library(tidyverse)
library(tidyr)
setwd("~/Data 110 Class Folder")
<- read_csv("500CitiesLocalHealthIndicators.cdc.csv")
cities500 data(cities500)
Healthy Cities GIS Assignment
Load the libraries and set the working directory
The GeoLocation variable has (lat, long) format
Split GeoLocation (lat, long) into two columns: lat and long
<- cities500|>
latlong mutate(GeoLocation = str_replace_all(GeoLocation, "[()]", ""))|>
separate(GeoLocation, into = c("lat", "long"), sep = ",", convert = TRUE)
head(latlong)
# A tibble: 6 × 25
Year StateAbbr StateDesc CityName GeographicLevel DataSource Category
<dbl> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr>
1 2017 CA California Hawthorne Census Tract BRFSS Health Outcom…
2 2017 CA California Hawthorne City BRFSS Unhealthy Beh…
3 2017 CA California Hayward City BRFSS Health Outcom…
4 2017 CA California Hayward City BRFSS Unhealthy Beh…
5 2017 CA California Hemet City BRFSS Prevention
6 2017 CA California Indio Census Tract BRFSS Health Outcom…
# ℹ 18 more variables: UniqueID <chr>, Measure <chr>, Data_Value_Unit <chr>,
# DataValueTypeID <chr>, Data_Value_Type <chr>, Data_Value <dbl>,
# Low_Confidence_Limit <dbl>, High_Confidence_Limit <dbl>,
# Data_Value_Footnote_Symbol <chr>, Data_Value_Footnote <chr>,
# PopulationCount <dbl>, lat <dbl>, long <dbl>, CategoryID <chr>,
# MeasureId <chr>, CityFIPS <dbl>, TractFIPS <dbl>, Short_Question_Text <chr>
Filter the dataset
Remove the StateDesc that includes the United Sates, select Prevention as the category (of interest), filter for only measuring crude prevalence and select only 2017.
<- latlong |>
latlong_clean filter(StateDesc != "United States") |>
filter(Data_Value_Type == "Crude prevalence") |>
filter(Year == 2017)
head(latlong_clean)
# A tibble: 6 × 25
Year StateAbbr StateDesc CityName GeographicLevel DataSource Category
<dbl> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr>
1 2017 CA California Hawthorne Census Tract BRFSS Health Outcom…
2 2017 CA California Hawthorne City BRFSS Unhealthy Beh…
3 2017 CA California Hayward City BRFSS Unhealthy Beh…
4 2017 CA California Indio Census Tract BRFSS Health Outcom…
5 2017 CA California Inglewood Census Tract BRFSS Health Outcom…
6 2017 CA California Lakewood City BRFSS Unhealthy Beh…
# ℹ 18 more variables: UniqueID <chr>, Measure <chr>, Data_Value_Unit <chr>,
# DataValueTypeID <chr>, Data_Value_Type <chr>, Data_Value <dbl>,
# Low_Confidence_Limit <dbl>, High_Confidence_Limit <dbl>,
# Data_Value_Footnote_Symbol <chr>, Data_Value_Footnote <chr>,
# PopulationCount <dbl>, lat <dbl>, long <dbl>, CategoryID <chr>,
# MeasureId <chr>, CityFIPS <dbl>, TractFIPS <dbl>, Short_Question_Text <chr>
What variables are included? (can any of them be removed?)
names(latlong_clean)
[1] "Year" "StateAbbr"
[3] "StateDesc" "CityName"
[5] "GeographicLevel" "DataSource"
[7] "Category" "UniqueID"
[9] "Measure" "Data_Value_Unit"
[11] "DataValueTypeID" "Data_Value_Type"
[13] "Data_Value" "Low_Confidence_Limit"
[15] "High_Confidence_Limit" "Data_Value_Footnote_Symbol"
[17] "Data_Value_Footnote" "PopulationCount"
[19] "lat" "long"
[21] "CategoryID" "MeasureId"
[23] "CityFIPS" "TractFIPS"
[25] "Short_Question_Text"
Remove the variables that will not be used in the assignment
<- latlong_clean |>
latlong_clean2 select(-DataSource,-Data_Value_Unit, -DataValueTypeID, -Low_Confidence_Limit, -High_Confidence_Limit, -Data_Value_Footnote_Symbol, -Data_Value_Footnote)
head(latlong_clean2)
# A tibble: 6 × 18
Year StateAbbr StateDesc CityName GeographicLevel Category UniqueID Measure
<dbl> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr>
1 2017 CA California Hawthorne Census Tract Health … 0632548… Arthri…
2 2017 CA California Hawthorne City Unhealt… 632548 Curren…
3 2017 CA California Hayward City Unhealt… 633000 Obesit…
4 2017 CA California Indio Census Tract Health … 0636448… Arthri…
5 2017 CA California Inglewood Census Tract Health … 0636546… Diagno…
6 2017 CA California Lakewood City Unhealt… 639892 Obesit…
# ℹ 10 more variables: Data_Value_Type <chr>, Data_Value <dbl>,
# PopulationCount <dbl>, lat <dbl>, long <dbl>, CategoryID <chr>,
# MeasureId <chr>, CityFIPS <dbl>, TractFIPS <dbl>, Short_Question_Text <chr>
The new dataset “Prevention” is a manageable dataset now.
For your assignment, work with a cleaned dataset.
1. Once you run the above code and learn how to filter in this format, filter this dataset however you choose so that you have a subset with no more than 900 observations.
Filter chunk here
#library(dplyr)
<- latlong_clean2 |>
midAtlantic filter(StateAbbr == "PA") |>
filter(Category == "Unhealthy Behaviors") |>
filter(MeasureId == "CSMOKING")
#n_distinct(midAtlantic$CityName)
#unique(midAtlantic$MeasureId)
2. Based on the GIS tutorial (Japan earthquakes), create one plot about something in your subsetted dataset.
First plot chunk here
ggplot(midAtlantic, aes(x = CityName, y = Data_Value)) +
geom_col() +
labs(title = "Percentage of Smokers by City in PA",
x = "City",
y = "Percent Smokers") +
theme()
Warning: Removed 13 rows containing missing values or values outside the scale range
(`geom_col()`).
3. Now create a map of your subsetted dataset.
First map chunk here
library(leaflet)
Warning: package 'leaflet' was built under R version 4.4.3
leaflet(data = midAtlantic) |>
addProviderTiles("Esri.WorldStreetMap") |>
addCircles(lng = ~long, lat = ~lat, radius = 500,
color = "black", fillOpacity = 0.25)
4. Refine your map to include a mouse-click tooltip
Refined map chunk here
<- paste0(
popup_info "<b>City: </b>", midAtlantic$CityName, "<br>",
"<b>State: </b>", midAtlantic$StateDesc, "<br>",
"<b>Percentage: </b>", midAtlantic$Data_Value, "%"
)
leaflet(data = midAtlantic) |>
addProviderTiles("Esri.WorldStreetMap") |>
addCircles(lng = ~long, lat = ~lat, radius = 500,
color = "brown", fillOpacity = 0.4,
popup = popup_info)
5. Write a paragraph
For my assignment I wanted to look at smoking data. I originally had to play around a lot with where I was going to look, because states that had few enough data points to be under the 900 threshold also tended to have only 1 or 2 locations where data was present, making mapping harder. Eventually, I landed on Pennsylvania because it had the most locations with under 900 points. I am still not super happy with the data, because it is only from a few larger cities in the state, and several large communities like Harrisburg, the state capital and 3rd largest metro area, are left out. Another problem with the data is that it is only reported on the city level, not on the neighborhood or even zip code level. I’m sure depending on where you go in a city, especially ones with such high populations like Philadelphia and Pittsburgh, you will get massive disparity in different parts of the city for what percentage of people smoke. Factors such as socioeconomic status of the area, what jobs people have, laws and regulations around the price and purchasing of cigarettes can and are all factors and are hard to disseminate on a city level in many cases.