The atmos
data set resides in the
nasaweather
package of the R programming language.
It contains a collection of atmospheric variables measured between 1995
and 2000 on a grid of 576 coordinates in the western hemisphere. The
data set comes from the 2006 ASA Data
Expo.
Some of the variables in the atmos data set are:
You can convert the temperature unit from Kelvin to Celsius with the formula
\[celsius = kelvin - 273.15\]
And you can convert the result to Fahrenheit with the formula
\[ fahrenheit = celsius \times \frac{9}{5} + 32 \]
## [1] 3
summary(cars)
## speed dist
## Min. : 4.0 Min. : 2.00
## 1st Qu.:12.0 1st Qu.: 26.00
## Median :15.0 Median : 36.00
## Mean :15.4 Mean : 42.98
## 3rd Qu.:19.0 3rd Qu.: 56.00
## Max. :25.0 Max. :120.00
library(nasaweather)
library(tidyverse)
For the remainder of the report, we will look only at data from the year 2000 . We aggregate our data by location, using the R code below. 5
means <- atmos %>%
filter(year == year) %>%
group_by(long, lat) %>%
summarize(temp = mean(temp, na.rm = TRUE),
pressure = mean(pressure, na.rm = TRUE),
ozone = mean(ozone, na.rm = TRUE),
cloudlow = mean(cloudlow, na.rm = TRUE),
cloudmid = mean(cloudmid, na.rm = TRUE),
cloudhigh = mean(cloudhigh, na.rm = TRUE)) %>%
ungroup()
Is the relationship between ozone and temperature useful for understanding fluctuations in ozone? A scatterplot of the variables shows a strong, but unusual relationship.
We suspect that group level effects are caused by environmental conditions that vary by locale. To test this idea, we sort each data point into one of four geographic regions:
# code chunk 7
means$locale <- "north america"
means$locale[means$lat < 10] <- "south pacific"
means$locale[means$long > -80 & means$lat < 10] <- "south america"
means$locale[means$long > -80 & means$lat > 10] <- "north atlantic"
We suggest that ozone is highly correlated with temperature, but that a different relationship exists for each geographic region. We capture this relationship with a second order linear model of the form
\[ ozone = \alpha + \beta_{1} temperature + \sum_{locales} \beta_{i} locale_{i} + \sum_{locales} \beta_{j} interaction_{j} + \epsilon\]
This yields the following coefficients and relationships.
lm(ozone ~ temp + locale + temp:locale, data = means)
##
## Call:
## lm(formula = ozone ~ temp + locale + temp:locale, data = means)
##
## Coefficients:
## (Intercept) temp
## 1336.508 -3.559
## localenorth atlantic localesouth america
## 548.248 -1061.452
## localesouth pacific temp:localenorth atlantic
## -549.906 -1.827
## temp:localesouth america temp:localesouth pacific
## 3.496 1.785
# code chunk 9
ggplot(means, aes(temp, ozone, color = locale)) +
geom_point() +
geom_smooth(method = "lm", se = FALSE) +
facet_wrap(~ locale)
## `geom_smooth()` using formula = 'y ~ x'
An anova test suggests that both locale and the interaction effect of locale and temperature are useful for predicting ozone (i.e., the p-value that compares the full model to the reduced models is statistically significant).
# code chunk 10
mod <- lm(ozone ~ temp, data = means)
mod2 <- lm(ozone ~ temp + locale, data = means)
mod3 <- lm(ozone ~ temp + locale + temp:locale, data = means)
anova(mod, mod2, mod3)
## Analysis of Variance Table
##
## Model 1: ozone ~ temp
## Model 2: ozone ~ temp + locale
## Model 3: ozone ~ temp + locale + temp:locale
## Res.Df RSS Df Sum of Sq F Pr(>F)
## 1 574 99335
## 2 571 41425 3 57911 706.17 < 2.2e-16 ***
## 3 568 15527 3 25898 315.81 < 2.2e-16 ***
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
Ozone | Solar.R | Wind | Temp | Month | Day |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
41 | 190 | 7.4 | 67 | 5 | 1 |
36 | 118 | 8.0 | 72 | 5 | 2 |
12 | 149 | 12.6 | 74 | 5 | 3 |
18 | 313 | 11.5 | 62 | 5 | 4 |
NA | NA | 14.3 | 56 | 5 | 5 |
28 | NA | 14.9 | 66 | 5 | 6 |
23 | 299 | 8.6 | 65 | 5 | 7 |
19 | 99 | 13.8 | 59 | 5 | 8 |
8 | 19 | 20.1 | 61 | 5 | 9 |
NA | 194 | 8.6 | 69 | 5 | 10 |