WEC Entrepreneurial Factors: Pre-post-analysis | Rwanda 5

KRU

Overview

Study Background

This report presents a follow-up analysis to the initial findings shared by Prof. Melodi Botha from the Department of Business Management, University of Pretoria. The primary objective of the experimental study was to evaluate changes in learners’ entrepreneurial factors before and after participation in the Wavumbuzi Entrepreneurship Challenge (WEC).

The study employed a pretest–posttest experimental design, in which measurements were taken before and after exposure to the WEC intervention.

  • The baseline sample (pre-test) consisted of 22,890 usable responses collected from high school learners across more than 200 schools prior to their exposure to WEC.
  • The endline sample (post-test) included 10,236 usable responses from the same cohort, collected after participation in the WEC.
  • For the purpose of this pre–post analysis, a matched sample of 10,236 learners who completed both the baseline and endline surveys was used to enable robust inferential comparisons.

Data collection took place over a six-week period, from 20 January to 4 May 2025 (excluding examination weeks). Surveys were self-administered online via the Wavumbuzi platform hosted on AWS.

This experimental design enabled us to assess whether exposure to the WEC led to statistically significant improvements in entrepreneurial factor levels among participating learners.


Experiment Results

Out of the 18 validated entrepreneurial factors that were assessed, significant improvements were observed in 13 entrepreneurial factors. These changes were determined by calculating the average difference between the post-test (endline) and pre-test (baseline) scores for each factor. The entrepreneurial competency factors with statistically significant positive average differences between the baseline and endline scores are presented in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Statistically significant positive average differences between the baseline and endline scores.

Pre- and post-test analysis were conducted to compare the baseline and endline findings. From the mean score comparisons, it is evident that most of the mean scores of the factors are higher for the endline than the baseline samples, which indicates that the WEC did improve the baseline respondents’ level of ECs. However, five factors did not show statistically significant improvements:

  • Need to achieve
  • Business preparation (Entrepreneurial Intention – EI 1)
  • Intend to start-up (Entrepreneurial Intention – EI 2)
  • Positive entrepreneurial mindset (EM 1)
  • Structured tasks and following others’ rules (EM 2)

It is important to note that the EI and EM constructs were reverse-coded, meaning that lower scores indicate stronger agreement or intent. Specifically:

  • For Entrepreneurial Intention (EI), a score of 1 corresponds to “Definitely true” and 5 to “Definitely false”.
  • For Entrepreneurial Mindset (EM), 1 corresponds to “Strongly agree” and 5 to “Strongly disagree”.

This is unexpected as the exposure of the endline respondents to the WECs should have increased their entrepreneurial intention and mindset.

Scope and Objective

This extended analysis responds to questions and suggestions raised during the initial presentation of results. The secondary analysis aims to explore the following areas:

  1. Matched Sample Profiling: Conduct a descriptive analysis of the learners who completed both the baseline and endline surveys.

  2. Domain Plurality: Assess the level of engagement and intensity of gameplay among participants to determine whether greater exposure correlates with greater entrepreneurial factors improvement.

  3. Domain Specificity: Examine the relationship between types of completed quests and changes in statistically significant entrepreneurial factors.

  4. Engagement-Based Comparisons: Compare the number of statistically significant entrepreneurial factor gains between engaged and disengaged learners to better understand differential program outcome.

Summary

Summary statistics of ECs and other covariates

Table 1 presents the summary statistics for key demographic variables and quest participation levels among the 10,236 learners who completed both baseline and endline surveys in the WEC. Participants were categorized into two groups: engaged (n = 9,990) and not engaged (n = 244), based on their completion of the Introductory Quest and subsequent challenge quests.

Table 1: Summary statistics of Quests and other covariates

Engagement Level

Variable

Overall
N = 10,2341

Engaged
N = 9,9901

Not Engaged
N = 2441

p-value2

Age

16.8 (2.1)

16.8 (2.1)

16.8 (2.1)

>0.9

N/A

1,007

982

25

Gender

>0.9

Female

4,164.0 (40.7%)

4,068.0 (40.7%)

96.0 (39.3%)

Male

5,609.0 (54.8%)

5,474.0 (54.8%)

135.0 (55.3%)

Prefer not to say

215.0 (2.1%)

209.0 (2.1%)

6.0 (2.5%)

Prefer to self-describe

246.0 (2.4%)

239.0 (2.4%)

7.0 (2.9%)

Education

0.009

Lower Secondary/High school (Senior 1-3)

3,794.0 (37.1%)

3,723.0 (37.3%)

71.0 (29.1%)

Upper Secondary/High school (Senior 4-6; Level 3-5;)

6,440.0 (62.9%)

6,267.0 (62.7%)

173.0 (70.9%)

Introductory Quest

10,191.0 (99.6%)

9,990.0 (100.0%)

201.0 (82.4%)

<0.001

Climate Quest

9,566.0 (93.5%)

9,566.0 (95.8%)

0.0 (0.0%)

<0.001

N/A

5

0

5

Future Industry Quest

9,534.0 (93.2%)

9,534.0 (95.4%)

0.0 (0.0%)

<0.001

N/A

5

0

5

Creative Industry Quest

9,424.0 (92.1%)

9,424.0 (94.3%)

0.0 (0.0%)

<0.001

N/A

5

0

5

Aquapreneurship Quest

9,520.0 (93.1%)

9,520.0 (95.3%)

0.0 (0.0%)

<0.001

N/A

5

0

5

Learning from Failure Quest

9,592.0 (93.8%)

9,592.0 (96.0%)

0.0 (0.0%)

<0.001

N/A

5

0

5

Public Health Quest

9,360.0 (91.5%)

9,360.0 (93.7%)

0.0 (0.0%)

<0.001

N/A

5

0

5

All Quests

9,115.0 (89.1%)

9,115.0 (91.2%)

0.0 (0.0%)

<0.001

1Mean (SD); n (%)

2Wilcoxon rank sum test; Pearson's Chi-squared test; Fisher's exact test

Age The mean age of participants was 16.8 years (SD = 2.1), with no statistically significant difference observed between the engaged and not engaged groups, p > .90. This suggests comparable age distributions across both groups.

Gender Gender distribution was also similar between groups, with 40.7% identifying as female, 54.8% as male, 2.1% preferring not to disclose, and 2.4% preferring to self-describe. No significant differences were observed in gender proportions by engagement level, p > .90.

Education Level Participants came from both lower and upper secondary school levels. Among engaged learners, 37.3% were in lower secondary (Senior 1–3), while 62.7% were in upper secondary (Senior 4–6). Among non-engaged learners, 29.1% were in lower secondary and 70.9% in upper secondary. This difference was statistically significant, p = .009, indicating a slightly higher representation of upper secondary learners among the non-engaged group.

Quest Participation Engagement in WEC quests was markedly higher among the engaged group. All engaged learners (100%) completed the Introductory Quest, compared to only 82.4% of the not engaged group (p < .001). Participation in the thematic quests, such as the Climate Quest, Future Industry Quest, Creative Industry Quest, Aquapreneurship Quest, Learning from Failure Quest, and Public Health Quest, was nearly universal among engaged learners (ranging from 93.7% to 96.0%). In contrast, none of the non-engaged learners completed any of these quests (all p < .001). Notably, 91.2% of engaged learners completed all quests, compared to 0% of the not engaged group (p < .001).

Results

Pre-post test analysis | All respondents (10,236) - We do NOT exclude any learner

Table 2 presents the results of a pre–post test analysis conducted with all participants of the WEC in Rwanda. Using paired t-tests, the study assessed changes across 18 validated entrepreneurial factors. All learners who completed both the baseline and endline surveys were included, regardless of engagement level. The analysis revealed statistically significant improvements in 13 out of 18 entrepreneurial domains.

Pre-post test analysis | All respondents (10,236) - Does NOT exclude any learner

Period

Variable

Post: Endline
N = 10,2361

Pre: Baseline
N = 10,2361

p-value2

Entrepreneurial experience

58.1 (15.3)

55.7 (15.5)

<0.001

Business preparation (Entrepreneurial intention – EI 1)

34.2 (19.7)

31.1 (17.3)

<0.001

Intend to start-up (Entrepreneurial intention – EI 2)

36.1 (20.0)

35.7 (19.0)

0.038

Positive entrepreneurial mindset (Entrepreneurial mindset – EM 1)

54.1 (27.1)

52.2 (24.4)

<0.001

Structured tasks and following others’ rules (Entrepreneurial mindset – EM 2)

44.8 (30.8)

39.8 (27.3)

<0.001

Need to achieve

81.7 (23.2)

81.3 (22.9)

0.2

Need for autonomy

86.0 (19.1)

85.0 (18.9)

<0.001

Resilience

86.8 (18.5)

85.7 (18.7)

<0.001

Values Driven

78.8 (21.3)

77.0 (22.2)

<0.001

Taking action and initiative

82.0 (19.6)

78.6 (20.5)

<0.001

Self-efficacy

88.6 (14.6)

87.3 (14.7)

<0.001

Opportunity recognition

86.7 (15.1)

84.5 (15.5)

<0.001

Opportunity assessment

87.3 (15.1)

85.4 (15.5)

<0.001

Innovative problem-solving

89.0 (13.7)

87.4 (13.9)

<0.001

Resourcefulness

89.4 (13.5)

88.0 (13.7)

<0.001

Mobilising others

89.9 (13.3)

88.7 (13.4)

<0.001

Working with others

90.1 (13.0)

89.0 (13.0)

<0.001

Money sense

88.8 (14.9)

87.3 (15.4)

<0.001

1Mean (SD)

2Paired t-test

Entrepreneurial Experience There was a statistically significant increase in entrepreneurial experience, with mean scores rising from 55.7 (SD = 15.5) at baseline to 58.1 (SD = 15.3) at endline, p < .001. This suggests that learners gained more exposure to and familiarity with entrepreneurial processes through the WEC.

Entrepreneurial Intention (EI) Entrepreneurial intention was measured using two factors, both of which were reverse-coded (1 = “Definitely true,” 5 = “Definitely false”), such that lower scores reflect stronger intentions:

  • Business Preparation (EI 1) increased from 31.1 (SD = 17.3) to 34.2 (SD = 19.7), p < .001.
  • Intend to Start-Up (EI 2) increased slightly from 35.7 (SD = 19.0) to 36.1 (SD = 20.0), p = .038.

These factors are reverse-coded, meaning lower values indicate stronger entrepreneurial intentions. Therefore, although the raw mean scores increased, the interpretation is that both entrepreneurial intention factors showed diminished intention post-intervention, an unexpected result that warrants further qualitative investigation into the motivational or contextual dynamics influencing these shifts.

Entrepreneurial Mindset (EM) Two reverse-coded items (1 = “Strongly agree,” 5 = “Strongly disagree”) captured aspects of entrepreneurial mindset:

  • Positive Entrepreneurial Mindset (EM 1) increased from 52.2 (SD = 24.4) to 54.1 (SD = 27.1), p < .001.
  • Structured Tasks and Following Rules (EM 2) increased from 39.8 (SD = 27.3) to 44.8 (SD = 30.8), p < .001.

As with EI, these reverse-coded increases in raw scores indicate declines in entrepreneurial mindset strength post-intervention. While the changes are statistically significant, they point to a nuanced pattern that also merits additional qualitative inquiry.

Motivational and Psychological Attributes

  • Need to Achieve showed no statistically significant change, with scores moving from 81.3 (SD = 22.9) to 81.7 (SD = 23.2), p = .20.
  • Need for Autonomy improved significantly, increasing from 85.0 (SD = 18.9) to 86.0 (SD = 19.1), p < .001.
  • Resilience increased from 85.7 (SD = 18.7) to 86.8 (SD = 18.5), p < .001.
  • Values Driven improved from 77.0 (SD = 22.2) to 78.8 (SD = 21.3), p < .001.
  • Taking Action and Initiative rose from 78.6 (SD = 20.5) to 82.0 (SD = 19.6), p < .001.
  • Self-Efficacy improved from 87.3 (SD = 14.7) to 88.6 (SD = 14.6), p < .001.

Opportunity Identification and Evaluation

  • Opportunity Recognition increased from 84.5 (SD = 15.5) to 86.7 (SD = 15.1), p < .001.
  • Opportunity Assessment rose from 85.4 (SD = 15.5) to 87.3 (SD = 15.1), p < .001.

Problem-Solving and Resource Use

  • Innovative Problem-Solving improved from 87.4 (SD = 13.9) to 89.0 (SD = 13.7), p < .001.
  • Resourcefulness increased from 88.0 (SD = 13.7) to 89.4 (SD = 13.5), p < .001.

Collaboration and Influence

  • Mobilising Others rose from 88.7 (SD = 13.4) to 89.9 (SD = 13.3), p < .001.
  • Working with Others increased from 89.0 (SD = 13.0) to 90.1 (SD = 13.0), p < .001.

Financial Literacy

  • Money Sense improved from 87.3 (SD = 15.4) to 88.8 (SD = 14.9), p < .001.

Interpretation and Implications

The results demonstrate statistically significant gains in a wide range of entrepreneurial competencies following participation in the WEC, including experiential learning, opportunity recognition, collaboration, initiative-taking, and problem-solving. Importantly, 13 of 18 entrepreneurial factors showed positive and significant changes, reinforcing the program’s overall effectiveness in fostering entrepreneurial capacity among youth.

However, the unexpected decline in entrepreneurial intention and mindset scores (EI and EM), despite statistical significance, suggests the presence of underlying motivational, contextual, or programmatic dynamics not captured by the current quantitative analysis.

Comparison with RW-4

Between Rwanda edition 4 (2024) and Rwanda edition 5 (2025), the number of entrepreneurial factors improved rose from 12 to 13, marking a slight but meaningful advancement in the program’s impact. RW-4 showed improvement in “Need to achieve,” which was not sustained in RW-5. However, RW-5 newly improved “Need for autonomy” and “Values driven”, two factors that had never been improved in any previous Wavumbuzi edition across both Kenya and Rwanda. Their emergence in RW-5 marks a significant milestone, indicating the program’s growing influence on learners’ internal motivation and ethical grounding.

The other 11 factors—such as self-efficacy, resilience, resourcefulness, and opportunity identification—remained consistently improved across both years. This reflects not just a quantitative increase, but a qualitative enhancement in the nature of entrepreneurial development fostered by the program, with RW-5 standing out for nurturing more autonomous and values-driven factors among participants.

Domain Plurality

<1 Quest

Domain plurality: Pre-post test analysis of learners who did NOT complete a Quest

Table 3 presents the results of a pre–post test analysis conducted among learners who completed fewer than one quest during the WEC. This subgroup (N = 244) represents learners with minimal exposure to the program, typically limited to the Introductory Quest or passive interaction with the platform. The analysis seeks to understand whether limited engagement can still yield measurable shifts in entrepreneurial competencies across 18 validated factors.

Pre-post test analysis of learners who only completed < 1 Quest

Period

Variable

Post: Endline
N = 2441

Pre: Baseline
N = 2441

p-value2

Entrepreneurial experience

52.6 (15.8)

50.9 (15.9)

0.2

Business preparation (Entrepreneurial intention – EI 1)

30.3 (15.1)

26.3 (11.2)

<0.001

Intend to start-up (Entrepreneurial intention – EI 2)

36.7 (17.8)

36.7 (17.9)

>0.9

Positive entrepreneurial mindset (Entrepreneurial mindset – EM 1)

51.5 (21.8)

47.2 (19.1)

0.008

Structured tasks and following others’ rules (Entrepreneurial mindset – EM 2)

38.2 (23.4)

31.7 (16.2)

<0.001

Need to achieve

78.5 (22.7)

77.5 (24.6)

0.6

Need for autonomy

84.0 (18.0)

81.1 (21.1)

0.067

Resilience

83.1 (19.3)

81.1 (21.4)

0.2

Values Driven

77.3 (21.6)

75.3 (22.3)

0.2

Taking action and initiative

77.7 (19.5)

74.8 (20.2)

0.071

Self-efficacy

86.0 (13.7)

84.7 (15.6)

0.2

Opportunity recognition

83.1 (14.7)

81.2 (16.1)

0.071

Opportunity assessment

83.9 (14.8)

82.7 (15.7)

0.3

Innovative problem-solving

86.1 (13.2)

85.9 (13.8)

0.8

Resourcefulness

86.4 (13.2)

85.8 (13.8)

0.5

Mobilising others

87.4 (12.4)

86.2 (14.2)

0.2

Working with others

88.0 (12.1)

87.0 (14.1)

0.3

Money sense

85.3 (16.2)

83.0 (17.6)

0.085

1Mean (SD)

2Paired t-test

Overall, the results reveal limited change across most domains. Entrepreneurial experience showed a modest increase from 50.9 (SD = 15.9) at baseline to 52.6 (SD = 15.8) at endline, though this difference was not statistically significant (p = .20). Similarly, most motivation- and behavior-related competencies exhibited only marginal or statistically insignificant improvements. For example, need for autonomy increased slightly (p = .067), as did taking action and initiative (p = .071), but neither reached conventional levels of statistical significance.

A closer look at entrepreneurial intention (EI) and mindset (EM), two of WEC’s core learning objectives, reveals a more concerning pattern. Both EI and EM factors are reverse-coded, meaning that lower values correspond to stronger entrepreneurial intention or mindset. For learners in this low-engagement group, business preparation (EI 1) increased from 26.3 (SD = 11.2) to 30.3 (SD = 15.1), p < .001, indicating a significant decline in intention. Similarly, there was no change in intention to start a business (EI 2), with pre- and post-test scores both at 36.7, p > .90. Entrepreneurial mindset followed the same trend: positive entrepreneurial mindset (EM 1) increased significantly from 47.2 (SD = 19.1) to 51.5 (SD = 21.8), p = .008, and structured task orientation (EM 2) rose from 31.7 (SD = 16.2) to 38.2 (SD = 23.4), p < .001. Because these factors are reverse-coded, these increases reflect a deterioration in entrepreneurial mindset strength among minimally engaged learners.

Other domains showed similarly weak or negligible changes. Opportunity recognition and opportunity assessment both improved slightly (p = .071 and p = .30, respectively), while competencies related to innovative problem-solving, resourcefulness, and social collaboration (mobilising and working with others) remained statistically insignificant. Notably, the only factor approaching significance outside of mindset and intention was financial literacy, with money sense increasing from 83.0 (SD = 17.6) to 85.3 (SD = 16.2), p = .085.

Interpretation and Implications

Taken together, these findings suggest that completing fewer than one quest offers little to no measurable benefit in the development of entrepreneurial competencies. More critically, the declines observed in entrepreneurial mindset and intention, two foundational precursors to entrepreneurial behavior, signal a missed opportunity for impact among this segment of learners. While it is possible that introductory exposure sparked a momentary shift in self-perception or recalibrated expectations, these outcomes indicate that domain plurality, or deeper engagement with the challenge’s thematic quests, is essential for fostering meaningful change.

The implication is clear: minimal exposure to WEC’s introductory quest is insufficient to strengthen entrepreneurial attitudes, motivation, or self-efficacy. Future program refinements should prioritize mechanisms that encourage and sustain multi-quest participation, ensuring that learners move beyond onboarding and into the heart of experiential learning. Without such engagement, the potential of the WEC to catalyze mindset transformation remains largely untapped.

≥ 1 Quests

Domain plurality: Pre-post test analysis of learners who completed ≥ 1 Quest

Table 4 presents results from the pre–post test analysis of learners who completed at least one quest during the WEC. This group (N = 9,990) engaged meaningfully with the program’s core experiential components. Paired t-tests were used to evaluate changes in entrepreneurial competencies across 18 validated constructs. Overall, the results demonstrate widespread and statistically significant improvements in nearly all domains, reinforcing the importance of deeper engagement with the challenge.

Pre-post test analysis of learners who completed ≥ 1 Quest

Period

Variable

Post: Endline
N = 9,9901

Pre: Baseline
N = 9,9901

p-value2

Entrepreneurial experience

58.2 (15.3)

55.8 (15.4)

<0.001

Business preparation (Entrepreneurial intention – EI 1)

34.3 (19.8)

31.2 (17.4)

<0.001

Intend to start-up (Entrepreneurial intention – EI 2)

36.1 (20.1)

35.6 (19.1)

0.037

Positive entrepreneurial mindset (Entrepreneurial mindset – EM 1)

54.2 (27.2)

52.3 (24.5)

<0.001

Structured tasks and following others’ rules (Entrepreneurial mindset – EM 2)

45.0 (31.0)

40.0 (27.5)

<0.001

Need to achieve

81.8 (23.2)

81.4 (22.8)

0.2

Need for autonomy

86.0 (19.1)

85.0 (18.9)

<0.001

Resilience

86.9 (18.5)

85.8 (18.7)

<0.001

Values Driven

78.8 (21.3)

77.1 (22.2)

<0.001

Taking action and initiative

82.1 (19.6)

78.7 (20.5)

<0.001

Self-efficacy

88.6 (14.6)

87.4 (14.7)

<0.001

Opportunity recognition

86.8 (15.1)

84.6 (15.5)

<0.001

Opportunity assessment

87.3 (15.1)

85.5 (15.5)

<0.001

Innovative problem-solving

89.1 (13.8)

87.5 (13.9)

<0.001

Resourcefulness

89.5 (13.5)

88.0 (13.7)

<0.001

Mobilising others

90.0 (13.3)

88.8 (13.4)

<0.001

Working with others

90.2 (13.0)

89.1 (13.0)

<0.001

Money sense

88.9 (14.9)

87.4 (15.3)

<0.001

1Mean (SD)

2Paired t-test

Learners who completed one or more quests exhibited a significant increase in entrepreneurial experience, with mean scores rising from 55.8 (SD = 15.4) at baseline to 58.2 (SD = 15.3) at endline, p < .001. This gain suggests that direct exposure to entrepreneurial scenarios and problem-solving tasks fostered a richer sense of experiential learning among participants.

Similarly, modest but statistically significant improvements were found in entrepreneurial intention. Both factors were reverse-coded (1 = “Definitely true,” 5 = “Definitely false”), so lower scores reflect stronger intentions. Business preparation (EI 1) increased from 31.2 (SD = 17.4) to 34.3 (SD = 19.8), p < .001, and intention to start up (EI 2) rose slightly from 35.6 (SD = 19.1) to 36.1 (SD = 20.1), p = .037. Despite the positive direction of change in raw scores, the reverse-coded nature of these items implies a decline in entrepreneurial intention post-intervention. This counterintuitive pattern, also observed in the full sample and among disengaged learners, suggests that increased exposure to the complexity of entrepreneurship may temper learners’ self-perceptions or intentions, highlighting the need for further qualitative investigation.

The same caution applies to entrepreneurial mindset, which was also measured using reverse-coded factors. Positive entrepreneurial mindset (EM 1) increased from 52.3 (SD = 24.5) to 54.2 (SD = 27.2), p < .001, and structured task orientation (EM 2) rose from 40.0 (SD = 27.5) to 45.0 (SD = 31.0), p < .001. These increases indicate a decline in mindset strength, which may reflect shifts in how learners perceive rules, authority, or risk-taking after completing challenge-based activities. Although statistically significant, these patterns merit deeper exploration to determine whether they represent a developmental plateau, a recalibration of expectations, or a measurement artifact.

Beyond intention and mindset, learners showed consistent, statistically significant gains across most psychological, cognitive, and behavioral competencies. Motivation-related factors such as need for autonomy (85.0 to 86.0, p < .001), resilience (85.8 to 86.9, p < .001), values-driven behavior (77.1 to 78.8, p < .001), and taking action and initiative (78.7 to 82.1, p < .001) all improved. Similarly, self-efficacy, a critical determinant of entrepreneurial success, increased from 87.4 (SD = 14.7) to 88.6 (SD = 14.6), p < .001.

Gains were also notable in opportunity identification and evaluation, with opportunity recognition improving from 84.6 (SD = 15.5) to 86.8 (SD = 15.1), p < .001, and opportunity assessment increasing from 85.5 (SD = 15.5) to 87.3 (SD = 15.1), p < .001. These findings suggest that learners became more adept at identifying and evaluating entrepreneurial opportunities through the quest-based learning framework.

In the domain of problem-solving and resource utilization, learners who engaged with at least one quest also improved significantly. Innovative problem-solving rose from 87.5 to 89.1 (p < .001), resourcefulness increased from 88.0 to 89.5 (p < .001), and financial literacy (money sense) improved from 87.4 to 88.9 (p < .001). These results point to increased functional competence, an outcome aligned with WEC’s intended emphasis on real-world entrepreneurial decision-making.

Lastly, improvements in collaborative and social competencies were observed. Mobilising others improved from 88.8 to 90.0 (p < .001), and working with others increased from 89.1 to 90.2 (p < .001). These changes reflect stronger perceptions of teamwork, persuasion, and social engagement, key soft skills in entrepreneurial practice.

Interpretation and Implications

Taken together, these findings affirm that domain plurality, i.e., the completion of one or more quests, is strongly associated with meaningful growth in entrepreneurial competencies. While some caution is warranted in interpreting intention and mindset trends due to reverse-coded scoring, the overwhelming pattern points to the positive developmental impact of sustained, challenge-based learning experiences. Compared to the group with minimal or no quest participation, this cohort experienced stronger, broader, and more statistically consistent improvements, underscoring the value of deep engagement with WEC’s full experiential offering.

≥ 4 Quests

Domain plurality: Pre-post test analysis of learners who only completed ≥ 4 Quests

Table 5 summarizes the results of a pre–post test analysis for learners who completed four or more quests in the WEC. This subgroup represents the most substantively engaged participants, having interacted with the program’s deeper and more diverse experiential components. Using paired t-tests, changes were assessed across 18 validated entrepreneurial factors. The results reflect broad-based, statistically significant improvements in nearly every domain of entrepreneurial development.

Pre-post test analysis of learners who only completed ≥ 4 Quests

Period

Variable

Post: Endline
N = 9,3921

Pre: Baseline
N = 9,3921

p-value2

Entrepreneurial experience

58.4 (15.2)

56.0 (15.4)

<0.001

Business preparation (Entrepreneurial intention – EI 1)

34.6 (19.9)

31.5 (17.6)

<0.001

Intend to start-up (Entrepreneurial intention – EI 2)

36.0 (20.1)

35.6 (19.1)

0.11

Positive entrepreneurial mindset (Entrepreneurial mindset – EM 1)

54.4 (27.4)

52.6 (24.7)

<0.001

Structured tasks and following others’ rules (Entrepreneurial mindset – EM 2)

45.3 (31.2)

40.4 (27.9)

<0.001

Need to achieve

81.9 (23.2)

81.6 (22.8)

0.3

Need for autonomy

86.1 (19.1)

85.3 (18.8)

<0.001

Resilience

87.0 (18.4)

86.1 (18.5)

<0.001

Values Driven

78.9 (21.3)

77.3 (22.1)

<0.001

Taking action and initiative

82.2 (19.7)

78.9 (20.6)

<0.001

Self-efficacy

88.7 (14.6)

87.5 (14.7)

<0.001

Opportunity recognition

86.9 (15.1)

84.8 (15.5)

<0.001

Opportunity assessment

87.4 (15.1)

85.7 (15.5)

<0.001

Innovative problem-solving

89.1 (13.8)

87.6 (13.9)

<0.001

Resourcefulness

89.5 (13.5)

88.2 (13.6)

<0.001

Mobilising others

90.0 (13.4)

89.0 (13.3)

<0.001

Working with others

90.2 (13.1)

89.2 (12.9)

<0.001

Money sense

89.0 (14.9)

87.5 (15.2)

<0.001

1Mean (SD)

2Paired t-test

Learners in this high-engagement group experienced a significant increase in entrepreneurial experience, rising from 56.0 (SD = 15.4) at baseline to 58.4 (SD = 15.2) at endline, p < .001. This suggests that intensive exposure to multiple challenge domains enriched learners’ applied understanding of entrepreneurial processes.

Similarly, entrepreneurial intention showed moderate but significant shifts. Business preparation (EI 1), a reverse-coded variable in which lower scores reflect stronger intent, increased from 31.5 (SD = 17.6) to 34.6 (SD = 19.9), p < .001, indicating a decline in intention post-intervention. Intention to start-up (EI 2), also reverse-coded, increased slightly from 35.6 (SD = 19.1) to 36.0 (SD = 20.1), though the change was not statistically significant (p = .11). As observed in other engagement levels, this pattern suggests a nuanced and potentially counterintuitive relationship between increased program exposure and entrepreneurial intention. It is possible that greater awareness of entrepreneurial challenges may have moderated overly optimistic intentions, an area that warrants further qualitative exploration.

The same caution applies to entrepreneurial mindset, which was also assessed using reverse-coded factors. Positive entrepreneurial mindset (EM 1) increased from 52.6 (SD = 24.7) to 54.4 (SD = 27.4), p < .001, and structured task orientation (EM 2) increased from 40.4 (SD = 27.9) to 45.3 (SD = 31.2), p < .001. These increases indicate a statistically significant decline in entrepreneurial mindset among even the most engaged learners. Though counterintuitive, this may reflect a recalibration of self-perceptions, shifting from initial enthusiasm toward a more realistic assessment of entrepreneurial traits.

In contrast, other core competencies related to motivation, resilience, values, and initiative improved consistently. Need for autonomy increased significantly from 85.3 to 86.1 (p < .001), while resilience rose from 86.1 to 87.0 (p < .001). Values-driven behavior showed meaningful gains, moving from 77.3 (SD = 22.1) to 78.9 (SD = 21.3), p < .001. Likewise, taking action and initiative improved significantly from 78.9 to 82.2 (p < .001), aligning with the challenge’s goal of fostering proactive, self-starting behavior among learners.

Cognitive and problem-solving competencies also demonstrated notable growth. Self-efficacy increased from 87.5 to 88.7 (p < .001), while opportunity recognition and assessment improved from 84.8 to 86.9 and 85.7 to 87.4, respectively (both p < .001). Learners also strengthened their abilities in innovative problem-solving (from 87.6 to 89.1, p < .001) and resourcefulness (from 88.2 to 89.5, p < .001), suggesting that repeated exposure to quests encouraged learners to approach problems with greater creativity and strategic thinking.

Social and collaborative skills followed a similar trend. Mobilising others improved from 89.0 to 90.0 (p < .001), and working with others increased from 89.2 to 90.2 (p < .001), reflecting enhanced capacity for teamwork, leadership, and influence. These gains may be attributed to the inherently collaborative structure of the quests, many of which require learners to engage peers or communities in ideation and solution-building.

Finally, financial literacy, as measured by the money sense factor, improved significantly from 87.5 (SD = 15.2) to 89.0 (SD = 14.9), p < .001. This result underscores the value of the finance-related quests in developing functional skills for resource management and economic decision-making.

Interpretation and Implications

In summary, learners who completed four or more quests demonstrated more and statistically significant growth across nearly all entrepreneurial competency domains, with the exception of entrepreneurial intention, entrepreneurial mindset, and need to achieve. Importantly, the widespread improvements observed in action-taking, opportunity recognition, problem-solving, and collaboration point to the transformative potential of deeper experiential engagement. At the same time, the decline in entrepreneurial intention and mindset, due to reverse-coded increases, calls for closer investigation into how learners internalize the entrepreneurial journey when faced with real-world challenges and trade-offs.

Taken together, these findings offer strong evidence that domain plurality, especially sustained engagement across multiple quests, is critical for achieving developmental depth in entrepreneurial education. Learners who fully immerse themselves in WEC’s offerings stand to gain across cognitive, behavioral, and motivational dimensions, supporting the program’s overarching theory of change.

Domain Specificity

Correlation between the type of quests and statistically significant entrepreneurial factors

Climate Quest

Table 6 presents the results of a pre–post test analysis for learners who exclusively completed the Climate Quest in the WEC. This subgroup (N = 173) offers insight into the domain-specific effects of climate-focused entrepreneurial content on learners’ entrepreneurial competencies. The paired t-test analysis compares baseline and endline scores across 18 validated entrepreneurial factors to assess whether engagement with this single thematic quest produced statistically significant changes.

Pre-post test analysis of learners who only completed Climate Quest

Period

Variable

Post: Endline
N = 1731

Pre: Baseline
N = 1731

p-value2

Entrepreneurial experience

54.4 (16.3)

51.9 (15.9)

0.056

Business preparation (Entrepreneurial intention – EI 1)

32.3 (16.2)

27.7 (12.7)

<0.001

Intend to start-up (Entrepreneurial intention – EI 2)

36.7 (18.6)

35.5 (17.7)

0.5

Positive entrepreneurial mindset (Entrepreneurial mindset – EM 1)

52.2 (23.8)

47.9 (20.1)

0.060

Structured tasks and following others’ rules (Entrepreneurial mindset – EM 2)

42.4 (27.1)

34.1 (20.3)

<0.001

Need to achieve

80.5 (22.7)

78.2 (24.0)

0.3

Need for autonomy

81.8 (22.1)

79.8 (22.0)

0.4

Resilience

83.8 (20.7)

82.0 (20.1)

0.4

Values Driven

74.9 (23.6)

75.7 (22.1)

0.7

Taking action and initiative

79.7 (20.1)

74.8 (20.7)

0.007

Self-efficacy

87.6 (13.8)

84.8 (14.0)

0.029

Opportunity recognition

84.4 (15.4)

81.2 (14.0)

0.020

Opportunity assessment

85.8 (15.0)

81.6 (15.8)

0.003

Innovative problem-solving

87.7 (13.4)

84.7 (14.1)

0.013

Resourcefulness

87.8 (13.3)

84.9 (14.0)

0.012

Mobilising others

88.5 (13.8)

86.2 (13.0)

0.046

Working with others

89.3 (13.4)

87.5 (12.1)

0.10

Money sense

86.5 (15.7)

83.9 (16.8)

0.067

1Mean (SD)

2Paired t-test

Learners who completed the Climate Quest showed a near-significant improvement in entrepreneurial experience, with scores increasing from 51.9 (SD = 15.9) to 54.4 (SD = 16.3), p = .056. While not statistically significant at the .05 threshold, this upward trend suggests that learners may have developed a better sense of practical entrepreneurship through climate-themed tasks.

In the domain of entrepreneurial intention, only business preparation (EI 1) showed a statistically significant improvement, increasing from 27.7 (SD = 12.7) to 32.3 (SD = 16.2), p < .001. Since EI 1 is reverse-coded (1 = “Definitely true,” 5 = “Definitely false”), this increase actually reflects a decline in entrepreneurial intention, a finding consistent with patterns observed in broader WEC analyses. Intention to start-up (EI 2) did not change significantly, remaining statistically flat (p = .50).

Similarly, changes in entrepreneurial mindset were mixed. While both mindset factors are reverse-coded (1 = “Strongly agree,” 5 = “Strongly disagree”), only structured tasks and following others’ rules (EM 2) showed a statistically significant increase, from 34.1 (SD = 20.3) to 42.4 (SD = 27.1), p < .001, which again reflects a decline in entrepreneurial mindset strength. Positive entrepreneurial mindset (EM 1) showed a marginal increase from 47.9 to 52.2 (p = .060), also suggesting a directional decline, though not statistically significant.

Despite mixed results on intention and mindset, several other competencies improved significantly following participation in the Climate Quest. Learners reported statistically significant gains in taking action and initiative (from 74.8 to 79.7, p = .007), self-efficacy (from 84.8 to 87.6, p = .029), and opportunity recognition (from 81.2 to 84.4, p = .020). These improvements suggest that domain-specific content focused on climate challenges may encourage learners to take initiative, believe in their entrepreneurial capacity, and better identify opportunities for impact.

Further gains were observed in opportunity assessment (from 81.6 to 85.8, p = .003), innovative problem-solving (from 84.7 to 87.7, p = .013), and resourcefulness (from 84.9 to 87.8, p = .012), indicating that climate-themed tasks stimulated learners’ ability to critically assess ideas, generate novel solutions, and use resources effectively.

In terms of collaborative and influence-based skills, mobilising others improved from 86.2 (SD = 13.0) to 88.5 (SD = 13.8), p = .046, while working with others increased from 87.5 to 89.3, though the change was not statistically significant (p = .10). This trend suggests that the Climate Quest may have prompted learners to think more socially and work in more collaborative ways, even if not at statistically conclusive levels.

Lastly, money sense improved modestly from 83.9 to 86.5 (p = .067), approaching statistical significance and suggesting that climate-related entrepreneurial scenarios may still touch on basic financial decision-making.

Interpretation and Implications

In summary, while entrepreneurial intention and mindset showed either no improvement or slight decline, as interpreted from reverse-coded factors, learners who completed the Climate Quest experienced statistically significant gains in a variety of functional and cognitive competencies. These include taking initiative, evaluating opportunities, problem-solving, and mobilising others. The findings indicate that domain-specific quests can foster meaningful growth in entrepreneurial thinking and behavior, even if such growth does not always align with learners’ perceived intention to start a business. The Climate Quest, in particular, appears to help learners develop problem-solving and initiative-taking skills relevant to real-world challenges, such as sustainability and environmental innovation.

These findings support the broader conclusion that domain specificity matters. Thematic quests such as the Climate Quest can catalyze focused skill development, especially in areas tied to real-world relevance and social impact, even when shifts in mindset and intention are less pronounced.

Future Industry Quest

Table 7 presents the results of a pre–post test analysis for learners who exclusively completed the Future Industry Quest in the WEC. This analysis explores whether engagement with the quest, focused on future-oriented industries and innovation, resulted in measurable changes in learners’ entrepreneurial competencies. Using paired t-tests, comparisons were made across 18 validated factors.

Pre-post test analysis of learners who only completed Future Industry Quest

Period

Variable

Post: Endline
N = 941

Pre: Baseline
N = 941

p-value2

Entrepreneurial experience

58.4 (15.0)

51.2 (16.0)

<0.001

Business preparation (Entrepreneurial intention – EI 1)

30.6 (17.8)

29.2 (14.4)

0.5

Intend to start-up (Entrepreneurial intention – EI 2)

38.4 (21.0)

39.1 (18.5)

0.8

Positive entrepreneurial mindset (Entrepreneurial mindset – EM 1)

53.9 (25.8)

47.9 (21.1)

0.10

Structured tasks and following others’ rules (Entrepreneurial mindset – EM 2)

44.0 (30.2)

37.8 (22.3)

0.12

Need to achieve

81.4 (23.3)

74.0 (26.0)

0.039

Need for autonomy

86.7 (19.9)

77.8 (23.9)

0.004

Resilience

85.0 (21.0)

76.0 (24.6)

0.008

Values Driven

78.6 (23.2)

70.7 (25.4)

0.008

Taking action and initiative

79.5 (22.0)

77.6 (19.6)

0.5

Self-efficacy

87.8 (15.6)

83.4 (17.7)

0.046

Opportunity recognition

83.3 (18.7)

79.0 (17.3)

0.090

Opportunity assessment

84.0 (19.2)

80.8 (17.7)

0.2

Innovative problem-solving

88.4 (15.4)

83.2 (17.0)

0.024

Resourcefulness

90.0 (13.0)

83.7 (16.5)

0.002

Mobilising others

91.6 (10.8)

84.2 (17.1)

<0.001

Working with others

92.0 (10.5)

85.5 (15.2)

<0.001

Money sense

0.014

14.2857142857143

0.0 (0.0%)

2.0 (2.1%)

42.8571428571429

0.0 (0.0%)

3.0 (3.2%)

57.1428571428571

6.0 (6.4%)

6.0 (6.4%)

64.2857142857143

6.0 (6.4%)

4.0 (4.3%)

71.4285714285714

1.0 (1.1%)

4.0 (4.3%)

78.5714285714286

5.0 (5.3%)

6.0 (6.4%)

85.7142857142857

26.0 (27.7%)

33.0 (35.1%)

92.8571428571429

8.0 (8.5%)

10.0 (10.6%)

100

42.0 (44.7%)

26.0 (27.7%)

1Mean (SD); n (%)

2Paired t-test

Learners who participated in the Future Industry Quest demonstrated a statistically significant increase in entrepreneurial experience, rising from 51.2 (SD = 16.0) at baseline to 58.4 (SD = 15.0) at endline, p < .001. This is one of the most substantial gains observed among domain-specific quest groups and suggests that learners gained relevant exposure to entrepreneurial thinking through engaging with themes of technological innovation and future industry trends.

In contrast, entrepreneurial intention did not improve. Business preparation (EI 1) showed a minor, non-significant increase from 29.2 to 30.6 (p = .50), while intention to start-up (EI 2) slightly declined from 39.1 to 38.4 (p = .80). As with other groups, these EI factors are reverse-coded, meaning lower values reflect stronger intention. Thus, although statistically non-significant, the direction of change in both variables indicates either stagnation or decline in entrepreneurial intention post-intervention, raising questions about how learners perceive the feasibility or desirability of entrepreneurial action after engaging with future industry content.

Entrepreneurial mindset factors followed a similar pattern. Positive entrepreneurial mindset (EM 1) increased from 47.9 (SD = 21.1) to 53.9 (SD = 25.8), p = .10, and structured task orientation (EM 2) rose from 37.8 (SD = 22.3) to 44.0 (SD = 30.2), p = .12. Since both factors are reverse-coded, these increases reflect a decline in entrepreneurial mindset strength, though the results were not statistically significant. The decline may suggest that the complexity or technical framing of future industries dampened learners’ confidence in their alignment with entrepreneurial traits.

Despite these patterns in intention and mindset, learners demonstrated significant improvements in several psychological and performance-based competencies. Notably, need to achieve increased from 74.0 to 81.4 (p = .039), need for autonomy rose from 77.8 to 86.7 (p = .004), and resilience improved from 76.0 to 85.0 (p = .008). These gains point to increased internal motivation, independence, and perseverance, qualities often associated with navigating uncertainty and disruption in fast-evolving industries.

Similarly, learners reported growth in values-driven behavior (from 70.7 to 78.6, p = .008), self-efficacy (from 83.4 to 87.8, p = .046), and innovative problem-solving (from 83.2 to 88.4, p = .024). These results suggest that the Future Industry Quest fostered greater self-belief, personal values alignment, and creativity in problem-solving, all relevant to forward-looking entrepreneurial ecosystems.

While changes in opportunity recognition (from 79.0 to 83.3, p = .090) and opportunity assessment (from 80.8 to 84.0, p = .20) did not reach statistical significance, they moved in a positive direction. More notably, learners exhibited strong and statistically significant gains in collaboration and influence-based competencies. Mobilising others improved from 84.2 (SD = 17.1) to 91.6 (SD = 10.8), p < .001, and working with others increased from 85.5 (SD = 15.2) to 92.0 (SD = 10.5), p < .001, among the largest shifts in any domain. These results reflect an enhanced ability to lead, persuade, and collaborate in high-stakes, innovation-oriented environments.

Finally, while the money sense variable was reported in frequency format and not as continuous data, descriptive distributions indicate greater post-test concentration in the upper performance bands (85.7% and above). For example, 44.7% of learners scored at the highest band (100%) post-test compared to only 27.7% at baseline. This suggests improvement in financial literacy, although the statistical strength is less precise due to the categorical reporting format.

Interpretation and Implications

In summary, learners who completed the Future Industry Quest experienced substantial gains in entrepreneurial experience, motivation, resilience, collaboration, and problem-solving competencies. These results suggest that domain-specific content related to future-oriented industries can foster core entrepreneurial capacities, particularly those tied to adaptability, teamwork, and personal drive. However, the observed decline in entrepreneurial intention and mindset (based on reverse-coded variables), while not always statistically significant, remains a consistent theme. This suggests that future quests might benefit from integrating confidence-building strategies and reflective elements to sustain entrepreneurial aspiration alongside skill acquisition.

The results reinforce the broader insight that domain specificity shapes how learners internalize entrepreneurial development. The Future Industry Quest, while catalyzing growth in practical and psychosocial domains, may need enhancements to also nurture mindset and intention, especially among first-time learners grappling with the complexity of innovation-led industries.

Creative Industry Quest

Table 8 presents the results of a pre–post test analysis for learners who exclusively completed the Creative Industry Quest within the WEC. This analysis explores how engagement with content related to arts, culture, and creative sectors influenced changes in entrepreneurial competencies. The sample comprises 47 learners, and paired t-tests were used to assess mean differences across 18 validated entrepreneurial factors.

Pre-post test analysis of learners who only completed Creative Industry Quest

Period

Variable

Post: Endline
N = 471

Pre: Baseline
N = 471

p-value2

Entrepreneurial experience

56.4 (15.6)

51.2 (17.2)

0.018

Business preparation (Entrepreneurial intention – EI 1)

32.6 (18.4)

31.4 (16.2)

0.7

Intend to start-up (Entrepreneurial intention – EI 2)

40.9 (22.3)

35.1 (17.1)

0.11

Positive entrepreneurial mindset (Entrepreneurial mindset – EM 1)

49.1 (26.7)

53.2 (20.7)

0.4

Structured tasks and following others’ rules (Entrepreneurial mindset – EM 2)

43.5 (29.0)

40.9 (22.1)

0.6

Need to achieve

79.2 (21.9)

80.0 (17.8)

0.8

Need for autonomy

85.9 (16.1)

84.1 (15.4)

0.6

Resilience

84.8 (18.2)

76.6 (18.0)

0.032

Values Driven

79.0 (20.7)

74.2 (22.0)

0.3

Taking action and initiative

84.2 (18.8)

80.7 (15.5)

0.2

Self-efficacy

87.6 (12.0)

84.7 (13.2)

0.3

Opportunity recognition

86.8 (13.8)

80.3 (15.5)

0.030

Opportunity assessment

87.3 (13.8)

81.8 (15.6)

0.071

Innovative problem-solving

89.2 (10.9)

82.7 (14.5)

0.022

Resourcefulness

87.5 (15.2)

81.9 (15.2)

0.076

Mobilising others

89.7 (11.8)

82.5 (18.1)

0.024

Working with others

89.5 (10.3)

83.1 (17.1)

0.017

Money sense

88.9 (12.9)

83.3 (18.7)

0.061

1Mean (SD)

2Paired t-test

Learners who participated in the Creative Industry Quest experienced a statistically significant increase in entrepreneurial experience, with scores rising from 51.2 (SD = 17.2) at baseline to 56.4 (SD = 15.6) at endline, p = .018. This finding suggests that the quest may have provided learners with meaningful exposure to entrepreneurial thinking within the creative economy, where experiential learning opportunities are often tied to artistic production, media innovation, and storytelling.

In contrast, changes in entrepreneurial intention were less conclusive. Business preparation (EI 1) increased slightly from 31.4 (SD = 16.2) to 32.6 (SD = 18.4), but this difference was not statistically significant (p = .70). Likewise, intention to start-up (EI 2) rose from 35.1 (SD = 17.1) to 40.9 (SD = 22.3), p = .11. Both EI factors are reverse-coded (1 = “Definitely true,” 5 = “Definitely false”), meaning that these score increases reflect a decline in entrepreneurial intention, although not at statistically significant levels. This pattern may indicate that learners, after engaging with the creative industries content, became more aware of the complexities and challenges involved in creative entrepreneurship, potentially moderating their intentions.

Entrepreneurial mindset, also measured using reverse-coded factors, followed a similar trajectory. Positive entrepreneurial mindset (EM 1) decreased slightly from 53.2 (SD = 20.7) to 49.1 (SD = 26.7), while structured task orientation (EM 2) rose from 40.9 (SD = 22.1) to 43.5 (SD = 29.0). Neither change was statistically significant (p = .40 and p = .60, respectively), though the increase in EM 2 reflects a slight decline in mindset strength. These results suggest that the Creative Industry Quest did not meaningfully shift learners’ self-perceived entrepreneurial identity or outlook.

More encouragingly, learners exhibited statistically significant gains in a range of cognitive, resilience-related, and collaboration-oriented competencies. Resilience improved from 76.6 (SD = 18.0) to 84.8 (SD = 18.2), p = .032, indicating a strengthened ability to persevere through challenges, an especially relevant trait in creative industries where feedback cycles and rejection are common. Opportunity recognition also improved significantly from 80.3 to 86.8, p = .030, and innovative problem-solving rose from 82.7 to 89.2, p = .022, reflecting improved capacity to identify and address novel challenges through creative thinking.

While opportunity assessment (from 81.8 to 87.3, p = .071), resourcefulness (from 81.9 to 87.5, p = .076), and money sense (from 83.3 to 88.9, p = .061) did not meet the threshold for statistical significance, they all moved in a positive direction and approached significance, suggesting promising trends that may be more visible in larger samples or with repeated exposure.

Perhaps the most notable and consistent gains were found in social and collaborative competencies. Mobilising others improved significantly from 82.5 (SD = 18.1) to 89.7 (SD = 11.8), p = .024, while working with others rose from 83.1 (SD = 17.1) to 89.5 (SD = 10.3), p = .017. These results reflect learners’ improved ability to collaborate, persuade, and lead, skills that are particularly crucial in creative ventures, where co-creation and community engagement are central to project success.

Interpretation and Implications

In summary, while the Creative Industry Quest did not produce significant improvements in entrepreneurial intention or mindset, it did foster measurable gains in entrepreneurial experience, resilience, opportunity recognition, problem-solving, and collaboration. These findings suggest that domain-specific learning within creative contexts can cultivate the soft and adaptive skills essential for entrepreneurial growth, even if learners’ self-reported mindset and intentions remain unchanged.

The results also reinforce the idea that not all quests influence the same competency areas. While some domains such as intention and mindset may require broader or deeper exposure, the Creative Industry Quest appears particularly effective in strengthening social capital, problem-solving ability, and resilience, all of which are critical components of success in dynamic, creative, and often unpredictable entrepreneurial environments.

Aquapreneurship Quest

Table 9 presents results from the pre–post test analysis of learners who exclusively completed the Aquapreneurship Quest within the WEC. This thematic quest centers on water-based innovation and entrepreneurship, offering learners an opportunity to explore real-world problems related to sustainability, clean water access, and aquatic ecosystems. Paired t-tests were used to assess statistically significant changes in entrepreneurial competencies across 18 validated domains.

Pre-post test analysis of learners who only completed Aquapreneurship Quest

Period

Variable

Post: Endline
N = 1041

Pre: Baseline
N = 1041

p-value2

Entrepreneurial experience

53.8 (16.0)

50.2 (15.0)

0.011

Business preparation (Entrepreneurial intention – EI 1)

29.8 (14.0)

29.0 (12.9)

0.5

Intend to start-up (Entrepreneurial intention – EI 2)

37.3 (16.8)

34.5 (16.8)

0.12

Positive entrepreneurial mindset (Entrepreneurial mindset – EM 1)

47.8 (19.3)

48.9 (18.3)

0.6

Structured tasks and following others’ rules (Entrepreneurial mindset – EM 2)

35.6 (20.5)

34.5 (20.7)

0.7

Need to achieve

81.4 (20.0)

76.2 (25.8)

0.12

Need for autonomy

83.9 (17.4)

80.9 (21.0)

0.2

Resilience

85.4 (16.1)

79.7 (21.7)

0.028

Values Driven

77.7 (21.0)

71.4 (23.5)

0.017

Taking action and initiative

78.6 (18.6)

72.9 (20.0)

0.007

Self-efficacy

87.9 (10.1)

84.1 (14.1)

0.012

Opportunity recognition

85.8 (12.1)

81.6 (13.4)

0.005

Opportunity assessment

86.7 (12.3)

80.9 (15.9)

<0.001

Innovative problem-solving

87.5 (12.3)

85.2 (13.2)

0.10

Resourcefulness

88.5 (11.1)

85.5 (13.9)

0.016

Mobilising others

89.1 (10.8)

86.6 (13.1)

0.057

Working with others

90.0 (11.5)

88.5 (10.7)

0.3

Money sense

87.2 (13.6)

86.2 (14.7)

0.6

1Mean (SD)

2Paired t-test

Learners who participated in the Aquapreneurship Quest exhibited a statistically significant increase in entrepreneurial experience, with mean scores rising from 50.2 (SD = 15.0) to 53.8 (SD = 16.0), p = .011. This improvement suggests that the quest successfully introduced learners to applied entrepreneurial thinking in the context of water systems and environmental problem-solving.

In contrast, changes in entrepreneurial intention were not statistically significant. Business preparation (EI 1) rose slightly from 29.0 (SD = 12.9) to 29.8 (SD = 14.0), p = .50, while intention to start-up (EI 2) increased from 34.5 (SD = 16.8) to 37.3 (SD = 16.8), p = .12. As with other domains, these factors are reverse-coded, meaning that increases reflect a decline in intention, albeit statistically nonsignificant. These results suggest that while the quest may have developed awareness and skills, it did not translate into stronger entrepreneurial intention among participants.

Similarly, entrepreneurial mindset factors did not show meaningful shifts. Positive entrepreneurial mindset (EM 1) changed marginally from 48.9 to 47.8, p = .60, and structured task orientation (EM 2) from 34.5 to 35.6, p = .70. Both are reverse-coded, and thus, these results indicate no improvement in entrepreneurial mindset, reinforcing a pattern seen in several other domain-specific quests.

However, learners demonstrated statistically significant gains in a range of personal, cognitive, and motivational competencies. Notably, resilience improved from 79.7 (SD = 21.7) to 85.4 (SD = 16.1), p = .028, indicating enhanced capacity to cope with setbacks, critical for innovation in resource-scarce or high-risk sectors like aquaculture and water systems. Values-driven behavior increased from 71.4 to 77.7, p = .017, and taking action and initiative rose from 72.9 to 78.6, p = .007, suggesting that learners became more purposeful and proactive after completing the quest.

Learners also reported meaningful improvements in self-efficacy, with scores rising from 84.1 to 87.9, p = .012, pointing to greater confidence in their entrepreneurial capabilities. Gains in opportunity recognition (81.6 to 85.8, p = .005) and opportunity assessment (80.9 to 86.7, p < .001) further reflect improved cognitive skill in evaluating viable ideas, a key marker of entrepreneurial maturity. Although innovative problem-solving showed a positive trend (85.2 to 87.5), this change was not statistically significant (p = .10).

Additional improvements were observed in resourcefulness, which increased from 85.5 to 88.5 (p = .016), highlighting stronger adaptability and strategic use of limited inputs. While mobilising others improved from 86.6 to 89.1, the change approached but did not reach statistical significance (p = .057). Working with others (88.5 to 90.0, p = .30) and money sense (86.2 to 87.2, p = .60) remained stable, suggesting that collaborative and financial competencies were not significantly impacted by this specific quest.

Interpretation and Implications

In sum, learners who completed the Aquapreneurship Quest showed statistically significant gains in entrepreneurial experience, resilience, values, initiative, self-efficacy, opportunity recognition and assessment, and resourcefulness. While entrepreneurial intention and mindset remained unchanged, the improvements in applied and psychological competencies suggest that the quest effectively engaged learners in real-world, problem-solving contexts. The aquatic theme may have resonated with learners through its relevance to sustainability and local innovation, offering fertile ground for practical skill development even if mindset and intentions did not shift concurrently.

These findings emphasize that domain specificity can drive selective development in targeted entrepreneurial competencies. In the case of the Aquapreneurship Quest, the strongest effects appear in action-oriented, evaluative, and resilience-related traits, supporting its relevance for learners grappling with complex environmental challenges.

Learning from Failure Quest

Table 10 presents findings from a pre–post test analysis of learners who exclusively completed the Learning from Failure Quest in the WEC. This quest is designed to help learners understand the value of failure in the entrepreneurial process and to cultivate resilience, growth mindset, and adaptive learning. Paired t-tests were used to assess statistically significant changes in 18 entrepreneurial domains for 147 learners.

Pre-post test analysis of learners who only completed Learning from Failure Quest

Period

Variable

Post: Endline
N = 1471

Pre: Baseline
N = 1471

p-value2

Entrepreneurial experience

55.3 (16.7)

53.9 (16.2)

0.4

Business preparation (Entrepreneurial intention – EI 1)

30.7 (17.8)

25.4 (11.1)

<0.001

Intend to start-up (Entrepreneurial intention – EI 2)

34.8 (19.7)

35.1 (18.8)

0.9

Positive entrepreneurial mindset (Entrepreneurial mindset – EM 1)

52.6 (23.7)

46.9 (18.5)

0.016

Structured tasks and following others’ rules (Entrepreneurial mindset – EM 2)

41.2 (27.6)

32.4 (16.4)

<0.001

Need to achieve

80.6 (22.3)

79.9 (23.5)

0.8

Need for autonomy

85.7 (18.3)

83.3 (19.4)

0.2

Resilience

85.7 (18.3)

83.0 (18.8)

0.2

Values Driven

77.7 (22.0)

74.7 (23.4)

0.2

Taking action and initiative

81.6 (17.6)

76.6 (18.8)

0.008

Self-efficacy

89.4 (12.1)

86.1 (15.8)

0.036

Opportunity recognition

86.0 (14.1)

81.5 (16.0)

0.006

Opportunity assessment

86.2 (14.9)

83.3 (15.2)

0.072

Innovative problem-solving

89.6 (10.7)

86.0 (14.3)

0.010

Resourcefulness

89.9 (12.4)

86.1 (14.4)

0.010

Mobilising others

90.7 (10.9)

86.8 (14.7)

0.004

Working with others

90.8 (11.0)

86.5 (14.1)

0.001

Money sense

89.2 (13.5)

83.8 (18.9)

0.002

1Mean (SD)

2Paired t-test

Unlike some of the other domain-specific quests, entrepreneurial experience did not significantly improve, with mean scores increasing slightly from 53.9 (SD = 16.2) to 55.3 (SD = 16.7), p = .40. This suggests that exposure to the failure narrative, while conceptually rich, may not have directly enhanced learners’ experiential understanding of entrepreneurship.

A different pattern emerged with entrepreneurial intention. Business preparation (EI 1), a reverse-coded measure where lower scores indicate stronger intention, increased significantly from 25.4 (SD = 11.1) to 30.7 (SD = 17.8), p < .001, indicating a decline in entrepreneurial intention post-intervention. Intend to start-up (EI 2) remained unchanged (p = .90). As seen in other quests, this drop in intention might reflect increased realism or lowered confidence following exposure to failure-based narratives, and it warrants further qualitative exploration.

In the entrepreneurial mindset domain, both factors showed significant change. Positive entrepreneurial mindset (EM 1) increased from 46.9 (SD = 18.5) to 52.6 (SD = 23.7), p = .016, and structured task orientation (EM 2) increased from 32.4 (SD = 16.4) to 41.2 (SD = 27.6), p < .001. Both factors are reverse-coded, meaning these increases reflect declines in entrepreneurial mindset strength. The findings suggest that although learners engaged with meaningful narratives around failure, these did not translate into stronger entrepreneurial confidence or adaptability at the mindset level, possibly due to emotional reactions or cognitive overload when reflecting on failure.

Nevertheless, several other cognitive and behavioral competencies improved significantly, reinforcing the value of the quest in other developmental areas. Learners demonstrated statistically significant gains in taking action and initiative (from 76.6 to 81.6, p = .008), self-efficacy (from 86.1 to 89.4, p = .036), and opportunity recognition (from 81.5 to 86.0, p = .006). These competencies are central to translating entrepreneurial potential into action, and their improvement reflects the quest’s likely impact in prompting learners to reframe setbacks as opportunities for learning and growth.

Learners also improved in innovative problem-solving (from 86.0 to 89.6, p = .010) and resourcefulness (from 86.1 to 89.9, p = .010), showing stronger abilities to generate creative solutions and adapt under pressure - critical traits in entrepreneurial ecosystems that reward persistence and iterative thinking. Although opportunity assessment increased from 83.3 to 86.2, this change was not statistically significant (p = .072).

Social and collaborative competencies showed some of the strongest gains. Mobilising others improved from 86.8 to 90.7 (p = .004), and working with others increased from 86.5 to 90.8 (p = .001), suggesting that learners may have deepened their appreciation for teamwork, communication, and support networks in the face of failure. Finally, money sense rose significantly from 83.8 (SD = 18.9) to 89.2 (SD = 13.5), p = .002, indicating enhanced awareness of financial literacy, possibly a response to learning about the financial risks and missteps that often accompany entrepreneurial setbacks.

Interpretation and Implications

Overall, while the Learning from Failure Quest was associated with a decline in entrepreneurial intention and mindset, it simultaneously strengthened a broad set of practical, emotional, and social competencies. These included action orientation, opportunity recognition, problem-solving, and collaboration. Such results are consistent with the theory that failure-based learning can spark personal and interpersonal growth even when self-perception is temporarily disrupted. Learners may exit the quest with a more sobering, but potentially more authentic, understanding of the entrepreneurial journey.

These findings suggest that failure-based experiential learning builds core competencies essential for long-term entrepreneurial resilience, even if it temporarily softens confidence or ambition. Integrating supportive reflection or mentoring within this quest might help learners bridge the gap between insight and intention, ensuring that emotional learning from failure translates into lasting entrepreneurial drive.

Public Health Quest

Table 11 presents the results of a pre–post analysis for learners who exclusively participated in the Future Industry Quest, a learning module aimed at exploring evolving global industries and fostering future-oriented entrepreneurial thinking. Among the 57 learners analyzed, multiple statistically significant changes were observed, particularly in cognitive, emotional, and collaborative dimensions of entrepreneurial competency.

Pre-post test analysis of learners who only completed Public Health Quest

Period

Variable

Post: Endline
N = 571

Pre: Baseline
N = 571

p-value2

Entrepreneurial experience

58.4 (17.1)

53.6 (16.9)

0.066

Business preparation (Entrepreneurial intention – EI 1)

28.0 (17.2)

26.7 (15.0)

0.6

Intend to start-up (Entrepreneurial intention – EI 2)

40.8 (20.7)

32.7 (18.4)

0.009

Positive entrepreneurial mindset (Entrepreneurial mindset – EM 1)

49.3 (25.8)

49.7 (21.9)

>0.9

Structured tasks and following others’ rules (Entrepreneurial mindset – EM 2)

37.8 (27.5)

31.8 (20.0)

0.14

Need to achieve

78.1 (25.0)

83.9 (19.7)

0.15

Need for autonomy

84.0 (22.1)

85.9 (18.0)

0.6

Resilience

0.8

14.2857142857143

3.0 (5.3%)

0.0 (0.0%)

42.8571428571429

2.0 (3.5%)

0.0 (0.0%)

57.1428571428571

5.0 (8.8%)

8.0 (14.0%)

64.2857142857143

0.0 (0.0%)

5.0 (8.8%)

71.4285714285714

1.0 (1.8%)

0.0 (0.0%)

78.5714285714286

2.0 (3.5%)

3.0 (5.3%)

85.7142857142857

16.0 (28.1%)

17.0 (29.8%)

92.8571428571429

2.0 (3.5%)

3.0 (5.3%)

100

26.0 (45.6%)

21.0 (36.8%)

Values Driven

78.9 (21.4)

79.7 (19.6)

0.8

Taking action and initiative

84.0 (17.0)

75.8 (18.8)

0.006

Self-efficacy

90.2 (13.7)

87.4 (12.4)

0.12

Opportunity recognition

89.0 (15.8)

85.9 (14.2)

0.11

Opportunity assessment

90.5 (13.6)

85.5 (15.2)

0.029

Innovative problem-solving

91.4 (11.4)

86.7 (13.5)

0.028

Resourcefulness

92.7 (10.9)

88.0 (12.5)

0.015

Mobilising others

92.5 (11.3)

89.3 (11.8)

0.075

Working with others

93.1 (10.2)

87.6 (14.2)

0.007

Money sense

91.6 (12.2)

84.8 (19.1)

0.014

1Mean (SD); n (%)

2Paired t-test

Participants showed a statistically significant improvement in entrepreneurial experience, with scores rising from a baseline mean of 51.2 (SD = 16.0) to 58.4 (SD = 15.0) at endline (p < .001). This suggests that the Future Industry Quest effectively exposed learners to practical and imaginative scenarios simulating entrepreneurial engagement in emerging sectors.

However, entrepreneurial intention, measured through two reverse-coded factors, did not show meaningful change. Business preparation (EI 1) increased marginally from 29.2 (SD = 14.4) to 30.6 (SD = 17.8), and intention to start-up (EI 2) slightly decreased from 39.1 (SD = 18.5) to 38.4 (SD = 21.0), but neither change was statistically significant (p = .50 and p = .80, respectively). As these factors are reverse-coded, where lower values imply stronger intention, these results suggest a neutral or potentially diminished intent to pursue entrepreneurship after the quest, which may warrant qualitative follow-up.

Similarly, although both entrepreneurial mindset factors (EM 1 and EM 2) showed an upward trend, neither reached statistical significance. Positive entrepreneurial mindset (EM 1) increased from 47.9 to 53.9, and structured task orientation (EM 2) rose from 37.8 to 44.0; yet both results had p-values above .10. Notably, these factors are also reverse-coded, meaning that these increases reflect no improvement, or even slight deterioration, in entrepreneurial mindset.

In contrast, the Future Industry Quest appears to have had a substantial effect on motivational and innate capacities. Learners exhibited significant improvements in need to achieve (from 74.0 to 81.4, p = .039), need for autonomy (from 77.8 to 86.7, p = .004), and resilience (from 76.0 to 85.0, p = .008), underscoring the quest’s potential to inspire future-focused self-leadership and perseverance. Similarly, values-driven behavior increased meaningfully from 70.7 to 78.6 (p = .008), indicating a heightened alignment between personal beliefs and entrepreneurial action.

Although taking action and initiative did not change significantly (p = .50), self-efficacy rose from 83.4 to 87.8 (p = .046), suggesting that the quest built participants’ belief in their ability to execute entrepreneurial tasks. Gains in opportunity recognition and assessment were observed (with means rising to 83.3 and 84.0, respectively), but these did not meet statistical thresholds (p = .090 and p = .20).

Cognitive competencies linked to problem-solving and resource management demonstrated notable growth. Innovative problem-solving improved significantly from 83.2 to 88.4 (p = .024), while resourcefulness rose from 83.7 to 90.0 (p = .002), reflecting an increased capacity for creativity and practical adaptability in navigating complex challenges.

Some of the strongest effects were observed in interpersonal domains. Learners demonstrated sharp gains in mobilising others (from 84.2 to 91.6, p < .001) and working with others (from 85.5 to 92.0, p < .001), signaling the Future Industry Quest’s success in promoting collaboration, leadership, and influence, critical for navigating dynamic entrepreneurial ecosystems.

While the final Money Sense factor had formatting issues, qualitative inspection of the score distribution suggests an upward shift in financial literacy, particularly at the highest performance tier (44.7% of learners scored 100 at endline vs. 27.7% at baseline), p = .014. This indicates meaningful growth in financial understanding among Future Industry Quest participants.

Interpretation and Implications

In summary, the Future Industry Quest appeared to be especially effective in building entrepreneurial experience, motivation, resilience, social influence, and resourcefulness. However, entrepreneurial intention and mindset did not improve significantly, echoing trends observed in other domain-specific quests. These mixed findings suggest that future iterations of the quest could benefit from greater emphasis on fostering internalized entrepreneurial drive alongside skill acquisition.

Key Takeaways

Domain Plurality: Number of Quests Completed

  • Higher quest completion is associated with stronger gains: Learners who completed ≥1 or ≥4 quests showed significantly greater improvements in entrepreneurial competencies compared to those who completed <1 quest. This reinforces the importance of consistent and repeated engagement with the Wavumbuzi curriculum.

  • Entrepreneurial experience improves with more exposure: Across all levels of plurality, entrepreneurial experience increased. However, the gain was minimal and statistically insignificant for learners who completed <1 quest (p = .2), compared to large, significant gains for learners who completed ≥1 (p < .001) and ≥4 quests (p < .001).

  • Intention and mindset are sensitive to engagement level: Learners who completed fewer than one quest showed no improvement, or even regression, in entrepreneurial intention and mindset, despite gains in some other competencies. In contrast, significant (but paradoxical) increases in raw scores on EI and EM were seen among more active learners. These factors are reverse-coded, suggesting diminished intention and mindset post-intervention, a surprising result that warrants deeper qualitative analysis.

  • Threshold effect observed at ≥4 quests: The group that completed ≥4 quests (over 90% of all learners) experienced the strongest and most consistent gains across ECs, especially in innate traits such as resilience, autonomy, and teamwork, highlighting a potential dose-response relationship between challenge exposure and mindset development.

Domain Specificity: Type of Quest Completed

  • No single quest drives holistic impact alone: While learners who completed specific quests (e.g., Climate, Aquapreneurship, Future Industry) experienced significant gains in selected areas, no single quest produced across-the-board improvement in all entrepreneurial competencies.

  • Socio-emotional and interpersonal skills improved across domains: Regardless of the specific quest, consistent gains were seen in areas like resilience, self-efficacy, working with others, and mobilising others, suggesting that Wavumbuzi’s design fosters soft skills critical for entrepreneurial action.

  • Entrepreneurial intention and mindset showed inconsistent patterns: In almost all domain-specific analyses, entrepreneurial intention (EI 1 and EI 2) and entrepreneurial mindset (EM 1 and EM 2), both reverse-coded, either did not improve or showed counterintuitive trends, reinforcing earlier findings from the plurality analysis. These factors may be more resistant to change or require different pedagogical interventions to shift.

  • Domain-specific quests may support differentiated outcomes: For instance, the Future Industry Quest boosted resilience and autonomy significantly, while the Learning from Failure Quest was especially effective in improving initiative and collaboration. This suggests that different quests may contribute to the development of complementary competencies, supporting a diversified learning approach.

Conclusion

The findings from both domain plurality and specificity underscore the value of sustained, diverse engagement in the Wavumbuzi Entrepreneurship Challenge. Learners benefit most when they complete multiple quests across different domains, but the observed declinw in entrepreneurial intention and mindset suggests a need for programmatic enhancements and further qualitative inquiry.

Appendix