25_11.14-UncivilPrejudicePilot2 (Prej versus Uncivil) - rerun

Design

Participants read an email exchange where a man (Paul) said something [sexist/generally rude]: “No idea, but it’s a leadership position so I doubt very many women will apply. And the women who do apply probably won’t be very strong.” And then another man (Jeff) responded: “Shut up, Paul. No one wants to hear what you have to say.”

Manipulations

Over the course of an email exchange, a coworker (Paul) says something rude about:
- Sexism: the other women in your workplace.
- General: the other analysts in your workplace.

Items

Status

To what extent do you agree with the following statements?

Item label Item text - 3 0 3
posstat1 After his response back to Paul, I think Jeff is worthy of…: -3. A lot of disrespect 0. Neither disrespect nor respect 3. A lot of respect
posstat2 After his response back to Paul, I hold Jeff… -3. In very low regard 0. In neither low regard nor high regard 3. In very high regard
posstat3 After his response back to Paul, in terms of being like Jeff…: -3. I want to be very different from him -3. A lot of disrespect 0. I don’t want to be like him, or different from him

Rewards

Do you think that Jeff should experience any of the following changes after his response to Paul?

Item label Item text - 3 0 3
reward1 change in his salary: -3. should definitely be decreased 0. would keep the same 3. should definitely be increased
reward2 change in his job rank: -3. should definitely be demoted 0. would keep the same 3. should definitely be promoted
reward3 change in visibility of his project assignments: -3. Should be assigned to projects with very low visibility 0. Should remain on projects with the same visibility as before 3. Should be assigned to projects with high visibility
reward4 change in his public recognition: -3. Should definitely be decreased 0. Should be kept the same 3. Should definitely be increased

Social Rewards

Do you think that Jeff should experience any of the following changes after his response to Paul?

Item label Item text - 3 0 3
socreward1 at the next work event: -3. I would avoid Jeff 0. I would neither avoid nor approach Jeff 3. I would approach Jeff
socreward2 how much closer did you feel to Jeff?: -3. I felt much more distant from him 0. The amount of closeness I felt towards him did not change 3. I felt much closer to him
socreward3 how would the amount of time that you want to spend with Jeff change?: -3. I would want to spend much less time with him 0. I would not want to change the amount of time I spend with him 3. I would want to spend much more time with him

Perceptions of Paul

When Jeff responded to Paul, did you feel…

My coding Text
jeff_concerned Jeff is concerned about the needs and interests of women
jeff_goals the goals and aspirations of women are important to Jeff
jeff_desires Jeff considers womens’ wishes and desires to be relevant
empowered
protected
safe
comfortable
motivated
disruptive this will be disruptive to your team’s functioning
harder this will make it harder for you and your teammates to get along
badvibes there will be bad vibes in your team
protectwomen Jeff wants to protect women in your workplace
stiflesexism Jeff wants to stifle sexism in your group
punishsexist Jeff wants to punish sexist colleagues
womenworkplace women’s workplace experiences are important to Jeff
wellbeingimp women’s well-being is important to Jeff

deter/learn uncivil

When Jeff responded to Paul, did you think that Paul… (1 = not at all, 4 = somewhat, 7 = very much so)

  • learnuncivil1: would be uncivil in the future?
  • learnuncivil2: feel intimidated?
  • learnuncivil3: learned his lesson?

Analyses

Midpoint analyses

Main effects

## 
## Call:
## glm(formula = reprimanded ~ instigation_type, family = "binomial", 
##     data = uncivprej3_clean)
## 
## Coefficients:
##                             Estimate Std. Error z value     Pr(>|z|)    
## (Intercept)                   -1.258      0.210   -5.98 0.0000000023 ***
## instigation_typetraditional    0.903      0.275    3.28        0.001 ** 
## ---
## Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
## 
## (Dispersion parameter for binomial family taken to be 1)
## 
##     Null deviance: 327.20  on 261  degrees of freedom
## Residual deviance: 316.05  on 260  degrees of freedom
## AIC: 320
## 
## Number of Fisher Scoring iterations: 4
## 
## Call:
## glm(formula = stayonteam ~ instigation_type, family = "binomial", 
##     data = uncivprej3_clean)
## 
## Coefficients:
##                             Estimate Std. Error z value     Pr(>|z|)    
## (Intercept)                    1.214      0.208    5.84 0.0000000053 ***
## instigation_typetraditional   -0.859      0.273   -3.14       0.0017 ** 
## ---
## Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
## 
## (Dispersion parameter for binomial family taken to be 1)
## 
##     Null deviance: 328.72  on 261  degrees of freedom
## Residual deviance: 318.52  on 260  degrees of freedom
## AIC: 322.5
## 
## Number of Fisher Scoring iterations: 4

Moderation

an asterix means that it reached p > .10 level. Used this benchmark because we are otherwise underpowered for moderation.

Graphs (DV ~ Moderator)

Status ~ learn_1

Status ~ learn_2

Social Rewards ~ learn_2

jeff_concerned ~ learn_1

jeff_concerned ~ learn_2

protected ~ learn_2

Empowered ~ Gender ID

Punishsexist ~ Gender ID

Reprimanded ~ rudeness_1

#### Reprimanded ~ rudeness_2

Mediation

Controls