary statistics of the wine data
summary(wine)
##  fixed.acidity    volatile.acidity  citric.acid     residual.sugar  
##  Min.   : 3.800   Min.   :0.0800   Min.   :0.0000   Min.   : 0.600  
##  1st Qu.: 6.300   1st Qu.:0.2100   1st Qu.:0.2700   1st Qu.: 1.700  
##  Median : 6.800   Median :0.2600   Median :0.3200   Median : 5.200  
##  Mean   : 6.855   Mean   :0.2782   Mean   :0.3342   Mean   : 6.391  
##  3rd Qu.: 7.300   3rd Qu.:0.3200   3rd Qu.:0.3900   3rd Qu.: 9.900  
##  Max.   :14.200   Max.   :1.1000   Max.   :1.6600   Max.   :65.800  
##    chlorides       free.sulfur.dioxide total.sulfur.dioxide    density      
##  Min.   :0.00900   Min.   :  2.00      Min.   :  9.0        Min.   :0.9871  
##  1st Qu.:0.03600   1st Qu.: 23.00      1st Qu.:108.0        1st Qu.:0.9917  
##  Median :0.04300   Median : 34.00      Median :134.0        Median :0.9937  
##  Mean   :0.04577   Mean   : 35.31      Mean   :138.4        Mean   :0.9940  
##  3rd Qu.:0.05000   3rd Qu.: 46.00      3rd Qu.:167.0        3rd Qu.:0.9961  
##  Max.   :0.34600   Max.   :289.00      Max.   :440.0        Max.   :1.0390  
##        pH          sulphates         alcohol         quality     
##  Min.   :2.720   Min.   :0.2200   Min.   : 8.00   Min.   :3.000  
##  1st Qu.:3.090   1st Qu.:0.4100   1st Qu.: 9.50   1st Qu.:5.000  
##  Median :3.180   Median :0.4700   Median :10.40   Median :6.000  
##  Mean   :3.188   Mean   :0.4898   Mean   :10.51   Mean   :5.878  
##  3rd Qu.:3.280   3rd Qu.:0.5500   3rd Qu.:11.40   3rd Qu.:6.000  
##  Max.   :3.820   Max.   :1.0800   Max.   :14.20   Max.   :9.000
wine_train <- wine[1:3750, ]
wine_test <- wine[3751:4898, ]

Step 3: Training a model on the data

# regression tree using rpart
library(rpart)
m.rpart <- rpart(quality ~ ., data = wine_train)
# get basic information about the tree
m.rpart
## n= 3750 
## 
## node), split, n, deviance, yval
##       * denotes terminal node
## 
##  1) root 3750 3140.06000 5.886933  
##    2) alcohol< 10.85 2473 1510.66200 5.609381  
##      4) volatile.acidity>=0.2425 1406  740.15080 5.402560  
##        8) volatile.acidity>=0.4225 182   92.99451 4.994505 *
##        9) volatile.acidity< 0.4225 1224  612.34560 5.463235 *
##      5) volatile.acidity< 0.2425 1067  631.12090 5.881912 *
##    3) alcohol>=10.85 1277 1069.95800 6.424432  
##      6) free.sulfur.dioxide< 11.5 93   99.18280 5.473118 *
##      7) free.sulfur.dioxide>=11.5 1184  879.99920 6.499155  
##       14) alcohol< 11.85 611  447.38130 6.296236 *
##       15) alcohol>=11.85 573  380.63180 6.715532 *
# get more detailed information about the tree
summary(m.rpart)
## Call:
## rpart(formula = quality ~ ., data = wine_train)
##   n= 3750 
## 
##           CP nsplit rel error    xerror       xstd
## 1 0.17816211      0 1.0000000 1.0005343 0.02388706
## 2 0.04439109      1 0.8218379 0.8226024 0.02238696
## 3 0.02890893      2 0.7774468 0.7894902 0.02226523
## 4 0.01655575      3 0.7485379 0.7611952 0.02111412
## 5 0.01108600      4 0.7319821 0.7493066 0.02068952
## 6 0.01000000      5 0.7208961 0.7379990 0.02044947
## 
## Variable importance
##              alcohol              density            chlorides 
##                   38                   23                   12 
##     volatile.acidity total.sulfur.dioxide  free.sulfur.dioxide 
##                   12                    7                    6 
##            sulphates                   pH       residual.sugar 
##                    1                    1                    1 
## 
## Node number 1: 3750 observations,    complexity param=0.1781621
##   mean=5.886933, MSE=0.8373493 
##   left son=2 (2473 obs) right son=3 (1277 obs)
##   Primary splits:
##       alcohol              < 10.85    to the left,  improve=0.17816210, (0 missing)
##       density              < 0.992385 to the right, improve=0.11980970, (0 missing)
##       chlorides            < 0.0395   to the right, improve=0.08199995, (0 missing)
##       total.sulfur.dioxide < 153.5    to the right, improve=0.03875440, (0 missing)
##       free.sulfur.dioxide  < 11.75    to the left,  improve=0.03632119, (0 missing)
##   Surrogate splits:
##       density              < 0.99201  to the right, agree=0.869, adj=0.614, (0 split)
##       chlorides            < 0.0375   to the right, agree=0.773, adj=0.334, (0 split)
##       total.sulfur.dioxide < 102.5    to the right, agree=0.705, adj=0.132, (0 split)
##       sulphates            < 0.345    to the right, agree=0.670, adj=0.031, (0 split)
##       fixed.acidity        < 5.25     to the right, agree=0.662, adj=0.009, (0 split)
## 
## Node number 2: 2473 observations,    complexity param=0.04439109
##   mean=5.609381, MSE=0.6108623 
##   left son=4 (1406 obs) right son=5 (1067 obs)
##   Primary splits:
##       volatile.acidity    < 0.2425   to the right, improve=0.09227123, (0 missing)
##       free.sulfur.dioxide < 13.5     to the left,  improve=0.04177240, (0 missing)
##       alcohol             < 10.15    to the left,  improve=0.03313802, (0 missing)
##       citric.acid         < 0.205    to the left,  improve=0.02721200, (0 missing)
##       pH                  < 3.325    to the left,  improve=0.01860335, (0 missing)
##   Surrogate splits:
##       total.sulfur.dioxide < 111.5    to the right, agree=0.610, adj=0.097, (0 split)
##       pH                   < 3.295    to the left,  agree=0.598, adj=0.067, (0 split)
##       alcohol              < 10.05    to the left,  agree=0.590, adj=0.049, (0 split)
##       sulphates            < 0.715    to the left,  agree=0.584, adj=0.037, (0 split)
##       residual.sugar       < 1.85     to the right, agree=0.581, adj=0.029, (0 split)
## 
## Node number 3: 1277 observations,    complexity param=0.02890893
##   mean=6.424432, MSE=0.8378682 
##   left son=6 (93 obs) right son=7 (1184 obs)
##   Primary splits:
##       free.sulfur.dioxide  < 11.5     to the left,  improve=0.08484051, (0 missing)
##       alcohol              < 11.85    to the left,  improve=0.06149941, (0 missing)
##       fixed.acidity        < 7.35     to the right, improve=0.04259695, (0 missing)
##       residual.sugar       < 1.275    to the left,  improve=0.02795662, (0 missing)
##       total.sulfur.dioxide < 67.5     to the left,  improve=0.02541719, (0 missing)
##   Surrogate splits:
##       total.sulfur.dioxide < 48.5     to the left,  agree=0.937, adj=0.14, (0 split)
## 
## Node number 4: 1406 observations,    complexity param=0.011086
##   mean=5.40256, MSE=0.526423 
##   left son=8 (182 obs) right son=9 (1224 obs)
##   Primary splits:
##       volatile.acidity     < 0.4225   to the right, improve=0.04703189, (0 missing)
##       free.sulfur.dioxide  < 17.5     to the left,  improve=0.04607770, (0 missing)
##       total.sulfur.dioxide < 86.5     to the left,  improve=0.02894310, (0 missing)
##       alcohol              < 10.25    to the left,  improve=0.02890077, (0 missing)
##       chlorides            < 0.0455   to the right, improve=0.02096635, (0 missing)
##   Surrogate splits:
##       density       < 0.99107  to the left,  agree=0.874, adj=0.027, (0 split)
##       citric.acid   < 0.11     to the left,  agree=0.873, adj=0.022, (0 split)
##       fixed.acidity < 9.85     to the right, agree=0.873, adj=0.016, (0 split)
##       chlorides     < 0.206    to the right, agree=0.871, adj=0.005, (0 split)
## 
## Node number 5: 1067 observations
##   mean=5.881912, MSE=0.591491 
## 
## Node number 6: 93 observations
##   mean=5.473118, MSE=1.066482 
## 
## Node number 7: 1184 observations,    complexity param=0.01655575
##   mean=6.499155, MSE=0.7432425 
##   left son=14 (611 obs) right son=15 (573 obs)
##   Primary splits:
##       alcohol        < 11.85    to the left,  improve=0.05907511, (0 missing)
##       fixed.acidity  < 7.35     to the right, improve=0.04400660, (0 missing)
##       density        < 0.991395 to the right, improve=0.02522410, (0 missing)
##       residual.sugar < 1.225    to the left,  improve=0.02503936, (0 missing)
##       pH             < 3.245    to the left,  improve=0.02417936, (0 missing)
##   Surrogate splits:
##       density              < 0.991115 to the right, agree=0.710, adj=0.401, (0 split)
##       volatile.acidity     < 0.2675   to the left,  agree=0.665, adj=0.307, (0 split)
##       chlorides            < 0.0365   to the right, agree=0.631, adj=0.237, (0 split)
##       total.sulfur.dioxide < 126.5    to the right, agree=0.566, adj=0.103, (0 split)
##       residual.sugar       < 1.525    to the left,  agree=0.560, adj=0.091, (0 split)
## 
## Node number 8: 182 observations
##   mean=4.994505, MSE=0.5109588 
## 
## Node number 9: 1224 observations
##   mean=5.463235, MSE=0.5002823 
## 
## Node number 14: 611 observations
##   mean=6.296236, MSE=0.7322117 
## 
## Node number 15: 573 observations
##   mean=6.715532, MSE=0.6642788
#install.packages("rpart.plot")
# use the rpart.plot package to create a visualization
library(rpart.plot)
## Warning: package 'rpart.plot' was built under R version 4.4.3
# a basic decision tree diagram
rpart.plot(m.rpart, digits = 3)

# a few adjustments to the diagram
rpart.plot(m.rpart, digits = 4, fallen.leaves = TRUE, type = 3, extra = 101)

Step 4: Evaluate model performanc

# generate predictions for the testing dataset
p.rpart <- predict(m.rpart, wine_test)
# compare the distribution of predicted values vs. actual values
summary(p.rpart)
##    Min. 1st Qu.  Median    Mean 3rd Qu.    Max. 
##   4.995   5.463   5.882   5.999   6.296   6.716
summary(wine_test$quality)
##    Min. 1st Qu.  Median    Mean 3rd Qu.    Max. 
##   3.000   5.000   6.000   5.848   6.000   8.000
# compare the correlation
cor(p.rpart, wine_test$quality)
## [1] 0.4931608
# function to calculate the mean absolute error
MAE <- function(actual, predicted) {
  mean(abs(actual - predicted))  
}
# mean absolute error between predicted and actual values
MAE(p.rpart, wine_test$quality)
## [1] 0.5732104
# mean absolute error between actual values and mean value
mean(wine_train$quality) # result = 5.87
## [1] 5.886933
MAE(5.87, wine_test$quality)
## [1] 0.5815679

Step 5: Improving model performance

#install.packages("plyr")
#install.packages("Cubist")
# train a Cubist Model Tree
library(Cubist)
## Loading required package: lattice
m.cubist <- cubist(x = wine_train[-12], y = wine_train$quality)
# display basic information about the model tree
m.cubist
## 
## Call:
## cubist.default(x = wine_train[-12], y = wine_train$quality)
## 
## Number of samples: 3750 
## Number of predictors: 11 
## 
## Number of committees: 1 
## Number of rules: 10
# display the tree itself
summary(m.cubist)
## 
## Call:
## cubist.default(x = wine_train[-12], y = wine_train$quality)
## 
## 
## Cubist [Release 2.07 GPL Edition]  Mon Feb 23 20:47:58 2026
## ---------------------------------
## 
##     Target attribute `outcome'
## 
## Read 3750 cases (12 attributes) from undefined.data
## 
## Model:
## 
##   Rule 1: [918 cases, mean 5.3, range 3 to 7, est err 0.5]
## 
##     if
##  volatile.acidity > 0.26
##  alcohol <= 10.2
##     then
##  outcome = 66.6 + 0.187 alcohol + 0.041 residual.sugar - 65 density
##            - 1.38 volatile.acidity + 0.5 pH + 0.0028 free.sulfur.dioxide
## 
##   Rule 2: [177 cases, mean 5.5, range 4 to 8, est err 0.5]
## 
##     if
##  citric.acid > 0.42
##  residual.sugar <= 14.05
##  free.sulfur.dioxide > 49
##     then
##  outcome = 32.5 + 0.379 alcohol - 0.024 residual.sugar - 31 density
##            - 0.54 volatile.acidity + 0.15 sulphates
##            + 0.0003 total.sulfur.dioxide + 0.07 pH + 0.4 chlorides
##            + 0.01 fixed.acidity
## 
##   Rule 3: [490 cases, mean 5.7, range 3 to 8, est err 0.5]
## 
##     if
##  volatile.acidity <= 0.26
##  residual.sugar <= 12.75
##  free.sulfur.dioxide <= 49
##  alcohol <= 10.2
##     then
##  outcome = 253.6 - 252 density + 0.102 residual.sugar
##            - 2.63 volatile.acidity + 0.0149 free.sulfur.dioxide
##            + 1.27 sulphates + 0.52 pH + 0.012 alcohol
## 
##   Rule 4: [71 cases, mean 5.8, range 5 to 7, est err 0.4]
## 
##     if
##  fixed.acidity <= 7.5
##  volatile.acidity <= 0.26
##  residual.sugar > 14.05
##  alcohol > 9.1
##     then
##  outcome = 127.2 - 125 density + 0.055 residual.sugar
##            - 2.47 volatile.acidity + 0.24 fixed.acidity + 0.67 sulphates
##            + 0.0017 total.sulfur.dioxide + 1.8 chlorides + 0.23 pH
##            - 0.0015 free.sulfur.dioxide + 0.013 alcohol
## 
##   Rule 5: [446 cases, mean 5.8, range 3 to 9, est err 0.5]
## 
##     if
##  citric.acid <= 0.42
##  residual.sugar <= 14.05
##  free.sulfur.dioxide > 49
##     then
##  outcome = 29.6 + 0.372 alcohol + 2.81 citric.acid
##            - 2.94 volatile.acidity - 28 density + 0.013 residual.sugar
##            + 0.13 sulphates + 0.0003 total.sulfur.dioxide
##            + 0.01 fixed.acidity
## 
##   Rule 6: [451 cases, mean 5.9, range 3 to 8, est err 0.7]
## 
##     if
##  free.sulfur.dioxide <= 20
##  alcohol > 10.2
##     then
##  outcome = 16.2 + 0.0537 free.sulfur.dioxide + 0.311 alcohol
##            - 2.63 volatile.acidity + 0.037 residual.sugar
##            - 0.2 fixed.acidity - 13 density + 0.08 pH
## 
##   Rule 7: [113 cases, mean 5.9, range 5 to 7, est err 0.5]
## 
##     if
##  fixed.acidity <= 7.5
##  volatile.acidity <= 0.26
##  residual.sugar > 14.05
##  alcohol <= 9.1
##     then
##  outcome = -8.3 + 2.204 alcohol - 0.143 residual.sugar
##            + 0.0066 total.sulfur.dioxide - 1.65 sulphates
##            - 0.0092 free.sulfur.dioxide - 3 density
## 
##   Rule 8: [35 cases, mean 6.2, range 3 to 8, est err 0.8]
## 
##     if
##  fixed.acidity > 7.5
##  volatile.acidity <= 0.26
##  residual.sugar > 14.05
##  alcohol <= 10.2
##     then
##  outcome = 29.5 - 0.451 residual.sugar - 19.04 volatile.acidity
##            - 0.804 alcohol - 39.4 chlorides + 0.0127 total.sulfur.dioxide
##            - 0.64 fixed.acidity
## 
##   Rule 9: [46 cases, mean 6.3, range 5 to 7, est err 0.4]
## 
##     if
##  volatile.acidity <= 0.26
##  residual.sugar > 12.75
##  residual.sugar <= 14.05
##  free.sulfur.dioxide <= 49
##  alcohol <= 10.2
##     then
##  outcome = 11.9 - 13.32 volatile.acidity + 0.0216 total.sulfur.dioxide
##            - 8.01 sulphates - 0.0521 free.sulfur.dioxide - 16.2 chlorides
## 
##   Rule 10: [1410 cases, mean 6.4, range 3 to 9, est err 0.6]
## 
##     if
##  free.sulfur.dioxide > 20
##  alcohol > 10.2
##     then
##  outcome = 247.3 - 250 density + 0.11 residual.sugar + 1.26 pH
##            + 0.116 alcohol + 1.04 sulphates + 0.11 fixed.acidity
##            - 0.26 volatile.acidity + 0.0012 free.sulfur.dioxide
## 
## 
## Evaluation on training data (3750 cases):
## 
##     Average  |error|                0.4
##     Relative |error|               0.63
##     Correlation coefficient        0.67
## 
## 
##  Attribute usage:
##    Conds  Model
## 
##     85%    99%    alcohol
##     73%    84%    free.sulfur.dioxide
##     40%    97%    volatile.acidity
##     33%    99%    residual.sugar
##     15%    11%    citric.acid
##      5%    62%    fixed.acidity
##            98%    density
##            85%    pH
##            66%    sulphates
##            21%    total.sulfur.dioxide
##             8%    chlorides
## 
## 
## Time: 0.1 secs
# generate predictions for the model
p.cubist <- predict(m.cubist, wine_test)
# summary statistics about the predictions
summary(p.cubist)
##    Min. 1st Qu.  Median    Mean 3rd Qu.    Max. 
##   3.315   5.574   6.093   6.028   6.437   7.647
# correlation between the predicted and true values
cor(p.cubist, wine_test$quality)
## [1] 0.5683117
# mean absolute error of predicted and true values
# (uses a custom function defined above)
MAE(wine_test$quality, p.cubist) 
## [1] 0.5306253