DiffID-25_10.14 - DiffID Imagine

Person

Manipulation text explanation
{Male coworker} Man was confronter/seeker
{Female coworker} Woman was confronter/seeker

Context

Given increasing demands to improve diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) for women at work, imagine that there has been a mandate from your firm that each team (including yours) give insights about a new Gender Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Advisor.

Your supervisor wants to know what would be useful for this role to be successful. The focus of this role is to improve DEI efforts.

This role is going to be occupied by an external hire who will help coordinate DEI efforts across the company.
Gender Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Advisor:
– Form and organize a committee that is tasked with improving gender diversity, equity, and inclusion in the organization.
– Design, measure, analyze, and interpret internal surveys assessing employee’s current approval of initiatives around gender diversity, equity, and inclusion.
– Design, measure, analyze, and interpret internal surveys assessing employee’s desire for additional gender diversity, equity, and inclusion-based initiatives.
– Present results of these analyses to organizational stakeholders.
– Describe and justify gender diversity, equity, and inclusion-related processes to employees and organizational stakeholders.
– Receive and address all gender diversity, equity, and inclusion-related complaints from employees.
– Hold 1-2 weekly “office hours” for colleagues to get advice or input about effectively implementing gender diversity, equity, and inclusion practices.
– Identify and reinforce the industry standard for gender diversity, equity, and inclusion practices.
– Monitor project managers’ compliance with organizational guidelines for enhancing gender diversity, equity, and inclusion.
– Generate and maintain a network of people external to the organization with expertise in gender diversity, equity, and inclusion.

Vignette

Imagine that, during a meeting, [SOLICITOR PSEUDONYM] encourages you, specifically, to share suggestions and concerns with the team. Specifically, they ask:

“[PARTICIPANT PSEUDONYM], do you have anything to add about this position?”

Items

Competence

In this scenario, would you think that {SOLICITOR PSEUDONYM}…(1 = Not at all, 4 = Somewhat, 7 = Very much so)

Item label Item text
Comp1 competent
Comp2 independent
Auto1 takes autonomy
Auto2 can make their own decisions

Fear of Social Retaliation

{SOLICITOR PSEUDONYM} led me to feel…(1 = Not at all, 4 = Somewhat, 7 = Very much so)

Item label Item text
fsr_1 shunned or excluded by others at work
fsr_3 gossiped about in an unkind way
fsr_5 criticized for complaining

Tokenism

{SOLICITOR PSEUDONYM} led me to feel…(1 = Not at all, 4 = Somewhat, 7 = Very much so)

Item label Item text
token_1 worried that I stood out because I am a woman
token_2 feel like my skills and knowledge as a woman were made salient
token_3 feel like a “token” representative of women

Empowerment

{SOLICITOR PSEUDONYM} led me to feel…(1 = Not at all, 4 = Somewhat, 7 = Very much so)

Item label Item text
empower_exp_2 supported
empower_exp_3 empowered
empower_exp_4 like I have influence
empower_exp_4.1 inspired

Proactive

In terms of reducing workplace inequality, {SOLICITOR PSEUDONYM}…

Item label Item text
proactive_1 tries to make a difference
proactive_2 independently takes initiative
proactive_3 does not need to be asked to get involved

Agency

When {SOLICITOR PSEUDONYM} responded to Paul, did you think that {SOLICITOR PSEUDONYM} was…(1 = Not at all, 4 = Somewhat, 7 = Very much so)

Item label Item text
agency_1 powerful
agency_2 capable
agency_3 agentic

Warm

When {SOLICITOR PSEUDONYM} responded to Paul, did you think that {SOLICITOR PSEUDONYM} was…(1 = Not at all, 4 = Somewhat, 7 = Very much so)

Item label Item text
warm_1 warm
warm_2 friendly
warm_3 caring

Status

Do you think that {SOLICITOR PSEUDONYM} should experience any of the following changes after {his/her} response to Paul?

Item label Item text - 3 0 3
j_posstat1 After {his/her} response back to Paul, I think{SOLICITOR PSEUDONYM} is worthy of…: -3. A lot of disrespect 0. Neither disrespect nor respect 3. A lot of respect
j_posstat2 After {his/her} response back to Paul, I hold{SOLICITOR PSEUDONYM}… -3. In very low regard 0. In neither low regard nor high regard 3. In very high regard
j_posstat3 After {his/her} response back to Paul, in terms of being like{SOLICITOR PSEUDONYM}…: -3. I want to be very different from him -3. A lot of disrespect 0. I don’t want to be like him, or different from him

Rewards

Do you think that {SOLICITOR PSEUDONYM} should experience any of the following changes after {his/her} response to Paul?

Item label Item text - 3 0 3
j_reward3 | change in visibility of {his/her} project assignments: |-3. Should be assigned to projects with very low visibility | 0. Should remain on projects with the same visibility as before | 3. Should be assigned to projects with high visibility|
j_reward4 | change in {his/her} public recognition: | -3. Should definitely be decreased | 0. Should be kept the same | 3. Should definitely be increased |

Social Rewards

Do you think that{SOLICITOR PSEUDONYM} should experience any of the following changes after {his/her} response to Paul?

Item label Item text - 3 0 3
j_socreward1 at the next work event: -3. I would avoid{SOLICITOR PSEUDONYM} 0. I would neither avoid nor approach{SOLICITOR PSEUDONYM} 3. I would approach{SOLICITOR PSEUDONYM}
j_socreward2 how much closer did you feel to{SOLICITOR PSEUDONYM}?: -3. I felt much more distant from him 0. The amount of closeness I felt towards him did not change 3. I felt much closer to him
j_socreward3 how would the amount of time that you want to spend with{SOLICITOR PSEUDONYM} change?: -3. I would want to spend much less time with him 0. I would not want to change the amount of time I spend with him 3. I would want to spend much more time with him

Coworker characteristics

1. Voice solicitation (1 = Not at all, 4 = Sometimes, 7 = Very much so) - Asks me personally to tell them about things that I think would be helpful for improving this organization. - Asks me personally to tell them about how things have been done in my previous job(s).
- Seeks out task-related knowledge from me.
- Asks me personally what skills I have that they may not know about that might contribute to our performance.

2. Sentiment Before this interaction, how would you describe your general sentiment toward [SOLICITOR PSEUDONYM] (-3 = Very negative, 3 = Very positive)?

3. Years known How long have you known [SOLICITOR PSEUDONYM]? 6 months or less, 6 months to 1 year, 1-3 years, 4-6 years, 7-9 years, 10-12 years, 13-15 years, 15+ years

Manipulations

## 
## female   male        
##     96     98      0

Analyses

Means and SDs

bind_rows(dlist)

Controls

bind_rows(dlist)

Moderators

moderatorlist <- expand.grid(
  moderators = c("sentiment_1", "years_known", "voicesol", "voice_solicit_1", "voice_solicit_2", "voice_solicit_3", "voice_solicit_4"),
  dvs = c("comp", "auto", "fsr", "token", "empower", "proactive", "agency", "warm", "reward", "socreward", "posstatus")
)
listmoderators <- vector("list")
graphlist <- vector("list")
graphs <- 1
for(variable in 1:nrow(moderatorlist)){
  data <- data.frame(
    iv = unlist(diffidp4raw$coworkergender),
    moderator = unlist(diffidp4raw[moderatorlist$moderators[variable]]),
    dv = unlist(diffidp4raw[moderatorlist$dvs[variable]]))
  regression <- lm(dv~iv*moderator, data)
  listmoderators[[variable]] <- regressiondata <-  coef(summary(regression)) %>% as.data.frame() %>%
    slice(4) %>% mutate(asterix = case_when(
      `Pr(>|t|)` < .10 ~ "*",
      `Pr(>|t|)` > .05 ~ "")) %>% mutate(moderator = moderatorlist$moderators[variable],
                                         dv = moderatorlist$dvs[variable]) %>% relocate(moderator, dv, asterix)
  if(regressiondata$`Pr(>|t|)` < .10){
    graphlist[[graphs]] <- sjPlot::plot_model(regression, type = "int", mdrt.values = "meansd", title = paste0("DV: ", moderatorlist$dvs[variable], "; Moderator: ", moderatorlist$moderators[variable]),
                       legend.title = moderatorlist$moderators[variable],
                       axis.title = moderatorlist$dvs[variable])
    graphs <- graphs+1
  }
}
bind_rows(listmoderators) %>%
  filter(asterix == "*")
graphlist
## [[1]]
## Ignoring unknown labels:
## • linetype : "moderator"
## • shape : "moderator"

## 
## [[2]]
## Ignoring unknown labels:
## • linetype : "moderator"
## • shape : "moderator"

## 
## [[3]]
## Ignoring unknown labels:
## • linetype : "moderator"
## • shape : "moderator"

## 
## [[4]]
## Ignoring unknown labels:
## • linetype : "moderator"
## • shape : "moderator"

## 
## [[5]]
## Ignoring unknown labels:
## • linetype : "moderator"
## • shape : "moderator"

## 
## [[6]]
## Ignoring unknown labels:
## • linetype : "moderator"
## • shape : "moderator"

## 
## [[7]]
## Ignoring unknown labels:
## • linetype : "moderator"
## • shape : "moderator"

## 
## [[8]]
## Ignoring unknown labels:
## • linetype : "moderator"
## • shape : "moderator"