Load libraries
library(readr)
library(ggplot2)
Load data
hr <- read_csv("https://raw.githubusercontent.com/aiplanethub/Datasets/refs/heads/master/HR_comma_sep.csv")
## Rows: 14999 Columns: 10
## ── Column specification ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
## Delimiter: ","
## chr (2): Department, salary
## dbl (8): satisfaction_level, last_evaluation, number_project, average_montly...
##
## ℹ Use `spec()` to retrieve the full column specification for this data.
## ℹ Specify the column types or set `show_col_types = FALSE` to quiet this message.
2. Interpret the results in technical terms.For each correlation,
explain what the test’s p-value means (significance).
The p-value is less than 0.05, which means the correlation is
statistically significant. Because the p-value is extremely small,
we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is evidence of
a relationship between satisfaction level and last evaluation.
————————————————————————————————————————————-
The correlation coefficient is 0.28, which indicates a positive and
small-to-moderate relationship. This means that as satisfaction
increases, last evaluation scores tend to increase as well, but not
perfectly.
3. Interpret the results in non-technical terms.For each
correlation, what do the results mean in non-techical terms.
Employees who are more satisfied tend to receive better performance
evaluations.In other words, happier employees usually get higher
performance ratings.
4. Create a plot that helps visualize the correlation. For each
correlation, create a graph to
help visualize the realtionship between the two variables. The title
must be the non-technical interpretation.
ggplot(hr, aes(x = last_evaluation, y = satisfaction_level)) +
geom_point(alpha = 0.2) +
geom_smooth(method = "lm", se = FALSE, color = "blue") +
labs(
title = "Last Evaluation Score VS Satisfaction Level",
x = "Last Evaluation Score",
y = "Satisfaction Level"
)
## `geom_smooth()` using formula = 'y ~ x'

Employees who are more satisfied tend to receive better performance
evaluations.