## # A tibble: 100 × 3
## asset date returns
## <chr> <date> <dbl>
## 1 AMZN 2020-03-31 0.0269
## 2 AMZN 2020-06-30 0.347
## 3 AMZN 2020-09-30 0.132
## 4 AMZN 2020-12-31 0.0338
## 5 AMZN 2021-03-31 -0.0513
## 6 AMZN 2021-06-30 0.106
## 7 AMZN 2021-09-30 -0.0461
## 8 AMZN 2021-12-31 0.0149
## 9 AMZN 2022-03-31 -0.0226
## 10 AMZN 2022-06-30 -0.428
## # ℹ 90 more rows
GOOGL had the highest typical return of 17.5%, which was the case for five quarters within this time period. NFLX had the second highest typical return at 25% (4 quarters). With that being said, if these returns were consecutive, then GOOGL would yield an 87.5% return while NFLX would return 100% despite having a lower frequency of occurrence. META came in around 15% (4 quarters), AMZN had a typical return of 5% (4 quarters) with AAPL coming in last with a return of 25% for 3 quarters. It’s important to note that AAPL had identical frequencies of returns at 10% and -10% as well.
META had the potential to have the highest return at roughly 55% whereas NFLX had the largest loss within the same time frame, just shy of -80% (around 75%). Both of these instances occurred only once during the calculated time period.
Hide the code, messages, and warnings