Since the population standard deviation ( sigma=4.82 mpg) is known, a z-interval is appropriate to use here.
alpha = 0.10
z_critical = qnorm(1 - alpha/2)
z_critical
## [1] 1.644854
x_bar = 25.16
sigma = 4.82
n = 50
confidence_level = 0.90
# Calculate the standard error
se = sigma / sqrt(n)
# Calculate the margin of error
margin_of_error = z_critical * se
# Calculate the confidence interval
lower_bound = x_bar - margin_of_error
upper_bound = x_bar + margin_of_error
cat("90% Confidence Interval: (", lower_bound, ", ", upper_bound, ")\n")
## 90% Confidence Interval: ( 24.03878 , 26.28122 )
width_target = 0.60
# Width = 2 * z_critical * (sigma / sqrt(n))
# Rearranging for n: n = (2 * z_critical * sigma / width)^2
n_required = (2 * z_critical * sigma / width_target)^2
ceiling(n_required) # Round up to the next whole number of trips
## [1] 699
calculate_sample_size = function(ci_width) {
sigma = 4.82
alpha = 0.10
z_critical = qnorm(1 - alpha/2)
n_required = (2 * z_critical * sigma / ci_width)^2
return(ceiling(n_required))
}
cat("Sample size for CI width of 1.0 mpg:", calculate_sample_size(1.0), "\n")
## Sample size for CI width of 1.0 mpg: 252
cat("Sample size for CI width of 0.5 mpg:", calculate_sample_size(0.5), "\n")
## Sample size for CI width of 0.5 mpg: 1006
cat("Sample size for CI width of 0.1 mpg:", calculate_sample_size(0.1), "\n")
## Sample size for CI width of 0.1 mpg: 25143
Since the population standard deviation is unknown and the sample size is relatively small (\(n=21 \< 30\)), a t-interval is appropriate to use here
n = 21
alpha = 0.02
df = n - 1
t_critical = qt(1 - alpha/2, df)
t_critical
## [1] 2.527977
x_bar = 5.87
s = 1.56
n = 21
confidence_level = 0.98
df = n - 1
# Calculate the standard error
se = s / sqrt(n)
# Calculate the margin of error
margin_of_error = t_critical * se
# Calculate the confidence interval
lower_bound = x_bar - margin_of_error
upper_bound = x_bar + margin_of_error
cat("98% Confidence Interval: (", lower_bound, ", ", upper_bound, ")\n")
## 98% Confidence Interval: ( 5.009426 , 6.730574 )
First, let’s calculate the sample proportion hatp: hatp= frac7501200=0.625
For a traditional confidence interval for proportions to be appropriate, we need to check the conditions:
n hatp ge10: 1200 times0.625=750 ge10 n(1− hatp) ge10: 1200 times(1−0.625)=1200 times0.375=450 ge10 Both conditions are met, so Yes, it is appropriate to use a traditional confidence interval. The sample size is large enough to assume that the sampling distribution of the sample proportion is approximately normal.
x = 750
n = 1200
p_hat = x / n
confidence_level = 0.99
alpha = 1 - confidence_level
# Find the critical z-value
z_critical = qnorm(1 - alpha/2)
# Calculate the standard error of the proportion
se_p_hat = sqrt(p_hat * (1 - p_hat) / n)
# Calculate the margin of error
margin_of_error = z_critical * se_p_hat
# Calculate the confidence interval
lower_bound = p_hat - margin_of_error
upper_bound = p_hat + margin_of_error
cat("99% Confidence Interval: (", lower_bound, ", ", upper_bound, ")\n")
## 99% Confidence Interval: ( 0.5890017 , 0.6609983 )
confidence_level = 0.99
alpha = 1 - confidence_level
z_critical = qnorm(1 - alpha/2)
desired_width = 0.01
margin_of_error = desired_width / 2
# Use p-hat = 0.5 for conservative estimate
p_hat_conservative = 0.5
n_required = (z_critical / margin_of_error)^2 * p_hat_conservative * (1 - p_hat_conservative)
ceiling(n_required)
## [1] 66349
Since the population standard deviation (sigma=4.82 mpg) is known, a z-test is appropriate to use here
Let mu be the true mean gasoline usage of the fleet. Null Hypothesis (H_0): mu=26 mpg Alternative Hypothesis (H_a): \(\\mu \< 26\) mpg
The alternative hypothesis is one-sided (left-tailed) because the company wants to see if the average is less than 26 mpg.
mu0 = 26 # Hypothesized mean
x_bar = 25.16 # Sample mean
sigma = 4.82 # Population standard deviation
n = 50 # Sample size
alpha = 0.05 # Significance level
# Calculate the test statistic (z-score)
z_test_statistic = (x_bar - mu0) / (sigma / sqrt(n))
z_test_statistic
## [1] -1.232302
# Construct the rejection region
# For a one-sided (left-tailed) test, the critical value is qnorm(alpha)
z_critical = qnorm(alpha)
z_critical
## [1] -1.644854
cat("Test Statistic (z):", z_test_statistic, "\n")
## Test Statistic (z): -1.232302
cat("Critical Value (z_alpha):", z_critical, "\n")
## Critical Value (z_alpha): -1.644854
if (z_test_statistic < z_critical) {
cat("Conclusion: Since the test statistic (", z_test_statistic, ") is less than the critical value (", z_critical, "), we **reject the null hypothesis**.\n")
cat("There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the fleet average gasoline usage is less than 26 mpg.\n")
} else {
cat("Conclusion: Since the test statistic (", z_test_statistic, ") is not less than the critical value (", z_critical, "), we **fail to reject the null hypothesis**.\n")
cat("There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the fleet average gasoline usage is less than 26 mpg.\n")
}
## Conclusion: Since the test statistic ( -1.232302 ) is not less than the critical value ( -1.644854 ), we **fail to reject the null hypothesis**.
## There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the fleet average gasoline usage is less than 26 mpg.
# Calculate the p-value for a one-sided (left-tailed) test
p_value = pnorm(z_test_statistic, lower.tail = TRUE)
p_value
## [1] 0.1089181
cat("P-value:", p_value, "\n")
## P-value: 0.1089181
cat("Significance level (alpha):", alpha, "\n")
## Significance level (alpha): 0.05
if (p_value < alpha) {
cat("Conclusion: Since the p-value (", p_value, ") is less than the significance level (", alpha, "), we **reject the null hypothesis**.\n")
cat("There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the fleet average gasoline usage is less than 26 mpg.\n")
} else {
cat("Conclusion: Since the p_value (", p_value, ") is not less than the significance level (", alpha, "), we **fail to reject the null hypothesis**.\n")
cat("There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the fleet average gasoline usage is less than 26 mpg.\n")
}
## Conclusion: Since the p_value ( 0.1089181 ) is not less than the significance level ( 0.05 ), we **fail to reject the null hypothesis**.
## There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the fleet average gasoline usage is less than 26 mpg.
cat("\nConsistency: Yes, the conclusion from the p-value method is consistent with the conclusion from the test statistic and rejection region method.\n")
##
## Consistency: Yes, the conclusion from the p-value method is consistent with the conclusion from the test statistic and rejection region method.