Warning: The dataset analyzed in this study is not an official list provided by ASE and was created based on the information available on site.
Objective: Our objective is to analyze the candidates’ admission results in ASE master’s programs across 12 faculties using data available on ASE platform.
The analysed variables are presented below:
## Rows: 4,392
## Columns: 16
## $ nr_crt 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16,…
## $ cod_candidat 4397, 1068, 1726, 1670, 1841, 2369, 2372, 1681, 1078, …
## $ proba_scrisa NA, 84, 84, 81, 78, 78, 78, 84, 75, 75, 75, 75, 75, 72…
## $ medie_concurs NA, 9.76, 9.76, 9.64, 9.52, 9.52, 9.52, 9.46, 9.40, 9.…
## $ medie_licenta 9.00, 10.00, 10.00, 10.00, 10.00, 10.00, 10.00, 9.50, …
## $ statut "Standard", "Standard", "Standard", "Standard", "Stand…
## $ rezultat "Absent", "Admis", "Admis", "Admis", "Admis", "Admis",…
## $ forma_invataman "Absent", "Buget", "Buget", "Buget", "Buget", "Buget",…
## $ specializare "EAM1", "EAM1", "EAM1", "EAM1", "EAM1", "EAM1", "EAM1"…
## $ program "Economia si administrarea afacerilor agroalimentare, …
## $ facultatea "Economie Agroalimentara si a Mediului", "Economie Agr…
## $ pob 187, 187, 187, 187, 187, 187, 187, 187, 187, 187, 187,…
## $ pot 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, …
## $ nlb 182, 182, 182, 182, 182, 182, 182, 182, 182, 182, 182,…
## $ nlt 36, 36, 36, 36, 36, 36, 36, 36, 36, 36, 36, 36, 36, 36…
## $ ntl 218, 218, 218, 218, 218, 218, 218, 218, 218, 218, 218,…
vars | n | mean | sd | median | trimmed | mad | min | max | range | skew | kurtosis | se | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
nr_crt | 1 | 4392 | 154.249317 | 123.1873186 | 116.00 | 142.406944 | 121.573200 | 1.00 | 489 | 488.00 | 0.6979490 | -0.6414385 | 1.8588093 |
cod_candidat | 2 | 4392 | 2993.158925 | 1081.2863994 | 3002.50 | 3004.741605 | 1352.131200 | 1000.00 | 4827 | 3827.00 | -0.0576121 | -1.1476045 | 16.3158451 |
proba_scrisa | 3 | 4065 | 61.880935 | 16.4470366 | 63.00 | 62.288964 | 17.791200 | 0.00 | 90 | 90.00 | -0.2042250 | -0.6877971 | 0.2579630 |
medie_concurs | 4 | 4065 | 8.365240 | 0.9224258 | 8.44 | 8.404670 | 0.978516 | 4.96 | 10 | 5.04 | -0.4075837 | -0.2062367 | 0.0144678 |
medie_licenta | 5 | 4392 | 9.166355 | 0.8373370 | 9.33 | 9.285048 | 0.993342 | 6.00 | 10 | 4.00 | -1.1061694 | 0.9198413 | 0.0126348 |
statut* | 6 | 4392 | 5.905965 | 0.6671120 | 6.00 | 6.000000 | 0.000000 | 1.00 | 6 | 5.00 | -7.0555778 | 48.1526684 | 0.0100662 |
rezultat* | 7 | 4392 | 2.084016 | 0.4753064 | 2.00 | 2.073136 | 0.000000 | 1.00 | 3 | 2.00 | 0.2467356 | 1.2008580 | 0.0071720 |
forma_invataman* | 8 | 4392 | 2.759107 | 1.0034257 | 2.00 | 2.791975 | 1.482600 | 1.00 | 4 | 3.00 | 0.0532872 | -1.3663717 | 0.0151410 |
specializare* | 9 | 4392 | 16.975865 | 7.9674446 | 16.00 | 17.173022 | 10.378200 | 1.00 | 31 | 30.00 | -0.1157721 | -1.1332144 | 0.1202231 |
program* | 10 | 4392 | 15.316257 | 8.8355986 | 15.00 | 15.290268 | 11.860800 | 1.00 | 31 | 30.00 | 0.0503145 | -1.2167796 | 0.1333229 |
The proportion of candidates that participated to admission exam
The proportion of candidates declared absent (absent candidates) by
social status
The proportion of admitted candidates by social status
The proportion of rejected candidates by social status
The proportion of candidates registered by social status
The proportion of admitted candidates by social status
The proportion of rejected candidates by form of education
The proportion of candidates declared absent (absent candidates)
across faculties
The proportion of candidates declared admitted across faculties
The proportion of candidates declared rejected across faculties
—
The number of outliers
Proportion of missing values
The dataset does not contain any missing values. However, because it includes all registered candidates, including those who did not participate in the admission exam, the missing values that we observe are associated with these absent candidates.
Following the analysis, we note that 7% of candidates did not participate in the admission exam and were declared absent, while 93% participated in the exam. Most of the absent candidates were from the diaspora group (26%), followed by candidates in the standard category.
It can also be seen that most of the admitted candidates were from the standard category, followed by candidates from the diaspora and candidates with disabilities.
With regard to the number of rejected candidates, we note that the highest number was recorded among candidates from the diaspora, followed by those in the standard category and candidates with disabilities.
Overall, the standard category accounted for the largest share of participants, representing 98% of all candidates enrolled in the admission competition.
Out of the total number of registered candidates, 77% were admitted, 16% were rejected, and 7% did not participate in the competition. Among the admitted candidates, 43% secured tuition-free places, while 34% were admitted on a tuition-fee basis.
We observe that the faculty with the highest number of candidates declared absent is the faculty of business administration in foreign languages, followed by the faculty of Cybernetics, statistics and economic informatics. The faculty with the highest percentage of admitted candidates out of the total number of registered candidates is the faculty of agri-food and environmental economics (99%), followed by the faculty of public administration and management with 98%. The high percentage may indicate that, in these faculties, the available places were not fully occupied. In the case of faculties with a low percentage of admitted candidates, this suggests that competition is higher. —