This dataset looks at all types of hate crimes in New York counties by the type of hate crime from 2019 to 2026 – https://data.cityofnewyork.us/Public-Safety/NYPD-Hate-Crimes/bqiq-cu78/about_data
My caveat:
Flawed hate crime data collection - we should know how the data was collected
(Nathan Yau of Flowing Data, Dec 5, 2017)
Data can provide you with important information, but when the collection process is flawed, there’s not much you can do. Ken Schwencke, reporting for ProPublica, researched the tiered system that the FBI relies on to gather hate crime data for the United States:
“Under a federal law passed in 1990, the FBI is required to track and tabulate crimes in which there was ‘manifest evidence of prejudice’ against a host of protected groups, regardless of differences in how state laws define who’s protected. The FBI, in turn, relies on local law enforcement agencies to collect and submit this data, but can’t compel them to do so.”
This is a link to the ProPublica Article: https://www.propublica.org/article/why-america-fails-at-gathering-hate-crime-statistics
Here is a data visualization of where hate crimes do NOT get reported around the country (Ken Schwencke, 2017): https://projects.propublica.org/graphics/hatecrime-map
So now we know that there is possible bias in the dataset, what can we do with it?
library(tidyverse)
── Attaching core tidyverse packages ──────────────────────── tidyverse 2.0.0 ──
✔ dplyr 1.1.4 ✔ readr 2.1.5
✔ forcats 1.0.1 ✔ stringr 1.5.2
✔ ggplot2 4.0.0 ✔ tibble 3.3.0
✔ lubridate 1.9.4 ✔ tidyr 1.3.1
✔ purrr 1.1.0
── Conflicts ────────────────────────────────────────── tidyverse_conflicts() ──
✖ dplyr::filter() masks stats::filter()
✖ dplyr::lag() masks stats::lag()
ℹ Use the conflicted package (<http://conflicted.r-lib.org/>) to force all conflicts to become errors
Rows: 4029 Columns: 14
── Column specification ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Delimiter: ","
chr (9): Record Create Date, Patrol Borough Name, County, Law Code Category ...
dbl (4): Full Complaint ID, Complaint Year Number, Month Number, Complaint P...
lgl (1): Arrest Date
ℹ Use `spec()` to retrieve the full column specification for this data.
ℹ Specify the column types or set `show_col_types = FALSE` to quiet this message.
bias_count |>head(10) |>ggplot(aes(x=biasmotivedescription, y = n)) +geom_col()
Arrange the bars according to height and rotate
bias_count |>head(10) |>ggplot(aes(x=reorder(biasmotivedescription, n), y = n)) +geom_col() +coord_flip()
Add title, caption for the data source, and x-axis label
bias_count |>head(10) |>ggplot(aes(x=reorder(biasmotivedescription, n), y = n)) +geom_col() +coord_flip()+labs(x ="",y ="Counts of hatecrime types based on motive",title ="Bar Graph of Hate Crimes from 2019-2026",subtitle ="Counts based on the hatecrime motive",caption ="Source: NY State Division of Criminal Justice Services")
Finally add color and change the theme
bias_count |>head(10) |>ggplot(aes(x=reorder(biasmotivedescription, n), y = n)) +geom_col(fill ="salmon") +coord_flip()+labs(x ="",y ="Counts of hatecrime types based on motive",title ="Bar Graph of Hate Crimes from 2019-2026",subtitle ="Counts based on the hatecrime motive",caption ="Source: NY State Division of Criminal Justice Services") +theme_minimal()
Add annotations for counts and remove the x-axis values
bias_count |>head(10) |>ggplot(aes(x=reorder(biasmotivedescription, n), y = n)) +geom_col(fill ="salmon") +coord_flip()+labs(x ="",y ="Counts of hatecrime types based on motive",title ="Bar Graph of Hate Crimes from 2019-2026",subtitle ="Counts based on the hatecrime motive",caption ="Source: NY State Division of Criminal Justice Services") +theme_minimal()+geom_text(aes(label = n), hjust =-.05, size =3) +theme(axis.text.x =element_blank())
Look deeper into crimes against Jewish, Asian, Black people, and gay males
# A tibble: 127 × 4
# Groups: complaintyearnumber, county [35]
complaintyearnumber county biasmotivedescription n
<dbl> <chr> <chr> <int>
1 2024 KINGS ANTI-JEWISH 152
2 2024 NEW YORK ANTI-JEWISH 136
3 2025 KINGS ANTI-JEWISH 136
4 2019 KINGS ANTI-JEWISH 128
5 2023 KINGS ANTI-JEWISH 126
6 2022 KINGS ANTI-JEWISH 125
7 2023 NEW YORK ANTI-JEWISH 124
8 2025 NEW YORK ANTI-JEWISH 110
9 2022 NEW YORK ANTI-JEWISH 104
10 2021 NEW YORK ANTI-ASIAN 84
# ℹ 117 more rows
Plot these three types of hate crimes together
ggplot(data = hate2) +geom_bar(aes(x=complaintyearnumber, y=n, fill = biasmotivedescription),position ="dodge", stat ="identity") +labs(fill ="Hate Crime Type",y ="Number of Hate Crime Incidents",title ="Hate Crime Type in NY Counties Between 2010-2016",caption ="Source: NY State Division of Criminal Justice Services")
What about the counties?
ggplot(data = hate2) +geom_bar(aes(x=county, y=n, fill = biasmotivedescription),position ="dodge", stat ="identity") +labs(fill ="Hate Crime Type",y ="Number of Hate Crime Incidents",title ="Hate Crime Type in NY Counties Between 2010-2016",caption ="Source: NY State Division of Criminal Justice Services")
The highest counts
Put it all together with years and counties using “facet”
ggplot(data = hate2) +geom_bar(aes(x=complaintyearnumber, y=n, fill = biasmotivedescription),position ="dodge", stat ="identity") +facet_wrap(~county) +labs(fill ="Hate Crime Type",y ="Number of Hate Crime Incidents",title ="Hate Crime Type in NY Counties Between 2010-2016",caption ="Source: NY State Division of Criminal Justice Services")
How would calculations be affected by looking at hate crimes in counties per year by population densities?
Rows: 62 Columns: 4
── Column specification ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Delimiter: ","
chr (2): Area Name, Population Percent Change
num (2): 2020 Census Population, Population Change
ℹ Use `spec()` to retrieve the full column specification for this data.
ℹ Specify the column types or set `show_col_types = FALSE` to quiet this message.
# A tibble: 127 × 5
# Groups: complaintyearnumber, county [35]
complaintyearnumber county biasmotivedescription n 2020 Census Populati…¹
<dbl> <chr> <chr> <int> <dbl>
1 2024 KINGS ANTI-JEWISH 152 NA
2 2024 NEW Y… ANTI-JEWISH 136 NA
3 2025 KINGS ANTI-JEWISH 136 NA
4 2019 KINGS ANTI-JEWISH 128 NA
5 2023 KINGS ANTI-JEWISH 126 NA
6 2022 KINGS ANTI-JEWISH 125 NA
7 2023 NEW Y… ANTI-JEWISH 124 NA
8 2025 NEW Y… ANTI-JEWISH 110 NA
9 2022 NEW Y… ANTI-JEWISH 104 NA
10 2021 NEW Y… ANTI-ASIAN 84 NA
# ℹ 117 more rows
# ℹ abbreviated name: ¹`2020 Census Population`
# A tibble: 127 × 5
# Groups: complaintyearnumber, county [35]
complaintyearnumber county biasmotivedescription n 2020 Census Populati…¹
<dbl> <fct> <chr> <int> <dbl>
1 2024 kings ANTI-JEWISH 152 2736074
2 2024 new y… ANTI-JEWISH 136 1694251
3 2025 kings ANTI-JEWISH 136 2736074
4 2019 kings ANTI-JEWISH 128 2736074
5 2023 kings ANTI-JEWISH 126 2736074
6 2022 kings ANTI-JEWISH 125 2736074
7 2023 new y… ANTI-JEWISH 124 1694251
8 2025 new y… ANTI-JEWISH 110 1694251
9 2022 new y… ANTI-JEWISH 104 1694251
10 2021 new y… ANTI-ASIAN 84 1694251
# ℹ 117 more rows
# ℹ abbreviated name: ¹`2020 Census Population`
Calculate the rate of incidents per 100,000. Then arrange in descending order
datajoinrate <- datajoin |>mutate(rate = n/`2020 Census Population`*100000) |>arrange(desc(rate))datajoinrate
# A tibble: 127 × 6
# Groups: complaintyearnumber, county [35]
complaintyearnumber county biasmotivedescription n 2020 Census Populati…¹
<dbl> <fct> <chr> <int> <dbl>
1 2024 new y… ANTI-JEWISH 136 1694251
2 2023 new y… ANTI-JEWISH 124 1694251
3 2025 new y… ANTI-JEWISH 110 1694251
4 2022 new y… ANTI-JEWISH 104 1694251
5 2024 kings ANTI-JEWISH 152 2736074
6 2025 kings ANTI-JEWISH 136 2736074
7 2021 new y… ANTI-ASIAN 84 1694251
8 2021 new y… ANTI-JEWISH 84 1694251
9 2019 kings ANTI-JEWISH 128 2736074
10 2023 kings ANTI-JEWISH 126 2736074
# ℹ 117 more rows
# ℹ abbreviated name: ¹`2020 Census Population`
# ℹ 1 more variable: rate <dbl>
Your turn!
What I liked about the The NY hate crimes dataset is the reliability because it comes from an official government source, which makes the information more reliable than random online data. The dataset also covers multiple years (2019–2026), which allows us to see trends over time and compare how hate crimes change from year to year. Another strength is that it includes detailed categories of bias motives, such as Anti-Jewish, Anti-Asian, Anti-Black, and Anti-Male Homosexual, which makes the analysis more specific. In addition, the data includes county information, so we can compare different areas of New York City. However, there are also negative aspects. Hate crimes are often underreported, so the dataset does not show the true number of incidents. Some people may not report crimes, and police may classify incidents differently. Also, increases in numbers might reflect better reporting rather than an actual rise in hate crimes. Overall, the dataset is useful, but we must interpret it carefully because it does not represent the full picture.
How do hate crime rates per 100,000 residents differ across New York counties when adjusting for population size, and which counties show the highest risk rather than just the highest raw counts?
How did hate crime trends change before, during, and after major events (such as the COVID-19 pandemic), and did certain bias motives increase significantly during specific time periods?