DiffID-25_10.25 - DiffID Imagine

Person

Manipulation text explanation
{Male coworker} Man was confronter/seeker
{Female coworker} Woman was confronter/seeker

Condition

Manipulation text explanation
{Function} Focus of advisor role: Participant’s selected work function
{DEI} Focus of advisor role: DEI

{Function/DEI}

Context

Given increasing demands to improve {Function/DEI}, imagine that there has been a mandate from your firm that each team (including yours) give insights about a new {Function/DEI} Advisor.

Your supervisor wants to know what would be useful for this role to be successful. The focus of this role is to improve DEI efforts.

This role is going to be occupied by an external hire who will help coordinate {Function/DEI} efforts across the company.
{Function/DEI} Advisor:
– Form and organize a committee that is tasked with improving {Function/DEI} in the organization.
– Design, measure, analyze, and interpret internal surveys assessing employee’s current approval of initiatives around {Function/DEI}.
– Design, measure, analyze, and interpret internal surveys assessing employee’s desire for additional gender {Function/DEI} initiatives.
– Present results of these analyses to organizational stakeholders.
– Describe and justify {Function/DEI}-related processes to employees and organizational stakeholders.
– Receive and address all {Function/DEI}-related complaints from employees.
– Hold 1-2 weekly “office hours” for colleagues to get advice or input about effectively implementing {Function/DEI} practices.
– Identify and reinforce the industry standard for {Function/DEI} practices.
– Monitor project managers’ compliance with organizational guidelines for enhancing {Function/DEI}.
– Generate and maintain a network of people external to the organization with expertise in {Function/DEI}.

Vignette

Imagine that, during a meeting, [SOLICITOR PSEUDONYM] encourages you, specifically, to share suggestions and concerns with the team. Specifically, they ask:

“[PARTICIPANT PSEUDONYM], do you have anything to add about this position?”

Items

Competence

${e://Field/coworkername}’s behavior made me feel…

Item label Item text
competence_1 competent
competence_2 independent
competence_3 autonomous

Voice calculus

${e://Field/coworkername}’s behavior made me feel…

Item label Item text
voice_calc_1 like my input matters
voice_calc_2 like my input will be taken seriously
voice_calc_3 like my input is valued
voice_calc_4 like it is safe to speak up

status_feel

In terms of how much status (i.e., respect and admiration) you would have in this interaction, ${e://Field/coworkername}’s behavior made you feel…

Like I would lose status; -3
.
Like my status wouldn’t change; 0.
Like I would gain status; 3

.

Empowerment

In this interaction, I would feel…

Item label Item text
empower_exp_1 supported
empower_exp_2 empowered
empower_exp_3 like I have influence
empower_exp_4 inspired

Agentic

In this interaction, I would feel…

Item label Item text
agency_1 powerful
agency_2 capable
agency_3 agentic

Status

Do you think that {SOLICITOR PSEUDONYM} should experience any of the following changes after {his/her} response to Paul?

Item label Item text - 3 0 3
posstat1 After {his/her} response back to Paul, I think{SOLICITOR PSEUDONYM} is worthy of…: -3. A lot of disrespect 0. Neither disrespect nor respect 3. A lot of respect
posstat2 After {his/her} response back to Paul, I hold{SOLICITOR PSEUDONYM}… -3. In very low regard 0. In neither low regard nor high regard 3. In very high regard
posstat3 After {his/her} response back to Paul, in terms of being like{SOLICITOR PSEUDONYM}…: -3. I want to be very different from him -3. A lot of disrespect 0. I don’t want to be like him, or different from him

Rewards

Do you think that {SOLICITOR PSEUDONYM} should experience any of the following changes after {his/her} response to Paul?

Item label Item text - 3 0 3
reward1 | change in visibility of {his/her} project assignments: |-3. Should be assigned to projects with very low visibility | 0. Should remain on projects with the same visibility as before | 3. Should be assigned to projects with high visibility|
reward2 | change in {his/her} public recognition: | -3. Should definitely be decreased | 0. Should be kept the same | 3. Should definitely be increased |

Social Rewards

Do you think that{SOLICITOR PSEUDONYM} should experience any of the following changes after {his/her} response to Paul?

Item label Item text - 3 0 3
socreward1 at the next work event: -3. I would avoid{SOLICITOR PSEUDONYM} 0. I would neither avoid nor approach{SOLICITOR PSEUDONYM} 3. I would approach{SOLICITOR PSEUDONYM}
socreward2 how much closer did you feel to{SOLICITOR PSEUDONYM}?: -3. I felt much more distant from him 0. The amount of closeness I felt towards him did not change 3. I felt much closer to him
socreward3 how would the amount of time that you want to spend with{SOLICITOR PSEUDONYM} change?: -3. I would want to spend much less time with him 0. I would not want to change the amount of time I spend with him 3. I would want to spend much more time with him

Voice

In this interaction, I would…

Item label Item text
voice_1 want to provide my insights
voice_2 speak up with my thoughts
voice_3 provide suggestions about the position

Coworker characteristics

1. Voice solicitation (1 = Not at all, 4 = Sometimes, 7 = Very much so) - Asks me personally to tell them about things that I think would be helpful for improving this organization. - Asks me personally to tell them about how things have been done in my previous job(s).
- Seeks out task-related knowledge from me.
- Asks me personally what skills I have that they may not know about that might contribute to our performance.

2. Sentiment Before this interaction, how would you describe your general sentiment toward [SOLICITOR PSEUDONYM] (-3 = Very negative, 3 = Very positive)?

3. Years known How long have you known [SOLICITOR PSEUDONYM]? 6 months or less, 6 months to 1 year, 1-3 years, 4-6 years, 7-9 years, 10-12 years, 13-15 years, 15+ years

Analyses

Interactions

Interaction results

Comparisons within coworker gender condition

Comparisons within focus condition

Controlling

Gender comparisons

Condition comparisons