Cover Page

Author: Sammi Johnson Matrikelnummer: 8228156 Article Title: The tepary bean genome provides insight into evolution and domestication under heat stress Article URL/DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22858-x

Introduction

  • Short information about the paper. Summary of main aims and findings.
    • TBD
  • Why did you choose this paper
    • TBD

Main Body

Abstract

  • Does it reflect content of the paper?
    • TBD
  • Does it describe the main findings?
    • TBD
  • Is it accessible to more general audience?
    • TBD

Introduction

  • Does it give sufficient background to understand the rationale for research?
    • TBD
  • Does it link/refer to previous research?
    • TBD

Methods

  • To your knowledge, are the methods appropriate?
    • TBD
  • Are they described in sufficient details (for example software and software version) to reproduce the research?
    • TBD
  • Are the methods state of the art or is the approach outdated? (for example short reads used for assembly when long reads could be produced)
    • TBD
  • Is the data/code publicly available?
    • TBD
  • Can you pinpoint any weaknesses of the study design?
    • TBD

Results

  • Can the results section be easily followed? Are there subheadings to help guide the reader?
    • TBD
    • TBD
  • Are the figures readable and is the information well presented? Are the legends/captions sufficient to understand the figures even without reading the whole text in detail?
    • TBD
    • TBD
  • Do the text and figures complement each other well or are there repetitions which could be avoided? Are all figures/tables mentioned in the text? Does the text expand on them?
    • TBD
    • TBD
    • TBD
  • Are there sections of text or figures/tables which are difficult to understand?
    • TBD
  • Do the results appear reliable? Are there sufficient quality checks?
    • TBD
    • TBD
  • Can you see any inconsistencies in between the figures and text?
    • TBD
  • Are there any potential errors in the results section?
    • TBD

Discussion

  • Does the discussion provide interpretation, described significance of the results?
    • TBD
  • Does the interpretation arise logically from the data? Is the discussion interesting? Does it point out any conclusions/inferences not immediately obvious from the results?
    • TBD
    • TBD
    • TBD
  • Does the discussion mention limitations of the study and points to future research?
    • TBD

Conclusion

  • Did you like the paper? What did you like about it? What did you not? Could it be mostly understood by more general audience?
    • TBD
    • TBD
    • TBD
  • Did you learn anything new?
    • TBD
  • Would you recommend it to others? Why yes, why not?
    • TBD