Characteristic N 1
N = 141
1
2
N = 285
1
p-value2
A6. Race 426


    1
66 (47%) 174 (61%)
    2
0 (0%) 7 (2%)
    3
47 (33%) 56 (20%)
    4
7 (5%) 24 (8%)
    5
3 (2%) 3 (1%)
    6
0 (0%) 1 (0%)
    99
8 (6%) 13 (5%)
    555
1 (1%) 1 (0%)
    999
9 (6%) 6 (2%)
A6a. If other race, please specify: 426

0.2
    
133 (94%) 272 (95%)
    -999
2 (1%) 1 (0%)
    7-Other
0 (0%) 2 (1%)
    Asian, White
0 (0%) 1 (0%)
    Black or African American, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 (0%) 1 (0%)
    Black or African American, White
1 (1%) 0 (0%)
    Black/African American, White
0 (0%) 1 (0%)
    Mixed: White and Black/African American
0 (0%) 1 (0%)
    more than one race
0 (0%) 1 (0%)
    Multiple
0 (0%) 1 (0%)
    Multiracial
0 (0%) 1 (0%)
    n/a
1 (1%) 0 (0%)
    Not specified
2 (1%) 0 (0%)
    Other
0 (0%) 1 (0%)
    White and Asian
1 (1%) 0 (0%)
    White and Black or African American
0 (0%) 2 (1%)
    White, Black or African American
1 (1%) 0 (0%)
A9. Neighborhood Atlas ADI Score *Please use National Percentiles* 426 51 (29, 74) 44 (19, 65) 0.005
D1. NAT diagnosed as a result of this visit for femur fracture based on at least one of the following study definitions of NATDefinitions:1. Removed from caregiver2. ICD code (T74.12 XA)3. SW/CAP concern for NAT with... (any of the following)---referral to govt agency (including CPS)---referral for ongoing SW FU---supervised or prohibited contact 426 141 (100%) 36 (13%) <0.001
D.2 * New Question to confirm NAT Diagnosis for cleaning and assurance: Review the chart again, and mark the diagnostic criteria that was used during chart review to determine NAT diagnosis: (choice=1. Removed from caregiver) 426 84 (60%) 0 (0%) <0.001
D.2 * New Question to confirm NAT Diagnosis for cleaning and assurance: Review the chart again, and mark the diagnostic criteria that was used during chart review to determine NAT diagnosis: (choice=2. ICD code (T74.12 XA)) 426 30 (21%) 0 (0%) <0.001
D.2 * New Question to confirm NAT Diagnosis for cleaning and assurance: Review the chart again, and mark the diagnostic criteria that was used during chart review to determine NAT diagnosis: (choice=3. SW/CAP concern for NAT with...referral to govt agency (including CPS)) 426 99 (70%) 37 (13%) <0.001
D.2 * New Question to confirm NAT Diagnosis for cleaning and assurance: Review the chart again, and mark the diagnostic criteria that was used during chart review to determine NAT diagnosis: (choice=4. SW/CAP concern for NAT with....referral for ongoing SW FU) 426 56 (40%) 18 (6%) <0.001
D.2 * New Question to confirm NAT Diagnosis for cleaning and assurance: Review the chart again, and mark the diagnostic criteria that was used during chart review to determine NAT diagnosis: (choice=5. SW/CAP concern for NAT with.... supervised or prohibited contact) 426 40 (28%) 1 (0%) <0.001
D1a. Who is the suspected abuser? 177

<0.001
    1
28 (20%) 2 (6%)
    2
37 (26%) 4 (11%)
    3
1 (1%) 0 (0%)
    4
1 (1%) 0 (0%)
    6
0 (0%) 2 (6%)
    7
1 (1%) 1 (3%)
    8
9 (6%) 0 (0%)
    99
21 (15%) 2 (6%)
    888
43 (30%) 25 (69%)
1 n (%); Median (Q1, Q3)
2 Fisher’s exact test; Wilcoxon rank sum test; Pearson’s Chi-squared test