2026-02-08

Research Goal

We want to use coin flips to estimate the population proportion of Heads using a parameter and point estimator.

  • Parameter: Probability of Heads “\(p\)”
  • Point Estimator: Sample Proportion “\(\hat{p} = \frac{X}{n}\)”

Point Estimation

If a coin is flipped \(n\) times and we observe the amount of times \(X\) it lands on Heads:

\[\hat{p} = \frac{X}{n}\]

Estimated Sampling Variability

When flipping a coin a repeated number of times, there’s a difference in answers. To calculate this difference, we calculate the Standard Error: including the

Theoretical Standard Error: \(SE(\hat{p})\) and Estimated Standard Error: \(\widehat{SE}(\hat{p})\)

\[ SE(\hat{p}) = \sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n}} \qquad \widehat{SE}(\hat{p})=\sqrt{\frac{\hat{p}(1-\hat{p})}{n}} \]

Sampling Distribution of \(\hat{p}\)

Creation of repeated coin flip experiments and the distribution of \(\hat{p}\) plotted

Sampling Distribution vs Sample Size

Using this graph, we can test the estimate variability among different sample sizes. The results of the graph show that when using larger samples, it produces more consistent and precise estimates.

Effect of Sample Size Closer Look

Using this graph, we can take a closer look on the effect different sample sizes have on distribution. We can see that tests with a larger sample size give a more consistent and accurate data set, closest to 50/50 Heads vs Tails as possible.

R Code Example to simulate \(\hat{p}\)

p_true <-  0.6 # real probability the coin lands on heads
n <- 50 # number of times coin is flipped
B <- 2000 # number of times experiment is repeated

phat <-  replicate(B, rbinom(1, size = n, prob = p_true) / n) 
#main simulation for coin flip

 m <- mean(phat) # average of all estimates
s <- sd(phat) #standard deviation of estimates

m
## [1] 0.60165
s
## [1] 0.06911343

Overall Takeaway

-Using the generated simulated coin flips we collected data and compared it to a known true probability

-From each sample, we estimated the probability using \(\hat{p}\)

-By repeating the samples and test, it showed how the estimate changes across experiments

-The graphs showed a tighter distribution of reesults when the sample size was increased

-Overall, these tests and data show how sample size improves estimate reliability and shows how point estimation works.