Comparison of the six-factor and the acquiescence model
Six-factor Model Acquiescence Model
chisq 1126.156 1110.165
chisq.scaled 779.453 769.631
df 237.000 243.000
pvalue 0.000 0.000
cfi 0.940 0.942
cfi.scaled 0.949 0.950
tli 0.931 0.934
tli.scaled 0.940 0.943
srmr 0.055 0.044
rmsea 0.047 0.046
rmsea.ci.lower 0.044 0.043
rmsea.ci.upper 0.050 0.049
rmsea.scaled 0.037 0.036
rmsea.ci.lower.scaled 0.034 0.033
rmsea.ci.upper.scaled 0.039 0.038Comparison of the six factor model and the acquiescence model fit indices
Six-factor Model Acquiescence Model
chisq 1976.063 1963.332
chisq.scaled 1439.176 1430.558
df 413.000 419.000
pvalue 0.000 0.000
cfi 0.921 0.922
cfi.scaled 0.929 0.930
tli 0.911 0.913
tli.scaled 0.920 0.922
srmr 0.058 0.051
rmsea 0.048 0.047
rmsea.ci.lower 0.046 0.045
rmsea.ci.upper 0.050 0.049
rmsea.scaled 0.039 0.038
rmsea.ci.lower.scaled 0.037 0.036
rmsea.ci.upper.scaled 0.041 0.040Models for T1 Vitality:
Regression weights of T1 subjective vitality as predicted by
needs satisfaction and frustration latent factors:
| dv | iv | est | se | p-value | std | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 Subjective vitality | ~ | Autonomy satisfaction | 0.222 | 0.064 | 0.001 | 0.167 |
| T1 Subjective vitality | ~ | Competence satisfaction | 0.362 | 0.064 | 0.000 | 0.331 |
| T1 Subjective vitality | ~ | Relatedness satisfaction | 0.189 | 0.072 | 0.009 | 0.117 |
| T1 Subjective vitality | ~ | Autonomy frustration | -0.108 | 0.042 | 0.010 | -0.112 |
| T1 Subjective vitality | ~ | Competence frustration | -0.122 | 0.088 | 0.166 | -0.105 |
| T1 Subjective vitality | ~ | Relatedness frustration | 0.081 | 0.055 | 0.142 | 0.071 |
Regression weights of T1 subjective vitality as predicted by three omnibus needs and acquiescence bias latent factors:
| dv | iv | est | se | p-value | std | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 Subjective vitality | ~~ | Autonomy satisfaction | 0.343 | 0.060 | 0.000 | 0.240 |
| T1 Subjective vitality | ~~ | Competence satisfaction | 0.454 | 0.050 | 0.000 | 0.381 |
| T1 Subjective vitality | ~~ | Relatedness satisfaction | 0.057 | 0.054 | 0.290 | 0.038 |
| T1 Subjective vitality | ~~ | Autonomy acquiescence | 0.105 | 0.083 | 0.209 | 0.046 |
| T1 Subjective vitality | ~~ | Competence acquiescence | 0.256 | 0.125 | 0.041 | 0.094 |
| T1 Subjective vitality | ~~ | Relatedness acquiescence | 0.278 | 0.106 | 0.009 | 0.108 |
The unexplained variance of T1 vitality from needs in the
six-factor model is .617
The unexplained variance of T1 vitality from needs in the
acquiescence model is .608
Comparison of the six factor model and the acquiescence model fit indices
Six-factor Model Acquiescence Model
chisq 1601.288 1584.190
chisq.scaled 1156.576 1145.078
df 356.000 362.000
pvalue 0.000 0.000
cfi 0.929 0.930
cfi.scaled 0.937 0.938
tli 0.919 0.922
tli.scaled 0.928 0.931
srmr 0.053 0.044
rmsea 0.046 0.045
rmsea.ci.lower 0.044 0.043
rmsea.ci.upper 0.048 0.047
rmsea.scaled 0.037 0.036
rmsea.ci.lower.scaled 0.035 0.034
rmsea.ci.upper.scaled 0.039 0.038Models for T1 Life Satisfaction:
Regression weights of T1 life satisfaction as predicted by needs
satisfaction and frustration latent factors:
| dv | iv | est | se | p-value | std | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 Life satisfaction | ~ | Autonomy satisfaction | 0.254 | 0.059 | 0.000 | 0.217 |
| T1 Life satisfaction | ~ | Competence satisfaction | 0.304 | 0.059 | 0.000 | 0.315 |
| T1 Life satisfaction | ~ | Relatedness satisfaction | 0.109 | 0.062 | 0.079 | 0.075 |
| T1 Life satisfaction | ~ | Autonomy frustration | -0.205 | 0.042 | 0.000 | -0.241 |
| T1 Life satisfaction | ~ | Competence frustration | 0.043 | 0.078 | 0.579 | 0.042 |
| T1 Life satisfaction | ~ | Relatedness frustration | -0.050 | 0.048 | 0.291 | -0.050 |
Regression weights of T1 life satisfaction as predicted by three omnibus needs and acquiescence bias latent factors:
| dv | iv | est | se | p-value | std | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 Life satisfaction | ~ | Autonomy satisfaction | 0.485 | 0.059 | 0.000 | 0.387 |
| T1 Life satisfaction | ~ | Competence satisfaction | 0.258 | 0.045 | 0.000 | 0.244 |
| T1 Life satisfaction | ~ | Relatedness satisfaction | 0.150 | 0.047 | 0.001 | 0.114 |
| T1 Life satisfaction | ~ | Autonomy acquiescence | 0.034 | 0.080 | 0.670 | 0.017 |
| T1 Life satisfaction | ~ | Competence acquiescence | 0.311 | 0.112 | 0.005 | 0.132 |
| T1 Life satisfaction | ~ | Relatedness acquiescence | 0.120 | 0.090 | 0.186 | 0.053 |
The unexplained variance of T1 life satisfaction from needs
in the six-factor model is .560
The unexplained variance of T1 life satisfaction from needs in
the acquiescence model is .548
Comparison of the six factor model and the acquiescence model fit indices
Six-factor Model Acquiescence Model
chisq 1666.243 1662.488
chisq.scaled 1308.001 1306.498
df 506.000 512.000
pvalue 0.000 0.000
cfi 0.911 0.912
cfi.scaled 0.919 0.920
tli 0.902 0.904
tli.scaled 0.910 0.912
srmr 0.055 0.047
rmsea 0.046 0.046
rmsea.ci.lower 0.044 0.043
rmsea.ci.upper 0.048 0.048
rmsea.scaled 0.038 0.038
rmsea.ci.lower.scaled 0.036 0.036
rmsea.ci.upper.scaled 0.041 0.040Models for T1 Depressive Feelings:
Regression weights of T1 depressive feelings as predicted by
needs satisfaction and frustration latent factors:
| dv | iv | est | se | p-value | std | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 Depressive feelings | ~ | Autonomy satisfaction | -0.095 | 0.050 | 0.059 | -0.102 |
| T1 Depressive feelings | ~ | Competence satisfaction | -0.099 | 0.045 | 0.029 | -0.133 |
| T1 Depressive feelings | ~ | Relatedness satisfaction | -0.036 | 0.049 | 0.468 | -0.031 |
| T1 Depressive feelings | ~ | Autonomy frustration | 0.221 | 0.034 | 0.000 | 0.335 |
| T1 Depressive feelings | ~ | Competence frustration | 0.127 | 0.067 | 0.058 | 0.162 |
| T1 Depressive feelings | ~ | Relatedness frustration | 0.063 | 0.042 | 0.135 | 0.077 |
Regression weights of T1 depressive feelings as predicted by three omnibus needs and acquiescence bias latent factors:
| dv | iv | est | se | p-value | std | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 Depressive feelings | ~ | Autonomy satisfaction | -0.397 | 0.058 | 0.000 | -0.385 |
| T1 Depressive feelings | ~ | Competence satisfaction | -0.207 | 0.041 | 0.000 | -0.260 |
| T1 Depressive feelings | ~ | Relatedness satisfaction | -0.110 | 0.044 | 0.013 | -0.103 |
| T1 Depressive feelings | ~ | Autonomy acquiescence | 0.135 | 0.064 | 0.037 | 0.087 |
| T1 Depressive feelings | ~ | Competence acquiescence | 0.031 | 0.091 | 0.730 | 0.017 |
| T1 Depressive feelings | ~ | Relatedness acquiescence | -0.002 | 0.070 | 0.980 | -0.001 |
The unexplained variance of T1 depressive feelings from
needs in the six-factor model is .570
The unexplained variance T1 depressive feelings from needs in
the acquiescence model is .567
Comparison of the six-factor and the acquiescence model
Six-factor Model Acquiescence Model
chisq 974.122 997.460
chisq.scaled 748.253 768.096
df 237.000 243.000
pvalue 0.000 0.000
cfi 0.923 0.921
cfi.scaled 0.930 0.928
tli 0.910 0.910
tli.scaled 0.919 0.919
srmr 0.048 0.044
rmsea 0.048 0.048
rmsea.ci.lower 0.045 0.045
rmsea.ci.upper 0.051 0.051
rmsea.scaled 0.040 0.040
rmsea.ci.lower.scaled 0.037 0.037
rmsea.ci.upper.scaled 0.043 0.043Comparison of the six factor model and the acquiescence model fit indices
Six-factor Model Acquiescence Model
chisq 1374.907 1400.865
chisq.scaled 1082.552 1104.960
df 384.000 390.000
pvalue 0.000 0.000
cfi 0.920 0.918
cfi.scaled 0.928 0.926
tli 0.909 0.909
tli.scaled 0.918 0.918
srmr 0.048 0.044
rmsea 0.045 0.045
rmsea.ci.lower 0.042 0.042
rmsea.ci.upper 0.047 0.047
rmsea.scaled 0.037 0.038
rmsea.ci.lower.scaled 0.035 0.035
rmsea.ci.upper.scaled 0.040 0.040Models for T3 Vitality:
Regression weights of T3 subjective vitality as predicted by
needs satisfaction and frustration latent factors:
| dv | iv | est | se | p-value | std | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T3 Subjective vitality | ~ | Autonomy satisfaction | 0.492 | 0.410 | 0.230 | 0.349 |
| T3 Subjective vitality | ~ | Competence satisfaction | 0.204 | 0.309 | 0.510 | 0.157 |
| T3 Subjective vitality | ~ | Relatedness satisfaction | 0.077 | 0.219 | 0.723 | 0.050 |
| T3 Subjective vitality | ~ | Autonomy frustration | -0.114 | 0.120 | 0.342 | -0.117 |
| T3 Subjective vitality | ~ | Competence frustration | -0.145 | 0.177 | 0.413 | -0.126 |
| T3 Subjective vitality | ~ | Relatedness frustration | 0.081 | 0.117 | 0.490 | 0.071 |
Regression weights of T3 subjective vitality as predicted by three omnibus needs and acquiescence bias latent factors:
| dv | iv | est | se | p-value | std | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T3 Subjective vitality | ~ | Autonomy satisfaction | 0.514 | 0.096 | 0.000 | 0.352 |
| T3 Subjective vitality | ~ | Competence satisfaction | 0.436 | 0.100 | 0.000 | 0.300 |
| T3 Subjective vitality | ~ | Relatedness satisfaction | -0.003 | 0.070 | 0.960 | -0.002 |
| T3 Subjective vitality | ~ | Autonomy acquiescence | 0.107 | 0.264 | 0.685 | 0.043 |
| T3 Subjective vitality | ~ | Competence acquiescence | 0.307 | 0.361 | 0.395 | 0.091 |
| T3 Subjective vitality | ~ | Relatedness acquiescence | 0.254 | 0.214 | 0.235 | 0.089 |
The unexplained variance of T3 vitality from needs in the
six-factor model is .573
The unexplained variance of T3 vitality from needs in the
acquiescence model is .578
Comparison of the six factor model and the acquiescence model fit indices
Six-factor Model Acquiescence Model
chisq 1257.201 1273.794
chisq.scaled 983.777 998.608
df 356.000 362.000
pvalue 0.000 0.000
cfi 0.920 0.919
cfi.scaled 0.929 0.928
tli 0.909 0.909
tli.scaled 0.919 0.919
srmr 0.047 0.043
rmsea 0.044 0.044
rmsea.ci.lower 0.042 0.042
rmsea.ci.upper 0.047 0.047
rmsea.scaled 0.037 0.037
rmsea.ci.lower.scaled 0.035 0.035
rmsea.ci.upper.scaled 0.039 0.039Models for T3 Life Satisfaction:
Regression weights of T3 life satisfaction as predicted by needs
satisfaction and frustration latent factors:
| dv | iv | est | se | p-value | std | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T3 Life satisfaction | ~ | Autonomy satisfaction | 0.630 | 0.482 | 0.191 | 0.598 |
| T3 Life satisfaction | ~ | Competence satisfaction | -0.286 | 0.369 | 0.438 | -0.290 |
| T3 Life satisfaction | ~ | Relatedness satisfaction | 0.151 | 0.235 | 0.519 | 0.132 |
| T3 Life satisfaction | ~ | Autonomy frustration | -0.023 | 0.149 | 0.875 | -0.031 |
| T3 Life satisfaction | ~ | Competence frustration | -0.377 | 0.190 | 0.047 | -0.432 |
| T3 Life satisfaction | ~ | Relatedness frustration | 0.138 | 0.116 | 0.232 | 0.160 |
Regression weights of T3 life satisfaction as predicted by three omnibus needs and acquiescence bias latent factors:
| dv | iv | est | se | p-value | std | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T3 Life satisfaction | ~ | Autonomy satisfaction | 0.474 | 0.081 | 0.000 | 0.434 |
| T3 Life satisfaction | ~ | Competence satisfaction | 0.233 | 0.084 | 0.006 | 0.209 |
| T3 Life satisfaction | ~ | Relatedness satisfaction | 0.045 | 0.055 | 0.418 | 0.037 |
| T3 Life satisfaction | ~ | Autonomy acquiescence | 0.200 | 0.261 | 0.442 | 0.104 |
| T3 Life satisfaction | ~ | Competence acquiescence | -0.379 | 0.347 | 0.276 | -0.148 |
| T3 Life satisfaction | ~ | Relatedness acquiescence | 0.537 | 0.199 | 0.007 | 0.246 |
The unexplained variance of T3 life satisfaction from needs
in the six-factor model is .529
The unexplained variance of T3 life satisfaction from needs in
the acquiescence model is .537
Comparison of the six factor model and the acquiescence model fit indices
Six-factor Model Acquiescence Model
chisq 1921.005 1935.911
chisq.scaled 1573.881 1586.858
df 506.000 512.000
pvalue 0.000 0.000
cfi 0.901 0.900
cfi.scaled 0.910 0.909
tli 0.890 0.891
tli.scaled 0.900 0.900
srmr 0.049 0.045
rmsea 0.047 0.047
rmsea.ci.lower 0.045 0.045
rmsea.ci.upper 0.049 0.049
rmsea.scaled 0.041 0.041
rmsea.ci.lower.scaled 0.039 0.039
rmsea.ci.upper.scaled 0.043 0.043Models for T3 Depressive feelings:
Regression weights of T3 depressive feelings as predicted by
needs satisfaction and frustration latent factors:
| dv | iv | est | se | p-value | std | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T3 Depressive feelings | ~ | Autonomy satisfaction | -0.484 | 0.347 | 0.163 | -0.554 |
| T3 Depressive feelings | ~ | Competence satisfaction | 0.281 | 0.255 | 0.271 | 0.344 |
| T3 Depressive feelings | ~ | Relatedness satisfaction | 0.069 | 0.173 | 0.691 | 0.072 |
| T3 Depressive feelings | ~ | Autonomy frustration | 0.082 | 0.103 | 0.424 | 0.134 |
| T3 Depressive feelings | ~ | Competence frustration | 0.368 | 0.128 | 0.004 | 0.510 |
| T3 Depressive feelings | ~ | Relatedness frustration | 0.044 | 0.088 | 0.616 | 0.062 |
Regression weights of T3 depressive feelings as predicted by three omnibus needs and acquiescence bias latent factors:
| dv | iv | est | se | p-value | std | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T3 Depressive feelings | ~ | Autonomy satisfaction | -0.402 | 0.055 | 0.000 | -0.447 |
| T3 Depressive feelings | ~ | Competence satisfaction | -0.264 | 0.060 | 0.000 | -0.285 |
| T3 Depressive feelings | ~ | Relatedness satisfaction | -0.073 | 0.041 | 0.076 | -0.072 |
| T3 Depressive feelings | ~ | Autonomy acquiescence | -0.074 | 0.168 | 0.658 | -0.047 |
| T3 Depressive feelings | ~ | Competence acquiescence | 0.438 | 0.230 | 0.057 | 0.206 |
| T3 Depressive feelings | ~ | Relatedness acquiescence | -0.059 | 0.130 | 0.652 | -0.033 |
The unexplained variance of T3 depressive feeligns from
needs in the six-factor model is .416
The unexplained variance T3 depressive feeligns from needs in
the acquiescence model is .422
Comparison of the six-factor and the acquiescence model
Six-factor Model Acquiescence Model
chisq 527.054 515.788
chisq.scaled 427.396 418.497
df 237.000 243.000
pvalue 0.000 0.000
cfi 0.949 0.952
cfi.scaled 0.958 0.961
tli 0.940 0.945
tli.scaled 0.951 0.956
srmr 0.055 0.053
rmsea 0.053 0.050
rmsea.ci.lower 0.047 0.044
rmsea.ci.upper 0.059 0.056
rmsea.scaled 0.043 0.040
rmsea.ci.lower.scaled 0.037 0.034
rmsea.ci.upper.scaled 0.048 0.046Comparison of the six factor model and the acquiescence model fit indices
Six-factor Model Acquiescence Model
chisq 734.053 721.968
chisq.scaled 624.243 613.433
df 384.000 390.000
pvalue 0.000 0.000
cfi 0.948 0.951
cfi.scaled 0.957 0.960
tli 0.942 0.945
tli.scaled 0.951 0.955
srmr 0.051 0.051
rmsea 0.045 0.044
rmsea.ci.lower 0.040 0.039
rmsea.ci.upper 0.050 0.049
rmsea.scaled 0.038 0.036
rmsea.ci.lower.scaled 0.033 0.031
rmsea.ci.upper.scaled 0.043 0.041Models for Autonomy supportive parenting:
Regression weights of Autonomy-supportive parenting as predicted by
needs satisfaction and frustration latent factors:
| dv | iv | est | se | p-value | std | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Autonomy-supportive parenting | ~ | Autonomy satisfaction | 0.332 | 0.146 | 0.022 | 0.235 |
| Autonomy-supportive parenting | ~ | Competence satisfaction | -0.209 | 0.163 | 0.200 | -0.163 |
| Autonomy-supportive parenting | ~ | Relatedness satisfaction | 0.502 | 0.134 | 0.000 | 0.320 |
| Autonomy-supportive parenting | ~ | Autonomy frustration | 0.048 | 0.133 | 0.721 | 0.041 |
| Autonomy-supportive parenting | ~ | Competence frustration | -0.225 | 0.158 | 0.153 | -0.212 |
| Autonomy-supportive parenting | ~ | Relatedness frustration | 0.049 | 0.100 | 0.625 | 0.047 |
Regression weights of Autonomy-supportive parenting as predicted by three omnibus needs and acquiescence bias latent factors:
| dv | iv | est | se | p-value | std | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Autonomy-supportive parenting | ~ | Autonomy satisfaction | 0.268 | 0.128 | 0.036 | 0.169 |
| Autonomy-supportive parenting | ~ | Competence satisfaction | 0.031 | 0.105 | 0.770 | 0.022 |
| Autonomy-supportive parenting | ~ | Relatedness satisfaction | 0.366 | 0.101 | 0.000 | 0.248 |
| Autonomy-supportive parenting | ~ | Autonomy acquiescence | 0.343 | 0.236 | 0.146 | 0.127 |
| Autonomy-supportive parenting | ~ | Competence acquiescence | -0.424 | 0.259 | 0.101 | -0.147 |
| Autonomy-supportive parenting | ~ | Relatedness acquiescence | 0.610 | 0.215 | 0.005 | 0.228 |
The unexplained variance of autonomy-supportive parenting
from needs in the six-factor model is
.798
The unexplained variance of autonomy-supportive parenting from
needs in the acquiescence model is .787
Note: Based on the understanding that “aod” items assess autonomy-supportive parenting
Comparison of the six-factor and the acquiescence model
Six-factor Model Acquiescence Model
chisq 732.810 737.745
chisq.scaled 605.174 609.967
df 237.000 243.000
pvalue 0.000 0.000
cfi 0.906 0.906
cfi.scaled 0.915 0.916
tli 0.891 0.894
tli.scaled 0.901 0.904
srmr 0.048 0.049
rmsea 0.052 0.051
rmsea.ci.lower 0.048 0.047
rmsea.ci.upper 0.056 0.056
rmsea.scaled 0.045 0.044
rmsea.ci.lower.scaled 0.041 0.040
rmsea.ci.upper.scaled 0.049 0.048Comparison of the six factor model and the acquiescence model fit indices
Six-factor Model Acquiescence Model
chisq 1372.198 1373.346
chisq.scaled 1105.590 1107.676
df 443.000 449.000
pvalue 0.000 0.000
cfi 0.884 0.884
cfi.scaled 0.893 0.894
tli 0.870 0.872
tli.scaled 0.881 0.883
srmr 0.051 0.051
rmsea 0.053 0.052
rmsea.ci.lower 0.050 0.049
rmsea.ci.upper 0.056 0.055
rmsea.scaled 0.044 0.044
rmsea.ci.lower.scaled 0.042 0.041
rmsea.ci.upper.scaled 0.047 0.047Regression weights of psychological well-being as predicted by needs satisfaction and frustration latent factors:
| dv | iv | est | se | p-value | std | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Psychological well-being | ~ | Autonomy satisfaction | 1.335 | 0.482 | 0.006 | 0.636 |
| Psychological well-being | ~ | Competence satisfaction | 1.039 | 0.449 | 0.021 | 0.502 |
| Psychological well-being | ~ | Relatedness satisfaction | -0.527 | 0.470 | 0.262 | -0.236 |
| Psychological well-being | ~ | Autonomy frustration | 0.182 | 0.238 | 0.445 | 0.124 |
| Psychological well-being | ~ | Competence frustration | 0.483 | 0.348 | 0.165 | 0.330 |
| Psychological well-being | ~ | Relatedness frustration | -1.216 | 0.557 | 0.029 | -0.540 |
Regression weights of psychological well-being as predicted by three omnibus needs and acquiescence bias latent factors:
| dv | iv | est | se | p-value | std | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Psychological well-being | ~ | Autonomy satisfaction | 0.810 | 0.134 | 0.000 | 0.374 |
| Psychological well-being | ~ | Competence satisfaction | 0.724 | 0.120 | 0.000 | 0.323 |
| Psychological well-being | ~ | Relatedness satisfaction | 0.528 | 0.109 | 0.000 | 0.233 |
| Psychological well-being | ~ | Autonomy acquiescence | 1.183 | 0.464 | 0.011 | 0.310 |
| Psychological well-being | ~ | Competence acquiescence | 1.045 | 0.506 | 0.039 | 0.216 |
| Psychological well-being | ~ | Relatedness acquiescence | -0.798 | 0.474 | 0.092 | -0.185 |
The unexplained variance of psychological well-being from
needs in the six-factor model is .201
The unexplained variance of psychological well-being from needs
in the acquiescence model is .219
Comparison of the six factor model and the acquiescence model fit indices
Six-factor Model Acquiescence Model
chisq 1136.732 1140.213
chisq.scaled 961.685 964.953
df 443.000 449.000
pvalue 0.000 0.000
cfi 0.899 0.899
cfi.scaled 0.907 0.908
tli 0.887 0.889
tli.scaled 0.896 0.898
srmr 0.046 0.046
rmsea 0.045 0.045
rmsea.ci.lower 0.042 0.042
rmsea.ci.upper 0.048 0.048
rmsea.scaled 0.039 0.039
rmsea.ci.lower.scaled 0.036 0.036
rmsea.ci.upper.scaled 0.042 0.042Regression weights of psychological control as predicted by needs satisfaction and frustration latent factors:
| dv | iv | est | se | p-value | std | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Psychological control | ~ | Autonomy satisfaction | 0.045 | 0.130 | 0.729 | 0.078 |
| Psychological control | ~ | Competence satisfaction | 0.096 | 0.129 | 0.454 | 0.167 |
| Psychological control | ~ | Relatedness satisfaction | -0.073 | 0.120 | 0.544 | -0.120 |
| Psychological control | ~ | Autonomy frustration | 0.122 | 0.071 | 0.087 | 0.299 |
| Psychological control | ~ | Competence frustration | 0.114 | 0.094 | 0.223 | 0.287 |
| Psychological control | ~ | Relatedness frustration | -0.041 | 0.139 | 0.770 | -0.065 |
Regression weights of psychological control as predicted by three omnibus needs and acquiescence bias latent factors:
| dv | iv | est | se | p-value | std | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Psychological control | ~ | Autonomy satisfaction | -0.134 | 0.054 | 0.013 | -0.227 |
| Psychological control | ~ | Competence satisfaction | -0.037 | 0.051 | 0.467 | -0.060 |
| Psychological control | ~ | Relatedness satisfaction | -0.044 | 0.038 | 0.246 | -0.071 |
| Psychological control | ~ | Autonomy acquiescence | 0.152 | 0.153 | 0.323 | 0.146 |
| Psychological control | ~ | Competence acquiescence | 0.178 | 0.172 | 0.301 | 0.132 |
| Psychological control | ~ | Relatedness acquiescence | -0.069 | 0.146 | 0.639 | -0.058 |
The unexplained variance of psychological control from needs
in the six-factor model is .849
The unexplained variance of psychological control from needs in
the acquiescence model is .852