Balance check after

## Balance Measures
##                          Type    M.0.Adj   SD.0.Adj    M.1.Adj   SD.1.Adj
## Age                   Contin.    71.2874    10.6759    66.6335    13.9670
## Race_Group_White       Binary     0.5643          .     0.4904          .
## Race_Group_Black       Binary     0.3242          .     0.2775          .
## Race_Group_Others      Binary     0.1116          .     0.2322          .
## Gender_Male            Binary     0.5654          .     0.5543          .
## HTN_Y                  Binary     0.9636          .     1.0000          .
## DM_Y                   Binary     0.6706          .     0.8070          .
## HF_score_Total        Contin.    43.0592     7.4632    44.2057     8.2481
## Dialysis_Vintage      Contin.     2.6643     1.8776     2.3082     4.0551
## Access_type_cat_2_TDC  Binary     0.2374          .     0.4420          .
## Location_HH            Binary     0.2325          .     0.4452          .
## EF                    Contin.    51.7821    14.2818    47.5666    15.4262
## NT_proBNP             Contin. 49487.5956 47450.5060 37004.0344 25157.3080
##                       Diff.Adj
## Age                    -0.3775
## Race_Group_White       -0.0739
## Race_Group_Black       -0.0467
## Race_Group_Others       0.1206
## Gender_Male            -0.0112
## HTN_Y                   0.0364
## DM_Y                    0.1364
## HF_score_Total          0.1441
## Dialysis_Vintage       -0.1001
## Access_type_cat_2_TDC   0.2046
## Location_HH             0.2126
## EF                     -0.2879
## NT_proBNP              -0.3194
## 
## Effective sample sizes
##                1     2
## Unadjusted 84.   93.  
## Adjusted   76.59 81.99

Table 1

Univariate negative‐binomial regression outcome los

Univariate negative‐binomial regression for LOS
Characteristic N IRR1 95% CI1 p-value
time 488


    1

    2
1.41 1.21, 1.64 <0.001
Age 488 1.00 1.00, 1.01 0.155
Gender 488


    Female

    Male
1.14 0.98, 1.33 0.090
Race_Group 488


    White

    Black
0.60 0.50, 0.71 <0.001
    Others
0.66 0.54, 0.81 <0.001
UF_rate 488 0.95 0.94, 0.97 <0.001
Dialysis_Vintage 488 0.99 0.97, 1.01 0.465
HF_score_Total 488 1.03 1.02, 1.04 <0.001
Access_type 488


    AVF

    AVG
0.56 0.37, 0.87 0.008
    TDC
2.18 1.89, 2.52 <0.001
weight.ATE.trunc 488 1.17 1.09, 1.25 <0.001
1 IRR = Incidence Rate Ratio, CI = Confidence Interval

Multivariate negative‐binomial regression los: age gender race

glm.nb(
  formula = LOS ~ time +Age+ Gender + Race_Group,
  data    = all_bwh,
  weights = weight.ATE.trunc 
) %>%
  tbl_regression(
    exponentiate   = TRUE,
    pvalue_fun     = ~style_pvalue(.x, digits = 3)
  ) %>%
  bold_p() %>%
  bold_labels() %>%
  add_n(location = "level") %>%
  modify_caption("**Multivariable NB regression for LOS**")
Multivariable NB regression for LOS
Characteristic N IRR1 95% CI1 p-value
time



    1 215
    2 272 1.47 1.27, 1.71 <0.001
Age 488 1.00 1.00, 1.01 0.696
Gender



    Female 215
    Male 273 1.07 0.92, 1.24 0.395
Race_Group



    White 255
    Black 145 0.60 0.50, 0.72 <0.001
    Others 87 0.63 0.51, 0.77 <0.001
1 IRR = Incidence Rate Ratio, CI = Confidence Interval

Multivariate negative‐binomial regression los : time+Gender+Race_Group+Dialysis_Vintage+HF_score_Total+UF_rate

Multivariable NB regression for LOS
Characteristic N IRR1 95% CI1 p-value
time



    1 215
    2 272 1.29 1.11, 1.49 <0.001
Gender



    Female 215
    Male 273 0.94 0.81, 1.09 0.439
Race_Group



    White 255
    Black 145 0.71 0.59, 0.85 <0.001
    Others 87 0.68 0.56, 0.83 <0.001
Dialysis_Vintage 488 1.00 0.98, 1.02 0.891
HF_score_Total 488 1.02 1.01, 1.03 <0.001
UF_rate 488 0.97 0.95, 0.98 <0.001
1 IRR = Incidence Rate Ratio, CI = Confidence Interval

90 days poisson regression: time

Characteristic N IRR1 95% CI1 p-value
time



    1 215
    2 272 0.96 0.79, 1.17 0.715
1 IRR = Incidence Rate Ratio, CI = Confidence Interval

90 days poisson regression: time Age Gender Race_Group

Characteristic N IRR1 95% CI1 p-value
time



    1 215
    2 272 1.00 0.81, 1.22 0.965
Age 488 1.00 1.00, 1.01 0.384
Gender



    Female 215
    Male 273 1.24 1.01, 1.52 0.041
Race_Group



    White 255
    Black 145 1.20 0.96, 1.51 0.111
    Others 87 0.97 0.72, 1.29 0.838
1 IRR = Incidence Rate Ratio, CI = Confidence Interval

90 days poisson regression:time+Gender+Race_Group+Dialysis_Vintage+HF_score_Total+UF_rate

Characteristic N IRR1 95% CI1 p-value
time



    1 215
    2 272 0.96 0.78, 1.17 0.670
Gender



    Female 215
    Male 273 1.24 1.00, 1.53 0.049
Race_Group



    White 255
    Black 145 1.14 0.90, 1.44 0.280
    Others 87 0.95 0.70, 1.26 0.718
Dialysis_Vintage 488 0.97 0.92, 1.00 0.110
HF_score_Total 488 1.00 0.98, 1.01 0.571
UF_rate 488 0.99 0.97, 1.01 0.569
1 IRR = Incidence Rate Ratio, CI = Confidence Interval

180 days poisson regression: time

Characteristic N IRR1 95% CI1 p-value
time



    1 215
    2 272 0.88 0.75, 1.02 0.095
1 IRR = Incidence Rate Ratio, CI = Confidence Interval

180 days poisson regression: Age Gender Race_Group

Characteristic N IRR1 95% CI1 p-value
time



    1 215
    2 272 0.86 0.73, 1.01 0.058
Age 488 1.00 0.99, 1.00 0.491
Gender



    Female 215
    Male 273 1.12 0.96, 1.32 0.159
Race_Group



    White 255
    Black 145 1.49 1.24, 1.78 <0.001
    Others 87 1.31 1.05, 1.64 0.016
1 IRR = Incidence Rate Ratio, CI = Confidence Interval

180 days poisson regression: time+Gender+Race_Group+Dialysis_Vintage+HF_score_Total+UF_rate

Characteristic N IRR1 95% CI1 p-value
time



    1 215
    2 272 0.83 0.71, 0.98 0.027
Gender



    Female 215
    Male 273 1.10 0.93, 1.30 0.265
Race_Group



    White 255
    Black 145 1.57 1.30, 1.89 <0.001
    Others 87 1.33 1.06, 1.65 0.012
Dialysis_Vintage 488 0.96 0.92, 1.0 0.038
HF_score_Total 488 1.01 1.00, 1.02 0.271
UF_rate 488 0.99 0.98, 1.01 0.351
1 IRR = Incidence Rate Ratio, CI = Confidence Interval

Univariate coxph decongestion_time_days

Characteristic N HR1 95% CI1 p-value
time 488


    1

    2
0.83 0.62, 1.12 0.225
Age 488 0.99 0.98, 1.01 0.378
Gender 488


    Female

    Male
0.80 0.58, 1.12 0.192
Race_Group 488


    White

    Black
1.68 1.06, 2.67 0.026
    Others
1.72 1.22, 2.43 0.002
Dialysis_Vintage 488 1.00 0.97, 1.03 0.903
HF_score_Total 488 0.97 0.95, 0.99 0.003
Access_type 488


    AVF

    AVG
1.78 1.03, 3.08 0.040
    TDC
0.57 0.40, 0.80 0.001
UF_rate 488 1.04 1.02, 1.07 0.001
weight.ATE.trunc 488 0.91 0.79, 1.05 0.192
1 HR = Hazard Ratio, CI = Confidence Interval

coxph decongestion_time_days :Age gender race

Characteristic HR1 95% CI1 p-value
time


    1
    2 0.77 0.57, 1.03 0.081
Age 1.00 0.98, 1.01 0.719
Gender


    Female
    Male 0.85 0.62, 1.16 0.310
Race_Group


    White
    Black 1.64 1.06, 2.56 0.027
    Others 1.76 1.21, 2.56 0.003
1 HR = Hazard Ratio, CI = Confidence Interval

coxph decongestion_time_days :time+Gender+Race_Group+DM+Dialysis_Vintage+HF_score_Total

Characteristic HR1 95% CI1 p-value
time


    1
    2 0.86 0.62, 1.18 0.340
Gender


    Female
    Male 0.98 0.69, 1.38 0.893
Race_Group


    White
    Black 1.42 0.92, 2.19 0.110
    Others 1.67 1.14, 2.45 0.009
Dialysis_Vintage 0.99 0.96, 1.02 0.474
HF_score_Total 0.97 0.95, 1.00 0.020
UF_rate 1.03 1.01, 1.06 0.005
1 HR = Hazard Ratio, CI = Confidence Interval

decongestion_time_days,n_90,n_180,los

1
(N=84)
2
(N=93)
Overall
(N=177)
decongestion_time_days
Mean (SD) 5.24 (3.80) 6.18 (7.72) 5.73 (6.18)
Median [Q1,Q3] 4.00 [2.00,7.00] 4.00 [2.00,6.00] 4.00 [2.00,7.00]
n_90
Mean (SD) 0.869 (1.03) 0.882 (1.10) 0.876 (1.06)
Median [Q1,Q3] 1.00 [0,1.00] 1.00 [0,1.00] 1.00 [0,1.00]
n_180
Mean (SD) 1.46 (1.72) 1.31 (1.59) 1.38 (1.65)
Median [Q1,Q3] 1.00 [0,2.00] 1.00 [0,2.00] 1.00 [0,2.00]
LOS
Mean (SD) 8.99 (6.98) 10.6 (11.1) 9.85 (9.42)
Median [Q1,Q3] 7.00 [3.00,14.0] 6.00 [4.00,12.0] 7.00 [4.00,13.0]