This analysis is for research scenario 2. It tests to determine whether there is an association between uniform design preference and parent type.
Null Hypothesis (H₀): There is no association
between parent type and uniform design preference.
Alternative Hypothesis (H₁): There is an association
between parent type and uniform design preference.
A Chi-Square Test of Independence was conducted to examine the association between parent type (mother, father) and uniform design preference (Design A, Design B) among 100 participants. The results indicated that there was no statistically significant association between parent type and uniform design preference, χ²(1, N = 100) = 3.25, p = .072. Although the result was not statistically significant, the effect size was small (Cramér’s V = 0.18).
```r # Load required packages library(readxl) library(lsr)
RQ2 <- read_excel(“C:/Users/dadal/Downloads/RQ2.xlsx”)
contingencytable <- table(RQ2\(Parent, RQ2\)Preferred_Design)
chisq_indep <- chisq.test(contingencytable) print(chisq_indep)
## Pearson’s Chi-squared test with Yates’ continuity correction ## ## data: contingencytable ## X-squared = 3.2452, df = 1, p-value = 0.07163
cramers_v <- cramersV(contingencytable) cat(“Cramer’s V (effect size):”, round(cramers_v, 3), “”)