2025-06-15
Explore relationships between historical spat performance and environmental data using multiple regressions.
Develop a decision-support tool to help farmers adapt spat-selection and seeding practices to improve crop performance.
Assess if local environmental parameters influence spat performance.
Use outcomes to guide future monitoring efforts and forecasting in AQU2023-05.
Industry partners supplied data in a variety of formats
Sanford datasets already included PI ratios; Cedenco, NIML and Maclab required calculation
For Cedenco and Maclab, seeding and interseeding records had to be matched by line and location to compute PI ratios
Some partners supplied extra information (e.g. spat size), but these were not consistent across datasets
Data focus on the early spat grow‑out period; where no interseeding occurred.
Cedenco includes both primary‑to‑interseed and primary‑to‑late‑harvest records (i.e. no interseeding)
All interseed stages data were removed
Sanford: 1,400 obs. from 91 sites in Banks Peninsula, TOS, SI (July 2007 - April 2024)
NIML: 939 obs. from 9 sites in Coromandel between (May 2013 - June 2023)
Cedenco: 439 obs. from 15 sites in TOS (March 2018 and August 2023)
Maclab: 199 obs. from 36 sites in TOS (October 2017 - November 2024)
P:I ratio is the meters of intermediate seed divided by the metres of primary seed, corrected for blue mussel numbers.
\[ P : I \text{ ratio} = \frac{\text{Intermediated seed (m)}}{\text{Primary seed (m)}} \]
Seeded Date: date lines were seeded with fresh spat
Strip Date: date lines were stripped (interseeding or harvest date)
SiteID: farm identifier for primary seeding
Owner: site owner (for confidentiality purposes)
Region: broad grow‑out area
Days between Seeded Date and Strip Date
National model: NZ Environmental Datacube (Oceanum, for MPI & PFR); public data (2010–2023); ~300–400 m nearshore resolution; coarsest of the three.
Marlborough model: 10-year hindcast (2009–2017) for Cook Strait/TOS (Develped by Cawtthron).
Southland model: 10-year hindcast (2010–2019) for Southland–Stewart Island, developed for MPI.
Variables extracted at 2 m intervals from 0–20 m depth: wind speed, wave height, current speed, salinity, temperature.
Note
The final model fitted with 1,520 samples and 9 predictors captured 27% of P:I ratio variability, with average prediction errors of 0.32 units—offering moderate accuracy and consistent performance.
Models are only as good as the data they are fed
Missing predictor forecasts hinder operational rollout
Limited understanding of critical factors of spat retention
Numerous interacting biological, environmental and operational factors
Lack of data on critical factors affecting performance, such as spat origin or type, may hinder the predictions.
Complete high‑resolution satellite data acquisition
Refine predictive models
Develop a simplified model using either forecasted variables or the previous month’s values, so it can be operationalised.
Validate models using Year 1 and Year 2 deployment data
Develop a prototype operational decision-support tool
“Models are not going to have the exact time, place and conditions that will lead to the best performance; they might help us to understand what’s happening around us and prioritise.”
Spat Research Collective Update and Planning Meeting - 2025