Information Technology - Software Infrastructure and Platforms

Industry Structure, Competition, and Strategic Advantage

MGMT4970 – Spring 2026

Information Technology - Software Infrastructure and Platforms

Industry Structure, Competition, and Strategic Advantage

Enormous Market Opportunities

  • NAICS 51 — Information: $2.5T
    • 51121 — Software Publishing: $567.0B
      • Operating Systems & Productivity Software: $192.7B
      • Database, Storage & Backup Software: $320.1B
      • Business Analytics & Enterprise Software: $320.1B
      • Security Software: $77.8B
    • 51821 — Data Processing, Hosting & Related Services: $383.8B
    • 51913A — Search Engines & Portals: $316.8B

Uneven Disruptions

Industry Scope and Activities

  • Platform-mediated coordination across users, businesses, and ecosystems

  • Core activities:

    • Customer acquisition + retention (distribution as advantage)
    • Transaction processing (trades, payments, ad auctions)
    • Data infrastructure (storage, analytics, monitoring)
    • Compliance, risk, and trust (critical in finance + government)
  • Compete within and across ecosystems, not isolated product markets

Demand Fundamentals

  • Structural demand drivers [productivity + connectivity]

    • Digitization of finance, commerce, and operations
    • Cloud adoption, AI, and automation
    • Shift toward real-time measurement and control (ops + ads)
  • Cyclical demand drivers

    • Market volatility and retail trading cycles (HOOD, COIN)
    • Ad budgets and macro cycles (TTD)
    • Enterprise IT spend cycles (SNOW, DDOG, PLTR)
  • Government innovation incentives

Supply Fundamentals

  • High fixed cost (engineering, compliance, integration), low marginal cost

  • Key constraints:

    • Scarce engineering talent (security, data, ML)
    • Trust and reputation
    • Integration knowledge and customer-specific deployment capability
  • Competitive scaling through:

    • APIs, partner ecosystems, workflow embedment
    • Efficient use of AI to lower development and maintenance cost

Core Revenue Models (Across Firms)

  • Transaction-based: trades, payments, ad spend

    • HOOD, COIN, SQ, TTD
  • Intermediation / spread: lending, float, interest income

    • SOFI, SQ (and in different ways, HOOD/COIN via interest-like lines)
  • Subscription / platform fees: recurring contracts

    • PLTR (enterprise/gov), parts of COIN (subscriptions/services)
  • Consumption-based (usage pricing): pay for compute/logs/events

    • SNOW, DDOG

Core Industry Economics: Where Profit Comes From

Profitability depends more on architecture and position than features:

  • Distribution advantage (CAC, brand, trust)
  • Switching costs (data gravity, workflow embedment, compliance lock-in)
  • Unit economics (take rate, loss rates, infra costs)
  • Regulatory positioning (permission to operate + credibility)
  • Ecosystem leverage (partners, developers, identity/measurement standards)

Threat of New Entrants — Moderate (Entry easy, scaling hard)

  • High: product cost reduction, low customer switching cost
  • Low: ecosystem lock-in
  • Low: embedded workflows
  • Low: brand and regulatory legitimacy
  • Low: new entrants lack of trust, compliance, licensing, customer acquisition costs
  • Low: Hard to scale if lack liquidity (crypto), inventory access (ads)
  • Low: integration challenges (enterprise)

Overall: lower entry for products, but higher for customer acquisition

Buyer Power — Generally High

  • Retail users: low individual power, but high churn sensitivity and multi-homing
  • SMBs: price-sensitive; switching depends on workflow integration (POS, payroll, lending)
  • Enterprises: high procurement leverage; demand discounts and proof of ROI
  • Advertisers: can multi-home; allocate budgets to performance and measurement quality

Overall: low product differentiation, power depends on retention and lock-in

Supplier Power — Moderate to High

  • High: Cloud providers (compute/storage costs and platform dependency)
  • High: Payment networks & banking partners (rails, fraud, compliance)
  • Medium: Data sources / identity systems (ads + targeting constraints)
  • Medium: Talent markets (security + infra engineers, esp AI talent)
  • High: Regulatory regimes (not a supplier, but a key stakeholder)

Overall: structured supplier value division, high risk from regulation and talent markets

Rivalry Among Existing Firms — High, but Uneven

  • FinTech: features commoditize quickly; competition shifts to trust + economics (e.g., HOOD, SOFI, SQ)
  • Crypto platforms: global competition + liquidity battles; regulation changes structure (COIN
  • Enterprise platforms: rivalry exists, but switching costs rise after adoption (e.g., PLTR, SNOW, DDOG)
  • AdTech: intense competition + platform power; identity and measurement define winners (e.g.,TTD)

Threat of Substitutes — Persistent and Indirect

  • High: In-house builds (esp., AI)
  • High: open source stacks (technology as commodity)
  • High: buyer forward intergration
  • High: bypassing platform for direct contracting
  • Low: for highly specialized, e.g., crypto

Overall: substitutes rarely “destroy” demand but compress margins and force bundling/position shifts.

Conclusion

  • These firms compete in infrastructure/platform industries, where advantage is shaped by:

    • Distribution + switching costs
    • Reputation and compliance
    • Ecosystem positioning
    • Pricing architecture (transaction vs subscription vs consumption)
  • Rivalry is intense, but winners may lock-in, rather than competing on features

  • Strategic advantage depends on governance, embedded workflows, and legitimacy

Strategic Positions of Key Firms

Firm Strategic Role Primary Advantage
Robinhood (HOOD) Retail investing gateway Attention-based distribution + engagement monetization
SoFi (SOFI) Consumer finance platform Bundling + balance-sheet & risk management
Coinbase (COIN) Crypto infrastructure Trust, liquidity, regulatory legitimacy
Palantir (PLTR) Decision infrastructure High-stakes deployment + deep embedment
Snowflake (SNOW) Cloud data platform Data gravity + ecosystem lock-in
Datadog (DDOG) Observability platform Developer workflow embedment
Trade Desk (TTD) Open-web ad infrastructure Identity + measurement + CTV scale

Strategic Implications by Firm (1/2)

  • HOOD
    Advantage: distribution and product simplicity
    Risk: revenue cyclicality and regulatory exposure
    Strategic path: evolve from trading gateway to durable financial platform

  • SOFI
    Advantage: bundled consumer finance and cross-sell
    Risk: credit cycles and funding cost volatility
    Strategic path: scale deposits, deepen platform attach, discipline underwriting

  • COIN
    Advantage: trusted, compliant crypto gateway with deep liquidity
    Risk: volume cyclicality and policy uncertainty
    Strategic path: expand recurring services and infrastructure role

  • SQ
    Advantage: merchant workflow control + consumer network effects
    Risk: margin pressure and financial risk management
    Strategic path: deepen seller operating system with sustainable unit economics

Strategic Implications by Firm (2/2)

  • PLTR
    Advantage: mission-critical deployment and operational credibility
    Risk: long sales cycles and political/regulatory scrutiny
    Strategic path: scale enterprise AIP adoption without diluting trust

  • SNOW
    Advantage: data gravity and ecosystem adoption
    Risk: pricing scrutiny and hyperscaler competition
    Strategic path: position as AI-ready data platform while managing cost narratives

  • DDOG
    Advantage: deep embedment in developer workflows
    Risk: pricing pressure and platform substitution
    Strategic path: expand security and AI-ops while defending core observability

  • TTD
    Advantage: open-web scale with strong identity and measurement
    Risk: platform power and privacy constraints
    Strategic path: lead in CTV and identity standards for the open internet