| Characteristic | N = 341 |
|---|---|
| Year in training | |
| Â Â Â Â MS-3 | 1 (3.0%) |
| Â Â Â Â MS-4 | 1 (3.0%) |
| Â Â Â Â PGY-1 | 16 (48%) |
| Â Â Â Â PGY-2 | 9 (27%) |
| Â Â Â Â PGY-3 | 4 (12%) |
| Â Â Â Â PGY-4 | 2 (6.1%) |
| Â Â Â Â Missing | 1 |
| Amount of geriatrics training in medical school | |
| Â Â Â Â None | 6 (18%) |
| Â Â Â Â <2 weeks | 17 (52%) |
| Â Â Â Â 2-4 weeks | 7 (21%) |
| Â Â Â Â 4-8 weeks | 3 (9.1%) |
| Â Â Â Â Missing | 1 |
| Amount of geriatrics training in residency (n = 32) | |
| Â Â Â Â None | 11 (35%) |
| Â Â Â Â <2 weeks | 6 (19%) |
| Â Â Â Â 2-4 weeks | 12 (39%) |
| Â Â Â Â 4-8 weeks | 2 (6.5%) |
| Â Â Â Â Missing | 1 |
| 1 n (%) | |
| Self-Efficacy Evaluation1 | Presurvey: No. (%) of Confident Learners2 | Postsurvey: No. (%) of Confident Learners2 | Delta | p-value3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Identifying patients at high risk for falls | 9/33 (27%) | 28/29 (97%) | 69% | <0.001 |
| Identifying falls risks factors among older patients | 12/33 (36%) | 29/29 (100%) | 64% | 0.001 |
| Implementing a fall risk reduction plan for an older adult | 2/33 (6.1%) | 26/28 (93%) | 87% | <0.001 |
| Using the Geriatric 5Ms or Age Friendly 4Ms framework when caring for an older adult | 8/33 (24%) | 28/29 (97%) | 72% | <0.001 |
| 1 Self-efficacy was assessed via a 5-point Likert scale (1 = not at all confident, 2 = not confident, 3 = neutral, 4 = somewhat confident, 5 = extremely confident); learners were qualified as confident if their response was 4 or 5. | ||||
| 2 n/N (%) | ||||
| 3 McNemar’s Chi-squared test with continuity correction | ||||
| Knowledge Evaluation1 | Presurvey: Mean (SD) Percentage of Correct Answers2 | Postsurvey: Mean (SD) Percentage of Correct Answers2 | Delta3 | p-value3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average score | 73.8% (19.9)% | 83.7% (16.2)% | 5% | 0.213 |
| 1 Knowledge was assessed via four multiple-choice questions; n = 28 for pre-test, n = 23 for post-test | ||||
| 2 Mean% (SD)% | ||||
| 3 Paired t-test | ||||
| Satisfaction Evaluation1 | N = 292 |
|---|---|
| Relevance to clinical practice | 4.7 (0.5) |
| Effectiveness of teachers | 4.8 (0.4) |
| Quality of workshop | 4.8 (0.4) |
| 1 Satisfaction was assessed via a 5-point Likert scale (1 = not at all satisfied; 5 = very satisfied) | |
| 2 Mean (SD) | |