A clothing company recently launched a marketing campaign featuring a famous actor. The goal was to increase profits (USD) by associating the brand with a well-liked celebrity. After the campaign, the company wants to determine if the campaign was effective. The company has data for 60 clothing stores. Did the sales increase after the campaign?
Used to test if there is a difference between Before scores and After scores (comparing the means).
There is no difference in store sales before and after the marketing campaign.
There is a difference in store sales before and after the marketing campaign.
Import your Excel dataset into R to conduct analyses.
chooseCRANmirror(graphics = FALSE, ind = 1)
install.packages("readxl")
## Installing package into 'C:/Users/manit/AppData/Local/R/win-library/4.5'
## (as 'lib' is unspecified)
## package 'readxl' successfully unpacked and MD5 sums checked
## Warning: cannot remove prior installation of package 'readxl'
## Warning in file.copy(savedcopy, lib, recursive = TRUE): problem copying
## C:\Users\manit\AppData\Local\R\win-library\4.5\00LOCK\readxl\libs\x64\readxl.dll
## to C:\Users\manit\AppData\Local\R\win-library\4.5\readxl\libs\x64\readxl.dll:
## Permission denied
## Warning: restored 'readxl'
##
## The downloaded binary packages are in
## C:\Users\manit\AppData\Local\Temp\RtmpCMKnXI\downloaded_packages
library(readxl)
A6R4<- read_excel("C:\\Users\\manit\\OneDrive\\Desktop\\A6R4.xlsx")
Purpose: Calculate the difference between the Before scores versus the after scores.
Before <- A6R4$PreCampaignSales
After <- A6R4$PostCampaignSales
Differences <- After - Before
Create a histogram for difference scores to visually check skewness and kurtosis.
hist(Differences,
main = "Histogram of Difference Scores",
xlab = "Value",
ylab = "Frequency",
col = "blue",
border = "black",
breaks = 20)
QUESTION 1: Is the histograms symmetrical, positively skewed, or
negatively skewed?
ANSWER: The histogram is positively
skewed.
QUESTION 2: Did the histogram look too flat, too tall, or did it
have a proper bell curve?
ANSWER:The histogram does not follow a
proper bell curve.proper bell-shaped curve.
Check the normality for the difference between the groups.
shapiro.test(Differences)
##
## Shapiro-Wilk normality test
##
## data: Differences
## W = 0.94747, p-value = 0.01186
QUESTION 1: Was the data normally distributed or abnormally
distributed?
ANSWER:The data is abnormally distributed because p
< .05.
Check for any outliers impacting the mean.
boxplot(Differences,
main = "Distribution of Score Differences (After - Before)",
ylab = "Difference in Scores",
col = "blue",
border = "darkblue")
QUESTION 1: How many dots are in your boxplot?
Ans)One or
two dots.
QUESTION 2: Where are the dots in your boxplot?
Ans)The
dots are Far away from the whiskers.
QUESTION 3: Based on the dots and there location, is the data
normal?
Ans) From the boxplot, I can see one outlier sitting far
above the whiskers. Since this point is clearly separated from the rest
of the data, it means the distribution isn’t really normal. A normal
dataset would have no outliers or maybe one or two very close to the
whiskers. But here, the outlier is too extreme, so the data is not
normal.
mean(Before, na.rm = TRUE)
## [1] 25154.53
median(Before, na.rm = TRUE)
## [1] 24624
sd(Before, na.rm = TRUE)
## [1] 12184.4
length(Before)
## [1] 60
mean(After, na.rm = TRUE)
## [1] 26873.45
median(After, na.rm = TRUE)
## [1] 25086
sd(After, na.rm = TRUE)
## [1] 14434.37
length(After)
## [1] 60
wilcox.test(Before, After, paired = TRUE)
##
## Wilcoxon signed rank test with continuity correction
##
## data: Before and After
## V = 640, p-value = 0.0433
## alternative hypothesis: true location shift is not equal to 0
If results were statistically significant (p < .05), continue to effect size section below.If results were NOT statistically significant (p > .05), skip to reporting section below.
Purpose: Determine how big of a difference there was between the group means.
install.packages("coin")
## Installing package into 'C:/Users/manit/AppData/Local/R/win-library/4.5'
## (as 'lib' is unspecified)
## package 'coin' successfully unpacked and MD5 sums checked
## Warning: cannot remove prior installation of package 'coin'
## Warning in file.copy(savedcopy, lib, recursive = TRUE): problem copying
## C:\Users\manit\AppData\Local\R\win-library\4.5\00LOCK\coin\libs\x64\coin.dll to
## C:\Users\manit\AppData\Local\R\win-library\4.5\coin\libs\x64\coin.dll:
## Permission denied
## Warning: restored 'coin'
##
## The downloaded binary packages are in
## C:\Users\manit\AppData\Local\Temp\RtmpCMKnXI\downloaded_packages
install.packages("rstatix")
## Installing package into 'C:/Users/manit/AppData/Local/R/win-library/4.5'
## (as 'lib' is unspecified)
## package 'rstatix' successfully unpacked and MD5 sums checked
##
## The downloaded binary packages are in
## C:\Users\manit\AppData\Local\Temp\RtmpCMKnXI\downloaded_packages
library(coin)
## Loading required package: survival
library(rstatix)
##
## Attaching package: 'rstatix'
## The following objects are masked from 'package:coin':
##
## chisq_test, friedman_test, kruskal_test, sign_test, wilcox_test
## The following object is masked from 'package:stats':
##
## filter
df_long <- data.frame(
id = rep(1:length(Before), 2),
time = rep(c("Before", "After"), each = length(Before)),
score = c(Before, After)
)
wilcox_effsize(df_long, score ~ time, paired = TRUE)
## # A tibble: 1 × 7
## .y. group1 group2 effsize n1 n2 magnitude
## * <chr> <chr> <chr> <dbl> <int> <int> <ord>
## 1 score After Before 0.261 60 60 small
Q1) What is the size of the effect?
Ans)The effect size is
0.26, which is considered a small effect.
Q2) Which group had the higher average score?
Ans)The
After group had the higher average score, meaning scores increased after
the intervention.
A Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test was conducted to compare the sales before and after a marketing campaign of a clothing company. Median sales were significantly lower before the campaign (Md = 24624) than after (Md = 25086), V = 640, p = 0.0433. These results indicate that the campaign has successfully managed to increase the clothing brand’s sales. The effect size was r = 0.261, indicating a small effect.