One of the most shocking headlines in The Age (2024) of the year was: “Surge in family violence calls linked to cost of living pressures”. As I delved deeper into the story, I connected the data to real-world developments, exploring who is most at risk, when and where incidents occur, and how the justice system responds. Family violence remains one of the most pressing challenges facing communities across Victoria. In 2024, the Crime Statistics Agency (CSA) recorded tens of thousands of family-related incidents – a chilling reminder that behind every statistic lies a story of vulnerability, trauma and the urgent need for change. So here I want to create a dashboard specifically for policymakers, community health practitioners and journalists to help them explore the data and extract meaningful insights. My goal is to use interactive, evidence-based storytelling to not only inform, but also motivate people to take action.
Data Source: Crime Statistics Agency Victoria (Year ending December 2024)
The occurrence of domestic violence throughout the year tells its own story.
The number of incidents peaks during the winter, with unusually high numbers of reports in July and August. Experts interviewed by ABC News in July 2024 pointed to seasonal unemployment and increased alcohol consumption during colder times as potential triggers. The increase in incidents as December approaches could also be related to holiday stress and financial strain, which also means it echoes a broader pattern observed over the past few years.
Not all cases are resolved fairly, and many victims receive no legal resolution.
While more than 24,000 domestic violence cases were prosecuted in Victoria, an almost equal number were not. In addition, more than 7,500 cases remain unresolved. According to an investigation by The Sydney Morning Herald (October 2024), understaffing in local courts has led to widespread delays in processing cases. Many victims, exhausted by legal barriers, give up before a prosecution can begin. This raises urgent questions about access to justice, court resources and victim support in Victoria’s legal system.
The age distribution of victims tells us who are bearing the brunt of this crisis.
Women aged 25-44 report the highest levels of violence. This age group often experiences stress from financial pressures, parenting responsibilities, and relationship challenges, which can intersect with risk for intimate partner violence. Recognizing and supporting women in this population is key to designing effective prevention and intervention policies.
Understanding the offender can help develop intervention strategies.
While the majority of domestic violence offenders are male, incident reports show that female offending peaks between the ages of 25 and 39. This age-based pattern supports research from The Conversation (2024) that suggests some women resort to violence in self-defense or after enduring prolonged abuse. These cases often complicate the legal narrative and highlight the importance of context-sensitive, trauma-informed approaches to justice and support.
Rate data provide a clearer picture of the risks for different populations.
The incidence of domestic violence faced by women aged 30 to 39 is more than 4,200 per 100,000 people, which means that about 1 in 24 women in this group has reported domestic violence. This alarming figure highlights the urgent need for targeted, age-specific intervention policies. It is more than just a number; it represents lives disrupted by fear, trauma, and injustice.
-Presenting domestic violence data requires not only technical skills but also a deep ethical awareness of the lives and vulnerabilities represented in the data. Each data point reflects an individual experience of trauma – and must be treated with dignity and care. In this project, I was careful not to overstate the problem, nor to simplify human suffering with bar graphs and statistics. Instead, I prioritized respectful storytelling in a trauma-informed way. Although the Crime Statistics Agency data is anonymized and aggregated, I avoided visualizing small local government areas or demographic intersections that could cause re-identification, especially for underrepresented groups or areas with low reporting rates. I was also careful not to isolate or stigmatize specific groups through broad geographic comparisons, and avoided using “heat maps” or exaggerated visual elements.
-Equally important, I worked hard to avoid sensationalist framing. Whereas media coverage often relies on shocking images or emotive language, this visualization project focused on neutrality and proportionality. For example, I reported incidence rates per 100,000 population rather than raw data, and carefully selected color schemes that conveyed seriousness without causing panic. In our narrative framework, I shifted the focus from individual responsibility to systemic insights, highlighting patterns of seasonal stress, under-resourced courts, and intergenerational trauma. This approach aligns with the public health model of violence prevention, which views family violence as a social problem rooted in structures of inequality and cultural expectations.
-This work was guided by the ethical principles set out in the Australian Data Strategy (2023), which emphasizes privacy, transparency, and the safe use of public data for social good. I also referenced relevant international frameworks, such as the United Nations Guidelines on Gender-Based Violence Statistics, to ensure that the data we used helped to raise awareness and promote reform, without re-traumatizing survivors. In short, an ethical lens informed every decision—from what data to include to how it is presented—ensuring that our end product was not only analytically rigorous, but also human-centered and socially responsible.
Conclusions drawn from the Community Services Administration data and the media coverage surrounding it suggest that a targeted, systemic response to family violence is urgently needed. Central to these findings is that women aged 25-44 are significantly over-represented in family violence statistics – both in terms of total reports and victimisation rates. These women often cope with multiple life pressures, from employment to care, while also potentially dealing with strained or abusive relationships. To truly address this, support services must be tailored to this population, with accessible housing, counselling, legal aid and income support in both urban and regional areas.
In addition to individual support, the justice system needs to be strengthened. The number of cases that go unsolved or unprosecuted – more than 40,000 in total – raises serious concerns about the system’s capacity to cope. Many victims see no justice, and some are even afraid to report a crime in the first place. As highlighted by The Sydney Morning Herald (2024), local courts remain under-resourced and police follow-up procedures inconsistent. Investing in specialist family violence policing units and speeding up court hearings is vital.
Children are often overlooked in discussions of data, with children present in more than a third of family violence incidents. Yet early exposure to violence is a known predictor of future trauma, criminal behaviour and socioeconomic disadvantage. An integrated early intervention model – integrating child psychologists and social workers into police response units – would ensure immediate support is available on the scene. This is in line with the recommendations of Guardian Australia (2024) and supports wider community safety goals.
Finally, public engagement remains vital. Campaigns like Victoria’s 2024 ‘Safe Homes, Strong Families’ should not be one-off events. These efforts must be extended to schools, workplaces and healthcare settings, using culturally and linguistically appropriate materials. Only through a multi-layered approach – grounded in data, human experience and strategic investment which can meaningful change truly be achieved.