Chapter One An Overview of Human Resource Management 1.1. Definition
and Nature of Human Resource Management Organisations use different
resources such as human resource, material resource, financial resource,
informational resource, and others. The human resource among this is the
most important resource that derives the effective utilization of all
the remaining resources. If the human resources of an organization are
neglected of managed the organisation is unlikely to do well in fact may
fail. Human Resource Management (HRM) is concerned with the process of
planning, organising, coordinating, directing and controlling the
activities of human resource in an organization. It is concerned with
obtaining, developing, and utilizing the right type of people within the
right quality and right quantity from the right source at the right time
and right cost in order to achieve organizational objectives. HRM is
concerned with the human side of an organisation and employees relation
with their work and work environment. Its purpose is to ensure that the
employees of the organisation are used in such a way that the employer
obtains the greatest possible benefit and psychological award from their
work and employees obtain the maximum possible development from their
work and their organization. To look into human resource management more
closely, it helps to go through the various definitions describing its
meaning as indicated below: i. Human Resource management deals with the
design of formal systems in an organization to ensure the effective and
efficient use of human talent to accomplish organizational goals. In an
organization, the management of human resources means that they must be
recruited, compensated, trained, and developed. ii. Human resource
management (HRM), centres on the policies, practices, and systems that
influence employees’ behaviour, attitudes, and performance. Many
companies refer to HRM as “people practices.”
iii. Human resource management refers to the total sum of all the
inherent abilities required knowledge and skills represented by the
aptitudes, attitudes, and talents of organisational work force. iv.
Human resource management is the process of achieving organizational
objectives by acquiring, developing, retaining, and properly using the
human resource in an organisation. v. Human resource is the effective
utilisation of human resource to achieve organisational objectives.
Nature of Human Resource Management The nature of HRM is clear from the
following points: 1. Human focus: HRM is concerned with the management
of people possessing capabilities in organisational settings. It is
individual oriented. 2. Pervasive: HRM is a pervasive function of
management. It is performed by all levels of management. 3. Continuous:
HRM is a continuous. It is not a one-time activity. It is concerned with
present as well as future. 4. Dynamic: HRM is a dynamic function. It is
greatly affected by the changes in the environment. It is
action-oriented. 5. System: HRM is a system consisting of interrelated,
acquisition, development, motivation, and maintenance subsystems. It
utilizes the potential of the workforce to improve their productive
contribution. If these are what HRM, what then is a HR manager? What is
HR Manger? A manager is an individual working for an organization who: o
Practices management by performing planning, organising, directing and
controlling functions. o Makes decisions o Solves organizational
problems, and o Is responsible for the work of at least one other person
reporting to him. HR Manager is a person who handles employment,
training, and development, compensation and benefits admin, and employee
relations functions. HR Manager act in an advisory capacity, working
with other managers regarding human resource matters. The human resource
manager is responsible for coordinating the management of human
resources to help the organization achieve its objectives. 1.2.
Importance of Human Resource Management The uniqueness of human resource
in organisations requires a separate and independent treatment and study
of HRM.
Some of the reasons for giving emphasis to the study of human resource
management include the following: i. Human Behaviour is complex People
provide the greatest challenge in organizations and relationship between
people is delicate with highly uncertain performance. Unlike other
resources, human resource is the most complex resource that needs strong
emphasis and special attention. Workers are easily disappointed and this
leads to significant damage in performance and objective of the
organization. ii. Cost This day’s manpower is becoming increasingly
costly. The percentage component of manpower expenditure is increasing
among the cost functions and organizational budgets. Costs such as
salaries, benefits and services are increasing form time to time. Unlike
other costs, the cost of human resource is difficult to reduce once it
is provide to workers. Therefore careful study of human resource
management study will help to control human resource costs.
1.3. Evolution and Development of Human Resource Management The origin human resource management is probably unknown. One can say HRM is as old as the human society itself. Some of the ancient greatest achievements such as the wall of China and Babylon, the pyramid of Egypt, the obelistk of Axum, the Djegol wall of Harar and others are witnesses where these achievements were made practical through some sort of management of human resource and the practice has changed from time to time in different societies. Development of HRM in Different Societies i. Primitive society During the primitive society “Natural division of labour” was based on criteria like age, sex, race and so on and the leadership were based on natural division of labour. The elders were usually taking the role of administration and the youth were administered. The relationship between the administrators and the administered was based on mutual concern with no antagonistic contradictions. ii. Slave society Administrative relationship during this period was between the slaves and the slave owners. Slave owners had absolute authority on the slaves and slaves were not considered as human beings and human resource. They were rather considered as tools or animals that were hunted, captured, bought, and sold in the market and killed. There were strong antagonistic contradictions between “workers”(slaves) and employers (salve owners). iii. Feudal society In the feudal society land was basic economic resource and the society was divided into two. The land lords and peasants. The peasants earned their living by working on the land of the lords. The land lords were administering the peasants (‘workers’) who were obliged to pay several types of taxes to the land lords in exchange of farming on the land. The taxes were too harsh which left the peasants between life and death. This unhealthy relationship between the land lords and peasants led to antagonistic relationships with no proper human resource concept. iv. Capitalist society This society emerged with the industrial revolution in about 1750. It marked a shift from hand or manual to the use of machinery because of the invention of steam engine. The industrial revolution which began in the mid eighteenth century in England was characterized by the development of machinery, the linkage of power to machines and the
establishment of factories employed many workers. Extensive
specialisation of labour where individual workers performed very narrow
tasks was introduces leading to human resource specialization. The
capitalist society was divided in to two with respect to HR and
administration as owners of capital and labour. a. The early stage of
capitalist society At the beginning the owners of factories were
managing employees of their organisation and their primary objective was
to have maximum profit. They gave much emphasis to mechanization and
profit than to human resource wellbeing. They concentrated on reducing
HR costs by employing the following methods. i. Poor and unpleasant
working conditions ii. Long working hours
iii. Minimum payment iv. Employment of children v. Physical punishment
etc. Such harsh treatment led to antagonistic contradictions and this
phase of capitalism caused the creation of labour unions. b. Later stage
of capitalism This stage is marked by industrial revolution and
emergence of theories, principles and guidelines of administration. The
owners now could not effectively administer or supervise their workers.
This was mainly because the owners were becoming more skilful and had
better knowledge of the job than the owners themselves. This made the
owner to delegate the task of administration to better skilled and
knowledgeable workers selected from the workforce.
This marked the separation of capital in to ownership and
administration. The workers which had been delegated the authority of
administration did not administer the organizations as the owners did
because they had dual responsibility to the owners and to the workers.
The workers started to come up with theories, administrative principles
and guidelines. 1.4. Purposes and Objectives of Human Resource
Management The main purpose of HRM is to provide efficient and effective
workforce which in other words is to have right people with the right
talent, knowledge and experience that are able to contribute towards the
achievement of objectives. Human resource has different purposes to
different stakeholders. These include: a. Purpose of HRM to Owners To
owners of an organization HRM has to play the purpose of assisting the
achievement of objectives. To business organizations HRM should
contribute in achieving the profit and productivity objectives. In
non-business organisations too HRM has a purpose in achieving client
satisfaction and other objectives. b. Purpose of HRM to Employees
Employees of a given organization require the HRM to assist them
personal goals such as:
Adequate income
Job security
Pleasant working conditions iv. Room for growth and development
Better quality of work life etc.
Purpose of HRM to the Society The society requires HRM to contribute to the product quality and to high societal values including fair competition, healthy environment, economic and social development etc.
Purpose of HRM to the Law Government requires HRM to comply with
the laws and regulations of the state which may include: Avoiding
discrimination
Allowing equal employment opportunities Fair treatment of workers
Application of the minimum pay provisions etc. 1.5. The Philosophy of
Human Resource Management
Mutual goal: the organization and individuals depend on each other.
Mutual respect: HRM believes that individuals need to be respected.
“Give respect and take respect”. Mutual rewards: HRM believes in the
mutual reward system. Both individual and organisations need to be
rewarded. Mutual Responsibilities: the individuals and the
organizations are responsible mutually. 1.6. Roles of Line Managers and
Human Resource Professionals
All managers are, in a sense, HR managers, since they all get involved
in activities like recruiting, interviewing, selecting, and
training.
Human resource management is the subsystem of the total management
system. It is primarily concerned with management of people, individuals
or groups at work as well as their inter-relationship. Human resource
management as an organizational function in most of the cases is viewed
as a staff function. Staff functions provide advisory, control or
support services to the line functions Line functions are those portions
of the organization directly concerned with operations resulting in
products or services. A. HR professional’s role, human resource
professionals typically assume four areas of responsibility i. Establish
human resource management procedures and methods. ii. Monitor/evaluate
human resource practices(control human resource practices) iii. Service
role iv. Advise/assist managers on human resource management related
matters B. Line manager’s role, line managers’ role is directing
employee’s day-to-daytasks.
1.7. Personnel Management Vs Human Resource Management From the 1960s
up to the mid-1980s, personal management was the term most commonly used
to describe the specialist occupation concerned with managing people.
However, in the last twenty years, the title”HRM”, an import form the
USA, has become more frequently used. HRM differs from personnel
management both in scope and orientation. HRM views people as an
important source or asset to be used for the benefit of organizations,
employees and the society. It is emerging as a distinct philosophy of
management aiming at policies that promote mutuality. Though a distinct
philosophy, HRM cannot be treated in isolation. It is being integrated
into the overall strategic management of business.
It is a systems approach to management of capabilities of people. It is
concerned with interrelationships of acquisition, development,
motivation and maintenance functions. It regards people as a resource
and emphasizes development and utilization of human potential. It is
regarded as a concern of all managers. On the other hand, personnel
management it is a traditional approach to management of people. It
focuses on personnel administration, employee welfare and labour
relations. It is more discipline and control oriented to perform
maintenance function. It is regarded as a staff function in the
organisation structure. Personnel management has a limited scope and
inverted orientation. It viewed labour as a tool, the behaviour of which
could be manipulated for the benefit of the organization and replaced
when it was worn out. The personnel function was treated as routine
activity meant to hire new employees and to maintain personnel records.
It was never considered a part of the strategic management of
businesses. Historically, PM preceded HRM. The other difference worth
mentioning is that personnel management has a strong functional focus.
That is, personnel managers were primarily concerned with the
administration of specific employee related functions such as hiring,
training, wage setting, and disciplinary action. It was never considered
as a part of the strategic management of business.
1.8. Environmental Challenges of Human Resource Management Almost all
the activities and functions of human resource administration are
influenced by numerous environmental factors. Broadly categorized, there
are internal and external environmental factors that affect the human
resource activities. The effects of these factors may be positive or
negative depending on the circumstances.
Internal environmental factors are those that influence the HRM from
within the organisation itself and they are relatively well under the
control of the management of the organisation. External factors on the
other hand, are factors provide opportunities and threats to the HRM
functions and activities of an organisation. The following table shows
some of the factors that affect HRM. Human Resource: Environmental
Factors A. Internal Factors o Policies and strategies of the
organisation o Nature of the work o Nature and attitude of the work
group o Leadership styles and philosophies o Organisational style. Etc.
B. External Factors o Government rules and regulations o Labour unions o
Economic conditions o Diversity of the work force o Geographic location
of organisations o Labour market conditions