NY Hate Crimes 2019-2026

Author

R Saidi

About this dataset

This dataset looks at all types of hate crimes in New York counties by the type of hate crime from 2019 to 2026 – https://data.cityofnewyork.us/Public-Safety/NYPD-Hate-Crimes/bqiq-cu78/about_data

My caveat:

Flawed hate crime data collection - we should know how the data was collected

(Nathan Yau of Flowing Data, Dec 5, 2017)

Data can provide you with important information, but when the collection process is flawed, there’s not much you can do. Ken Schwencke, reporting for ProPublica, researched the tiered system that the FBI relies on to gather hate crime data for the United States:

“Under a federal law passed in 1990, the FBI is required to track and tabulate crimes in which there was ‘manifest evidence of prejudice’ against a host of protected groups, regardless of differences in how state laws define who’s protected. The FBI, in turn, relies on local law enforcement agencies to collect and submit this data, but can’t compel them to do so.”

This is a link to the ProPublica Article: https://www.propublica.org/article/why-america-fails-at-gathering-hate-crime-statistics

Here is a data visualization of where hate crimes do NOT get reported around the country (Ken Schwencke, 2017): https://projects.propublica.org/graphics/hatecrime-map

So now we know that there is possible bias in the dataset, what can we do with it?

library(tidyverse)
library(knitr)
setwd("C:/Users/rsaidi/Dropbox/Rachel/MontColl/Datasets/Datasets")
hatecrimes <- read_csv("NYPD_Hate_Crimes_19-26.csv")

Clean up the data:

Make all headers lowercase and remove spaces

After cleaning up the variable names, look at the structure of the data. Since there are 44 variables in this dataset, you can use “summary” to decide which hate crimes to focus on. In the output of “summary”, look at the min/max values. Some have a max-vale of 1.

names(hatecrimes) <- tolower(names(hatecrimes))
names(hatecrimes) <- gsub(" ","",names(hatecrimes))
head(hatecrimes)
# A tibble: 6 × 14
  fullcomplaintid complaintyearnumber monthnumber recordcreatedate
            <dbl>               <dbl>       <dbl> <chr>           
1         2.02e14                2019           1 1/23/2019       
2         2.02e14                2019           2 2/25/2019       
3         2.02e14                2019           2 2/27/2019       
4         2.02e14                2019           4 4/16/2019       
5         2.02e14                2019           6 6/20/2019       
6         2.02e14                2019           7 7/31/2019       
# ℹ 10 more variables: complaintprecinctcode <dbl>, patrolboroughname <chr>,
#   county <chr>, lawcodecategorydescription <chr>, offensedescription <chr>,
#   pdcodedescription <chr>, biasmotivedescription <chr>,
#   offensecategory <chr>, arrestdate <lgl>, arrestid <chr>

Explore the bias motive (biasmotivedescription)

bias_count <- hatecrimes |>
  select(biasmotivedescription) |>
  group_by(biasmotivedescription) |>
  count() |>
  arrange(desc(n))
head(bias_count)
# A tibble: 6 × 2
# Groups:   biasmotivedescription [6]
  biasmotivedescription          n
  <chr>                      <int>
1 ANTI-JEWISH                 1906
2 ANTI-MALE HOMOSEXUAL (GAY)   489
3 ANTI-ASIAN                   401
4 ANTI-BLACK                   315
5 ANTI-OTHER ETHNICITY         168
6 ANTI-MUSLIM                  156

*We can see that the highest counts come from hate crimes against Jewish people, gay males, Asian people and Black people.

Visualize these counts as a bar graph

ggplot(hatecrimes, aes(x = biasmotivedescription))+
  geom_bar()

Use inclusion/exclusion criteria to filter

As we saw in the table, there are 29 different levels, and some are only one or two. Filter for the top 10. This time, use the bias_count subset with geom_col()

bias_count |>
  head(10) |>
  ggplot(aes(x=biasmotivedescription, y = n)) +
  geom_col()

Arrange the bars according to height and rotate

Use “reorder” and “coord_flip”

bias_count |>
  head(10) |>
  ggplot(aes(x=reorder(biasmotivedescription, n), y = n)) +
  geom_col() +
  coord_flip()

Add title, caption for the data source, and x-axis label

bias_count |>
  head(10) |>
  ggplot(aes(x=reorder(biasmotivedescription, n), y = n)) +
  geom_col() +
  coord_flip()+
  labs(x = "",
       y = "Counts of hatecrime types based on motive",
       title = "Bar Graph of Hate Crimes from 2019-2026",
       subtitle = "Counts based on the hatecrime motive",
       caption = "Source: NY State Division of Criminal Justice Services")

Finally add color and change the theme

bias_count |>
  head(10) |>
  ggplot(aes(x=reorder(biasmotivedescription, n), y = n)) +
  geom_col(fill = "salmon") +
  coord_flip()+
  labs(x = "",
       y = "Counts of hatecrime types based on motive",
       title = "Bar Graph of Hate Crimes from 2019-2026",
       subtitle = "Counts based on the hatecrime motive",
       caption = "Source: NY State Division of Criminal Justice Services") +
  theme_minimal()

Add annotations for counts and remove the x-axis values

bias_count |>
  head(10) |>
  ggplot(aes(x=reorder(biasmotivedescription, n), y = n)) +
  geom_col(fill = "salmon") +
  coord_flip()+
  labs(x = "",
       y = "Counts of hatecrime types based on motive",
       title = "Bar Graph of Hate Crimes from 2019-2026",
       subtitle = "Counts based on the hatecrime motive",
       caption = "Source: NY State Division of Criminal Justice Services") +
  theme_minimal()+
  geom_text(aes(label = n), hjust = -.05, size = 3) +
  theme(axis.text.x = element_blank())

Look deeper into crimes against Jewish, Asian, Black people, and gay males

Spelling makes a difference, so be careful!

First check the year totals

hate_year <- hatecrimes |>
  filter(biasmotivedescription %in% c("ANTI-JEWISH", "ANTI-MALE HOMOSEXUAL (GAY)", "ANTI-ASIAN", "ANTI-BLACK"))|>
  group_by(complaintyearnumber) |>
  count(biasmotivedescription)|>
  arrange(desc(n))
hate_year
# A tibble: 28 × 3
# Groups:   complaintyearnumber [7]
   complaintyearnumber biasmotivedescription          n
                 <dbl> <chr>                      <int>
 1                2024 ANTI-JEWISH                  371
 2                2023 ANTI-JEWISH                  343
 3                2025 ANTI-JEWISH                  320
 4                2022 ANTI-JEWISH                  279
 5                2019 ANTI-JEWISH                  252
 6                2021 ANTI-JEWISH                  215
 7                2021 ANTI-ASIAN                   150
 8                2020 ANTI-JEWISH                  126
 9                2023 ANTI-MALE HOMOSEXUAL (GAY)   116
10                2022 ANTI-ASIAN                    91
# ℹ 18 more rows

Then check the county totals

hate_county <- hatecrimes |>
  filter(biasmotivedescription %in% c("ANTI-JEWISH", "ANTI-MALE HOMOSEXUAL (GAY)", "ANTI-ASIAN", "ANTI-BLACK"))|>
  group_by(county) |>
  count(biasmotivedescription)|>
  arrange(desc(n))
hate_county
# A tibble: 20 × 3
# Groups:   county [5]
   county   biasmotivedescription          n
   <chr>    <chr>                      <int>
 1 KINGS    ANTI-JEWISH                  798
 2 NEW YORK ANTI-JEWISH                  651
 3 QUEENS   ANTI-JEWISH                  289
 4 NEW YORK ANTI-MALE HOMOSEXUAL (GAY)   237
 5 NEW YORK ANTI-ASIAN                   228
 6 KINGS    ANTI-MALE HOMOSEXUAL (GAY)   120
 7 KINGS    ANTI-BLACK                    99
 8 BRONX    ANTI-JEWISH                   92
 9 QUEENS   ANTI-MALE HOMOSEXUAL (GAY)    91
10 KINGS    ANTI-ASIAN                    80
11 NEW YORK ANTI-BLACK                    79
12 QUEENS   ANTI-ASIAN                    78
13 RICHMOND ANTI-JEWISH                   76
14 QUEENS   ANTI-BLACK                    75
15 BRONX    ANTI-MALE HOMOSEXUAL (GAY)    35
16 RICHMOND ANTI-BLACK                    35
17 BRONX    ANTI-BLACK                    27
18 BRONX    ANTI-ASIAN                    10
19 RICHMOND ANTI-MALE HOMOSEXUAL (GAY)     6
20 RICHMOND ANTI-ASIAN                     5

Check information combining totals from counties and years

hate2 <- hatecrimes |>
  filter(biasmotivedescription %in% c("ANTI-JEWISH", "ANTI-MALE HOMOSEXUAL (GAY)", "ANTI-ASIAN", "ANTI-BLACK"))|>
  group_by(complaintyearnumber, county) |>
  count(biasmotivedescription)|>
  arrange(desc(n))
hate2
# A tibble: 127 × 4
# Groups:   complaintyearnumber, county [35]
   complaintyearnumber county   biasmotivedescription     n
                 <dbl> <chr>    <chr>                 <int>
 1                2024 KINGS    ANTI-JEWISH             152
 2                2024 NEW YORK ANTI-JEWISH             136
 3                2025 KINGS    ANTI-JEWISH             136
 4                2019 KINGS    ANTI-JEWISH             128
 5                2023 KINGS    ANTI-JEWISH             126
 6                2022 KINGS    ANTI-JEWISH             125
 7                2023 NEW YORK ANTI-JEWISH             124
 8                2025 NEW YORK ANTI-JEWISH             110
 9                2022 NEW YORK ANTI-JEWISH             104
10                2021 NEW YORK ANTI-ASIAN               84
# ℹ 117 more rows

Plot these three types of hate crimes together

Use the following commands to finalize your barplot: - position = “dodge” makes side-by-side bars, rather than stacked bars - stat = “identity” allows you to plot each set of bars for each year between 2010 and 2016 - ggtitle gives the plot a title - labs gives a title to the legend

ggplot(data = hate2) +
  geom_bar(aes(x=complaintyearnumber, y=n, fill = biasmotivedescription),
      position = "dodge", stat = "identity") +
  labs(fill = "Hate Crime Type",
       y = "Number of Hate Crime Incidents",
       title = "Hate Crime Type in NY Counties Between 2010-2016",
       caption = "Source: NY State Division of Criminal Justice Services")

We can see that hate crimes against Jewish people continually rose from 2020 to 2024, while hate crimes agains gay males and Asian people decreased during that same time frame.

What about the counties?

I have not dealt with the counties, but I think that is the next place to explore. I can make bar graphs by county instead of by year.

ggplot(data = hate2) +
  geom_bar(aes(x=county, y=n, fill = biasmotivedescription),
      position = "dodge", stat = "identity") +
  labs(fill = "Hate Crime Type",
       y = "Number of Hate Crime Incidents",
       title = "Hate Crime Type in NY Counties Between 2010-2016",
       caption = "Source: NY State Division of Criminal Justice Services")

The highest counts

We can see that the highest counts of hate crimes against Jewish, Asian, and Black people took place in Kings County (Brooklyn) and New York County

Put it all together with years and counties using “facet”

ggplot(data = hate2) +
  geom_bar(aes(x=complaintyearnumber, y=n, fill = biasmotivedescription),
      position = "dodge", stat = "identity") +
  facet_wrap(~county) +
  labs(fill = "Hate Crime Type",
       y = "Number of Hate Crime Incidents",
       title = "Hate Crime Type in NY Counties Between 2010-2016",
       caption = "Source: NY State Division of Criminal Justice Services")

How would calculations be affected by looking at hate crimes in counties per year by population densities?

Bring in census data for populations of New York counties. These are estimates from the 2010 census.

setwd("C:/Users/rsaidi/Dropbox/Rachel/MontColl/Datasets/Datasets")
nypop <- read_csv("nyc_census_pop_2020.csv")

Clean the county name to match the other dataset

Rename the variable “Geography” as “county” so that it matches in the other dataset.

nypop$`Area Name` <- gsub(" County", "", nypop$`Area Name`)
nypop2 <- nypop |>
  rename(county = `Area Name`)|>
  select(county, `2020 Census Population`)
head(nypop2)
# A tibble: 6 × 2
  county      `2020 Census Population`
  <chr>                          <dbl>
1 Albany                        314848
2 Allegany                       46456
3 Bronx                        1472654
4 Broome                        198683
5 Cattaraugus                    77042
6 Cayuga                         76248

Join the hate2 data with nypop

datajoin <- left_join(hate2, nypop2, by=c("county"))
datajoin
# A tibble: 127 × 5
# Groups:   complaintyearnumber, county [35]
   complaintyearnumber county biasmotivedescription     n 2020 Census Populati…¹
                 <dbl> <chr>  <chr>                 <int>                  <dbl>
 1                2024 KINGS  ANTI-JEWISH             152                     NA
 2                2024 NEW Y… ANTI-JEWISH             136                     NA
 3                2025 KINGS  ANTI-JEWISH             136                     NA
 4                2019 KINGS  ANTI-JEWISH             128                     NA
 5                2023 KINGS  ANTI-JEWISH             126                     NA
 6                2022 KINGS  ANTI-JEWISH             125                     NA
 7                2023 NEW Y… ANTI-JEWISH             124                     NA
 8                2025 NEW Y… ANTI-JEWISH             110                     NA
 9                2022 NEW Y… ANTI-JEWISH             104                     NA
10                2021 NEW Y… ANTI-ASIAN               84                     NA
# ℹ 117 more rows
# ℹ abbreviated name: ¹​`2020 Census Population`

It didn’t work - the new column has NA values

The counties are upper case in hate2 and mixed in nypop

hate_new <- hate2 |>
  mutate(county = as_factor(str_to_lower(as.character(county))))
nypop_new <- nypop2 |>
  mutate(county = as_factor(str_to_lower(as.character(county))))

Try joining again

datajoin <- left_join(hate_new, nypop_new, by=c("county"))
datajoin
# A tibble: 127 × 5
# Groups:   complaintyearnumber, county [35]
   complaintyearnumber county biasmotivedescription     n 2020 Census Populati…¹
                 <dbl> <fct>  <chr>                 <int>                  <dbl>
 1                2024 kings  ANTI-JEWISH             152                2736074
 2                2024 new y… ANTI-JEWISH             136                1694251
 3                2025 kings  ANTI-JEWISH             136                2736074
 4                2019 kings  ANTI-JEWISH             128                2736074
 5                2023 kings  ANTI-JEWISH             126                2736074
 6                2022 kings  ANTI-JEWISH             125                2736074
 7                2023 new y… ANTI-JEWISH             124                1694251
 8                2025 new y… ANTI-JEWISH             110                1694251
 9                2022 new y… ANTI-JEWISH             104                1694251
10                2021 new y… ANTI-ASIAN               84                1694251
# ℹ 117 more rows
# ℹ abbreviated name: ¹​`2020 Census Population`

Calculate the rate of incidents per 100,000. Then arrange in descending order

datajoinrate <- datajoin |>
  mutate(rate = n/`2020 Census Population`* 100000) |>
  arrange(desc(rate))
datajoinrate
# A tibble: 127 × 6
# Groups:   complaintyearnumber, county [35]
   complaintyearnumber county biasmotivedescription     n 2020 Census Populati…¹
                 <dbl> <fct>  <chr>                 <int>                  <dbl>
 1                2024 new y… ANTI-JEWISH             136                1694251
 2                2023 new y… ANTI-JEWISH             124                1694251
 3                2025 new y… ANTI-JEWISH             110                1694251
 4                2022 new y… ANTI-JEWISH             104                1694251
 5                2024 kings  ANTI-JEWISH             152                2736074
 6                2025 kings  ANTI-JEWISH             136                2736074
 7                2021 new y… ANTI-ASIAN               84                1694251
 8                2021 new y… ANTI-JEWISH              84                1694251
 9                2019 kings  ANTI-JEWISH             128                2736074
10                2023 kings  ANTI-JEWISH             126                2736074
# ℹ 117 more rows
# ℹ abbreviated name: ¹​`2020 Census Population`
# ℹ 1 more variable: rate <dbl>

Notice that the highest rates of hate crimes happened in:

New York and Kings counties

Your turn!

Once you complete this tutorial, include an essay of about 150-200 words which that answers the following questions:

  1. Write about the positive and negative aspects of this hatecrimes dataset.

  2. List 2 different paths you could hypothetically like to study about this dataset at some future point.