Brief notes.
Prior, M. (2019). Hooked: How politics captures people’s interest. Cambridge University Press.
Table of Chapters
Topic & Hypothesis | Chapter |
---|---|
1. What is political interest? | |
Cognition & affect hypothesis: Political interest has both cognitive and affective elements | 2 |
Valence hypothesis: Politically interested people do not necessarily have positive emotional reactions | 2 |
Importance hypothesis: Positively related to perceived importance of politics | 2 |
Efficacy hypothesis: Political efficacy raises political interest | 2, 14 |
Instrumentality hypothesis: Instrumental value of political domains to people | 3, 12 |
RQ: How many content dimensions does political interest have? | 3, 4 |
RQ: Is political interest dispositional? | 4, 5, 7 |
RQ: Can events trigger situational political interest? | 4, 5, 6 |
2. When does political interest change? | |
Aging hypothesis: Aging raises political interest | 6 |
Stabilization hypothesis: Individual-level stability of political interest increases with age | 6 |
Event-driven socialization hypothesis: Events have a stronger effect among young people | 7 |
Curiosity hypothesis: Faster development among people with open personality | 8 |
Cognitive ability hypothesis: Faster development among people with high cognitve ability | 8 |
3. What changes political interest? | |
Education hypothesis: Education raises political interest | 10 |
Resource hypothesis: Material resources are not causally related to political interest | 12 |
Partisan identity hypothesis: Identification with a political party raises political interest | 14 |
System support hypothesis: Trust in government and satisfaction with democracy increase interest | 14 |
Selectivity hypothesis: Selective encounters (e.g., involvement in civic organization) have no effect | 13 |
Inadvertent political encounters hypothesis: Inadvertent/unavoidable political experiences raise interest | 10 |
Parental influence hypothesis: Parents’ political interest affects interest of their children | 11 |