• Mature assets require strategic clarity, not more data.

  • Capital allocation decisions demand understanding of true asset capabilities vs. theoretical potential
  • OPEX optimization requires knowing what’s achievable vs. what’s aspirational
  • Performance gaps may indicate correctable issues or inherent system limitations

• AaaS Express provides decision-grade intelligence:

  • Asset capability baselines with realistic performance boundaries
  • Cost-effective improvement identification vs. acceptance of operational constraints
  • Strategic clarity on where to invest vs. where to adapt expectations

Fiscalized production (ANH, 2024) provides a reference baseline for Palagua and Caipal:

Source: ANH — Fiscalized Production, 2024

• Strategic framing:

  • Do current production levels represent optimal performance, correctable inefficiencies, or inherent asset constraints?
  • Our assessment also incorporates lifting cost benchmarking, comparing Palagua’s performance against analog heavy-oil operations with similar artificial lift systems and water cut profiles.

• Phase 1: Asset Capability Assessment

  • Process efficacy validation against operational requirements
  • Identification of correctable vs. systemic performance constraints

• Phase 2: Strategic Opportunity Mapping

  • Efficiency optimization potential for well-functioning processes
  • Cost-benefit analysis of intervention vs. acceptance for limited processes

• Phase 3: Operational Reality Baseline

  • Realistic performance boundaries based on asset fundamentals
  • Strategic guidance on capital allocation priorities

Outcome: Clear executive decisions on optimization vs. adaptation strategies

• Not consulting theories. Operational maturity perspective.

  • Four-scenario assessment — Optimization, correction, constraint acceptance, or baseline reset
  • Cost-effective prioritization — Where to invest vs. where to adapt expectations
  • Decision-grade deliverables — Strategic clarity, not technical reports
  • Rapid deployment — 3–4 week executive briefings
  • Risk mitigation — Avoid unproductive CAPEX on inherently limited processes

• Executive Engagement: Flexible structure aligned with strategic priorities

• Capital Allocation Intelligence:

  • Clarity on achievable performance boundaries vs. theoretical potential
  • Informed decisions on optimization investments vs. operational constraint acceptance
  • Strategic opportunities that translate into measurable improvements

• Operational Maturity Benefits:

  • Realistic performance baselines for strategic planning
  • Cost-effective resource allocation based on true asset capabilities
  • Executive confidence in operational performance expectations

• Strategic Assessment Phase (3–4 weeks):

  • Asset Capability Analysis → Realistic performance boundaries identification
  • Strategic Options Mapping → Investment priorities vs. constraint acceptance
  • Executive Decision Brief → Clear recommendations with cost-benefit rationale

• Follow-up:

  • Implementation guidance and performance monitoring as strategically appropriate

📧 info@jrengineering.com.co

🌐 www.jrengineering.co

“Strategic clarity through operational maturity intelligence.”