MPI-54 2025-26
Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE), University of Luxembourg
Important information for the seminar.
No ECTs are given for participation in this seminar.
Participation is going to help in the long run because psychological network systems and analysis is a complex yet powerful tool.
It is an emergent method/ paradigm so there is plenty to discover yet.
Theory input
Practical session
Please let me know in advance if you cannot make it to a class. Send me an E-MAIL.
If overlapping meetings on my side, I will inform you in advance via MOODLE.
Help with understanding psychological network systems and analysis better.
A comprehensive introductory paper.
An example of applying psychological network systems outside abnormal psychology.
Group of 2-3 making sure any R expertise is balanced out.
Ideally, groups emerge organically already starting today.
Groups work on their research question, data, and create a 15 minutes presentation.
All presentations will be held during the last session. Feedback will be provided but no grading.
Create slides using PowerPoint, Quarto or any other software you feel comfortable with.
Each group may organize a consultation meeting of up to 45 minutes with me in advance.
We will analyse and visualize data using R. Data will be provided and introduced in due time.
R is a programming language used for data analysis and beyond.
For this seminar, no previous R knowledge is expected.
At UL there are several seminars on R that you might take. (See the offered courses on Moodle.)
Online resources exist too:
What is a psychological network system (PNS), and what makes it appealing.
Let’s discuss first.
Interconnected elements operate in unison according to a set of rules,
fulfilling a specific function from which
a unified whole is observable.
Axioms
1 - Formative elements are interconnected either directly or through a shared element
2 - There is causal relationship among the formative elements
3 - Emergent system as a whole or specific elements are influenced by exogenous factors
Change in approach from Depression is the common cause of observed symptoms to
Specific symptoms are activated due to internal or external factors and remain activated and influence each-other resulting in depression.
A chain of spill-over positive effects in depression interventions might look like:
Feel confident > Hope > Feel in control > No suicidal thoughts > Good sleep
That is indeed the question!
PNS can inform about
Does annulling a trigger equal healing from depression?
Is one intervention approach applicable to long-term and episodic depression reduction?
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) works by identifying negative thought and emotional patterns through exploring current and past situations that may have caused them and that are no longer applicable.
Certain symptoms may be strong in patients and thus have priority in therapy.
But, what if certain symptoms, if adequately identified, may promote a causal chain of positive effects onto other symptoms?
What if certain symptoms are highly influential in some people but not other, and why is that the case?
One might enquire which are these symptoms, what are the overlaps with other disorders, or whether dynamics between symptoms map differently in different populations.
Overview network based on meta-results drawing on a literature review.
Cai et al. (2024) identify PHQ2 (sad mood), GAD2 (uncontrollable worrying) and GAD3 (worry too much) as central (highly influential) symptoms. The authors discuss how this can inform targeted intervention strategies.
Fundamentals of psychological network systems.
Psychological network systems (PNS) = Describes the shape, structure and formative elements of a psychological construct that can be visualized and mapped as a network of interconnected elements that together serves one function.
Psychological network analysis (PNA) = A method used to analyse data such that through pre-set techniques a network structure is estimated from data.
PNS is estimated from data using PNA that adheres to strict methodological protocols.
Circles are the nodes of the network. These are symptoms, for example.
Lines are the edges linking two nodes in the network. These are relationships between symptoms, for example.
Edges or the relationship between symptoms are operationalized in several ways, each having its own advantages and limitations. We will address this in the next classes.
Note
1 - Some may be more influential than other (e.g. that one friend who has strong opinions and is the leader of the pack)
2 - Some may take longer to be influenced by one other (e.g. that lone-wolf)
3 - Some my be the one to re-formulate the message so that other influence each-other (e.g. that friend that balances the group)
Political ideology itself, media outlets and influencers have all influenced these networks.
What other examples can you think of?
Make groups of 2-3 to propose, discuss and identify influencing factors of mental dissorders that can be seen as a psychological network system.
What is do you think, mental health conditions are
Do mental health symptoms causally sustain each other or they are related but not causally?
More research is needed but one thing is for sure:
we should remain open and accept novelty as progress in our effort to address abnormal mental health