Running a T-test
Karissa Holubiak
2025-10-29
1 Loading Libraries
# install any packages you have not previously used, then comment them back out.
#install.packages("car")
#install.packages("effsize")
library(psych) # for the describe() command
library(car) # for the leveneTest() command## Loading required package: carData##
## Attaching package: 'car'## The following object is masked from 'package:psych':
##
## logitlibrary(effsize) # for the cohen.d() command##
## Attaching package: 'effsize'## The following object is masked from 'package:psych':
##
## cohen.d2 Importing Data
d <- read.csv(file="Data/projectdata.csv", header=T)
# For the HW, you will import the project dataset you cleaned previously
# This will be the dataset you'll use for HWs throughout the rest of the semester3 State Your Hypothesis
There will be a significant difference in self-efficacy by people’s level of age, between 18 to 25 and 26 to 35.
4 Check Your Variables
# you **only** need to check the variables you're using in the current analysis
## Checking the Categorical variable (IV)
str(d)## 'data.frame': 2092 obs. of 7 variables:
## $ ResponseID : chr "R_BJN3bQqi1zUMid3" "R_2TGbiBXmAtxywsD" "R_12G7bIqN2wB2N65" "R_39pldNoon8CePfP" ...
## $ age : chr "1 between 18 and 25" "1 between 18 and 25" "1 between 18 and 25" "1 between 18 and 25" ...
## $ income : chr "1 low" "1 low" "rather not say" "rather not say" ...
## $ moa_independence: num 3.67 3.67 3.5 3 3.83 ...
## $ efficacy : num 3.4 3.4 2.2 2.8 3 2.4 2.3 3 3 3.7 ...
## $ idea : num 3.75 3.88 3.75 3.75 3.5 ...
## $ stress : num 3.3 3.3 4 3.2 3.1 3.5 3.3 2.4 2.9 2.7 ...# if the categorical variable you're using is showing as a "chr" (character), you must change it to be a ** factor ** -- using the next line of code (as.factor)
d$age <- as.factor(d$age)
str(d)## 'data.frame': 2092 obs. of 7 variables:
## $ ResponseID : chr "R_BJN3bQqi1zUMid3" "R_2TGbiBXmAtxywsD" "R_12G7bIqN2wB2N65" "R_39pldNoon8CePfP" ...
## $ age : Factor w/ 4 levels "1 between 18 and 25",..: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ...
## $ income : chr "1 low" "1 low" "rather not say" "rather not say" ...
## $ moa_independence: num 3.67 3.67 3.5 3 3.83 ...
## $ efficacy : num 3.4 3.4 2.2 2.8 3 2.4 2.3 3 3 3.7 ...
## $ idea : num 3.75 3.88 3.75 3.75 3.5 ...
## $ stress : num 3.3 3.3 4 3.2 3.1 3.5 3.3 2.4 2.9 2.7 ...table(d$age, useNA = "always")##
## 1 between 18 and 25 2 between 26 and 35 3 between 36 and 45 4 over 45
## 1928 110 37 17
## <NA>
## 0## Checking the Continuous variable (DV)
# you can use the describe() command on an entire dataframe (d) or just on a single variable within your dataframe -- which we will do here
describe(d$efficacy)## vars n mean sd median trimmed mad min max range skew kurtosis se
## X1 1 2092 3.11 0.44 3.1 3.12 0.44 1.2 4 2.8 -0.2 0.39 0.01# also use a histogram to visualize your continuous variable
hist(d$efficacy)
# use the describeBy() command to view the means and standard deviations by group
# it's very similar to the describe() command but splits the dataframe according to the 'group' variable
describeBy(d$efficacy, group=d$age)##
## Descriptive statistics by group
## group: 1 between 18 and 25
## vars n mean sd median trimmed mad min max range skew kurtosis se
## X1 1 1928 3.1 0.44 3 3.1 0.44 1.2 4 2.8 -0.2 0.45 0.01
## ------------------------------------------------------------
## group: 2 between 26 and 35
## vars n mean sd median trimmed mad min max range skew kurtosis se
## X1 1 110 3.26 0.43 3.2 3.27 0.44 1.8 4 2.2 -0.29 -0.01 0.04
## ------------------------------------------------------------
## group: 3 between 36 and 45
## vars n mean sd median trimmed mad min max range skew kurtosis se
## X1 1 37 3.43 0.41 3.3 3.45 0.3 2.5 4 1.5 -0.12 -0.88 0.07
## ------------------------------------------------------------
## group: 4 over 45
## vars n mean sd median trimmed mad min max range skew kurtosis se
## X1 1 17 3.44 0.55 3.5 3.51 0.44 1.8 4 2.2 -1.49 2.1 0.13# lastly, use a boxplot to examine your chosen continuous and categorical variables together
boxplot(d$efficacy~d$age)
5 Check Your Assumptions
5.1 T-test Assumptions
- IV must have two levels.
- Data values must be independent (independent t-test only)
- Data obtained via a random sample
- Dependent variable must be normally distributed.
- Variances of the two groups are approximately equal.
# If the IV has more than 2 levels, you must DROP any additional levels in order to meet the first assumption of a t-test.
## NOTE: This is a FOUR STEP process!
d <- subset(d, age != "4 over 45") # use subset() to remove all participants from the additional level
table(d$age, useNA = "always") # verify that now there are ZERO participants in the additional level##
## 1 between 18 and 25 2 between 26 and 35 3 between 36 and 45 4 over 45
## 1928 110 37 0
## <NA>
## 0 d$age<- droplevels(d$age) # use droplevels() to drop the empty factor
table(d$age, useNA = "always") # verify that now the entire factor level is removed ##
## 1 between 18 and 25 2 between 26 and 35 3 between 36 and 45 <NA>
## 1928 110 37 0d <- subset(d, age != "3 between 36 and 45") # use subset() to remove all participants from the additional level
table(d$age, useNA = "always") # verify that now there are ZERO participants in the additional level##
## 1 between 18 and 25 2 between 26 and 35 3 between 36 and 45 <NA>
## 1928 110 0 0 d$age<- droplevels(d$age) # use droplevels() to drop the empty factor
table(d$age, useNA = "always") # verify that now the entire factor level is removed ##
## 1 between 18 and 25 2 between 26 and 35 <NA>
## 1928 110 0## Repeat ALL THE STEPS ABOVE if your IV has more levels that need to be DROPPED. Copy the 4 lines of code, and replace the level name in the subset() command.5.2 Testing Homogeneity of Variance with Levene’s Test
We can test whether the variances of our two groups are equal using Levene’s test. The NULL hypothesis is that the variance between the two groups is equal, which is the result we WANT. So when running Levene’s test we’re hoping for a NON-SIGNIFICANT result!
# use the leveneTest() command from the car package to test homogeneity of variance
# it uses the same 'formula' setup that we'll use for our t-test: formula is y~x, where y is our DV and x is our IV
leveneTest(efficacy~age, data =d)## Levene's Test for Homogeneity of Variance (center = median)
## Df F value Pr(>F)
## group 1 0.1099 0.7403
## 2036Levene’s test revealed that our data has no significantly different variances between the two comparison groups, 18 to 25 and 26 to 35, on their levels of age.
When running a t-test, we can account for heterogeneity in our variance by using the Welch’s t-test, which does not have the same assumption about variance as the Student’s t-test (the general default type of t-test in statistics). R defaults to using Welch’s t-test so this doesn’t require any changes on our part! Even if your data has no issues with homogeneity of variance, you’ll still use Welch’s t-test – it handles the potential issues around variance well and there are no real downsides. We’re using Levene’s test here to get into the habit of checking the homogeneity of our variance, even if we already have the solution for any potential problems.
5.3 Issues with My Data
My independent variable has more than two levels . To proceed with this analysis, I will drop the over 45 and between 36 and 45 participants from my sample. I will make a note to discuss this issue in my Methods section write-up and in my Discussion section as a limitation of my study.
My data does not have an issue regarding homogeneity of variance, as Levene’s test was not significant. Since my data does have homogeneity, I will still use Welch’s t-test in my analysis.
6 Run a T-test
# Very simple! we use the same formula of y~x, where y is our DV and x is our IV
t_output <- t.test(d$efficacy~d$age) # t_output will now show in your Global Environment7 View Test Output
t_output##
## Welch Two Sample t-test
##
## data: d$efficacy by d$age
## t = -3.8109, df = 122.18, p-value = 0.0002182
## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means between group 1 between 18 and 25 and group 2 between 26 and 35 is not equal to 0
## 95 percent confidence interval:
## -0.24558785 -0.07767129
## sample estimates:
## mean in group 1 between 18 and 25 mean in group 2 between 26 and 35
## 3.095643 3.2572738 Calculate Cohen’s d - Effect Size
# once again, we use the same formula, y~x, to calculate cohen's d
# We **only** calculate effect size if the test is SIG!
d_output <- cohen.d(d$efficacy~d$age) # d_output will now show in your Global Environment9 View Effect Size
d_output##
## Cohen's d
##
## d estimate: -0.3684714 (small)
## 95 percent confidence interval:
## lower upper
## -0.5610509 -0.1758919## Remember to always take the ABSOLAUTE VALUE of the effect size value (i.e., it will never be negative)10 Write Up Results
To test our hypothesis that there will be a significant difference in self-efficacy by people’s level of age, between 18 to 25 and 26 to 35 . This required us to drop our over 45 and 36 to 45 age group participants from our sample, as we are limited to a two-group comparison when using this test. We tested the homogeneity of variance with Levene’s test and confirmed signs of homogeneity (p < .001). This suggests that there is an decreased chance of Type 1 error. Since we confirmed homogeniety, we used Welch’s t-test. Our data met all other assumptions of an independent samples t-test.
As predicted, we found that 18 to 25 (M = 3.095, SD = 0.44) reported significantly lower levels of self-efficacy than 26 to 35 (M = 3.257, SD = .43); t(122.18) = -3.810, p < 0.001 (see Figure 1). The effect size was calculated using Cohen’s d, with a value of 0.37 (small effect; Cohen, 1988).
References
Cohen J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York, NY: Routledge Academic.