Flow Data

This project evaluates the outcome of the transcranial direct current stimulation device in relation to patients engagement and perceived helpfulness. The primary outcome was focused on engagement with the device, while the secondary outcomes assesses whether it was helpful for parients or not

The values below shows the mean, SD of the outcomes

MADRS-s change     GAD change     PHQ change   REQoL change 
      9.204688       7.000000       8.129062      -0.580625 

MADRS-s change     GAD change     PHQ change   REQoL change 
      9.690304       6.415707       7.868852      11.284515 

The values shows the correlation between each individual outcome and their adherence level (attendance cum completion of stimulations)

MADRS-s change     GAD change     PHQ change   REQoL change 
     0.2362411     -0.3238716     -0.2261864      0.4837138 

#The Flow (transcranial direct current stimulation) evaluation data assessed patients engagement and potential Outcomes

 
## Primary Outcome
 
#High Adherance (≥75%) was achieved by 70% of participants.  
#Medium Adherance (50–74%) by 18%, and low Adherance (<50%) by 12%.
 
#While the majority engaged well, nearly 30% fell below the high standard, suggesting a need for more targeted support.
 
## Secondary Outcome
 
#The mean change in REQoL was -0.58, with a large standard deviation of 11.28, indicating substantial variability.
 
#The correlation between Adherance and REQoL was 0.48, suggesting a moderate relationship, though the direction was not clearly positive — more participants experienced a decline than an improvement.