Survey Results Analysis
Q9. Cost Coverage for Supplemental Data
Research Question: If there is a cost associated
with making the supplemental data/resources tied to your publications
available, who covers the cost?
Cost Coverage for Supplemental Data
|
Option
|
Count
|
Percentage
|
|
No Cost
|
109
|
44%
|
|
Author/Institution
|
87
|
35%
|
|
Other
|
43
|
17%
|
|
Publisher
|
31
|
12%
|
|
Shared Cost
|
19
|
8%
|
|
Total Respondents
|
250
|
100%
|
Q10. Data Accessibility
Research Question: How accessible are the data in
your possession to others?
- How are entities approaching data security and access?
Data Accessibility Approaches
|
Option
|
Count
|
Percentage
|
|
Conditional access
|
158
|
20%
|
|
Contact custodian
|
151
|
19%
|
|
Publicly accessible
|
125
|
16%
|
|
Discoverable via search
|
91
|
12%
|
|
Password protected
|
67
|
9%
|
|
No access
|
55
|
7%
|
|
Additional info
|
48
|
6%
|
|
De-identified subset
|
41
|
5%
|
|
Delayed access
|
26
|
3%
|
|
Metadata only
|
21
|
3%
|
|
Total Responses
|
783
|
100%
|
Q14. Dataset Understanding Challenges
Research Question: Have you ever received/worked
with a dataset you haven’t been able to understand?
Challenges in Understanding Datasets
|
Option
|
Count
|
Percentage
|
|
Missing Information
|
200
|
14%
|
|
Questionable Data Quality
|
180
|
13%
|
|
Mismatched Formats
|
154
|
11%
|
|
Unclear Instructions
|
153
|
11%
|
|
Confusing Terms
|
141
|
10%
|
|
Varied Types of Data
|
121
|
8%
|
|
Too Much Information
|
103
|
7%
|
|
Encrypted or Locked Data
|
97
|
7%
|
|
Data Volumes
|
87
|
6%
|
|
Complex Analysis Needed
|
74
|
5%
|
|
Language
|
56
|
4%
|
|
Other
|
29
|
2%
|
|
Other Explanation Text
|
29
|
2%
|
|
Total Responses
|
1424
|
100%
|
Q18. Data Security Measures
Research Question: Do you have data security
measures in place to protect confidential information?
- How do different access levels relate to security
responsibilities?
Data Security Measures Implementation
|
Option
|
Count
|
Percentage
|
|
Password protection on devices and files
|
226
|
14%
|
|
Regular software and system updates
|
214
|
13%
|
|
Secure backup solutions
|
200
|
13%
|
|
Controlled access policies
|
182
|
11%
|
|
Use of secure networks (VPNs, secure Wi-Fi)
|
177
|
11%
|
|
Physical security measures
|
149
|
9%
|
|
Training on data security for staff
|
108
|
7%
|
|
Encryption of files and communications
|
95
|
6%
|
|
Compliance with IRB guidelines
|
60
|
4%
|
|
Data anonymization or pseudonymisation
|
39
|
2%
|
|
Compliance with GDPR
|
38
|
2%
|
|
Compliance with other industry regulations
|
28
|
2%
|
|
I am not sure what measures are in place
|
25
|
2%
|
|
Other regulations text
|
19
|
1%
|
|
Other
|
18
|
1%
|
|
Other explanation text
|
18
|
1%
|
|
I do not have any specific measures in place
|
0
|
0%
|
|
Total Responses
|
1596
|
100%
|
Q20. Implementation Support Needs
Research Question: What would help you most to
implement data access and reuse?
Factors Helping Data Access and Reuse (Ranked by Importance)
|
Option
|
Average_Rank
|
Total_Count
|
|
Guidelines from journals and publishers
|
6.47
|
347
|
|
Guidelines from repositories
|
5.91
|
347
|
|
Guidelines from professional organizations
|
5.76
|
347
|
|
Training for individuals and institutions to comply with new policies
|
5.40
|
347
|
|
Regulations/guidelines from research funding bodies to set such
policies/rules
|
4.79
|
347
|
|
Tribal or similar regulations/guidelines to set such policies/rules
|
4.72
|
347
|
|
Defined internal/institutional rules to follow
|
4.31
|
347
|
|
Financial support for archiving
|
3.97
|
347
|
|
Government regulations to set such policies/rules
|
3.66
|
347
|
|
Total Respondents
|
NA
|
347
|
Note: Higher average rank indicates greater
importance (lower numerical ranks assigned by respondents).
Q21. Engagement Across Research Activities
Research Question: Do you engage with Indigenous
Peoples and/or Descendant Communities during any of these
activities?
- Which research activities show the most/least community
engagement?
Engagement during Brainstorming
|
Response
|
Count
|
Percentage
|
|
Yes, always
|
38
|
10.1%
|
|
Yes. when relevant
|
138
|
36.5%
|
|
Inconsistently
|
58
|
15.3%
|
|
No
|
88
|
23.3%
|
|
I don’t know
|
20
|
5.3%
|
|
N/A
|
36
|
9.5%
|
|
Total
|
378
|
100.0%
|
Engagement during Grant writing
|
Response
|
Count
|
Percentage
|
|
Yes, always
|
29
|
7.7%
|
|
Yes. when relevant
|
108
|
28.6%
|
|
Inconsistently
|
51
|
13.5%
|
|
No
|
117
|
31%
|
|
I don’t know
|
26
|
6.9%
|
|
N/A
|
47
|
12.4%
|
|
Total
|
378
|
100.0%
|
Engagement during Project design
|
Response
|
Count
|
Percentage
|
|
Yes, always
|
51
|
13.5%
|
|
Yes. when relevant
|
147
|
38.9%
|
|
Inconsistently
|
57
|
15.1%
|
|
No
|
68
|
18%
|
|
I don’t know
|
17
|
4.5%
|
|
N/A
|
38
|
10.1%
|
|
Total
|
378
|
100.0%
|
Engagement during Development of a data management plan
|
Response
|
Count
|
Percentage
|
|
Yes, always
|
45
|
11.9%
|
|
Yes. when relevant
|
83
|
22%
|
|
Inconsistently
|
33
|
8.7%
|
|
No
|
117
|
31%
|
|
I don’t know
|
43
|
11.4%
|
|
N/A
|
57
|
15.1%
|
|
Total
|
378
|
100.0%
|
Engagement during Development of data use policy
|
Response
|
Count
|
Percentage
|
|
Yes, always
|
41
|
10.8%
|
|
Yes. when relevant
|
92
|
24.3%
|
|
Inconsistently
|
62
|
16.4%
|
|
No
|
121
|
32%
|
|
I don’t know
|
21
|
5.6%
|
|
N/A
|
41
|
10.8%
|
|
Total
|
378
|
100.0%
|
Engagement during Data collection or acquisition
|
Response
|
Count
|
Percentage
|
|
Yes, always
|
48
|
12.7%
|
|
Yes. when relevant
|
92
|
24.3%
|
|
Inconsistently
|
49
|
13%
|
|
No
|
122
|
32.3%
|
|
I don’t know
|
23
|
6.1%
|
|
N/A
|
44
|
11.6%
|
|
Total
|
378
|
100.0%
|
Engagement during Analysis
|
Response
|
Count
|
Percentage
|
|
Yes, always
|
62
|
16.4%
|
|
Yes. when relevant
|
135
|
35.7%
|
|
Inconsistently
|
49
|
13%
|
|
No
|
79
|
20.9%
|
|
I don’t know
|
17
|
4.5%
|
|
N/A
|
36
|
9.5%
|
|
Total
|
378
|
100.0%
|
Engagement during Reporting/dissemination/sharing
|
Response
|
Count
|
Percentage
|
|
Yes, always
|
48
|
12.7%
|
|
Yes. when relevant
|
131
|
34.7%
|
|
Inconsistently
|
63
|
16.7%
|
|
No
|
73
|
19.3%
|
|
I don’t know
|
19
|
5%
|
|
N/A
|
44
|
11.6%
|
|
Total
|
378
|
100.0%
|
Engagement during Preservation and curation
|
Response
|
Count
|
Percentage
|
|
Yes, always
|
78
|
20.6%
|
|
Yes. when relevant
|
140
|
37%
|
|
Inconsistently
|
52
|
13.8%
|
|
No
|
54
|
14.3%
|
|
I don’t know
|
17
|
4.5%
|
|
N/A
|
37
|
9.8%
|
|
Total
|
378
|
100.0%
|
Engagement during Secondary use of data
|
Response
|
Count
|
Percentage
|
|
Yes, always
|
77
|
20.4%
|
|
Yes. when relevant
|
134
|
35.4%
|
|
Inconsistently
|
44
|
11.6%
|
|
No
|
67
|
17.7%
|
|
I don’t know
|
17
|
4.5%
|
|
N/A
|
39
|
10.3%
|
|
Total
|
378
|
100.0%
|
Engagement during Other
|
Response
|
Count
|
Percentage
|
|
Yes, always
|
41
|
10.8%
|
|
Yes. when relevant
|
104
|
27.5%
|
|
Inconsistently
|
58
|
15.3%
|
|
No
|
89
|
23.5%
|
|
I don’t know
|
38
|
10.1%
|
|
N/A
|
48
|
12.7%
|
|
Total
|
378
|
100.0%
|
Q22. Indigenous Data Sovereignty Practices
Research Question: Do you have processes to actively
facilitate the use and reuse of data by Indigenous Peoples and/or
Descendant Communities represented in those data?
Processes to Facilitate Data Use by Indigenous Peoples
|
Response
|
Count
|
Percentage
|
|
No
|
142
|
37.6%
|
|
Yes
|
118
|
31.2%
|
|
Don’t know
|
87
|
23%
|
|
N/A
|
53
|
14%
|
|
Total
|
378
|
100.0%
|
Processes to Facilitate Data Use by Descendant Communities
|
Response
|
Count
|
Percentage
|
|
No
|
139
|
36.8%
|
|
Yes
|
90
|
23.8%
|
|
Don’t know
|
80
|
21.2%
|
|
N/A
|
75
|
19.8%
|
|
Total
|
378
|
100.0%
|
Comparison of Data Access Facilitation Processes
|
|
Indigenous Peoples
|
Descendant Communities
|
|
Response
|
Count
|
Percent
|
Count
|
Percent
|
|
No
|
142
|
37.6%
|
139
|
36.8%
|
|
Yes
|
118
|
31.2%
|
90
|
23.8%
|
|
Don’t know
|
87
|
23%
|
80
|
21.2%
|
|
N/A
|
53
|
14%
|
75
|
19.8%
|
|
Total
|
378
|
100.0%
|
378
|
100.0%
|
Q24. Interest in Implementation FAIR/CARE Principles
Research Question: Who is most/least willing to
implement FAIR/CARE principles?
Interest in Implementing FAIR and/or CARE
|
Response
|
Count
|
Percentage
|
|
Yes
|
170
|
45%
|
|
Maybe, but I need more information
|
148
|
39%
|
|
No
|
28
|
7%
|
|
Total Responses
|
346
|
100%
|
Demographic Analysis Example
Pivoted Cost Coverage by Demographic (with Totals)
|
Demographic
|
Author/Institution
|
Publisher
|
Shared Cost
|
No Cost
|
Other
|
Total Responses
|
|
Local.Govt
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
3
|
2
|
6
|
|
Federal
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
11
|
2
|
17
|
|
Academic..University.or.College
|
39
|
8
|
5
|
32
|
9
|
93
|
|
Archive.or.Digital.Repository
|
4
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
6
|
|
CRM
|
15
|
11
|
6
|
16
|
6
|
54
|
|
CRM…Tribal
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
4
|
|
Student
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
2
|
|
NGO
|
2
|
0
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
10
|
|
Library
|
1
|
3
|
0
|
6
|
2
|
12
|
|
Tribal.Govt
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
4
|
2
|
6
|
|
State
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
13
|
9
|
25
|
|
Publisher
|
2
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
5
|
|
Digital.Library
|
2
|
3
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
7
|
|
Museum
|
7
|
1
|
1
|
8
|
5
|
22
|
|
Private.Foundation
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
4
|
|
Library..Tribal
|
2
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
3
|
|
Total
|
83
|
30
|
19
|
102
|
42
|
276
|