Lecture 03 — Internal Analysis

Resources, Capabilities, and Value Creation

MGMT4970 – Spring 2026

Strategy: The Big Picture

From diagnosis to action

  • Industry / environment
  • Firm / internal analysis
  • SWOT
  • Strategic recommendations

Review: Industry Analysis

Five Forces

  • Threat of new entrants
  • Supplier power
  • Buyer power
  • Threat of substitutes
  • Rivalry

Team Exercise 1: Changes in Competitive Dynamics

Based on firms presented in prior sessions, take 10 minutes to discuss the following questions. Appoint one spokesperson to deliver a 2-minute verbal briefing (3–5 bullets; please be specific (e.g., which firm, use what strategies).

  • Team 1 Identify three concrete strategies firms used to reduce buyer power
  • Team 2 Identify three concrete strategies firms used to reduce supplier power
  • Team 3 Identify three concrete strategies firms used to raise entry barriers.
  • Team 4 Identify two examples where a single strategy reshaped multiple forces in the same direction, all favoring the focal firm.
  • Team 5 Identify two examples where a single strategy reshaped multiple forces in opposing directions for the focal firm.
  • Team 6 Identify two strategies that was at first favorable for the focal firm, but become fragile once competitors respond.

Internal Analysis: Overview

Internal analysis asks:

  • Where does the commercial value come from?
  • What can we do with to create and capture the value?
  • What resources do we have to acquire?

Internal Analysis: Theories and Frameworks

  • Value Capture Theory (Brandenburger & Stuart (1996))
  • Value Creation Activities
  • VRIN(O) Test (Penrose, 1959;Barney,1991)

Value Creation & Capture

Value Creation & Capture Breakdown

Team Exercise 2: The “Nebula-X” Tech Launch

In your groups, take 10 minutes to act as the Financial Strategy team for a new product launch. Calculate the value distribution based on this scenario:

The Scenario: You are launching the “Nebula-X” Pro Tablet. Die-hard fans are willing to pay $500 to get their hands on one. You decide to retail the tablet for $350. It costs you $200 in parts and labor (input price) to build each unit. Your component supplier is giving you a deal, but they are walking away from $150 they could have made selling to a rival (opportunity cost).

Which of the following is True?

  • A. Consumer surplus is $150
  • B. Supplier profits are $100
  • C. Total economic contribution is $300

Answer: Breaking Down the “Value Pie”

The Correct Answer is A. Here is how the value is distributed:

  • Consumer Surplus = WTP - Product Price 500 - 350 = 150
  • Firm’s Profit = Product Price - Input Price 350−200 = 150
  • Supplier’s Surplus = Input Price - Supplier’s Opportunity Cost 200−150=50
  • Total Economic Contribution = 150 + 150 + 50 = 350

Value Chain Analysis

RBV Value Creation Logic

Resources → Activities → Capabilities → Value → Performance

Analytic Steps:

  • Audit revenue & cost structures (Value Pie)
  • Decompose the value chain activities
  • Diagnose how specific activities impact SOC, WTP, and margin.
  • Catalog the firm’s core resources and capabilities.
  • Apply the VRIN Test on firm resources and capabilities

Uber Cost Breakdown

Uber Revenue Breakdown

Value Chain Activities

Uber Value Chain Activities

Primary activities

  • R&D: Platform matching, pricing, routing algorithms
  • Operation & Support: Customer support and dispute resolution
  • Sales and marketing: Users acquisition, promotions

Support activities

  • Sales and marketing: Brand management
  • General and Administrative (G&A): Regulatory strategy and lobbying (in addition to general administrative tasks such HR etc.)
  • R&D: Internal efficiency improvement (e.g., data analytics), future oriented (AI, autonomous driving)
  • Operation & Support: Payments and trust systems

Uber Value Chain Activities and Firm Value Creation

Value Chain Activity Platform Matching Pricing Algorithms Customer Support User Acquisition Trust & Safety Regulatory Strategy & Lobbying
Impact on WTP ↑ Convenience, ↓ wait time ↑ Reliability, ↓ cancellations ↑ Service confidence, ↓ frustration ↑ Awareness & trial ↑ Perceived safety & legitimacy ↑ Market availability
Impact on Costs ↓ Idle capacity, ↑ utilization ↓ Supply–demand imbalance ↑ Service & support costs ↑ Marketing spend ↑ Insurance & compliance costs ↑ Fixed regulatory costs
Margin Impact Structurally positive Structurally positive Neutral to slightly negative Short-term negative Long-term positive Indirect, long-term positive

Resources

Inputs into the production process that do not create value alone.

Category Examples
Financial Cash, borrowing capacity
Physical Plants, equipment
Organizational Reporting structures
Technological Patents, IP
Human Skills, experience, trust
Innovation R&D, know-how
Reputation Brand, legitimacy

Capabilities

Capabilities: Result from bundling resources, enable firms to perform tasks, often tacit and collective.

Core Competencies: Capabilities that distinguish the firm, create customer value, difficult to replicate, shape organizational identity

Function Core Competencies Firm
R&D Rapid iterative prototyping Tesla
Service Radical customer centricity Zappos
Design Product–User Interface (UI) Apple
IT / Data Algorithmic personalization Netflix
Logistics Distribution efficiency & scale Walmart
Marketing Brand management & consumer insight P&G

The VRIN Test

Uber Resources and Capabilities

Key resources

  • Global merchant and driver network
  • Brand recognition and installed user base
  • Technical infrastructure and algorithm
  • Real-time mobility and demand data
  • Regulatory experience across markets

Key capabilities

  • Multi-sided platform coordination
  • R&D
  • Scaling local operations globally
  • Regulatory navigation

Uber Capabilities VRIN Test

Core Capability Valuable Rare Costly to Imitate Non-substitutable Competitive Consequence Performance Implication
Demand–supply matching algorithms Yes Moderate Yes Partial Temporary advantage Improves utilization
Global platform scale Yes Yes Yes No Strong advantage Cost spreading
Brand & user trust Yes Moderate Moderate Partial Parity → advantage Retention
Regulatory experience Yes Yes Yes Yes Sustained advantage Market survival

Uber Internal Analysis Summary / Conclusion

Uber’s internal analysis shows that its competitive position is driven less by network effects from its platform orchestration capabilities.

  • Value is created through network scale, data, and algorithms
  • Profitability depends on cross-services selling (e.g., rides, Eats,) and reducing incentives without losing demand
  • The most defensible advantage lies in regulatory capability and platform coordination, not technology alone
  • Uber’s near-term performance hinges on managing tradeoffs between growth, regulation (esp. labor condition requirements), and margins
  • Uber’s long-term potential for renewed exponential growth depends in part on successful bets in autonomous driving technologies

Key takeaways

  • Value Capture Theory: A firm has a competitive advantage when it creates a larger wedge between willingness to pay (WTP) and supplier opportunity cost (SOC) than its rivals.

  • VRIN Framework: Competitive advantage is sustained when a firm’s resources and capabilities are valuable, rare, difficult to imitate, and non-substitutable, allowing the value wedge to persist over time.

Next Session

Capsim Competition