Resources, Capabilities, and Value Creation
Based on firms presented in prior sessions, take 10 minutes to discuss the following questions. Appoint one spokesperson to deliver a 2-minute verbal briefing (3–5 bullets; please be specific (e.g., which firm, use what strategies).
In your groups, take 10 minutes to act as the Financial Strategy team for a new product launch. Calculate the value distribution based on this scenario:
The Scenario: You are launching the “Nebula-X” Pro Tablet. Die-hard fans are willing to pay $500 to get their hands on one. You decide to retail the tablet for $350. It costs you $200 in parts and labor (input price) to build each unit. Your component supplier is giving you a deal, but they are walking away from $150 they could have made selling to a rival (opportunity cost).
Which of the following is True?
The Correct Answer is A. Here is how the value is distributed:
Resources → Activities → Capabilities → Value → Performance
Source: Uber 2022-10k
Source: Uber 2022-10k
| Value Chain Activity | Platform Matching | Pricing Algorithms | Customer Support | User Acquisition | Trust & Safety | Regulatory Strategy & Lobbying |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Impact on WTP | ↑ Convenience, ↓ wait time | ↑ Reliability, ↓ cancellations | ↑ Service confidence, ↓ frustration | ↑ Awareness & trial | ↑ Perceived safety & legitimacy | ↑ Market availability |
| Impact on Costs | ↓ Idle capacity, ↑ utilization | ↓ Supply–demand imbalance | ↑ Service & support costs | ↑ Marketing spend | ↑ Insurance & compliance costs | ↑ Fixed regulatory costs |
| Margin Impact | Structurally positive | Structurally positive | Neutral to slightly negative | Short-term negative | Long-term positive | Indirect, long-term positive |
Inputs into the production process that do not create value alone.
| Category | Examples |
|---|---|
| Financial | Cash, borrowing capacity |
| Physical | Plants, equipment |
| Organizational | Reporting structures |
| Technological | Patents, IP |
| Human | Skills, experience, trust |
| Innovation | R&D, know-how |
| Reputation | Brand, legitimacy |
Capabilities: Result from bundling resources, enable firms to perform tasks, often tacit and collective.
Core Competencies: Capabilities that distinguish the firm, create customer value, difficult to replicate, shape organizational identity
| Function | Core Competencies | Firm |
|---|---|---|
| R&D | Rapid iterative prototyping | Tesla |
| Service | Radical customer centricity | Zappos |
| Design | Product–User Interface (UI) | Apple |
| IT / Data | Algorithmic personalization | Netflix |
| Logistics | Distribution efficiency & scale | Walmart |
| Marketing | Brand management & consumer insight | P&G |
| Core Capability | Valuable | Rare | Costly to Imitate | Non-substitutable | Competitive Consequence | Performance Implication |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Demand–supply matching algorithms | Yes | Moderate | Yes | Partial | Temporary advantage | Improves utilization |
| Global platform scale | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Strong advantage | Cost spreading |
| Brand & user trust | Yes | Moderate | Moderate | Partial | Parity → advantage | Retention |
| Regulatory experience | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Sustained advantage | Market survival |
Uber’s internal analysis shows that its competitive position is driven less by network effects from its platform orchestration capabilities.
Value Capture Theory: A firm has a competitive advantage when it creates a larger wedge between willingness to pay (WTP) and supplier opportunity cost (SOC) than its rivals.
VRIN Framework: Competitive advantage is sustained when a firm’s resources and capabilities are valuable, rare, difficult to imitate, and non-substitutable, allowing the value wedge to persist over time.
Capsim Competition